Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Supreme Court strikes down Canada's prostitution laws
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
frankhenry



Joined: 13 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

littlelisa wrote:
ttompatz wrote:
Are they going to arrest every housewife in the country?

Regulate it like any other business and treat it as such. Sex is no different than beer if the parties are willing, consenting adults.

Put the pimps out of business and give the sex-trade workers access to all the other benefits that other employees gain including protection under the various labor acts.

.


Yes, because every single housewife (and stay-at-home husband) married for money. All of them. And the husbands (or women who earn the household income) married them only for sex. So that's a perfect example of how that's the same as prostitution, and a reasonable assumption that under anti-prostitution laws all those above should all be arrested.

Other than the first sentence, which seems especially ridiculous, I agree with your post.


Yep. Women are well known for marrying for money. That's why you will always have most women looking down on prostitution. Women don't like the idea of competition. Once married and locked on to the loot, women are afraid that some other woman might get their fingers on some of the coins.

On the other hand, most men are just fine with prostitution. Now the husband might say that prostitution is disgusting when discussing the situation with his wife, but in reality he thinks it's fine and dandy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fox wrote:

Quote:
The only groups I can even think of whom are both politically interested and willing to step up to the plate are libertarians, who rarely get their way unless they're acting as useful idiots for corporate interests, and "men's rights activists," who are possibly the least effectual "movement" in history.


And libertarians, in the thought-out, ideological sense(as opposed to the default, don't-rock-the-boat-on-social-issues sense), are even less influential in Canada than in the US.

The opposition leader in my home province is an ideological libertarian. In the last election, the governing party dug up an old column she'd written advocating legal brothels, in the hopes of smearing her as soft on human-trafficking or something. She backtracked pretty quickly from her earlier position.

And yeah, the Men's Rights Movement. Oof. As far as I can tell, their main tactic now is going onto university campuses and engaging in shouting matches with the Women's Studies crowd. It's like Battle Of The Irrelevancies. .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ersatzredux



Joined: 15 Dec 2007
Location: Same as it ever was, same as it ever was

PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think you have predicted what is going to happen pretty much spot on. It will be the ludicrously unfair and counterproductive "Nordic model", no doubt passed on first reading with at least tri-partisan support.

As for the Men's rights movement, at least they can console themselves that they haven't taken away our porn yet. Masturbation is still free- for now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ersatzredux



Joined: 15 Dec 2007
Location: Same as it ever was, same as it ever was

PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Titus wrote:
Here's a general question.

If the state and/or the church is not designating and enforcing morality then who is?

Answer?: Hollywood.

Secular people best wish for the best. Whatever was on Prime Time TV last night is American (etc) Values.


Wrong answer. The state hasn't stopped enforcing morality. It's called the judicial system. I think what you really mean to say is that you do not like the type of morality they are enforcing or wish they would enforce different types. And by Hollywood you mean Jews, right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ghostrider



Joined: 27 Jun 2011

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 5:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I recently watched a documentary about this on Netflix - Buying Sex. In Canada, it was the sex workers themselves stepping up to the plate and defending their right to make a living the way they want to. They hired a lawyer to challenge Canada's laws on prostitution in court.

Some argue that it is exploitation of women. However, a lot of these women say they would feel more exploited if they were working as minimum wage burger flippers.

The typical John is a middle aged guy whose wife has lost interest in sex. What is he supposed to do? Just ignore an instinctual drive?

The issue of the morality of prostitution aside, the police do not really have the resources to enforce a ban. The internet has changed a lot of things. It would be a huge strain on the legal system to arrest and prosecute the hundreds of thousands of service providers that advertise online and their clients. In the US, it is a very low priority for a lot of police departments.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ghostrider wrote:

The typical John is a middle aged guy whose wife has lost interest in sex. What is he supposed to do? Just ignore an instinctual drive?


You are essentially arguing, "Of course we need prostitutes, how else can bored middle aged men commit casual adultery?" Do you really see that as a point in prostitution's favor?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Cosmic Hum



Joined: 09 May 2003
Location: Sonic Space

PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2014 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fox wrote:
ghostrider wrote:

The typical John is a middle aged guy whose wife has lost interest in sex. What is he supposed to do? Just ignore an instinctual drive?


You are essentially arguing, "Of course we need prostitutes, how else can bored middle aged men commit casual adultery?" Do you really see that as a point in prostitution's favor?

Actually, what it is essentially arguing is,
What options are available for men to have sex?

