Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

A sad day for Korean culture
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
schwa



Joined: 18 Jan 2003
Location: Yap

PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 4:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wiki provides a country-by-country summary of dog-eating laws.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_meat

Some surprises. Its okay in Canada, for instance, with conditions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tiger fancini



Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Location: Testicles for Eyes

PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr. BlackCat wrote:
Thailand is still poor (not as oppressively poor, but still). They don't eat dog.


They do in some parts of the country, specifically Sakon Nakhon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jazzmaster wrote:
catman wrote:
jvalmer wrote:
Essentially a poor man's meat.


Kind of like haggis.


Haggis is based on using the less desirable parts of a desirable animal in order to minimize waste and maximize the amount of meals obtainable from one animal.
Eating a dog is desperation at not having a desirable animal and therefore eating the only animal you can find.
The current day hotdog is kind of like haggis.

I can't think of a current day example similar to eating a dog.


Lobster. Originally these rats of the sea were fit only to serve to prisoners and the very poor. Then someone dressed it up and it became what it is today. Dog was originally "eat whatever" and then it became a dressed up luxury.

Gamey meats like Venison, buffalo, elk, and so on are popular for their association with hunting. Probably not necessary to eat those animals, but we still do.

And then the exotic meat craze where people are getting into things like snake, alligator, ostrich, and others is just a general curiosity with eating whatever is strange.

I do think anyone who harps on people eating dog and still eats beef should have some sort of "mirror universe" experience in which the Hindus have taken over most of the world and they live in one of the few places that eat beef and listen to everyone rag on them with their hypocrisy as they wolf down lamb.

As long as its not endangered, its all good. Go ahead and eat baby seals if its not endangered. I eat lamb aka baby sheep. Who am I to call you out?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cave Dweller



Joined: 17 Aug 2014
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 6:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I didnt mention beating the dog, I only mentioned eating it.

So to further debate this: Have you ever seen a slaughterhouse for pigs and cows Its no better than what Korean do to dogs.

And also the whole beating the dog thing is more Korean junk science than anything else.

CentralCali wrote:
Cave Dweller wrote:
Do you eat pigs, chickens, and cows

If you do, that makes you a hypocrite.


I'm a vegetarian and I disagree with your assertion. For one thing, there's no myth floating around that beating the daylights out of the pig will improve the diner's stamina. There are a quite a few differences between eating farm animals and eating dog.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 8:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Weigookin74 wrote:
mithridates wrote:
Cave Dweller wrote:
Do you eat pigs, chickens, and cows

If you do, that makes you a hypocrite.


Devil's advocate: pigs, chickens and cows were all domesticated to be eaten / milked / have their eggs stolen, whereas dogs were domesticated more as guards and hunting companions, cats as vermin killers. The latter two were sometimes eaten but were never domesticated in the first place as a great source of meat.

If you're walking through a place like Afghanistan in 2006 by yourself you're going to want a big dog like this; using it as meat is a waste and will probably end up in you dying earlier. And when you're storing grain you want a cat to kill the mice, not for a quick meal. Early man made the same decision.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/06/10/books/11bissell.2.500.jpg

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/11/books/review/11cover_bissel.html


When you're startving, you prob eat anything and then later develop a taste for it. Korea, China, etc use to be pretty poor up until recently. Old folks here love this $h!t. Young folks not so much. It'll die out soon enough.


Yep. I had a National Geographic in the house way back when from the early 60s (I think) when President Park was getting ready to build the highway from Seoul to Busan, and some parts of it were showing fried red ant cuisine and how few people ate them anymore. I've yet to meet a Korean that even knew about that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
atwood



Joined: 26 Dec 2009

PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steelrails wrote:
jazzmaster wrote:
catman wrote:
jvalmer wrote:
Essentially a poor man's meat.


Kind of like haggis.


Haggis is based on using the less desirable parts of a desirable animal in order to minimize waste and maximize the amount of meals obtainable from one animal.
Eating a dog is desperation at not having a desirable animal and therefore eating the only animal you can find.
The current day hotdog is kind of like haggis.

I can't think of a current day example similar to eating a dog.


Lobster. Originally these rats of the sea were fit only to serve to prisoners and the very poor. Then someone dressed it up and it became what it is today. Dog was originally "eat whatever" and then it became a dressed up luxury.

Gamey meats like Venison, buffalo, elk, and so on are popular for their association with hunting. Probably not necessary to eat those animals, but we still do.

And then the exotic meat craze where people are getting into things like snake, alligator, ostrich, and others is just a general curiosity with eating whatever is strange.

I do think anyone who harps on people eating dog and still eats beef should have some sort of "mirror universe" experience in which the Hindus have taken over most of the world and they live in one of the few places that eat beef and listen to everyone rag on them with their hypocrisy as they wolf down lamb.

As long as its not endangered, its all good. Go ahead and eat baby seals if its not endangered. I eat lamb aka baby sheep. Who am I to call you out?

Snake and alligator are not exotic meats. They've been eaten for as long as men could hunt and kill them. Rattlesnake is good eating, alligator not so much. Turtle soup is delicious, IMO.

As for eating game such as deer and elk, the same applies. A farm boy like yourself should know the only meat some people have to eat is the meat they hunt and kill. A good-sized deer will feed a family of four for quite some time. Elk makes a hell of a steak. You should get out more.

BTW, why do you find it necessary to spout nonsense about any and all topics that show up on this forum?

In addition, the culture of eating dog is more complex than "dressed-up luxury." Sheesh.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 8:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cave Dweller wrote:
I didnt mention beating the dog, I only mentioned eating it.


Eating dog in Korea. That entails all the malarkey the locals have dressed up the act with.

Quote:
So to further debate this: Have you ever seen a slaughterhouse for pigs and cows


Yes, actually I have.

Quote:
Its no better than what Korean do to dogs.


The ones I've seen are a lot better than what Koreans do to dogs. For one thing, the animals are dispatched with an attempt at minimizing the pain. That is decidedly not the case with dogs consumed in Korea.

Quote:
And also the whole beating the dog thing is more Korean junk science than anything else.


Of course it's junk science. That doesn't negate the fact that the practice occurs and is even touted.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KimchiNinja



Joined: 01 May 2012
Location: Gangnam

PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I could care less about any of this, it's just meat guys.

But having just Googled it I will say that it looks slightly disturbing (click at your own risk)...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_meat_consumption_in_South_Korea#mediaviewer/File:Dog_Meat.jpg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Smithington



Joined: 14 Dec 2011

PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

KimchiNinja wrote:
I could care less about any of this, it's just meat guys.


So are you, you vacuous, amoral bore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KimchiNinja



Joined: 01 May 2012
Location: Gangnam

PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Smithington wrote:
KimchiNinja wrote:
I could care less about any of this, it's just meat guys.


So are you, you vacuous, amoral bore.


Not vacuous obviously, amoral perhaps 50%.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mithridates wrote:
Cave Dweller wrote:
Do you eat pigs, chickens, and cows

If you do, that makes you a hypocrite.


Devil's advocate: pigs, chickens and cows were all domesticated to be eaten / milked / have their eggs stolen, whereas dogs were domesticated more as guards and hunting companions, cats as vermin killers.


Can we draw such an absolute rule? It looks like peoples pretty much all over the world have experience eating dog, so I don't see why we should believe that the (probably food-poor, at least at times) primitives who originally domesticated dogs never had a mind to eat them. Feeding leavings to dogs during the good times to keep them useful, then eating a few of them during the bad times (while leaving enough to breed more) seems like such an obvious food-preservation strategy that it surely must have occurred to someone. Besides, multi-purpose domestication is possible. The fact that you want cows around to milk and eat won't stop you from using them as field labor if it will benefit you, right? The same rule probably applies here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jvalmer



Joined: 06 Jun 2003

PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 9:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Always wondered why Koreans get the brunt of the dog-eating backlash from the west, when a lot of places eat, or have eaten dogs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KimchiNinja



Joined: 01 May 2012
Location: Gangnam

PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jvalmer wrote:
Always wondered why Koreans get the brunt of the dog-eating backlash from the west, when a lot of places eat, or have eaten dogs.


Westerner's ancestors have all eaten dog. So their great great grandparents were "vacuous and amoral". Since intelligence is largely hereditary, umm... Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atwood



Joined: 26 Dec 2009

PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

KimchiNinja wrote:
jvalmer wrote:
Always wondered why Koreans get the brunt of the dog-eating backlash from the west, when a lot of places eat, or have eaten dogs.


Westerner's ancestors have all eaten dog. So their great great grandparents were "vacuous and amoral". Since intelligence is largely hereditary, umm... Laughing

You mean Westerners'. Before throwing stones about intelligence, you might think about boarding up the windows on that glass house your're residing in. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KimchiNinja



Joined: 01 May 2012
Location: Gangnam

PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

atwood wrote:
KimchiNinja wrote:
jvalmer wrote:
Always wondered why Koreans get the brunt of the dog-eating backlash from the west, when a lot of places eat, or have eaten dogs.


Westerner's ancestors have all eaten dog. So their great great grandparents were "vacuous and amoral". Since intelligence is largely hereditary, umm... Laughing

You mean Westerners'. Before throwing stones about intelligence, you might think about boarding up the windows on that glass house your're residing in. Very Happy


Doesn't make sense on multiple levels:

1) I wasn't the one who called people stupid who ate dogs, that was racist Smithington...who called his own ancestors retarded.

2) Spelling is not intelligence, it is knowledge.

3) Pedanticism is not intelligent.

Draw sword on the Ninja, get cut down. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International