|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
cmxc
Joined: 19 May 2008
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 5:42 pm Post subject: Discrimination flows freely at bars across Seoul |
|
|
A piece from the JoongAng Daily highlights a number of popular bars and clubs in Korea that have explicit policies turning away foreign patrons.
Is such discrimination consistent with Korea's attempts to attract more foreign tourists and immigrants?
If someone opened a bar or club and had policies that explicitly denied Korean patrons, would that be OK with Korean laws?
Reasons given for excluding foreign customers include:
'The owner said he put up the sign because his bar was being overtaken by foreigners. He said it was difficult for him to interact with non-Korean customers because he couldn’t speak English and added that Korean patrons don’t enjoy a multicultural vibe. “You know, the drinking cultures of Koreans and non-Koreans are too different. They don’t mesh well together,” he said.'
and
“It is discrimination,” admitted the manager, who said the ban came into effect after “too many incidents of rowdy foreigners who start fights and sexually harass women.”
Discrimination flows freely at bars across Seoul:
http://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=2988812 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 6:00 pm Post subject: Re: Discrimination flows freely at bars across Seoul |
|
|
cmxc wrote: |
Reasons given for excluding foreign customers include:
'The owner said he put up the sign because his bar was being overtaken by foreigners. He said it was difficult for him to interact with non-Korean customers because he couldn’t speak English and added that Korean patrons don’t enjoy a multicultural vibe. “You know, the drinking cultures of Koreans and non-Koreans are too different. They don’t mesh well together,” he said.' |
That seems reasonable enough. Honestly, coercing private businesses to serve people against their will has always been a somewhat questionable element of western culture. With regards to necessities (housing, groceries, clothing, and so forth) it's understandable since every citizen needs access to those things, but with regards to luxuries like movie theaters, bars, wedding cakes, and so forth? It's probably fine to allow discrimination. If some Korean bar owner or sauna owner doesn't want me in his establishment, then fine, I don't want to be there. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
le-paul

Joined: 07 Apr 2009 Location: dans la chambre
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It would be good if the world were aware of this kind of prejudice.
Whether its right or wrong is of course debatable, however in light of Koreas drive to encourage tourists, I think people ought to be informed of what to expect when they arrive here.
Infact, its a bit offensive when Koreans want to offload their cars, electronics and kimchi on the world and make money from an international market, but behave like this in their own country toward foreigners - especially considering most of us were invited here in the first place. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cam83
Joined: 27 Jan 2013 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It happened in Manhattan not so long ago with club Circle http://observer.com/2013/06/korean-only-club-to-pay-snubbed-patrons-20k-in-discrimination-fines/
The difference is that the US has law in place that are more often than not, enforced. In Asia I have found this isn't the case.
Only last year Koreans were banned from using certain hotel resorts in Bali due to complaints about their noise and lack of consideration to other patrons (I think there was even a thread on here about it).
I doubt that any foreigner who has an understanding Korean culture and some of the xenophobic attitudes on display is surprised. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
r2b2ct
Joined: 14 Jun 2013
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I've seen signs like that several times in Korea. I've also been denied entrance to places with no sign, and they openly stated that it was because I am a foreigner. On the flip side, I have seen places that let foreigners in for free or reduced cover. Haven't run into a foreigner only place but my mind wouldn't be blown.
That article of the club in NYC is hilarious though. No surprise it was a Korean club.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The only time I think its okay for those bars to discriminate is if they are engaged in illegal activity. That's understandable if your local mafia-hooker-business room bar has things like shady construction deals and prostitutes flowing through it.
But as far as normal cocktail bars and clubs, we should get a list going for consumer's sake.
And yes, there are "No Korean" bars in Korea. Though those usually involve illegal activity as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Who's Your Daddy?
Joined: 30 May 2010 Location: Victoria, Canada.
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There was a foreign bar here in my town with a sign saying along the lines of "this bar is for foreigners." I don't think they ever turned away Koreans but the sign was there at the door.
The bar and sign were there for years (until it closed down). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cam83
Joined: 27 Jan 2013 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess I'm a little torn about the discrimination here sometimes though... like when some club/bar/store gives free entrance/discount to foreigners I have seen it as a plus and just pay for my gf (or the Korean I'm with) and they don't seem to care and often see it as a cool thing.
But then you have the foreigner-only taxis - which makes me a little uncomfortable (not 100% sure why) so I refuse to take those taxis.
I have only heard of the non-foreigner thing in Hongdae really (though I'm sure it happens in other places). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Pink

Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Location: China
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steelrails wrote: |
The only time I think its okay for those bars to discriminate is if they are engaged in illegal activity. That's understandable if your local mafia-hooker-business room bar has things like shady construction deals and prostitutes flowing through it.
But as far as normal cocktail bars and clubs, we should get a list going for consumer's sake.
And yes, there are "No Korean" bars in Korea. Though those usually involve illegal activity as well. |
The juicy bars near US bases are "No Korean" bars. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wanderkind
Joined: 01 Jan 2012 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 8:15 pm Post subject: Re: Discrimination flows freely at bars across Seoul |
|
|
Quote: |
The first stop was the bar in Hongdae....the chalkboard sign still indicated that the venue was for “Koreans only,”...........“We have a policy that we don’t let foreigners in, but in this case we can make an exception,” he said, adding, “but please tell your friend that she can’t come back with her foreigner friends.” ..............The owner said he put up the sign because his bar was being overtaken by foreigners...................
Just a few months ago, the bar was a popular haunt for foreigners because of its cocktail deals and kitschy, themed decor, which is modeled to look like a pharmacy. |
Oh god dammit! 약국! I wanted to go back there, guess that's off the table now. I went there last summer with a mixed group for a Korean friend's birthday. It was 15,000 for Koreans 20,000 for foreigners at the time, but whatever, it was a nice enough place (near Hapjeong I think?).
I'm not surprised to hear the owner reference drinking cultures not meshing, given their 'set-price-unlimited-drinks deal'. To Koreans that might be a good deal, but to a lot of foreigners it's the alcohol equivalent of an all-you-can-drink buffet (or thrown gauntlet). When I was there it seemed like a quiet, sit down and chat spot, but 'laid-back hole-in-the-wall lounge' and 'unlimited cocktails' are somewhat incongruous. I can definitely see the intended atmosphere evaporating as soon as word got around about the place.
cam83 wrote: |
But then you have the foreigner-only taxis - which makes me a little uncomfortable (not 100% sure why) so I refuse to take those taxis. |
Foreigner only taxis? Never heard of those, what's their deal? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
r2b2ct wrote: |
Haven't run into a foreigner only place but my mind wouldn't be blown.
|
Aren't most casinos here foreigner only? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Okie from Muskogee
Joined: 30 Jan 2014
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mr. Pink wrote: |
Steelrails wrote: |
The only time I think its okay for those bars to discriminate is if they are engaged in illegal activity. That's understandable if your local mafia-hooker-business room bar has things like shady construction deals and prostitutes flowing through it.
But as far as normal cocktail bars and clubs, we should get a list going for consumer's sake.
And yes, there are "No Korean" bars in Korea. Though those usually involve illegal activity as well. |
The juicy bars near US bases are "No Korean" bars. |
Yeah, i am a regular at those bars. I almost feel right at home without korean patrons. I like korean waitresses though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tob55
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A real problem at some haunts when you have Korean dual citizenship and they attempt to deny entrance to you. I had it happen a time or two since receiving my citizenship last year and a simple call to the local cop shop brought the authorities there. They asked my what I wanted, and I said "I want to go in and have a drink." The owner said, "no way" to which the cops responded, if you deny entrance to this Korean citizen we will have to shut down your business. He relented and let me in. I wasn't trying to make trouble, but I was trying to make a point. Sometimes the people business owners least expect to be 'Korean' are the people who show up at their doorsteps.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. BlackCat

Joined: 30 Nov 2005 Location: Insert witty remark HERE
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fox wrote: |
r2b2ct wrote: |
Haven't run into a foreigner only place but my mind wouldn't be blown.
|
Aren't most casinos here foreigner only? |
Yes, but that's the Korean government's decision, not the casinos. It's different because it's Koreans doing it. If Koreans really wanted access to the casinos they could make it an election issue and change the laws. So, yeah, I see it as completely different.
To the main topic (and this isn't directed at you Fox, just don't want to start a new post), I don't really care about the bars/clubs themselves but I do think it's indicative of a bit of the larger feeling in the country in some circles. If foreigners really wanted to shame these places, they could get pictures of the signs and post them to the PyeongChang 2018 internet site. Betcha the government would step in then. But then it'd just go more underground.
What I don't accept is comparing it to foreigner only bars or even black/Asian/etc bars back home. While I don't agree with those policies either, it's always different for the majority to discriminate against the minority than it is the other way around. I know "reverse-racism" has been a catch phrase since Obama was elected, but a whites only club in the US, and a Korean only club in Korea is different than a blacks only club or a foreigner only club. If you need to ask why I'd suggest visiting your local library to check out pretty much every history book available.
Again, don't agree with it but it's not the same thing. And I also said it wasn't right for resorts in Bali to ban Koreans in the past. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. BlackCat

Joined: 30 Nov 2005 Location: Insert witty remark HERE
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tob55 wrote: |
A real problem at some haunts when you have Korean dual citizenship and they attempt to deny entrance to you. I had it happen a time or two since receiving my citizenship last year and a simple call to the local cop shop brought the authorities there. They asked my what I wanted, and I said "I want to go in and have a drink." The owner said, "no way" to which the cops responded, if you deny entrance to this Korean citizen we will have to shut down your business. He relented and let me in. I wasn't trying to make trouble, but I was trying to make a point. Sometimes the people business owners least expect to be 'Korean' are the people who show up at their doorsteps.  |
That's a nice story and I'm glad they got some comeuppance, but it sort of sounds like one of those stories after 9/11 when a man is beaten and the news says, "And he wasn't even Muslim!" Well, he shouldn't have been beaten even if he was Muslim. And you shouldn't have to prove your citizenship to gain entrance, either. I mean, I'm glad you got to shove it in their faces, but it isn't so much a win for human rights as it is for red tape technicalities. So, to compare it to the Muslim story above it's like, "He tried to deny me entry, but I'm not even technically a foreigner!" Well, a foreigner shouldn't be refused entry either.
This also reminds me of the story a couple of years ago of the Uzbeki (I believe) woman who was denied entrance to a jimjilbang because she probably had AIDS (aka was a foreigner), despite having Korean citizenship. It turned out there wasn't much the law could do for her, but she was pursuing it anyway. I wonder how that all ended up... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|