Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why I'd Never Send My Kids to an English Hogwon...
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
deessell



Joined: 08 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

the_beaver wrote:
deessell wrote:
If you are using a set text, I personally see no reason why it isn't more efficient to study 1-1 with a private tutor.


Of course, it depends on the tutor and the learner, but in general it's not more effecient. Most good textbooks have a ton of communicative activities and these activities. The average tutor will make overt attempts to get the other party to communicate while another student of the same level won't. What happens is genuine focus on the content of the communication instead of attempts at just getting the other person to communicate. Additionally, the higher level person, whether native speaker or not, tends to speak more and fill in blanks and give and model language (often subconsciously) and not allow the lower level learner to go through the mental process of ordering information and schemata -- it's like a spotter taking 90% of the weight in weightlifting.

Some students do better with a tutor and some tutors are better at the necessary interaction, but these are minority cases.



Beaver I agree with your ideas when dealing with adults but I still think children benefit more from 1-1 teaching.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
butter808fly



Joined: 09 May 2004
Location: Northern California, USA

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting thoughts and ideas... you mean it actually pays to learn how to teach people of another language? haha... anyways, the kids that have really improved at my school are actually my young kids that were in a class with a child that used to live in England (so, his English was pretty good).. just the natural interaction of it all and they really picked up the English so quickly! I didnt have to teach them sentence structure or anything.. maybe everyone should just throw in an English speaking child and that might cure all the hicups.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
the_beaver



Joined: 15 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

deessell wrote:
Beaver I agree with your ideas when dealing with adults but I still think children benefit more from 1-1 teaching.


I won't argue that. I would rather have my short curlies pulled out one by one, twined into a rope, lassooed around my jewels, and tugged on by elephants than teach children. This bias has moved my focus on theory away from young learners.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deessell



Joined: 08 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thats why we don't usually teach children grammar, they learn the rules innately like we did.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
joe_doufu



Joined: 09 May 2005
Location: Elsewhere

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Language learning is not a secret technique. Anybody can do it. With the countless billions of won the Korean people have thrown at the English learning problem, it's unthinkably appalling how little they have learned. Somewhere somehow somebody must have translated Barry Farber's "How to Learn Any Language" or just figured out the secrets by trial and error.

Unfortunately for Korea, the secret ingredient to language learning is to want to learn the language! People who want to learn the language will seek out people to chat with on the internet, foreign girls to hit on, books and movies to consume, etc.

What Koreans do to their children is terrible. Forcing them to study from the early morning until after midnight, to study things they don't care about for so many hours they long surpass their maximum brain load for the day, is plainly cruel. It depresses me to be a part of it. If I could get away with playing games every day, I would. I have some classes that absolutely refuse to cooperate with me, and I used to get frustrated with them, but you know, I consider it my good deed to let them have their wild + free 40 minutes every day.

Just don't tell the boss!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

the_beaver wrote:
I would rather have my short curlies pulled out one by one, twined into a rope, lassooed around my jewels, and tugged on by elephants than teach children.


My experience here in Korea has made me ready to hear this and say, yeah, I know exactly what he's talking about...


Last edited by Gopher on Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:01 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
butter808fly



Joined: 09 May 2004
Location: Northern California, USA

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

joe_doufu wrote:
Somewhere somehow somebody must have translated Barry Farber's "How to Learn Any Language" or just figured out the secrets by trial and error.


Hey, thats actually a pretty good book.. or at least motivating since he knows like 20 languages or something crazy like that.

Im with you all, with the amount of money the invest, these kids should be speaking better by now. Something is amiss.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I were a Korean parent thinking about sending my kid to English class I would:

1. Visit the school in question and look at the facilities and see if they have books, tapes, etc. Is the place equipped with educational materials?

2. Interview the director and ask if he/she has a professional background in English education. I would avoid a school run by someone without experience in both teaching English and in administering a school. (I might consider someone who has a business background. Might.) I would avoid like a plague any school that advertises a hot new fad in learning English--like shouting.

3. Discuss the educational background of the teachers with the manager. Do the teachers have both education and experience in teaching English? If not, I'd keep looking.

4. I'd ask how often tests are given and if students can remain at one level until they master that level. A small school is not going to be able to manage that.

5. I'd discuss with my kid what specific rewards he will get if he makes satisfactory progress each month. (I'm a strong believer in positive reinforcement.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
just because



Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Location: Changwon - 4964

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My hagwon is very very well run...

My wonjang(director) speaks excellent english and is very familiar with western education having lived in canada 7 years....plus is one of the nicest people i have ever met plus likes to drink9always a bonus Very Happy )

There is one Korean teacher whose english is also great and is an awesoem person as well...

Plus there are us 2 foreigners whos english i would consider to be good enough to teach the language Very Happy

My hagwon is GREAT!!!!!


Not all hagwons are bad - i would send my child to this one if he was Korean
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OiGirl



Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Location: Hoke-y-gun

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cubanlord wrote:
I speak to languages and I have to say (currently working on my third...very slowly that is)....there is absolutely NO WAY to learn a second language without understanding what the new language does in your native language (if you are over the age of 12). Spanish was my first language (up until 4 when I started learning English). English is now my predominant language.

Remember.....the part of the brain that learns language begins its' countdown process the moment you are born. It shuts off around the ages of 8-12 (different in people). Once shut off...it is impossible to turn back on. This is where the translation part begins. Now...for argumentative sake...can that part be turned on again? I would say (merely speculation) maybe.....maybe....a 1 in 10,000 chance (in extreme situations). I'm going by what I have learned.


