Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Clause vs phrase

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Badmojo



Joined: 07 Mar 2004
Location: I'm just sitting here watching the wheels go round and round

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 9:12 pm    Post subject: Clause vs phrase Reply with quote

For people with better grammar books or grammar knowledge than me, here's one for you. What's the difference between a clause and a phrase?

Thank you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 9:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Clause vs phrase Reply with quote

Badmojo wrote:
For people with better grammar books or grammar knowledge than me, here's one for you. What's the difference between a clause and a phrase?

Thank you.


A clause contains a verb and a phrase has no verb.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Badmojo



Joined: 07 Mar 2004
Location: I'm just sitting here watching the wheels go round and round

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 9:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Clause vs phrase Reply with quote

Wangja wrote:
Badmojo wrote:
For people with better grammar books or grammar knowledge than me, here's one for you. What's the difference between a clause and a phrase?

Thank you.


A clause contains a verb and a phrase has no verb.


Thank you.

Can you give me some examples please?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sliver



Joined: 04 May 2003
Location: The third dimension

PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry but linguistically Wangja is not correct.

Look here for exact definitions.

Clause

http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAClause.htm

Phrase

http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAPhrase.htm

Good luck Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 4:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sliver wrote:
Sorry but linguistically Wangja is not correct.

Look here for exact definitions.

Clause

http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAClause.htm

Phrase

http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAPhrase.htm

Good luck Cool


well, I see verbs in the clauses but not in the phrases .....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Grotto



Joined: 21 Mar 2004

PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Clause is the name of the guy who comes down your chimney at xmas.

Phrase is what you get when a Korean compliments you Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seirogan



Joined: 19 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A clause has a subject and verb and a phrase is lacking either a subject or verb.

The man is sitting on the sofa. (cluase)

The man WHO IS SITTING ON THE SOFA is my brother. (adjective clause....describes the man and has a subject and a verb)

The man SITTING ON THE SOFA is my brother. (adjective phrase describing the man...there is no subject)

The man has been sitting on the sofa SINCE I CAME HOME. (adverbial clause...has a subject and verb)

The man has been sitting on the sofa SINCE COMING HOME. (adverbial phrase)


Clauses can be independent and occur by itself or dependent and must be attached to and independent clause.

Although I have eatien, I am still hungry.

However, now I am confused. (The man sitting on the sofa is my brother.) "Sitting on the sofa" is a gerund phrase and gerunds function as nouns. But doesn't "sitting on the sofa" describe the man and is therefore functioning as an adjective?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
denverdeath



Joined: 21 May 2005
Location: Boo-sahn

PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Try this website, too. Usually it's pretty useful...

http://webster.commnet.edu/grammar/

Clauses:

http://webster.commnet.edu/grammar/clauses.htm

clause n. Grammar. A group of words containing a subject and a predicate and forming part of a compound or complex sentence.

Phrases:

http://webster.commnet.edu/grammar/phrases.htm

phrase n. Grammar. Two or more words in sequence that form a syntactic unit that is less than a complete sentence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
denverdeath



Joined: 21 May 2005
Location: Boo-sahn

PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

seirogan,

I ain't no wiz, but I think you're looking at a phrase, not a gerund, in your example. At least that's what the site said...

http://cctc.commnet.edu/grammar/verbs.htm#gerunds


Gerund: a verb form, ending in -ing, which acts as a noun. Running in the park after dark can be dangerous. Gerunds are frequently accompanied by other associated words making up a gerund phrase ("running in the park after dark").

Because gerunds and gerund phrases are nouns, they can be used in any way that a noun can be used:

as subject: Being king can be dangerous for your health.
as object of the verb: He didn't particularly like being king.
as object of a preposition: He wrote a book about being king.

If we changed your example to, "Sitting on the sofa is a wonderful way to pass the time," then it would be a gerund, I think.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Badmojo



Joined: 07 Mar 2004
Location: I'm just sitting here watching the wheels go round and round

PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I gave my student Wangja's explanation and that's good enough for me.

Why do some students insist on knowing the most insignificant grammar distinction when they can't adequately speak in the past or the future?

As far as I'm concerned, a phrase is something on Wheel Of Fortune.

A clause? Hey, I'll go with Grotto on that one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
the saint



Joined: 09 Dec 2003
Location: not there yet...

PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:31 pm    Post subject: