|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
KOREAN_MAN
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
double post
Last edited by KOREAN_MAN on Fri Jun 14, 2013 9:27 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KOREAN_MAN
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ginobili has a high basketball IQ??? Since when? I always thought of Ginobili as a stallion you cannot tame. He is not out of control but he is so wild on the court it's just fun to watch him play. (He made an impression on Charles Barkley.) He keeps making some of the craziest passes I've ever seen.
People argue whether he should be playing or not in the series. Well, The Spurs don't have a choice. Ginobili is the only guy who can really carry the ball for the Spurs other than Tony Parker. Gary Neal is not a true point guard and he can't run offense the same way. Ginobili doesn't have to score but he has to play big minutes unless you expect Tony Parker to play the whole game.
| warmachinenkorea wrote: |
People say this all the time. Where is the proof or justification? If it was much tougher to score in the 80's and 90's then why were the scores in the games higher on average? |
Most players were good shooters back then. They had arms like Kevin Durant and the game depended more on mid-range jump shooting. Now the league is filled with pro wrestlers (and DeAndre Jordan) who can't make a shot outside the paint. The stats are regular reason numbers anyway.
Back in the days you could touch, push, hit a player and that was no foul. Kobe gets so ticked off whenever his defender touches him just a tiny bit. He would have been frustrated to no end if he played the game in the 80s and 90s. I'll just copy and paste some quotes.
"The defensive rules, the hand checking, the ability to make contact on a guy in certain areas .... [have] all been taken away from the game. If Kobe could get 81, I think Michael could get 100 in today's game." - Scottie Pippen
"Michael would average 45 with these rules." - Phil Jackson
"You can't even touch a guy now. The college game is much more physical than our game. I always tease Michael, if he played today, he'd average 50." - Larry Brown
"So if you're asking me what would I have done [today], well, put it this way, if you couldn't touch me [because of the rule changes], instead of averaging 25 or 30 [points], I'd probably average 40." - Dominique Wilkins
"If [MJ] were playing now, with the way the refs call everything, and with all the padding these guys wear, he'd average 40 or 50 a night if he wanted." - Tim Grover, who has worked with MJ, Kobe, and LeBron |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jyang486
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
|
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think Koremenos from Grantland made a great point and why I think the Heat will take this series in either 6 or 7:
"Sixty-two percent. That is what Gary Neal and Danny Green are shooting combined from 3-point territory through the first four games of this series on 50 attempts. That is a staggering hot streak. It�s been a huge boost for the team, making up for the continued slide of Manu Ginobili and middling offensive performances from Tim Duncan, and (at least since Game 1) Tony Parker. This raises a question that nobody would have asked before the Finals began: What happens if Neal and Green stop making nearly everything they throw in the vicinity of the hoop?
With the way Duncan, Ginobili, and Parker have struggled to score at times, it�s hard to picture the Spurs winning two more times if Green and Neal aren�t knocking down shots like they have some kind of NBA Jam cheat code. The basic principles of statistics tell us that it�s unlikely those two can keep things going like this for much longer, but that�s the thing about variance, it�s hard to tell when exactly it�s going to strike. At some point in the future, Green and Neal will go back to shooting 3-pointers like normal human beings. Whether that happens in the next week or next season is anyone�s guess, yet there�s a good chance that whims of variance will decide San Antonio�s fate in this series."
If that number falls, then the Spurs fall with it, unless Ginobili has some kind of Dwayne Wade-esque reemergence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
warmachinenkorea
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| KOREAN_MAN wrote: |
Ginobili has a high basketball IQ??? Since when? I always thought of Ginobili as a stallion you cannot tame. He is not out of control but he is so wild on the court it's just fun to watch him play. (He made an impression on Charles Barkley.) He keeps making some of the craziest passes I've ever seen.
