Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Things are getting interesting in Colorado...
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Swartz wrote:
It's how the authoritarian mindset of the Levant who perhaps takes his Plato a bit too seriously works.


Haha, I was just re-reading a bit of Plato a night or two ago actually. Gorgias, in honor of your accusations against my rhetorical style.

Thanks for the conversation. I'll think it over.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Leon



Joined: 31 May 2010

PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 5:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with Swartz about the insanity of the idea that the GOP could use the convention to take away the nomination from Trump if he is clearly ahead in the primaries, which it seems very likely he will be. If they give it to someone like Kaisch, than it will show how worthless the whole process is. Cruz, not as much, but Trump doesn't seem like the type of guy to go off into the night quietly. To have the US going on and on about democracy, but than complain that sometimes it produces bitter fruit and try to refuse to eat it seems equally as ugly a prospect as a Trump nomination.

BTW, pure curiosity, Swartz et. al. what is your take on Cruz (divorced from the fact that he is challenging Donald)? He also seems to dislike immigrants.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Plain Meaning



Joined: 18 Oct 2014

PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leon wrote:
[T]he insanity of the idea that the GOP could use the convention to take away the nomination from Trump if he is clearly ahead in the primaries, which it seems very likely he will be. If they give it to someone like Kaisch, than it will show how worthless the whole process is. Cruz, not as much, but Trump doesn't seem like the type of guy to go off into the night quietly. To have the US going on and on about democracy


There seems to be a huge misunderstanding here. The Republican Party is not the US, party conventions are not democratic, and the party decides. Am I arguing in favor of the system? Certainly not. Nonetheless, if Trump fails to obtain a majority of delegates on the first ballot, most of those delegates become free to decide on another candidate within the rules adopted at the Convention. This last part is important: almost nowhere were the delegates assigned in direct proportion to how the votes were cast.

BTW, the US going on and on about democracy is a little like Burger King pitching how healthy its foods are.

"Hey, we have a Constitution dating from the Enlightenment, revised when we ended chattel slavery (revisions only implemented another 100 years after that), listen to us about how great democracy is!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Plain Meaning wrote:

There seems to be a huge misunderstanding here. The Republican Party is not the US, party conventions are not democratic, and the party decides.


Exactly correct. Indeed, if the primaries actually were and were intended to be purely democratic mechanisms, there would not be a delegate system in place, and certainly would not be anything like unbound delegates, "super delegates," or so forth. The process takes into account the opinions of the populace, but it is not truly democratic, and that is by design, just as the undemocratic character of the American government itself is by design. A lot of this comes back, again, to just how little the average American understands their own political system; frustrations frequently arise from misguided expectations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Leon



Joined: 31 May 2010

PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fox wrote:
Plain Meaning wrote:

There seems to be a huge misunderstanding here. The Republican Party is not the US, party conventions are not democratic, and the party decides.


Exactly correct. Indeed, if the primaries actually were and were intended to be purely democratic mechanisms, there would not be a delegate system in place, and certainly would not be anything like unbound delegates, "super delegates," or so forth. The process takes into account the opinions of the populace, but it is not truly democratic, and that is by design, just as the undemocratic character of the American government itself is by design. A lot of this comes back, again, to just how little the average American understands their own political system; frustrations frequently arise from misguided expectations.


I agree, but would say that in normal times the party does not actively try to disabuse the people from their misguided expectations, because it is not in their interest to be forthright about the undemocratic nature of the primaries.

Also, when realistically there are only two parties, by the time you get to vote in the general, most of the important choices were already made. It's funny, one criticism of Iran's democracy is that the ayatollahs pick who can run or not, but in the us we have primaries that are designed to provide a similar function, albeit for two competing sides. It is a very constrained political system, which isn't ispo facto bad, except that the people have been willfully mislead about this fact.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leon wrote:

I agree, but would say that in normal times the party does not actively try to disabuse the people from their misguided expectations, because it is not in their interest to be forthright about the undemocratic nature of the primaries.


That's right, the point is to build consensus and unity, reconciling the electorate with the opinion of party leaders. An excessively obviously rejection of electorate opinion could result in a lost election, it's true. On the other hand, the Republican Party embracing Mr. Trump could also have long-term consequences for the party, and the American public's political memory is very short, so it's not inconceivable that the party could see it as the lesser of two evils, depending on how they actually feel about the candidate in question. Proclamations that the Republican party is "doomed" if it rejects Mr. Trump are probably gross over-statements, assuming they're more careful in the future about managing the process, but there would certainly be some short-term fallout.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Plain Meaning



Joined: 18 Oct 2014

PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GOP Primary Votes so far:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016

Trump: 8.26m, 755 delegates

Cruz: 6.32m, 521 d

Rubio: 3.48m, 177 d

Kasich: 2.98m, 141 d

The following two statements are true regarding votes:

Cruz's + another's > Trump's

Rubio's + Kasich's > Cruz's

The foregoing is untrue regarding delegates.

Trump can still capture a majority of the delegates with only a plurality of the votes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trueblue



Joined: 15 Jun 2014
Location: In between the lines

PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2016 8:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leon wrote:
I agree with Swartz about the insanity of the idea that the GOP could use the convention to take away the nomination from Trump if he is clearly ahead in the primaries, which it seems very likely he will be. If they give it to someone like Kaisch, than it will show how worthless the whole process is. Cruz, not as much, but Trump doesn't seem like the type of guy to go off into the night quietly. To have the US going on and on about democracy, but than complain that sometimes it produces bitter fruit and try to refuse to eat it seems equally as ugly a prospect as a Trump nomination.

BTW, pure curiosity, Swartz et. al. what is your take on Cruz (divorced from the fact that he is challenging Donald)? He also seems to dislike immigrants.


....yes it would.


ILLEGAL immigrants.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International