Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Is 2.1 a low starting salary for Seoul?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
schwa



Joined: 18 Jan 2003
Location: Yap

PostPosted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

goat wrote:
World Traveler wrote:
That's why we need to start encouraging newbs not to accept 2.1.


I agree 100%.

Easily said, but entry level teachers really dont have any negotiating weight to throw around. The market has spoken. The pool of applicants is deep.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
World Traveler



Joined: 29 May 2009

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 1:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would disagree with that. Since their presence makes a ton of money for the hagwon owners, they have a high value and worth. We need to tell people to stop treating themselves like chopped liver. We should tell people not to accepts contracts with illegal parts and to not be OK with lower and lower wages.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
schwa



Joined: 18 Jan 2003
Location: Yap

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 2:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"We need to tell..." "We should tell..."

Not clear on who this "we" is. The industry certainly isnt listening to daves esl, nor are the large majority of jobseekers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tophatcat



Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Location: under the hat

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 2:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

World Traveler wrote:
I would disagree with that. Since their presence makes a ton of money for the hagwon owners, they have a high value and worth. We need to tell people to stop treating themselves like chopped liver. We should tell people not to accepts contracts with illegal parts and to not be OK with lower and lower wages.


If people would turn down offers under 2.5, a very high percentage of the hogwon owners would be paying 2.5 for newbies. But most everyone seems thrilled to be starting at 2.1, and sometimes less.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
schwa



Joined: 18 Jan 2003
Location: Yap

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 2:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BTW I'm certainly not defending skimpy wages. Just pointing out the current reality.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 2:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

2.1 million a month plus housing is actually not an entirely unreasonable wage for a starting ESL teacher in Korea. A single person can live comfortably on that wage and save, and a family can get by on it (albeit tightly). Wages in the past were probably inflated by an absence of available workers.

I'm sure we'd all like it if wages were higher, but liking something won't make it come true, and as much as one might say, "Everyone should turn down these wages," when people are told they can work a generally fun job in a foreign country and save a thousand dollars a month while doing so, it's going to be hard to convince them that they need to turn down those offers. Doubly so when their personal sacrifice will just mean someone else getting the job and nothing else changing.

There is no effective means of affecting change on a national scale regarding this issue, at least on the employee side of things. Wages will likely continue to decline. 2.5 average starting wages will not happen absent substantial inflation causing that 2.5 to be worth less than 2.1 is now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tophatcat



Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Location: under the hat

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fox wrote:
2.1 million a month plus housing is actually not an entirely unreasonable wage for a starting ESL teacher in Korea. A single person can live comfortably on that wage and save, and a family can get by on it (albeit tightly). Wages in the past were probably inflated by an absence of available workers.

I'm sure we'd all like it if wages were higher, but liking something won't make it come true, and as much as one might say, "Everyone should turn down these wages," when people are told they can work a generally fun job in a foreign country and save a thousand dollars a month while doing so, it's going to be hard to convince them that they need to turn down those offers. Doubly so when their personal sacrifice will just mean someone else getting the job and nothing else changing.

There is no effective means of affecting change on a national scale regarding this issue, at least on the employee side of things. Wages will likely continue to decline. 2.5 average starting wages will not happen absent substantial inflation causing that 2.5 to be worth less than 2.1 is now.


@ Fox
Yes, you've pretty much summed it up.

2.1 isn't unreasonable if pre-paid flight and the normal package is figured in, for a single person. But I think a family would be struggling on this salary.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
World Traveler



Joined: 29 May 2009

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 2:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fox wrote:
Wages will likely continue to decline.

Think of it this way: Most writers on Dave's are lifers. However, most readers of Dave's are newbs trying to decide whether to come to Korea. (Most of those people don't even have a registered account. They are just reading this forum for the first time.) Stop telling those people 2.1 is a good deal (and it's not) unless you want wages (for everyone) to continue to fall.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Swampfox10mm



Joined: 24 Mar 2011

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I neglected to mention that my 2.3 salary 11 years ago was coupled with an 850 to 1 dollar exchange rate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
World Traveler



Joined: 29 May 2009

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The exchange rate now sucks. 1117 to 1 dollar. (Another way to say that is 1,000 won is worth 89 cents.) The exchange rate went South in 2008 and has not recovered since.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
misher



Joined: 14 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's still a good deal for the 22-24 year old with no skills.

Unfortunately for people who teach English conversation in Asia for more than a year or two, you ARE NOT the target market for hagwon owners. It is always said that the backpacker 1-2 year young and active type is the desired "teacher." For that group 2.1 plus everything is a good deal regardless of the crap exchange rate.