I speak to people, usually, sometimes to myself or to animals.

But seriously, there are plenty of things I know in Korean, that I understand through experience, that I don't know how to talk about in my first language. Same goes for Spanish, and most definately sign language. There are many concepts that defy translation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OiGirl



Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Location: Hoke-y-gun

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Badmojo wrote:
Gopher wrote:
Well you've just identified the key barrier to learning any foreign language.

Unless you can overcome your tendency to think of "baize" as "glass," you're not going to internalize Chinese. To acquire the language, you must enter the Chinese world of language expression. You must forget about "glass" and only think of "baize."

It's much more complicated than that, but, yeah, that's it. I knew that I was finally learning Spanish, for example, when I could read without translating the text in my mind.



Yes I agree that the language must be internalized. I also agree that when you can think in that language, you're almost home free, as in your Spanish example.

But my point and Cubanlord's too, I think, is this. You can't avoid translation until that point. And that point takes quite a bit of time to get to, especially in a country like Korea. For you to say you can just forget "glass" and think "baize" is ridiculous IMO, especially for beginners.

My Korean is hardly past the beginner stage, despite years of halfhearted study. However, I'm making the effort, especially in reading environmental print to not translate. I still depend heavily on symbol-sound correspondence (but am working on acquiring sight words -- it's less motivating when everything can be sounded out, except for Hanja, which has always been sight words.) But I try to make the connection between the word and the concept (or a visual image) directly, without using English.

Any ideas on how to explain to Koreans that this is an effective way to learn a language? Because they are so married to the translation idea and frankly, it's not working out for them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OiGirl



Joined: 23 Jan 2003
Location: Hoke-y-gun

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 6:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Badmojo wrote:
Gopher wrote:
Well you've just identified the key barrier to learning any foreign language.

Unless you can overcome your tendency to think of "baize" as "glass," you're not going to internalize Chinese. To acquire the language, you must enter the Chinese world of language expression. You must forget about "glass" and only think of "baize."

It's much more complicated than that, but, yeah, that's it. I knew that I was finally learning Spanish, for example, when I could read without translating the text in my mind.



Yes I agree that the language must be internalized. I also agree that when you can think in that language, you're almost home free, as in your Spanish example.

But my point and Cubanlord's too, I think, is this. You can't avoid translation until that point. And that point takes quite a bit of time to get to, especially in a country like Korea. For you to say you can just forget "glass" and think "baize" is ridiculous IMO, especially for beginners.


In China, the transarent thing you drink out of is always a "baize." That same vessel transported back home would be a "glass," and if it were brought to Korea, I wouldn't know what to call it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bosintang



Joined: 01 Dec 2003
Location: In the pot with the rest of the mutts

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 7:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the better side of the spectrum of hagwons, they seem to be run by people who are sincere, but really don't know what they're doing, and are too stubborn to change. The Korean teachers use ridiculously outdated and innefficient teaching methods. Few standards are expected of foreign teachers -- or "teachers", as Gopher put it -- as if children will learn a language by magical foreign presence alone.

On the other end of the spectrum, the industry is a complete sham. It's run and operated by pseudo-businessmen who have absolutely no education backgrounds, never bothered to buy the product themselves, and sold to controlling, manipulative, and most of all, gullible parents. Add in there a range of other players like recruiters and booksellers who have no vested interested except to get their own share of the pie.

And then there are public school jobs. Ridiculously overcrowded classes completely test-orientated with Korean teachers, and too infrequent with foreign teachers to make any meaningful difference.

Of course some people will pipe up about how their jobs are nothing but gumdrop waterfalls and fairy kisses, but anyone who seriously looks at this industry outside a bubble would have a hard-time putting a rose-tinted glass over it. And of course there really are exceptions, but it's not helpful to study industry trends by focusing on these.

Think how many hours your typical hagwon kid will study a week. 6 hagwon classes a week, half of those with a native speaker or even more, plus 3-4 classes a week at their public schools. Added up over a few years, that's a lot of time and money spent learning a foreign language. How many people here spent that much time of their childhood learning a foreign language?

And does any other country have as many native speakers teaching as Korea does? Face it, we're expensive to maintain. We cost more, we whine, we run away, we're hard to replace. And yet, we're used in such redundant, innefficient, or just plain useless roles.

Koreans are learning English, albeit very slowly but wiith the astonishing amount of effort and money Koreans are putting into it, Koreans should not just be learning English, they should be learning it well. I wonder how long Koreans can keep up the momentum and will to keep going. For the time and effort they're putting into it , the results to me are very inneffectual.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bosintang



Joined: 01 Dec 2003
Location: In the pot with the rest of the mutts

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 7:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cubanlord wrote:
What's up Gopher!

I must say that you are right about the "KT's teach in Korean and it is dependant upon traslation". I will say this; that is what we are here for. To suppliment what is being taught to them in Korean. We (the foreigners) show them how it is used.


hahah.........yeah.........

I'm thinking of one time I had the pleasure of getting to watch a foreign teacher during an interview. The boss was really proud of his teacher because he "talked a lot..children have lots opportunity to hear his voice", and indeed, despite there being no coherent lesson or language tasks, the teacher did certainly talk a lot. The children got to hear his wonderful voice. He was a good teacher.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
deessell



Joined: 08 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

deessell wrote:
Thats why we don't usually teach children grammar, they learn the rules innately like we did.


Embarassed I mean inductively.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International