People argue whether he should be playing or not in the series. Well, The Spurs don't have a choice. Ginobili is the only guy who can really carry the ball for the Spurs other than Tony Parker. Gary Neal is not a true point guard and he can't run offense the same way. Ginobili doesn't have to score but he has to play big minutes unless you expect Tony Parker to play the whole game.
| warmachinenkorea wrote: |
People say this all the time. Where is the proof or justification? If it was much tougher to score in the 80's and 90's then why were the scores in the games higher on average? |
Most players were good shooters back then. They had arms like Kevin Durant and the game depended more on mid-range jump shooting. Now the league is filled with pro wrestlers (and DeAndre Jordan) who can't make a shot outside the paint. The stats are regular reason numbers anyway.
Back in the days you could touch, push, hit a player and that was no foul. Kobe gets so ticked off whenever his defender touches him just a tiny bit. He would have been frustrated to no end if he played the game in the 80s and 90s. I'll just copy and paste some quotes.
"The defensive rules, the hand checking, the ability to make contact on a guy in certain areas .... [have] all been taken away from the game. If Kobe could get 81, I think Michael could get 100 in today's game." - Scottie Pippen
"Michael would average 45 with these rules." - Phil Jackson
"You can't even touch a guy now. The college game is much more physical than our game. I always tease Michael, if he played today, he'd average 50." - Larry Brown
"So if you're asking me what would I have done [today], well, put it this way, if you couldn't touch me [because of the rule changes], instead of averaging 25 or 30 [points], I'd probably average 40." - Dominique Wilkins
"If [MJ] were playing now, with the way the refs call everything, and with all the padding these guys wear, he'd average 40 or 50 a night if he wanted." - Tim Grover, who has worked with MJ, Kobe, and LeBron |
Yes, Ginobli has a high basketball IQ. Every time he speaks to a reporter at half time the analysts, usually Hubie Brown who's a basketball genius, talk about how smart he is and how he is one of the players that truly understand the game.
Quoting players and coaches that won't to believe their version of basketball was better justifies nothing. Michael Jordan would never admit anyone would ever beat him. Have you ever seen the video where he's throwing he football in his back yard and there are some little kids around? The kids are talking to him about playing little league and one of them says, " I read in a book where you threw 3 no-hitters." Jordan replies with, " I did! I don't know where they got that form maybe my dad I think he lied a little but that's ok it's in the book so it's true."
Of course everyone of those guys are gonna believe they could beat the pants off guys in today's game. Why where the rules changed? The players are bigger today, faster, and jump higher. Without the rule changes people would get hurt pretty bad. The "Jordan Rules" that Detroit used caused Michael Jordan to begin lifting weights. He was already strong, especially for a two guard in the late 80's, but he needed to be stronger. Basketball players saw no need to lift before then. Maybe a few guys did here and there but after Jordan started lifting so did other guys. Then it trickles down to college then high school. And by the late 90's guys started getting bigger. Look at Karl Malone from when he started to when he retired.
Granted certain guys like Barkley who was a freak athlete, he was listed at 6'6 at the PF spot, could run and jump like a mad man while always being on the heavy side, would be able to play in today's game.
The 80's saw a revitalization of the NBA with Magic and Bird. Regardless of the other stars the game was dying until these two entered the league. Every Finals in the 80's saw either the Lakers or Celtics or both. Then in the mid 80's Jordan came along. He was a high flying, take the ball to the rim, dunk on everybody player that people hadn't really seen before, Dominique Wilkins was there but Jordan was something different because he was being marketed by Nike. Magic and Bird where getting old and Jordan was making his mark on the game. So we go from Bird and Magic to Jordan the 3 biggest stars the game has ever seen. Then Jordan retires the NBA has a decline in viewers and ratings. Then comes Kobe and Shaq. They brought some people back but couldn't sustain it. Now we have LBJ that's been hyped since he was 16 to be the greatest ever. The only era's that are ever compared are the 80's, 90's and today. What don't we compare the 60's and Bill Russel and his ten championships to Shaq and Olajuwon? The game is great and competitive today, The 90's saw the greatest player ever retire just to come back and win 3 more championships. The 80's were captivated by the Lakers and Celtics becaue of Magic and Bird. The 70's could be compared to the early 2000's where people had lost interest due to the culture that was in boys eras that people didn't liek and couldn't relate to. Before that who knows. But what I do know is comparing this and that is exhausting and take away from the game I love and adore.
One more thing why do we never talk about Oscar Roberson? He averaged a triple double for a season. That is pretty frickin impressive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
augustine
Joined: 08 Sep 2012 Location: México
|
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What an odd series of second half blowouts. And it's funny that Manu happened to have his best game of the season in game 5 after getting the start, he looked like a blast from the past. Just have to win one more! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jyang486
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
|
Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the spurs continuing to make all those off balanced circus shots, and danny green shooting like the greatest 3 point shooter in nba history, is blowing my mind. but 5 games, even 7 games if it goes to 7, is a small sample size so it's certainly possible for this to continue. but, wth.
also lebron played so meh this game. so passive at the end of the third quarter, and much of the fourth when they needed him to keep them in it. whatevs..he does what he does. can't defend him, can't criticize him. he is what he is. the best player on the court when he plays his game, an average player when he doesn't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KOREAN_MAN
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you can't put hands on MJ, be really physical with him, and crowd the paint with big men, Michael Jordan can definitely average 10 to 20 more points a game today if he wanted to. That's about 5 to 10 more shots made. Nothing short of impossible.
MJ had to get stronger because the bad boys in Detroit pushed him around, bullied Scottie Pippen, and the Pistons beat the Bulls three years in a row. The Bulls were considered soft compared to the Pistons. Isiah Thomas and Joe Dumars weren't that physically strong. But the whole team's attitude was to be very physical, against anybody. That's why Karl Malone one time got mad and almost killed (I mean literally killed) Isiah Thomas by fouling him hard on the court.
Yes, MJ would exaggerate sometimes but he never lied. He always admitted that Joe Dumars played him very well defensively. The league changed the rules because after MJ retired the ratings were dropping. David Stern found out that the higher the scores, the higher the ratings. So he made the game faster-paced and easier to score.
I just watched Game 5. Miami's defense was just awful. I don't understand how they keep losing track of Spurs' three-point shooters. Their main concern seems to be defending Duncan, Tiago Splitter, Tony Parker, and Ginobili. Miami helped way too much. But why help??? They don't need to double-team or help anybody. Let Tony and Ginobili score 60 points. Guard Tim Duncan one-on-one as much as possible. All they have to do is stay with shooters like Danny Green.
Mike Miller, Shane Battier, Dwayne Wade, LeBron James, Mario Chalmers were all watching someone else and let their men run around and shoot open shots. Jeff van Gundy said that Miami's players are trying to do two, three things at the same time. Why not just do one thing right? All they have to do is chase guys like Danny Green, who is being unbelievable right now, and let Tony, Ginobili, and Duncan score 100 points all by themselves. When the Spurs are scoring two points instead of three, they can't beat the Heat.
LeBron James and Mario Chalmers played with no energy. They were just walking around the court like seniors. I hope Miami's role players play much better in Game 6. They'd better not expect LeBron to carry them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KOREAN_MAN
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
LeBron's +/- in the Finals when he's in the game.
Game 1: -3
Game 2: +29
Game 3: -32
Game 4: +8
Game 5: -9
Total +/-: -7
No wonder the Heat looked better when he wasn't on the court.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
warmachinenkorea
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Miami did play like crap but give San Antonio credit. They did a great job of moving the ball. I only had a chance to watch the first half before my 2 week old son demanded my attention. I saw Norris Cole let Tony Parker put him on roller skates and absolutely abuse him. The 3's I saw weren't wide open but pretty contested. Miami shot the 3 better than San Antonio but SA made 60% from the field. The rebounds were almost even and SA had 5 more turnovers than Miami. When you make shots it's gonna be tough for the opposing team to beat you. Miami has got to find some fire. LBJ and Wade had 25 and Ray Allen had 21 but the guy that hurt Miami was Chalmers. He shot 20% had one assist and had two turnovers.
