Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Australian PM Gillard ousted
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Julius



Joined: 27 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Axiom wrote:
Only 8% of Aussie CEO's now think she has an understanding of business.


Their perceptions are fuelled by a one-sided media portrayal and bear no relation to the facts of her record in office.

Axiom wrote:
Then why isn't she still PM?


Because of the media hate-campaign.

Quote:
What the agenda to produce media that consumers wish to purchase.


I don't know how to break it to you, but what people wish to read does not necesarily equal reality.

The fact is that Gillard was a victim of a media hate campaign directed by the Murdoch dictatorship. Repeat lies for long enough, the public starts to believe them.

Quote:
The owners of the mainstream press in Australia and the political party that serves their interests largely dictate our one-sided political coverage.

..what is it that drives the media’s relentless character assassination of Julia Gillard, and why does the press gallery so consistently fail to scrutinise the policies and rhetoric of the Opposition?

http://www.independentaustralia.net/2013/politics/how-bad-is-the-gillard-government-really/


Quote:
Labor MPs have urged Prime Minister Julia Gillard to go on the offensive against newspapers controlled by Rupert Murdoch as his News Corp media conglomerate said it was opposed to further regulation and didn’t plan to buy the Ten Network.

There is an arrogance that underpins the Murdoch press, there are political agendas that underpin the Murdoch press and I think it’s in the public interest for reporting to be done in an accurate manner in this country,’’ he said.
http://www.afr.com/p/national/labor_mps_want_offensive_against_ndLsgPVbumWcBYGprkp9nJ


Quote:
That's one explanation for the approach taken by the News Limited papers. The other is much more politically significant: that Rupert Murdoch has let it be known within his organisation that Australia needs change in Canberra and his editors were simply doing his bidding
http://www.smh.com.au/national/mogul-in-the-corner-20110521-1exun.html#ixzz2XZaW3WDT
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Julius



Joined: 27 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is Australia still not ready for a female prime minister?

On June 24, 2010, Australia’s first female prime minister, Julia Gillard, was sworn into office by Australia’s first female governor-general, Quentin Bryce. The iconic photographs of that day spoke of an occasion that was a long time coming.

In the three years to have passed since then, Gillard has been the victim of appalling levels of sexism not seen before in Australian public life. With some justification, therefore, she has made her gender a political issue. But has it been a proportional response to the misogynistic attacks meted out, or used simply for her own political gain?

By July 2011 a Facebook page had been created called “Julia Gillard – Worst PM in Australian history”. The iconic photo of the day Gillard was sworn in was now accompanied by obscene suggestions as to what the prime minister and the governor-general would do next.

And in 2012, after cartoons of her naked and wearing a dildo were emailed to all federal parliamentarians, Gillard finally started making public references to the sexism going viral on the internet. In October she made headlines around the world for her speech to parliament on sexism and misogyny.

Many in the Australian media reacted with outrage that the prime minister was drawing attention to the sexism experienced by women in public life. Critics attacked Gillard for “playing the gender card” – as though she should ignore this sexual vilification. But to remain silent would condemn others to experience the same treatment, just as silence over domestic violence still does.

Gillard had studiously ignored gender issues during the 2010 federal election, going so far as to “forget” to allocate a status of women portfolio immediately afterward. She was much more likely to don a hard hat than to identify as a feminist, despite being instrumental in changes of particular importance to women, such as the replacement of WorkChoices by Fair Work Australia.

What happened between 2010 and 2012? Gillard had been subjected to an unrelenting campaign of vilification by a loose coalition of shock jocks, bloggers and newspaper columnists.

The campaign has been rhetorically violent in nature at times. Talkback radio host Alan Jones suggested Gillard be put in a chaff bag and taken out to sea, presumably to drown. His justification was that she was a “liar”, having broken a campaign promise not to introduce a carbon tax.

Television watchers also saw a banner reading “Juliar…Bob Brown’s bitch” behind opposition leader Tony Abbott while speaking to an anti-carbon tax rally at Parliament House in 2011.

Has Julia Gillard ‘played the gender card’ for political purposes or simply as a response to unadulterated misogyny and sexism from her opponents? AAP/Alan Porritt.

This lack of respect contrasts strongly with the treatment of Denmark’s first female prime minister, Helle Thorning-Schmidt, who took office in 2011. Thorning-Schmidt also headed a minority government and faced numerous accusations of broken election promises – but not of being a “liar” or someone’s “bitch”. She explained that the government had made a mistake in not making sufficiently clear that the election result demanded compromises.

In the past fortnight outrage has again been expressed over the prime minister’s speech to the launch of the Women for Gillard campaign. The speech was largely a summary of policy gains under Labor governments, including the Rudd and Gillard governments. It covered paid parental leave, the equal pay win by community service workers and the increase of the tax-free threshold to A$18,000 – of particular benefit to part-time and low-paid women workers.

What was extracted for media headlines was a clumsy warning about “men in blue ties” retaking centre stage in Australian politics, and a single sentence about abortion again becoming the “political plaything of men who think they know better”.

