|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Which do you prefer to use? |
Korea |
|
88% |
[ 48 ] |
Corea |
|
11% |
[ 6 ] |
|
Total Votes : 54 |
|
Author |
Message |
Holyjoe

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: Away for a cuppa
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2003 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is by no means a scientific test or anything, but a quick look in the dictionary reveals that most words with the opening letters "Ko-" are 'borrowed' words into the English language...
koala, Kochel number, Kodak, Koh-i-noor, kohl, kohlrabi, kola, kilinsky, kolkhoz, koodoo, kook, kookaburra, kooky, kopeck, Koran, Korea, Korean, kosher, koumiss, kowtow
(there's possibly more, as someone with a bigger dictionary can no doubt point out)
Yet consider other words with the exact same opening sound and you'll find them in the C section of your dictionary.
Curious... (but then English is full of anomalies...) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mokpochica

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Location: Ann Arbor, MI
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2003 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use Korea (in English) because I think it looks better. I use Corea in Spanish though. I don't really think it's a big deal how it is spelled. I've seen a few students write Corea, but very few. Anyway, it's not a big deal to me if they use Corea as long as they are aware of the other spelling. I don't feel like getting into a discussion with them about it because, to me it seems pretty trivial.
Anyway, the name came from the 'Koryo' (Koguryo) dynasty and foreigners who thought that Koryo was pronounced like Korea. Maybe they used to write Koryo as Coryo, but I've never seen it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gang ah jee

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: city of paper
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2003 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
new zillun |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leslie Cheswyck

Joined: 31 May 2003 Location: University of Western Chile
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
How about 'GOREA'? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mack the knife

Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: standing right behind you...
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tejas, Occupied Mexico, Gringolandia |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chillin' Villain

Joined: 13 Mar 2003 Location: Goo Row
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
To uphold a little of the world's respect, it should just be kept as it is...
Even if (IF) all that historical stuff is accurate, what do you think the average response of the typical world citizen would be to a sudden new spelling of Korea everywhere?
-"Oh, that must have been so painful, enduring years of having your name spelled with a K!"
OR
-"Huh? Because of some dictionary thing? Gosh, seems kinda petty to me..."
I guess I can understand the feelings behind the whole colonization thing, but dredging up an old spelling over some dictionary battle 60-something years after the fact is a little too much. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gord

Joined: 25 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Homer wrote: |
1) Ahhh..yes...
Japan changed many things during the colonization period and the spelling of Korea seems to have been one of them. It was a singular policy but it seems it was applied none the less.
Perhaps you need a source Gordie?
well here it is pal: |
Wow. Links to three people's opinions that have no actual evidence. HOLY FUCKING SHIT! IT MUST BE TRUE!
Wait, that's a lie. The truth is this. Back in the late 19th century my great, great grandfather was playing some new game his friend invented called Scrabble. One of the words on the board was "ore". Next to ore was a triple word score. So my grandfather hummed and hawed, and finally put down a K over the triple word score, and and A on the end. Boom, Korea.
Now his friend said it wasn't a word. Back then, no one really had any dictionaries. So my great, great grandfather said it the name of a country on a peninsula near Japan.
This the the answer.
Quote: |
Why? For one of Japan's prospective colonies to precede its master in the alphabetical lineup of nations would be unseemly, Japanese imperialists decided. |
Bad time to point out Jaqan also invaded China? Or that Japan had lobbied extensively to be called "Nippon". Sure, they renamed Korea to Corea to be alphabetically sooner while spending more much effort to be called Nippon which would make their efforts futile.
Quote: |
They do call it Hanguk in hangul. They have the right to decide how to spell their nation's name in English. If other countries decide they don't like it then thats a different story. It would not be that big of a deal to change the name. |
Care to explain why you continally refer to "THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA" as "North Korea"?
Quote: |
Look at the case of Pusan which is spelt With a "P" or with a "B" as in Busan. If they want to call it Corea for national and historical reasons its their right after all they are korean..err..I mean corean...or perhaps cor�en... |
The BP issue has to do with mistranslations from ages ago thanks to the lovely McCune-Reischauer romanization, which was probably due to a regional accent issue.
National Academy for the Korean Language (NAKL) is the standard that should be used, and that correctly has "Busan" with a B.
Now you know. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
With a C just looks weird. Yes, I know its because I'm used to seeing Korea, but so is 99.9% of the English-speaking world.
The whole "Japan changed it because it wanted to come in front of K(C)orea alphabetically" thing is just some BS a nationalist Korean came up with. As Gord, said, Japan campaigned to get countries to call it Nippon during the Korean occupation. If it were really true, do you think Kim Il-Sung, the supposed guerilla leader of Korea (and anti-japanese as they come, at least according to him),would have kept the K after independence?? I seriously doubt it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HardyandTiny

Joined: 03 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
TaeHanMinGuk or MinGuk
are the only names that can replace the place name "Korea" in the English language.
But to ask a Korean person to change the word America in Hangul from "MiGook" to "USgook" would never happen and if you don't get it..well, good luck.
Corea is not English, it is the word for Korea in Latin based languages.
I'm putting my fan on high and I'm closing all the windows. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
King of Kw,
I was simply trying to show Gordie that the debate on this name is real and that some people have some facts concerning it.
The first link was from a known advocate group in favor of changing back to the "C" so it has to be taken with a grain of salt.
The rest of the links showed opinions from people on this same topic.
I was not meant to be an academic demonstration of fact.
However, there is a enough evidence to support the claim that Korea was known as Corea before the eary 20th century and this is what I was trying to show Gordie. The fact that its spelled with a "C" in French, spanish and a few other languages is alson indicative.
The basis of ot all is quite simple: a country has the right, and this is quite basic, to spell their countries name however they please.
If Koreans for historical or cultural reasons want to go back the the "C" then its their basic right. the Korean government being a democracy all they have to do is run a referendum on the question and go with the majority. Thats just how it works.
As a foreigner you have no say in this. You can voice your opinion of course, that is your right but you have no right to tell Koreans or Coreans how to run their nation or for that matter name it.
As for the english world not liking the change well it really is not up to them is it? I don't see why people get all huffed up about it. the governments of the nations that form this "English world" have not protested or even opposed themselves to the potential change and it has been floated out to them to check their reactions.
In the end its the choice of Koreans thats all.
Now on to respond to Gordie,
a) Care to explain why you continally refer to "THE DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA" as "North Korea"?
I did not refer to it as that ever my little friend.
As for the english world not liking the change well it really is not up to them is it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gord

Joined: 25 Feb 2003
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
ahh gordie...read again pal...that was a thread on reunification buddy.
I was discussing the views of both sides of the Korean peninsula..
Never once refered to all of Korea as the Democratic Republic of korea, not in either of my posts in that thread.
Better luck next time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gord

Joined: 25 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Homer wrote: |
ahh gordie...read again pal...that was a thread on reunification buddy.
I was discussing the views of both sides of the Korean peninsula..
Never once refered to all of Korea as the Democratic Republic of korea, not in either of my posts in that thread.
Better luck next time. |
What?
How the hell did you derail into talking about the entire peninsula? We're talking about the peace loving country just north of here with over a million troops waiting to liberate their southern neighbors. Let's just back up and start again.
The government of the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" DEMANDS you address them as such. You claim that countries can easily change their English language names if they want. Yet you contradict yourself and refer to the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" as "North Korea"
Here's an exact quote from this page:
Quote: |
Its hardly logical to think that the North Korea population would not want to reunify and would not want to get rid of their current system of government. |
In case you missed it, I'll quote the important part:
You lied. You got caught. Stop pretending you didn't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mack the knife

Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: standing right behind you...
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 6:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
POW!! SLAM!! KWAK!!
THE GLOVES ARE OFF!! BLOOD!! DRAMA!! SUSPENSE!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HardyandTiny

Joined: 03 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2003 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
The word will appear on a map as "Corea" because the maps were made by academics and it was mandatory to use Latin at that time. Latin was required, and even today in some instances it is still required in subjects.
It was never changed from Corea to Korea in English.
Are you going to change every single place name that was written in the Latin C back to C? Cawasawki?
The Koreans do not have any right AT ALL to change the English language and they can not do it! They would have to revert to their own words TaHanMiguk or MinGuk. They can not change the English word to Corea. You have no idea what you are talking about! Show me the precedent!
the reason why people get upset is because Korean history has nothing to do with the English or the Latin language. Just use your name as it is, TaeHanMinGuk, and stop trying to include another language into your illogical mess. Take your name as it is in your language, cowards. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|