View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gladiator
Joined: 23 May 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 9:41 pm Post subject: Korean Sexual Harassment Laws |
|
|
We just had a Korean legal specialist visit my organization and give a presentation on sexual harassment, which is apparently mandatory under Korean law for all companies and enterprises.
After being in this country a number of years and seeing the rough deal K women get in the corporate world it was actually very pleasing to see Korean society addressing this. If many of the guidelines are enforced I think we might see massive improvements in women's working conditions (However I use might because I'm factoring in how the authorities here are generally larger on rhetoric than action).
Some of the behaviours identified as sexual harassment included:
*Forcing women to dance at office parties (I guess they meant "Hwoeshik").
*Taking women's hands and fondling them under the pretext of reading their palms.
*Staring (leering) at anyone for over 30 seconds (I'm not making light of this but it's interesting how in Korean law that they manage to specify a black and white time limit).
*Addressing women in terms that denote strict gender roles such as "Adjuma" are now deemed sexually demeaning. (Does this mean a change in the Korean language is on the horizon?)
*Forcing women to pour drinks
*Making unwelcome comments about body or bust shape to the victim
*Questioning the victim intrusively about dating, sex life, marital status etc.and making unwelcome suggestions for social activity outside the office.
I've interpreted these from the female viewpoint, but the guest speaker stressed that her law office has dealt with cases of Korean males being harassed by randy married women in the office.
I wonder what changes in corporate behaviour might be on the horizon. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tzechuk

Joined: 20 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:28 pm Post subject: Re: Korean Sexual Harassment Laws |
|
|
Gladiator wrote: |
*Addressing women in terms that denote strict gender roles such as "Adjuma" are now deemed sexually demeaning. (Does this mean a change in the Korean language is on the horizon?) |
So they can't call women ajumma - can they call men ajorshi? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cellphone
Joined: 18 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I may be wrong about this, but my reaction is "terrible." The only one of those I could likely agree with is the very last one. All the others are so common sense it's useless to make them laws. At a party if a worker doesn't want to dance, don't, or dance for 20 secs and then opt out. Korean women are tough and can take care of themselves. When they don't like something they easily say it.
That's not to say Korean men don't have a lot to learn. Personally, I think most of these laws however are off. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think there are a lot bigger issues in the workplace for women here than wether they get their hand fondled. I've heard a lot of stories about how women are pressured to leave the company after getting married, and well god forbid they get pregnant! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gladiator
Joined: 23 May 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:57 pm Post subject: Sexual Harassment |
|
|
So they can't call women ajumma - can they call men ajorshi?
I think Adjumma basically implies that a woman is married or should, by the standards of the society in which she lives, at least be married and have children. I think it's fair to say that Adjossi doesn't have any corresponding nuances. I am far from being an expert in the subject, but we have to remember that so much of Korean language is intrinsically sexist, from a western viewpoint anyhow. The fact that nobody draws such a sharp distinction between woman and married woman in our language shows the width, I guess, of the cultural chasm. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chiaa
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Guess I have to get a stop watch now. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tzechuk

Joined: 20 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 3:10 am Post subject: Re: Sexual Harassment |
|
|
Gladiator wrote: |
The fact that nobody draws such a sharp distinction between woman and married woman in our language shows the width, I guess, of the cultural chasm. |
That's precisely what I thought too... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiberious aka Sparkles

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 3:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just hope they don't turn the Korean workplace into the paranoia-filled environment it is at some western companies, where office workers are scared sh*tless about even lightly flirting with their co-workers for fear that they'll be fired or sued.
Fondling a woman's hand? C'mon.
Sparkles*_* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
INteresting what they include:
*Forcing women to dance at office parties (I guess they meant "Hwoeshik").
Should be obvious enough. What about bar employees, though?
*Taking women's hands and fondling them under the pretext of reading their palms.
My friend tried this at the bar a few nights ago and it worked quite well.
*Staring (leering) at anyone for over 30 seconds (I'm not making light of this but it's interesting how in Korean law that they manage to specify a black and white time limit).
Leering at someone for 20 seconds would still be pretty awkward, but then this is Korea.
*Addressing women in terms that denote strict gender roles such as "Adjuma" are now deemed sexually demeaning. (Does this mean a change in the Korean language is on the horizon?)
Good luck.
*Forcing women to pour drinks
Ditto. Does this mean our boss can't get any Korean employee to make tea for everyone who comes into his office?
*Making unwelcome comments about body or bust shape to the victim
Does 'oh, European nose' count?
*Questioning the victim intrusively about dating, sex life, marital status etc.and making unwelcome suggestions for social activity outside the office.
KTs will never talk about their sex life - if it exists - anyways, but is there a way to get everyone to stop constantly inquiring about one's age? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JacktheCat

Joined: 08 May 2004
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:03 am Post subject: Re: Sexual Harassment |
|
|
tzechuk wrote: |
Gladiator wrote: |
The fact that nobody draws such a sharp distinction between woman and married woman in our language shows the width, I guess, of the cultural chasm. |
That's precisely what I thought too... |
I think though that adjuma is less sexist than xiaoje. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tzechuk

Joined: 20 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:47 pm Post subject: Re: Sexual Harassment |
|
|
[quote="JacktheCat"]
tzechuk wrote: |
I think though that adjuma is less sexist than xiaoje. |
And why is that? Because it means Little Miss? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JacktheCat

Joined: 08 May 2004
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:43 pm Post subject: Re: Sexual Harassment |
|
|
[quote="tzechuk"]
JacktheCat wrote: |
tzechuk wrote: |
I think though that adjuma is less sexist than xiaoje. |
And why is that? Because it means Little Miss? |
Perhaps I should clarify.
I mean in the way that they are used.
Adjuma can used be as a title of respect or authority. I don't really think of it as a sexist word.
Xiaoje is almost always used in a demeaning way, as it signifies a woman of lower status than the man using the word. I think of it as a very sexist word. This is why the communists tried to ban the word. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pyongshin Sangja

Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Location: I love baby!
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's ajumaNI you dodoheads. Makes all the difference in the world. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tzechuk

Joined: 20 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 7:06 pm Post subject: Re: Sexual Harassment |
|
|
JacktheCat wrote: |
Xiaoje is almost always used in a demeaning way, as it signifies a woman of lower status than the man using the word. I think of it as a very sexist word. This is why the communists tried to ban the word. |
I am Chinese and I never felt demeaned? But in Hong Kong, people don't use xiaoje in a demeaning way... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mog

Joined: 06 May 2004
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Amoni won't work either, since that means mother...Agassi may be demeaning to females who are married. What's the word?
I read in the book I got that asking your age is necessary for Korean people so that they know which formal verb endings to use. I don't get annoyed at that question, or the "have you eaten yet" question because it's a cultural thing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|