|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
philinkorea
Joined: 27 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 8:36 pm Post subject: Anyone renting out property back home? |
|
|
Ok
A bit naive on the subject but always told its a wicked money maker. Im about to finish my second year in Korea, still not too old i guess well 24 almost 25. Thinking i could stay longer and if i get the setup i want i should be saving a lot. Was thinking of putting a deposit on a house in england. Heard you can do it through a company whereas its looked after while your not around, then its rented and paying for itself.
I mean whats the deal? i havnt paid off any student loan yet, although guess i could get in the folks name maybe. how hard is it to get a mortgage? is it just the case of coming up with the money. england is usually around 10 000 for a cheap house deposit.
just thinking of it as a possibility so i could continue my korean lifestyle. i dont necessarily see my future in england and im enjoying studying koream and developing some counselling skills here to i hope so would like to stay around at least another year.
if anyone could give me any advice info etc it would be cool |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FUBAR
Joined: 21 Oct 2003 Location: The Y.C.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you own property in Canada, you have to pay tax on your income earned in Korea. Not sure if the same rules apply in England, but it's something to look into. Unless you want to buy something in your parents name, which I don't know many parents who would willingly do that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used to rent out a property in England, but sold it a year or so ago as I felt that prices had peaked or were about to peak.
In principle, the idea is very good one, but if I were you, I would wait a few years. The property market in UK is very overheated right now and debt is starting to catch people out.
Fior the average price to average earnings ratio to revert to its long term trend of 3.5 or so (as it will) then either earnings have to all but double or prices have to drop by up to 40%.
Which do you think is more likely?
Yield on residential property is barely 5% at present and you can do better in the Building Society, with no risk.
But, keep stashing the cash (I have said elswhere that cash is king) and in a couple of years you will have enough for two deposits to buy property reposessed by the banks.
There are two key points in renting:-
1. Location: the smallest house in the best area is better than the biggest house in a poor area.
2. Avoid "voids" (a period when the property is empty for a month or more). Better to rent at 5% below the market than to have it sit empty, even for one month.
Lastly, smaller property is generally easier to rent than larger. Do not refuse DHSS tenants - the government's cheque does not bounce and the fair rental values they assess are indeed fair rental values. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the tax issue, under UK rules, if you are non-resident, your offshore pay is not taxed.
Any income arising in UK is taxed.
In the case of rental, you oay tax at the standard rate on the gross rent less allowable expenses, reduced of course by the basic tax-free allowances for a single person. This usually means that for a single "typical" property, with high loan and hence interest, the net profit at the end of the year is usually less than the tax threshold.
From the UK tax point of view, it is attractive. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matthews_world
Joined: 15 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess the big thing is managing your property while you are away from it.
Are your going to be able to keep an eye on your tenants? Are they gonna trash the place? Can you trust them?
I'd have someone I trust either live in the property and pay rent and look after the place.
Homeowner's insurance only covers you in certain types of losses. Find a good all-inclusive policy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That is true, there is the risk of the house being trashed. You do have the deposit of course, but that might not cover the cost. If the tenant is a DHS tenant, DHSS pays the repair cost.
As to student loans: I am not expert here, but don't you have to be earing over 15,000 GBP to start to repay? A teacher's pay in Korea is probably below that threshold. Whether or not that would affect a buy-to-let (BTL) mortgage application, I am not sure. BTL mortgages are normally considered on a stand-alone, commercial basis. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the saint

Joined: 09 Dec 2003 Location: not there yet...
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is a catch 22 here you have to watch out for. If to avoid tax you go non-resident for tax purposes (fill in a form to do this - don't just presume you are if you live here), the vast majority of BTL mortgages are out of your grasp. Those that are, and there are some, require a deposit of 15-20% up front. Ifyou are still paying back your student loan, I bet you don't have that kind of money - especially with house prices the way they are now.
We've had our property rented for almost 8 years now. Best thing we ever did financially. House prices are mad at the moment. If we sold now, we would make 300% profit on it. We're keeping it for the long haul because we will very soon be getting a nice cash income int he UK when we finish off the mortgage. We'll use that to save a deposit for a non-resident BTL mortgage for house number two.
Re tenants, one piece of advice. Unless you are seriously into hassle never rent to friends or family. Just don't go there. We got burned badly twice. It is much better to have a total stranger trash the place than someone you actually know. Re your fear of them trashing the place, remember, it is not your place i.e. not your home. It is just a building. Providing you have the property rented through an agency, even if every tenant you had trashed the place, you would still find that, long term you will still be making a good investment. Truth be told, tenants trashing the place are actually fairly few and far between.
If I were you, to get yourself rolling, I would get myself a copy of the Which Guide to Renting and Letting which is excellent and then start scouting for property in an area you know well back home. It might take you a few years to actually find a property and get the finance together but renting is definitely a good long term investment - if not one of the best.
BTW, all the above is for the UK. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was thinking about this too.
Just online (never been to these properties). But I saw a 1-bedroom apartment in Waikiki (Honolulu) for $50,000 as well as condos in Manila (also 1-bedroom for $50,000).
Either one, particularly Manila, I was thinking it would technically be possible to attempt a down payment on them and rent them out. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TJ
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:32 pm Post subject: Being a landlord sucks |
|
|
My wife and I have rented out a house twice and on both occasions the damage to house and gardens exceded the amount of the bond. On both occasions we had an agent supposedly looking after the property and collecting a fee for that service.
It is our experience that not only do you need good tenants but you also need good agents.
Now, we have left our house empty rather than go through all the worry of a tenant.
Our recommendation is DONT !!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chronicpride

