|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Wrench
Joined: 07 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I too agree with gopher. I actually did learn english so from first hand experience a language is easier learned through acquisition then through learning. I don't get it either why Koreans have such a hard time with English. I teach Kindy and I think their methodology is absolute shit. They have us sing and dance for 25 minutes and they expect kids to learn. They force us to make the kids repeat everything like parrots and I know when I see their glazed looks on their faces that they have no clue what they are spouting. EFL is all about money and not enough about actuall teaching and the sole people who can be blamed are Koreans. I know of couple really good haqwans that actually teach english very well. Guess what they are both the best language institutes prolly in the country and they are not owned or operated by Koreans. On of the schools in Busan and its damn hard to get into it according to one of my coworkers. The requirements are that at least 2 consecutive hours are spent at the school, they use profesionaly written ESL and EFL material made in north america and you have to have one parent that is not Korean. Teaching is english is a joke, if they were serious about teaching they would ask foreigners what they would do different, but we all know that Koreans know best. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wrench wrote: |
| if they were serious about teaching they would ask foreigners what they would do different, but we all know that Koreans know best. |
A few months ago I attempted to broach the subject with my director and she smiled and said that it didn't matter that I had so many years teaching experience in other countries because I didn't have any experience in Korea. So I couldn't really know anything about it.
She -- she who doesn't even have a college education -- basically threw away all of the experience I have gained in one sweeping gesture and suggested that experience only counts if its country-specific.
I gave up trying to make any input at that point and just went back to the chanting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guangho

Joined: 19 Jan 2005 Location: a spot full of deception, stupidity, and public micturation and thus unfit for longterm residency
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To me, the fact that most Korean English teachers in hakwons do not speak English is enough to make their credibility vanish. There were four Korean English teachers at my hakwon: Two spoke English (fluently, but haltingly), one couldn't muster a sentence, and the fourth wanted to demonstrate her Korean superiority by asking English questions/issuing commands from the realm of the absurd. ("why you say 'hi' all the time?" "what means raining cats and dogs?" "you are teacher! you should know what i say!")
I understand that the set-up is to have a Korean teach grammar in Korean and a paleface prattle on so that the kids can practice, but the reality is that learning a language is about utilizing it, not memorizing inane phrases ('hi teacher! teacher hi!') and repeating them for years.
English is my second language too but I learned it because I had to. Nobody in Philly, Memphis, Oklahoma, whatever was going to learn Hungarian. I think it is that element- the element of compulsion- that's missing here. They learn English because it's cool and sorta prestigious to be around a native speaker. They don't learn it for the sake of learning or out of a need to do so.
Also, I think it is easier to learn to read and write another language than to speak it, especially when the alphabet and phonics are similar like they were with Hungarian and English. I did poorly in Russian class, partly because it was being force-fed to us during the Glory Days of Marxism but also partly because I could never pick up the alphabet. (Not that I tried too hard to do so.) The problem with Korea (as with other Pacific cultures) is that they are primarily oral in nature. (No trees=no paper= no books), so what would ordinarily be easier in acquiring a second language- writing skills- becomes harder here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JongnoGuru

Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
...
I gave up trying to make any input at that point and just went back to the chanting. |
Yay!! Let's do the Chanting again! We wants more than more and more of Chanting!
Pizza, Chicken, Pizza, Chicken
Eat them up, yum!
Time for lunch,
lunch, lunch, lunch,
Time for lunch, yum!
Gopher Teacher, we thinking the students get a tired about that Chanting. Please you providing students a new Chantings for making the students enjoyful? Please? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joe_doufu

Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: Elsewhere
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think one mistake we are making, is to think that when Koreans study "English", they are studying that language that we speak to each other in. In fact, Koreans are studying an abstract body of knowledge for the sole purpose of passing exams. (Somebody joked about opening Latin hagwons in the OT forum... seems like a perfect fit.)
So the students that we think are not successful, may actually be getting exactly what they want out of the hagwon system.
Which begs the question, why do they want US here??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JongnoGuru wrote: |
Gopher Teacher, we thinking the students get a tired about that Chanting. Please you providing students a new Chantings for making the students enjoyful? Please? |
Will this do?
"A one and a two and a ping pang pong!
A one and a two and a ping pang pong!
What will you do this summer? ping pang pong
What will you do this summer? ping pang pong
I will read books! R-E-A-D!
I will play soccer! P-L-A-Y!
I will ride a bike! B-I-K-E!
A one and a two and a ping pang pong!
A one and a two and a ping pang pong Yeah!"
I wish I were joking but that's really what I had to teach last week. For all the complaints about the hagwon system, it really is light years ahead of the public school curriculum- at least at the elementary school level. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Peppermint: Don't get me started on the chants, man. I'm going to be scarred by these chants. I'm going to start teaching them Marine Corps death chants. They won't know the difference. I'll just alter the tone of voice and it'll seem pleasant and peaceful...
I was recently mystified by one that treated "Let's go hiking!" but showed a picutre of a kid on a bike at the beach, as if there were some association between the phrase and the picture. I actually stopped the chant and looked at the pic for a minute or two to try and figure it out. That is, until one of the kids said "why?" (their word for "what?" "what's wrong" or "what's up"). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JongnoGuru

Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So, they use the chants in schools and hagwons.
Thank you so much, Peppermint. The childrens are most enjoyable for the new Chanting! Especially, ping pang pong! But now we having some concernings about the words and meaning of it. Especially, we did finding some disagreeful message for the childrens summer activities. We not want to thinking bad way about you, but you maybe inserts the small brainswash material or trickeries from your America and Canada culture point, yes? Summer is not for the freely enjoying the bike rides and soccer play or read just any books. It is for the Summer English Camp and diligence of study. It can be that a sometimes Dokdo Struggle outing with soccer play or like that, but the childrens needing our planning. Much much planning for their summer days. You make Chanting with suggestable message for the idle freely spending time too much. We think you must understand this Korea is not the American or the Canada.
Please you not disappoint us again, or we must calling to the Immigration. 
Last edited by JongnoGuru on Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kermo

Joined: 01 Sep 2004 Location: Eating eggs, with a comb, out of a shoe.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cubanlord wrote: |
Remember.....the part of the brain that learns language begins its' countdown process the moment you are born. It shuts off around the ages of 8-12 (different in people). Once shut off...it is impossible to turn back on. This is where the translation part begins. Now...for argumentative sake...can that part be turned on again? I would say (merely speculation) maybe.....maybe....a 1 in 10,000 chance (in extreme situations). I'm going by what I have learned. |
I've studied Foreign Language Acquisition too, and although I respect the people who come up with these theories, please remember they are often just *making this shit up.* Chomski, who proposed the "language acquisition device" you are describing, is one of the worst offenders when it comes to explaining phenomenona by creating mythical elements.
Take, for example, his statement that "children are born with a knowledge of the principles of the grammatical structure of all languages, and this inborn knowledge explains the success and speed with which they learn language."
Chomsky's theory of language acquisition
All children go through a Critical Learning Period in the first three years of their life. During this period, the child's Language Acquisition Device or LAD is active. It will be much more difficult for someone to acquire a language outside of the Critical Learning Period.
It is still very hypothetical as to how the Language Acquisition Device actually works, but the relative ease with which infants learn a language provides evidence for its existence.
How can that sort of statement be evaluated empirically? Chomsky is actually anti-empirical, and doesn't have too many nice things to say about "behavioural science" (he denounces it as "much preoccupied with data and organisation of data.") Some people hail him as a genius, but I wonder whether he is just too absurd to argue with. I wish university students would be encouraged to take a more critical look at the theories they are force-fed.
http://academics.tjhsst.edu/psych/oldPsych/language/chomsky.html
http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/chomsky.htm
http://www.timothyjpmason.com/WebPages/LangTeach/CounterChomsky.htm[/u] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JongnoGuru

Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kermo, what exactly possessed you to take that job you have? Don't answer that. And don't take it amiss. I'm just... kinda shaking my head. The same question can be asked of so many teachers here. I'd like to see an EFL programme on SBS/MBC featuring a cross-section of teachers who post here on Dave's. (Not holding my breath, though.)
Last edited by JongnoGuru on Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
matthewwoodford

Joined: 01 Oct 2003 Location: Location, location, location.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| the_beaver wrote: |
| In the meantime, many of the studies have to do with interaction. Lower level language users tend to communicate less and use a narrower range of language when in a situation with significantly higher ability language users. They also tend to have a more positive attitude and are less prone to discouragement when studying with learners of a similar level. |
I've read this too. It makes sense. If you're taking a language class it's galling to be paired with someone who can talk circles around you and it's also annoying trying to work with someone way lower than you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
matthewwoodford

Joined: 01 Oct 2003 Location: Location, location, location.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| guangho wrote: |
| The problem with Korea (as with other Pacific cultures) is that they are primarily oral in nature. (No trees=no paper= no books), so what would ordinarily be easier in acquiring a second language- writing skills- becomes harder here. |
Sorry but that is absolute rubbish. Not sure what you mean by 'Pacific' cultures since it sounds like you're talking about Polynesians, and what you say about paper and books would be better applicable to Polynesians. Everyone knows and uses the Roman alphabet here so that at least is not a problem.
I agree with you that one reason for not learning English is they don't have to. That's my excuse for not speaking Korean too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kermo wrote: |
| It is still very hypothetical as to how the Language Acquisition Device actually works, but the relative ease with which infants learn a language provides evidence for its existence. |
This is a really good point. My understanding is that we do not know whether it is best to use a deductive or inductive methodology, whether we should explicitly teach grammar, or just emphasize vocabulary, or whether it should be some mix of all of it, tailored to each student as an individual...
My point is this: from where I stand, we're not dealing with any of this in Korea. We're trapped in an unthinking dogma/hierarchy by non-qualified people who arrogantly assume they know everything about the problem and we know nothing...and they're just using us human tape recordings.
Maybe some hogwons are really spectacular; maybe there are some worthwhile positions here that actually free you to teach. They're not anywhere near my sphere of acquaintence here, however.
And to Guru: I plead ignorance of local conditions and an adventurous personality. Leaped without looking. Sometimes foolish, sometimes leads to discovery of entirely new things. But, in any case, I'll soon be extricated from this mess and relaxing somewhere where "dos cervezas, porfa," will produce the desired response... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cubanlord

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Location: In Japan!
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that would be, "dos cervezas, por favor". hehehehhe . You KNEW i couldn't resist!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kermo

Joined: 01 Sep 2004 Location: Eating eggs, with a comb, out of a shoe.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
My understanding is that we do not know whether it is best to use a deductive or inductive methodology, whether we should explicitly teach grammar, or just emphasize vocabulary, or whether it should be some mix of all of it, tailored to each student as an individual...
|
I do run my own "advanced" classes, and I'm responsible for the content. I have been given a rather good grammar book to work through (it's called "Up and Away In English" by Crowther) and the rest of the time, I play games and read books designed to challenge the students "Zone of Proximal Development" (this is Krashen's word, to describe the area just outside a students' comfort zone of knowledge), to encourage a positive attitude toward English, reward participation and authentic communication, and basically dream up ways in which students are rewarded when they try to communicate or understand. Right now, we're reading Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. We're having discussions, inventing new candies, doing crosswords to refresh vocabulary, etc.
If you're interested in finding out the very best means of teaching language, I would look into the research and methods of behaviour psychologists. It's low on theory, and high on data analysis. It's used to teach autistic kids to speak, so it doesn't rely on "Language Acquisition Devices" being turned on or off, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|