And yet, there has been little media attention to the drop in women’s political representation across Australia since 2009. For example, the fall of the Queensland Labor government in 2012 led to a drop in the number of women in that state’s parliament from 37% to 20%. Given Australia’s commitments to gender equality in public decision making this seems a fair point to raise.

Was it outrageous of Gillard to raise the issue of abortion? Given the halt to overseas aid for family planning during the Howard period, the ministerial veto on importation of RU486, and the federal funding of misleading pregnancy counselling services, this hardly seems an irrelevant concern.

Women mobilised across party lines on these issues to oppose the then-health minister Tony Abbott. The big gain from the inclusion of abortion in Gillard’s speech was a commitment by Abbott, now as opposition leader, not to do any deals to restrict the funding of abortion.

No reasonable person could argue that all the policies of the Gillard government have advanced gender equality. Cuts to public expenditure always have disproportionate impact on women. The shift of sole parents onto the Newstart Allowance was strongly resisted by elements within the parliamentary ALP.

But regardless of the reasons, the issue of gender equality has once again been put on the political agenda – where it should be, as long as women remain underpaid, underrepresented and at risk of violence from their intimate partners.
http://theconversation.com/is-australia-still-not-ready-for-a-female-prime-minister-15424
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Immigration barriers are not the same as absolute stoppage, low IQ is not the same thing as inferior in some general sense (which is what is so exasperating about people like yourself: you cannot understand the difference between "worse by some specific metric" and "just plain worse"), and low IQ immigrants are not the same as all immigrants. I am sick of your hypocrisy and tired of your lies. Do I really need to outright ignore you, as if you were an annoying child? Evidently so. Goodbye.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Axiom



Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Julius wrote:
Is Australia still not ready for a female prime minister?

On June 24, 2010, Australia’s first female prime minister, Julia Gillard, was sworn into office by Australia’s first female governor-general, Quentin Bryce. The iconic photographs of that day spoke of an occasion that was a long time coming.

.....

http://theconversation.com/is-australia-still-not-ready-for-a-female-prime-minister-15424


And the first comment for that article pretty much sums it up.

Quote:
Pera Lozac
Heat management assistant
Julia is the worst prime minister because she is the worst prime minister and NOT because of her gender. If she was a male she would still have been the worst prime minister. The main reason is her utter artificiality, lack of humanity and humility. Every time when she would get a pole boost was in the rare occasions when she would react to Abbot's provocations as a human being not as a bureaucratic robot, which is her normal persona. She should sack the whole PR team and talk to a real human being with a heart and soul.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Axiom



Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Senator Michaelia Cash cuts loose on the sisterhood.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JVdnD8cTeWc

My favourite bit:

Quote:
I wonder how loud former prime minister Gillard screamed when her own sisterhood knifed her in the back and took her out - Minister Wong is now sitting reaping the spoils of the victory, drinking from the chalice of blood.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Axiom



Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 10:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/as-gillards-budget-disintegrates-roll-on-september/story-fnfenwor-1226638920795

As Gillard's budget disintegrates, roll on September

BY:GRAHAM RICHARDSON From: The Australian May 10, 2013 12:00AM

Quote:
IN the Macquarie Dictionary the word shambles is defined as: "1. a slaughterhouse; 2. any place of carnage;. 3. any place or thing in confusion or disorder". There can't be a better word than shambles to describe the state into which this government has descended.


http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breaking-news-blog/richardsons-advice-for-gillard-just-go-and-go-quietly/20130222-2evb9.html

Quote:
Former Labor Powerbroker Graham Richardson has told Neil Mitchell Julia Gillard's legacy could become the 'near destruction of modern labor.'

"If these figures are right and Labor gets a primary vote of around 30%, they'll lose 30-40 seats and the results will just be appalling," Richardson said.

"The talent pool will just be wiped out, the future layer of leaders and cabinet members will just be gone. This is going to create a terrible problem for Labor in terms of morale, fundraising, everything...it will just be terrible.


Graham Richardson - an ex-Labor minister in the Hawke and Keating governments.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Julius



Joined: 27 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Axiom wrote:

And the first comment for that article pretty much sums it up.

Quote:
Pera Lozac
Heat management assistant
Julia is the worst prime minister because she is the worst prime minister and NOT because of her gender. If she was a male she would still have been the worst prime minister. The main reason is her utter artificiality, lack of humanity and humility. Every time when she would get a pole boost was in the rare occasions when she would react to Abbot's provocations as a human being not as a bureaucratic robot, which is her normal persona. She should sack the whole PR team and talk to a real human being with a heart and soul.



Once again, always attacking the person, never the policies.

The very powerful murdoch media mafia has created an artificial crisis based on the personal villification of one person.

Quote:
she slipped to record lows in the polls amid mounting criticism on trivialities from her hair colour to the tone of her voice. http://gulfnews.com/news/world/australia/australia-prime-minister-julia-gillard-a-victim-of-gender-wars-1.1202646


Is it ever about the issues?

Quote:
"It was not a gender war – it was the deep-seated sexism and misogyny of some of the attacks thrown at her The discourse in Australia about women is completely different to the one you get in the UK and the US."

