View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
VC

Joined: 10 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:03 am Post subject: Hours to general professional proficiency in Korean |
|
|
According to the experience of the Foreign Service Institute, 2200 hours of class instruction are needed to achieve a level of general professional proficiency in Korean (a level at which US State Department employees can do their job). Compare this to only 600 class hours needed to attain the same level in Dutch or Spanish (look at the chart at the end of the article).
The article also says that for every 5 hours in class, atleast three hours of additional independent study are usually needed. That's another 1320 hours. So a minimum of 3520 hours are needed to attain this level in Korean.
www.govtilr.org/PapersArchive/TESOL03ReadingFull.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mashimaro

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: location, location
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
dang, I've only done about 400 hours of korean classes... loooong way to go! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Drakoi

Joined: 26 Sep 2003 Location: The World
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I guess I shouldn't be so dissapointed with my slow progress so far...
seems rather daunting.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Derrek
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So if you study 24 hours a day, you could learn it in under half of a year! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In two years I've clocked well over 1,000 hours in private study and am appalled at how little I understand around me. My grammar is not too bad, but I lack the vocabulary. It's coming though.
I did take some private lessons and must say that in imposing an external discipline, they did force the pace and progress after each lesson was notceable. Bloody expensive though, at least witrh Berlitz.
Maybe after new year I will sign up for some more at KLA, which is a lot cheaper. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VC

Joined: 10 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is a more complete list. As you can see Korean is one of the most difficult languages for a native speaker to learn.
http://www.nvtc.gov/lotw/months/november/learningExpectations.html
Also look here-
"For learner to achieve these goals, classroom study should be supplemented by a minimum of two to three hours of preparation for each five classroom hours."
http://www.icls.com/FLD/ILRlevels.htm
Based on information from the last link and adding 3 hours of independent study for every 5 hours spent in class-
It takes 560 hours of study to reach a level 1 in Korean.
It takes 1,760 hours of study to reach a level 2 in Korean.
It takes 3,250 hours of study to reach a level 3 in Korean.
Last edited by VC on Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:14 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the_beaver

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've posted this before but, in a feeble effort to stave off work for a little while, there are several things that should be mentioned here.
First, the proficiency level given doesn't say to what degree. That is, it says it says that US State Department employees can do their job but what the *beep* is their job? An accurate (arguably) and generalizable set of level descriptions, and the one I use, is the ACTFL Scale.
Proficiency in another language can mean almost anything along the ability continuum so what you personally need/want to use the target language for affects the number of hours of practice/study required. Compare this to Erisson's studies of expert behaviour and it is probably (this I qualify because it's just my idea how the number of hours spent studying/practicing correlates to level of proficiency) reasonable to say that the target of 10,000 hours of quality practice/study will bring a person to a native or near-native speaker level while 5,000 hours of quality practice/study will bring a person to an advanced level. If the student's goal is everyday usage intermediate mid/intermediate high should suffice and that would take around 2,500~3,500 hours.
The important thing to realize is that, while students who study in a formal manner tend to get better faster, formal study is of less value in the equation than good quality practice. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting - from the *.pdf attachment from the second link, I grade myself as between 1 and 2, so 1+, between 350 and 1100 class hours. Having spent over 1,000 I'd say that proves that classroom hours are more efficient. Good news for you English teachers in fact.
I should add that being a lot older than most students I am now convinced, if I was not before, that the earlier you learn, the faster it is absorbed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VC

Joined: 10 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the_beaver wrote: |
First, the proficiency level given doesn't say to what degree. That is, it says it says that US State Department employees can do their job but what the *beep* is their job? An accurate (arguably) and generalizable set of level descriptions, and the one I use, is the ACTFL Scale. |
It says that the proficiency level is roughly equivalent to the superior level of the ACTFL scale.
"The Foreign Service Institute (FSI) of the Department of State has compiled approximate learning expectations for languages based on the length of time it takes to achieve Professional Speaking (S3) and Reading Proficiency (R-3) in them. This is roughly equivalent to ACTFL Superior."
http://www.nvtc.gov/lotw/months/november/learningExpectations.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the_beaver

