|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hypnotist

Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Location: I wish I were a sock
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 12:05 am Post subject: The regimes the West support |
|
|
What drives support for this torturer
Oil and gas ensure that the US backs the Uzbek dictator to the hilt
Craig Murray
Monday May 16, 2005
The Guardian
The bodies of hundreds of pro-democracy protesters in Uzbekistan are scarcely cold, and already the White House is looking for ways to dismiss them. The White House spokesman Scott McClellan said those shot dead in the city of Andijan included "Islamic terrorists" offering armed resistance. They should, McClellan insists, seek democratic government "through peaceful means, not through violence".
But how? This is not Georgia, Ukraine or even Kyrgyzstan. There, the opposition parties could fight elections. The results were fixed, but the opportunity to propagate their message brought change. In Uzbek elections on December 26, the opposition was not allowed to take part at all.
Full story:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1484631,00.html
Note that whilst this guy is clearly not the biggest fan of the British Government, most of the facts in this piece are supported by the reports of international news agencies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
R. S. Refugee

Joined: 29 Sep 2004 Location: Shangra La, ROK
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rumsfeld embraces Saddam
Rumsfeld embraces Karimov
Man, that Rumsfeld gets around to embrace
all the mass murderers, dont' he?
Last edited by R. S. Refugee on Mon May 16, 2005 12:29 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
[img]http://images.google.co.kr/images?q=tbn:a7gfs6ywfpEJ:www.shia-islam.org/khamenei-khomeni.jpg[/img]
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hypnotist

Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Location: I wish I were a sock
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, Joo, let me ask you a question.
Two states. One is a democracy ruled by a theocratic and anti-US Islamic government (but one which does not actively threaten other states). The other is a brutal dictatorship which kills its own people for daring to fight for democracy, but which is strongly pro-US in an area where the US has economic interests and geopolitical ambitions.
Why does American rhetoric favour the first, yet American actions favour the second? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Talking about Iran?
Iran is no democracy. The ruler of Iran and the only one who counts is Ali Khamani. Any candidate who isn't are hardliner can't run for office.
In 1989 alone Khomeni killed 30,000 people
Iran says they want to nuke Israel , Iran has supported terror against the US Iran for years tried to spread its revolution.
I need for you to set the record straight on Iran before I can have the discussion |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hypnotist

Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Location: I wish I were a sock
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nah, I'm talking in the abstract (but with particular thought to Uzbekistan and the other former Soviet republics).
I don't think you could call Iran a democracy by any stretch of the imagination. I would note that if I were Iran I'd be really rather concerned about Israel (my enemy) having (illegal and undeclared) nukes on my doorstep, and that the NPT gives it the right to nuclear power, but that's about as much sympathy as that regime is getting from me.
But I don't want to get dragged into a discussion about Iran. To put my question another way - does America only support democracy if the people will vote for a government it likes? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
No to upstage but here is my two cents...
| Quote: |
| does America only support democracy if the people will vote for a government it likes? |
Sure it does. However, it is far from alone in this age old practice. Other western nations have been doing this for a while and still do today. International relations by economic interests and national interests. Not very complicated: you do for us and we are willing to ignore certain details...like dictature and oppression.
Remmember Suharto in Indonesia? A dictator for 30 years and he had full western democracy support. The list goes on and on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hypnotist

Joined: 04 Dec 2004 Location: I wish I were a sock
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Homer,
Right - what has changed is the message from the American Government - "we are on the side of freedom" etc etc. Only when it suits your interests, chaps.
This was most interesting though:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1484718,00.html
Straw condemns Uzbekistan after 500 protesters are killed
Nick Paton Walsh in Moscow and Ewen MacAskill in London
Monday May 16, 2005
The Guardian
The British government clashed openly with Uzbekistan yesterday over the violent suppression of a protest in the former Soviet republic that the Foreign Office said had left hundreds dead.
In an unusual condemnation of a country routinely described as a loyal ally by both Britain and the US, Jack Straw, the foreign secretary, said yesterday there had been a "clear abuse of human rights".
[...]
The Foreign Office, based on information from its embassy in Tashkent, has acknowledged the toll was "in the hundreds rather than dozens".
In an interview with the BBC's The World This Weekend yesterday, Mr Straw said: "The situation is very serious, there has been a clear abuse of human rights, a lack of democracy and a lack of openness."
Mr Straw also called on the Uzbekistan government to allow independent observers, such as the Red Cross, to visit Andijan.
But asked if Britain would support an opposition movement, he said: "It's for the people to decide on a change of regime, not outsiders." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
R. S. Refugee

Joined: 29 Sep 2004 Location: Shangra La, ROK
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 2:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hypnotist wrote: |
Homer,
Right - what has changed is the message from the American Government - "we are on the side of freedom" etc etc. Only when it suits your interests, chaps.
|
I don't think that hypnotist harbors any illusions about the phoniness of America's "March of Freedom and Democracy"(TM) rhetoric, Homer, but the apologists for Bush War II in Iraq are al | | |