WorldTraveler, you should just get out of the game entirely IMO. Praying for ESL/EFL to return to pre-2000 where nobody really knew about "teaching English" in Asia...Those days are OVER and they aren't coming back. If you got into the game then, alright. If you just got into the game in the last 4-5 years, ack. My advice? Get out unless you're on a gap year or just absolutely love what yo do and couldn't see yourself doing anything else in the Korean countryside somewhere.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
World Traveler



Joined: 29 May 2009

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are right. I agree with you. I think from 2006-2008 (and prior) there was really good money to be made in Korea. And even now there is for the F-visa holders. But getting the F visa is not possible unless one is gypo or married to Korean...or unless one buys $500,000 of property on Jeju, in which case they wouldn't need the F visa anyways...
Also, it can be obtained through a point system, but unless one's Korean level is extremely high, this isn't possible. (And a new revision was made to this system May 2013, making it much harder to get).
Heck, maybe some non-F visa holders feel they are doing well now (and maybe they are)...but if things are declining now, it is only logical they will continue to decline in the future.

(Also, misher you are right that those who got into this more than 4-5 years ago were able to slide into good university jobs that they otherwise wouldn't have been able to get into had they come just a little bit later. Will those guys' gravy train continue into the future? I wonder. Maybe. Maybe not.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

World Traveler wrote:
I would disagree with that. Since their presence makes a ton of money for the hagwon owners, they have a high value and worth. We need to tell people to stop treating themselves like chopped liver. We should tell people not to accepts contracts with illegal parts and to not be OK with lower and lower wages.



Problem is that some of them won't listen...just a few months back someone posted on here complaining about his contract. The thing was when he posted in the contract sticky thread and asked if he should accept this contract several people including myself warned him against it.

Yet he went ahead and signed it anyway.

You can warn or tell people all you want...but the sad reality is if they are making/saving less than a job in Korea is offering...they are likely to jump ship. Another thing to keep in mind is that most people that come here are short termers. They are here for a year or two to have "fun". They are not really concerned about any downwards trend as this is only a short term issue for them.

Given the above...there's really not much one can do. And Dave's and other like forums really only serve a small number of first time teachers. Yeah I agree with the people who say that hoping for Korea to return to the early 2000's is probably never going to happen (bar a sudden and dramatic recovery in several of the Big Seven countries).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Julius



Joined: 27 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

schwa wrote:
goat wrote:
World Traveler wrote:
That's why we need to start encouraging newbs not to accept 2.1.


I agree 100%.

Easily said, but entry level teachers really dont have any negotiating weight to throw around. The market has spoken. The pool of applicants is deep.


Turn a job down, someone else gets it.

Your protest makes not a jot of difference. The employer will instantly forget you exist and call the next resume on in their pile of 10 billion applicants.

Funny how the guys recommending that some unemployed person must take a moral stand...are quite safely ensconced in their jobs saving away.

The fact is...2.1 is no bad thing.
2.1 is better than china, vietnam, thailand, or any number of other esl destinations.
2.1 is better than what other migrant workers to korea get.
2.1 enables you to save more than many people on even higher salaries back home.
2.1 Enables you to pay off your student debt.
2.1 is more than the average korean salary.
A year of 2.1 enables you to spend a year of loafing in SE Asia.
2.1 is better than living off your savings.
2.1 in a place you enjoy is better than 3.1 in a place you don't.


Base pay has not even twitched in the past decade.

And its not going to until the market dynamic changes. Until that happens, best not be getting delusions of grandeur.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Xanetos



Joined: 23 Jul 2013

PostPosted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 8:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Julius wrote:
schwa wrote:
goat wrote:
World Traveler wrote:
That's why we need to start encouraging newbs not to accept 2.1.


I agree 100%.

Easily said, but entry level teachers really dont have any negotiating weight to throw around. The market has spoken. The pool of applicants is deep.


Turn a job down, someone else gets it.

Your protest makes not a jot of difference. The employer will instantly forget you exist and call the next resume on in their pile of 10 billion applicants.

Funny how the guys recommending that some unemployed person must take a moral stand...are quite safely ensconced in their jobs saving away.

The fact is...2.1 is no bad thing.
2.1 is better than china, vietnam, thailand, or any number of other esl destinations.
2.1 is better than what other migrant workers to korea get.
2.1 enables you to save more than many people on even higher salaries back home.
2.1 Enables you to pay off your student debt.
2.1 is more than the average korean salary.
A year of 2.1 enables you to spend a year of loafing in SE Asia.
2.1 is better than living off your savings.
2.1 in a place you enjoy is better than 3.1 in a place you don't.


Base pay has not even twitched in the past decade.

And its not going to until the market dynamic changes. Until that happens, best not be getting delusions of grandeur.


Quoted for logic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International