| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Titus
Joined: 19 May 2012
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 6:33 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Did the men who wrote the constitution advocate for homo marriage and polygamy?
The constitution now functions almost solely as a means to establish and solidify prog gains. The people don't want something so some prog with a government job deems it unconstitutional and then we go bomb some shitty country for democracy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Titus wrote: |
The constitution now functions almost solely as a means to establish and solidify prog gains. |
I do not see a Federal ruling which upholds the religious freedom of a Mormon custom which the Federal government suppressed over 100 years ago as "prog." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Titus
Joined: 19 May 2012
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It is. The norm in America and elsewhere in the Western world has been 1 woman and 1 man building families. The progs are at war with this, not for any coherent ideological reason, but b/c the people that progs hate really like 1 man 1 woman. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| On the other hand wrote: |
| Quote: |
Had it been a state judge, I'd think "Utah of all places" would be appropriate. As it is, federal judges haven't been exactly absent in striking down laws against SSM.
|
So, federal judges do not in any way reflect the culture and values of the states in which they preside? |
Depends on where the particular judge is from, I guess. But that's neither here nor there as the "culture and values" on which he will base his decision is on the federal law, most notably the federal constitution.
| Quote: |
| I assume it's just a coincidence, then, that none of these pro-SSM rulings have been handed down in the Bible Belt? |
Takes time, I suppose. As marriage is supposed to be an issue for the states to regulate, I'd think it'd have to run through the state courts first before going to the feds. But I might be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