Mr McTernan said a senior female politician in Britain such as Theresa May, the Home Secretary, would never be forced to endure the level of personal vitriol directed at Ms Gillard.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/10146031/Julia-Gillards-treatment-cruder-than-British-response-to-women.html


The whole redneck boys club mentality needs to change. Not just the misogyny, the racism as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Axiom



Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Julius wrote:

Quote:
"It was not a gender war – it was the deep-seated sexism and misogyny of some of the attacks thrown at her The discourse in Australia about women is completely different to the one you get in the UK and the US."

Mr McTernan said a senior female politician in Britain such as Theresa May, the Home Secretary, would never be forced to endure the level of personal vitriol directed at Ms Gillard.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/10146031/Julia-Gillards-treatment-cruder-than-British-response-to-women.html


The whole redneck boys club mentality needs to change. Not just the misogyny, the racism as well.


OMG, you quoted McTernan. McTernan was part the problem. The only way he knew to operate was through the politics of division. Men against woman. Business against unions. Rich against poor.

Bob Hawke's, the great Labor PM, election slogan was "Bringing Australia Together" Gillard's election slogan should have been "Tearing It Apart".


Oh, I forgot about the contrived Australia Day race riot. So you can add indigenous against non-indigenous.


Last edited by Axiom on Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:41 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Axiom



Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Julius"] The very powerful murdoch media mafia has created an artificial crisis based on the personal vilification of one person.


So if I give you the benefit of doubt and believe your leftist groupthink conspiracy nonsense, how do you explain the collapse of her popularity in regional Australia where News Corp has virtually no impact. Where hardly anyone reads "The Australian" or "The Daily Telegragh" or "The Courier Mail".
Most of them rely on their local rag and the ABC for their politics.

Surely you not going to try to tell me that the ABC are in on the conspiracy as well.

On more time, Gillard was a hopeless political tactician, who took terrible advice from the likes of McTernan. Her demise had virtually nothing to do with her being women or any News Corp media bias.

I will go so far to say, I think she was only given the opportunity to be the PM because she is a women.

Do you think a male politician in Australia would ever be given the opportunity to become the PM if:

(a) they were unmarried.

(b) they were agnostic.

(c) they proceeded an equally inept government from their same party with virtually the same policy and personnel, such as she did with Rudd.

(d) they performed so unethically in they chosen career before politics that will never be able to work in that field again.


She said of herself that she was "young and naive" when she was 30 and working as a senior partner in a law firm. Well now she is just older and still naive.


Last edited by Axiom on Sat Jun 29, 2013 4:30 pm; edited 5 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Axiom



Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The amount of negative press and insults that Gillard received pales into insignificance compared to the negative press and insults that PM John Howard had to endure.

Great Australian political insults

http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/11/great-australian-political-insults-a-crikey-list/

Keating was the best.

Quote:
Paul Keating:

On John Hewson:

* He’s like a shiver waiting for a spine.
* Debating with him is like being flogged by a warm lettuce.
* A feral abacus.
* The answer is, mate, because I want to do you slowly. (after Hewson asked him why he wouldn’t call an early election)


Did any of these politicians go whining to media about sexism, or misogyny, or misandry?
No. Most gave as good as they got.

Speaking of giving as good as they got. Although this list doesn't include any, Gillard's government was not above trading insults with her coalition opponents. Some examples.

Quote:
Tony Abbott is a hack. A dog. An aggressive, carping, bitter, mindless, deceptive, dodgy, mendacious, rancid, negative, nasty, muck-raking, untruthful, obstructionist, opportunistic, sexist, political Neanderthal. He is unfit for high office. He cannot control his temper. No trick is too low for him. No stunt is too wild. He is a bully. A thug. A snake oil salesman. A poster child for vile bully-boy values. He has repulsive double standards. He hates women. He stands for nothing. He has unhealthy obsessions. He is nuts.

Abbott behaves like Jack the Ripper.

He is Gina Rinehart’s butler.

He is Nancy Reagan without the astrology. He is a douchebag.


These are insults delivered in the last two years, by federal Labor MPs and orchestrated by Julia Gillard.


Her screeching of misogyny and victimhood was nothing more than political opportunism and therefore abhorrent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Axiom



Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

**sigh** I miss Hawky.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFw7iIvCFpo


Last edited by Axiom on Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:30 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Axiom



Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Julia Gillard Blasted for "Misogynist" Hypocrisy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yy3pjnk_u28



Julia Gillard's top spin doctor defends Kyle Sandilands

Quote:
JULIA Gillard's communications chief has leapt to the defence of radio shock jock Kyle Sandilands saying he touches ''the hearts of millions of people''.

In response to a News Limited article about a radio interview the Prime Minister did with Sandilands and his co-host Jackie O yesterday, McTernan fired off an email defending the controversial personality.

''It appears it falls to me to point out some basic rules of comms to you,'' McTernan wrote.

''I have no idea why you - and it appears your paper - have a vendetta against Kyle. He is a popular and talented broadcaster and is listened to by more than a million people every morning.



So now there's a News Corp vendetta against Kyle Sandilands. Laughable.

So Julius, was Gillard actually trying to appeal to the "redneck aussie males"? Was that her constituency?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International