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VC wrote: |
It says that the proficiency level is roughly equivalent to the superior level of the ACTFL scale.
"The Foreign Service Institute (FSI) of the Department of State has compiled approximate learning expectations for languages based on the length of time it takes to achieve Professional Speaking (S3) and Reading Proficiency (R-3) in them. This is roughly equivalent to ACTFL Superior."
http://www.nvtc.gov/lotw/months/november/learningExpectations.html |
Then I have to say that there's no way in fucking hell that's accurate. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gi66y
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I sense disagreement, but aren't you two both saying the same thing?
It takes over 2000 hours of study to learn enough to do a job? This makes sense keeping in mind that any job you do will end up being repetitive enough that you don't need a native speakers grasp of the language to do it well.
As for myself, I suppose I'm somewhere near 2000 hours (including 800+ hours of classroom study) and I suppose if I keep talking to my girlfriend and her friends and family in Korean I'll get to 5000 hours eventually, but I doubt that without studying subjects in Korean I'd ever get to a native speaker's level.
I suppose I should watch the news more often, but sadly I still don't understand much more than the general idea of what they're talking about. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VC

Joined: 10 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
gi66y wrote: |
I sense disagreement, but aren't you two both saying the same thing?
It takes over 2000 hours of study to learn enough to do a job? This makes sense keeping in mind that any job you do will end up being repetitive enough that you don't need a native speakers grasp of the language to do it well.
As for myself, I suppose I'm somewhere near 2000 hours (including 800+ hours of classroom study) and I suppose if I keep talking to my girlfriend and her friends and family in Korean I'll get to 5000 hours eventually, but I doubt that without studying subjects in Korean I'd ever get to a native speaker's level.
I suppose I should watch the news more often, but sadly I still don't understand much more than the general idea of what they're talking about. |
True. I wasn't talking about attaining native proficiency. I was talking about reaching a level 3 on the the Interagency Language Roundtable (ILR) scale which was developed by the US Foreign Service Institute. Native fluency is not reached until level 5.
http://www.sil.org/lingualinks/LANGUAGELEARNING/MangngYrLnggLrnngPrgrm/CorrespondenceOfProficiencySca.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rather_Dashing
Joined: 07 Sep 2004
|
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wangja wrote: |
Interesting - from the *.pdf attachment from the second link, I grade myself as between 1 and 2, so 1+, between 350 and 1100 class hours. Having spent over 1,000 I'd say that proves that classroom hours are more efficient. Good news for you English teachers in fact.
I should add that being a lot older than most students I am now convinced, if I was not before, that the earlier you learn, the faster it is absorbed. |
And they also forget just as fast. I knew a kid who could speak fluent german when he was 10 years old... 6 years later, he can't even put a sentence together.
When it comes to languages, if you don't use it, you lose it. This is why I'm only going to learn enough Korean to shop around and get laid. Because once I'm out of there, chances are I'll never speak it again.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
just because

Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Location: Changwon - 4964
|
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rather_Dashing wrote: |
When it comes to languages, if you don't use it, you lose it. This is why I'm only going to learn enough Korean to shop around and get laid. Because once I'm out of there, chances are I'll never speak it again. |
Are you the playboy?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rather_Dashing
Joined: 07 Sep 2004
|
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
just because wrote: |
Rather_Dashing wrote: |
When it comes to languages, if you don't use it, you lose it. This is why I'm only going to learn enough Korean to shop around and get laid. Because once I'm out of there, chances are I'll never speak it again. |
Are you the playboy?  |
I suppose if I were in Korea, I'd understand the meaning of the word playboy. Since I am not, I will sit silently and wait for someone to explain it to me...  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|