It is one of many points in prostitution's favor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 6:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Cosmic Hum wrote:
Fox wrote:
ghostrider wrote:

The typical John is a middle aged guy whose wife has lost interest in sex. What is he supposed to do? Just ignore an instinctual drive?


You are essentially arguing, "Of course we need prostitutes, how else can bored middle aged men commit casual adultery?" Do you really see that as a point in prostitution's favor?

Actually, what it is essentially arguing is,
What options are available for men to have sex?

It is one of many points in prostitution's favor.


Actually no. Mr. Fox is correct.

Mr. ghostrider clearly laid out the parameters for his premise. "a middle aged guy whose wife has lost interest in sex."

That does not equate to having options for men to have sex. You are casting a much wider net here then Mr. ghostrider himself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Titus



Joined: 19 May 2012

PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:

And yeah, the Men's Rights Movement. Oof. As far as I can tell, their main tactic now is going onto university campuses and engaging in shouting matches with the Women's Studies crowd. It's like Battle Of The Irrelevancies. .


No, the video you're speaking of doesn't reflect that.

There was a lecture about male suicide at a campus in Toronto. Women said men talking about male suicide was "sexist" and protested and yelled at the men in attendance. They called them rapists etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Cosmic Hum



Joined: 09 May 2003
Location: Sonic Space

PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Titus wrote:
On the other hand wrote:

And yeah, the Men's Rights Movement. Oof. As far as I can tell, their main tactic now is going onto university campuses and engaging in shouting matches with the Women's Studies crowd. It's like Battle Of The Irrelevancies. .


No, the video you're speaking of doesn't reflect that.

There was a lecture about male suicide at a campus in Toronto. Women said men talking about male suicide was "sexist" and protested and yelled at the men in attendance. They called them rapists etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0

Ouch.
Thanks for that link.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NovaKart



Joined: 18 Nov 2009
Location: Iraq

PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Nordic Model really seems like a Victorian kind of attitude. Prostitutes are fallen women, not responsible for their own actions. I suppose some of this comes from a fear of female trafficking but is there really evidence to suggest that most prostitutes are women trafficked from 3rd world countries?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Titus wrote:
On the other hand wrote:

And yeah, the Men's Rights Movement. Oof. As far as I can tell, their main tactic now is going onto university campuses and engaging in shouting matches with the Women's Studies crowd. It's like Battle Of The Irrelevancies. .


No, the video you're speaking of doesn't reflect that.

There was a lecture about male suicide at a campus in Toronto. Women said men talking about male suicide was "sexist" and protested and yelled at the men in attendance. They called them rapists etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0


I'm not sure how that video disproves my characterization of the men's rights movement.

Okay, maybe those specific scenes didn't qualify as shouting matches, because most of the shouting was done by one side.

But anyone could pretty much have predicted the response a known men's rights activist would garner by going onto the U Of T campus and announcing that he's gonna give a speech. The ensuing farce was so foreseeable, I have to assume Farrell went there because he wanted to get the local feminists picketing him.

Had he rented a church-basement in the suburbs to give his speech, it would not likely have become the same sort of magnet for campus-based protestors that the university was.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Titus



Joined: 19 May 2012

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 7:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
But anyone could pretty much have predicted the response a known men's rights activist would garner by going onto the U Of T campus and announcing that he's gonna give a speech.


1) statement: men go to uni to yell at women
2) opposite was true
3) how could the men not know they'd get yelled at?
4) point 1 stands.

Solid work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Leon



Joined: 31 May 2010

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 7:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NovaKart wrote:
The Nordic Model really seems like a Victorian kind of attitude. Prostitutes are fallen women, not responsible for their own actions. I suppose some of this comes from a fear of female trafficking but is there really evidence to suggest that most prostitutes are women trafficked from 3rd world countries?


Considering how close most of the Nordic countries are to Eastern Europe, there is evidence that a significant number of them are. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union it has been a big business.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 7:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
1) statement: men go to uni to yell at women
2) opposite was true
3) how could the men not know they'd get yelled at?
4) point 1 stands.

Solid work.


Well, again, I concede that the men(at least as far as that video goes) weren't literally yelling at the women.

So I'll re-write my original post...


Quote:
As far as I can tell, their main tactic now is going onto university campuses and engaging in confrontation with the Women's Studies crowd.


I mean, do you seriously believe that after their meeting was cancelled, those guys were sitting around scratching their heads and saying "Huh? We got shouted down? By feminists? At the U Of T?! THAT sure was an unexpected twist!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International