| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ThePoet
Joined: 15 May 2004 Location: No longer in Korea - just lurking here
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am one of the teacher trainers in the program that was reported in the news. I think we have all seen the reliable and unbiased (yeah, sure) reporting that comes from the Korean media but I will mention a couple things here that were improperly or inadequately covered in the news articles:
1) TOEIC is not used by Korean English teachers...it is normally used for the business community. As such, for teachers here, it is like taking a written drivers test 10 - 20 years after getting your drivers license with no time to prep and for a transportation classification you have never driven.
2) The TOEIC scores that were reported in the news were internal placement scores. they have no scores after improvement in the program to be compared to. and they did not report the scores used by the trainees to get into the program in the first place.
there are a lot of other problems/inconsistencies with the news article, but I don't really want to vent publicly about it.
Poet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Qinella
Joined: 25 Feb 2005 Location: the crib
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| joe_doufu wrote: |
| Gollum wrote: |
| joe_doufu wrote: |
My favorite quote from that article was this:
| Quote: |
| the teachers were participating in the education ministry��s English training course provided for ��excellent�� teachers with teaching careers of three years or more |
|
Gosh, so what would the less-than-excellent people score?? |
My reaction was a little different. I was wondering, in what kind of a system are "excellent" teachers defined as teachers who've worked for three years? Seniority is not a strong indicator of excellence, and, if you did choose to judge by seniority, doesn't this country have any teachers who've been working for slightly longer than three years?
Maybe the English business sucks just as bad for the K-teachers as it does for us? |
That was a conclusion you drew. It's not necessarily implied. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Derrek
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ThePoet wrote: |
I am one of the teacher trainers in the program that was reported in the news. I think we have all seen the reliable and unbiased (yeah, sure) reporting that comes from the Korean media but I will mention a couple things here that were improperly or inadequately covered in the news articles:
1) TOEIC is not used by Korean English teachers...it is normally used for the business community. As such, for teachers here, it is like taking a written drivers test 10 - 20 years after getting your drivers license with no time to prep and for a transportation classification you have never driven.
2) The TOEIC scores that were reported in the news were internal placement scores. they have no scores after improvement in the program to be compared to. and they did not report the scores used by the trainees to get into the program in the first place.
there are a lot of other problems/inconsistencies with the news article, but I don't really want to vent publicly about it.
Poet |
EXACTLY what I thought of.
My friends also mentioned some TV news stories where they showed a Korean teacher teaching English, and the students were bored/sleeping. Then they showed some foreign woman teaching, and the kids were having a good time.
I worked in TV for several years, and I know how easily a story can be skewed. The writers of this story had a definate agenda, as they usually do here in Korea. They can write what they want, and pick video clips to fit it.
I felt sorry for the Korean teachers in the TV story I heard about. I'm sure they had not clue what was going to be done to them, and it probably hurt them and their reputation. Odd that this TV story was actually "PRO foriegn teacher!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Who makes all the money from administering the TOEIC test? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ThePoet
Joined: 15 May 2004 Location: No longer in Korea - just lurking here
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Derrek,
Remember a couple of months back the Ministry of Education decided it wanted to hire a foreign teacher for every middle and high school in Korea through the ETIK program?
And remember how the Korean public and the Korean teachers said that it would be a waste of resources to do this?
Do you see an agenda from pro-ETIK cabinet ministers looming here?
Poet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Derrek
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The thing that really irks me no matter what side they argue on is when they say things like, "Most foreign teachers are not qualified."
Totally wrong!
If you have a BA, YOU ARE QUALIFIED to teach English in Korea.
Now who is wrong here? It's not the teachers' fault that Korea sets its barometer lower than everyone else.
If they want to raise their qualifications higher to require, say, a BA in Education with teaching certification, like in the US -- THEN they can argue that most teachers here are not qualified!
But they won't/can't do that. It would mean getting rid of (a guess here) 95% of the people teaching English in Korea. There aren't enough "certified" teachers who would want to come here.
If they start paying 4+ million per month, plus housing, then I'd venture to say a lot more "certified" teachers would come. And I'd be going back home for 1 1/2 years to get my certification! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joe_doufu

Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: Elsewhere
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Qinella wrote: |
| That was a conclusion you drew. It's not necessarily implied. |
Yes, that was my conclusion. Wasn't that clear? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|