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't forget about the use of property management firms. If you have some profit margin room on your rent, it may be wise to use the extra $100-150/mnth to have a property management firm oversee tenancy issues, advertising, and maintenance. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the saint

Joined: 09 Dec 2003 Location: not there yet...
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 10:16 pm Post subject: Re: Being a landlord sucks |
|
|
TJ wrote: |
My wife and I have rented out a house twice and on both occasions the damage to house and gardens exceded the amount of the bond. On both occasions we had an agent supposedly looking after the property and collecting a fee for that service.
It is our experience that not only do you need good tenants but you also need good agents.
Now, we have left our house empty rather than go through all the worry of a tenant.
Our recommendation is DONT !!!!! |
...use the same firm if they let you down the first time. Did you use different agents for that.
BTW, learn a lesson here all would be buy-to-letters: don't have a house with a garden - just too much maintenance.
You can also get insurance to help with sorting out stuff after the tenants leave... I think. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TJ
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: Being a landlord sucks |
|
|
the saint wrote: |
TJ wrote: |
My wife and I have rented out a house twice and on both occasions the damage to house and gardens exceded the amount of the bond. On both occasions we had an agent supposedly looking after the property and collecting a fee for that service.
It is our experience that not only do you need good tenants but you also need good agents.
Now, we have left our house empty rather than go through all the worry of a tenant.
Our recommendation is DONT !!!!! |
...use the same firm if they let you down the first time. Did you use different agents for that.
BTW, learn a lesson here all would be buy-to-letters: don't have a house with a garden - just too much maintenance.
You can also get insurance to help with sorting out stuff after the tenants leave... I think. |
Used different agents but both were no good. First house had a very small garden - when we returned to that state in Australia and checked it out we discovered that the tenants had dug up and removed all the bushes and shrubs from what had been a very pretty garden.
Second house (different tenants and agents) had a larger garden but it was fully reticulated. The tenant obviously did not turn on the reticulation during the summer and the whole garden and lawn died. The @#%&* agent obviously did not inspect the property regualrly as he was supposed to.
Both houses had stains on the carpets, gouges in the walls, dirt everywhere etc. etc.
And before anyone tells us to take the tenants and the agents to court that would have simply been thorwing more money away. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the saint

Joined: 09 Dec 2003 Location: not there yet...
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
sad story... especially when it happens twice to you. You're right about taking tenants to court. Any lessons we can learn from you re selecting an agent? What should we look for in a reputable agent? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Butterfly
Joined: 02 Mar 2003 Location: Kuwait
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wangja wrote: |
Lastly, smaller property is generally easier to rent than larger. Do not refuse DHSS tenants - the government's cheque does not bounce and the fair rental values they assess are indeed fair rental values. |
Oooh, I'd say avoid DSS people, and if you're in an area where you're only likely to get DSS tenants, then the property isn't worth investing in anyway, unless you forsee it being a commutable area in the future. DSS tentants, well, lots of them have no respect for the property because they have no vested interest in the property, no deposit.
I'd advise biting the bullet, buying in a nicer area, and spending a bit of cash on the place to furnish it nicely. (DFS and MFI, 0% finance, thank you very much). Then let it out through and agency and pay the standard 10% commission on the monthly rent, and they take care of everything, any probs, they take it out of the rent.
I don't know how things are though in the UK right now, the housing market just can't keep rising like this. So I don't know if the time is right as OP is only a youngster.
Quote: |
Both houses had stains on the carpets, gouges in the walls, dirt everywhere etc. etc. |
This is to be expected. They haven't completely bulldozed the house, and I think you have to expect to have to redecorate every couple of years and buy some items of new furniture.
That said, I would look for a property agent that asks for a big security deposit and charges more commission. If people have money bound up in the place then they are less likely to treat it disrespectfully.
And why tenants should have to take responsibility for the garden I have no idea.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TJ
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:08 pm Post subject: tenants' responsibilities |
|
|
[quote="Butterfly"]
Wangja wrote: |
Quote: |
Both houses had stains on the carpets, gouges in the walls, dirt everywhere etc. etc. |
This is to be expected. They haven't completely bulldozed the house, and I think you have to expect to have to redecorate every couple of years and buy some items of new furniture.
That said, I would look for a property agent that asks for a big security deposit and charges more commission. If people have money bound up in the place then they are less likely to treat it disrespectfully.
And why tenants should have to take responsibility for the garden I have no idea.  |
Don't know where you are from but in Australia the law has gone from protecting the landlord to protecting the tenant. Unfortunately the amount of bond (security deposit) that a tenant has to pay is restricted to (I think) 4 weeks rent. Unless you are charging an exhorbitant rent, 4 weeks rent will not cover the cost of even a small amount of repairs.
Also, I feel that a landlord having to redecorate every couple of years shows a shocking lack of care on the tenant's part. Before becoming a house owner I also rented and did not do any damage at all to the property I rented.
Re the gardens .......... if a tenant doesn't want to take responsibility for a garden he / she should not rent a house with a garden. Besides, I think many tenancy agreements include a clause that states the tenant MUST look after the garden.
Unfortunately, as I stated before, the cost of taking a tenant to court is often greater than the damages that a court will award to a landlord. And even if a court does award damages, the tenant often does a midnight runner and the property owner then has the trouble and expense of chasing the defaulter.
For the landlord it's a no-win situation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|