What would the series be like if SA wasn't shooting the 3 so well? Would it already be over? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KOREAN_MAN
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Numbers show that a team has a better chance of winning if they take more 3s. I'm pretty sure the Spurs built their team around with that philosophy. You have to give the Spurs a lot of credit because their role players are making shots on the biggest stage.
But at the same time, Indiana also made a lot of three-pointers against the Heat and Indiana is not a three-point shooting team. To me, the Heat players pay too much attention to everyone. They should just stay in front of perimeter shooters and let the big three (Tony, Manu, and Duncan) beat them with two-point shots. Otherwise, the Spurs will win the series and Danny Green will be the Finals MVP as he should be. If somehow the Heat win, give it to Ray Allen. He deserves it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
augustine
Joined: 08 Sep 2012 Location: México
|
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Game 5 finally finished downloading for me so I'm losing sleep and watching it right now on my TV. I'm not sure what will happen in game 6 in Miami since the Heat usually bounce back strong after losing, and they're at home. I'm a little worried. I agree with Korean Man again, and I said it before, but the Spur role players have been playing so well and role players are always such a huge part of their system year after year. Bowen was a starter for years, yet he rarely scored. Neal and Green have been insane. I also think we're seeing Leonard emerge into one of the next super stars. He's 21, shoots very well from the 3, and is defending LeBron in the finals... just think about that for a second.
And what an interesting move from Pop to start Manu in Game 5. We've been talking about how horrible he's played in the playoffs (though he's been playing bad for months), but him going out there and playing his best game of the season? Who expected that?
| Quote: |
| Otherwise, the Spurs will win the series and Danny Green will be the Finals MVP as he should be. If somehow the Heat win, give it to Ray Allen. He deserves it. |
I was actually born in Seattle so I've always been a Ray Allen fan, and you know I'm obviously a Spurs fan... but I'm doubtful that the finals MVP would go to Allen if the Heat win. I wish. Green would definitely be deserving of that award if the Spurs pull it off, though. Few knew who Danny Green was before this series, and now he's setting NBA finals records... he's been playing like a madman. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
augustine
Joined: 08 Sep 2012 Location: México
|
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ugh, that made me feel sick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hogwonguy1979

Joined: 22 Dec 2003 Location: the racoon den
|
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
sooooo close, that game made me sick. I really wonder how SA comes back after that.
I never really question decisions by coach Popp but not putting Duncan in before that shot by Ray Allen was head scratching. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Um this one I totally disagree on. Agree on the drive, but he had Shaq, the most dominant center for those championship runs, Phil Jackson, and awesome role players (and refs) for the first 3 Finals wins, and he had Pau Gasol, Lamar Odom in his prime, and good role players for his next couple Finals wins. His support was just as good as Jordan's IMO. |
I meant through his entire career. Or at least to the same extent as Jordan's. Jordan had two coaches while on the Bulls; how many has Kobe had? Mike Brown vs. Doug Collins, hmm... There were a few bleak seasons in Lakerland during Kobe's career.
I agree Kobe had as much support as MJ if not more in some seasons, including all the ones he won a championship. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KOREAN_MAN
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
What a game. I thought it was going to be a close game but that was unreal. If the Heat win Game 7, Ray Allen probably won't get the MVP but he saved the Heat's ass.
| hogwonguy1979 wrote: |
| I never really question decisions by coach Popp but not putting Duncan in before that shot by Ray Allen was head scratching. |
I agree. I thought Duncan should have stayed in the game. But they also had a chance to call a time-out at the end. Ginobili decided to just dribble the ball like hell but somebody on the Spurs should have called a timeout. Maybe Tony Parker should have stayed in the game as well.
I expect Tim Duncan to be fully ready for Game 7. He's just so efficient out there it's amazing. I don't know if Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili have anything left though. That could be the key for Game 7. Man, what a series. I did not expect this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|