View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:19 am Post subject: Violent Clashes Feared Over MacArthur Statue in Incheon |
|
|
Fears of a violent clash mounted Friday after progressive civic groups wanting a statue of U.S. General Douglas MacArthur in Incheon pulled down and conservative groups determined to protect it to the very end announced simultaneous Sunday demonstrations in the city��s Freedom Park.
One pro-unification civic group told police it will hold a rally in front of the MacArthur statue from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Sunday. The gathering, which it expects to attract 100 people, will call for the expulsion of the U.S. military and the toppling of the statue.
Chosun Ilbo (July 15, 2005)
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200507/200507150022.html
Since 2002, Incheon police have been guarding the statue in the city's Freedom Park for fear of vandalism. Anti-U.S. demonstrations took place in the park in 2002 and 2003, according to the police.
Guards for McArthur angers civic groups
JoongAng Daily (December 01, 2004)
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/200411/30/200411302250512509900090409041.html
General Douglas MacArthur, was commander of Allied Forces in the Southwest Pacific during World War II, commander of the Allied Forces during the occupation of Japan, and commander of United Nations (U.N.) forces during the first nine months of the Korean War.
http://korea50.army.mil/history/biographies/macarthur.shtml |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Douglas MacArthur lobbied to nuke China during the Korean war.
He was convinced that several Chinese cities needed to have nuclear bombs dropped on them, precipitating his own removal from command, after a long and at times distinguished career.
That general wasn't what Korea needed, nor America. His time had passed.
Why should Koreans have a huge public tribute to him now that the pro-U.S. dictators have been removed from office? The Korean public can have their say through democratic means; in other words, it'll be a hot-button political issue that the next right-wing candidate for president won't want to make too much of due to public sentiments at the time being. It'll come down or be moved before the next election, because it serves the political interests of both sides to do so. A prediction. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leslie Cheswyck

Joined: 31 May 2003 Location: University of Western Chile
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ironic when you consider MacArthur nearly succeded in re-unifying Korea. That is, until the Chinese stepped in and ruined the whole thing.
The Chinese were what Korea didn't need. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Leslie Cheswyck wrote: |
The Chinese were what Korea didn't need. |
Of course, but beside the point.
Unless you think nuking China would have served America's longterm interests in the region. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dogbert

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just how wrong can you be, VanIslander?
China Ready to Use Nuclear Arms Against U.S.
We should have tagged the little devils before they stole from us the secret of splitting the atom. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Newbie

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Leslie Cheswyck wrote: |
Ironic when you consider MacArthur nearly succeded in re-unifying Korea. That is, until the Chinese stepped in and ruined the whole thing.
The Chinese were what Korea didn't need. |
Try explaining that to any Korean under 50 years old  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
To be fair, not many westerners know how it feels to be saved, developed, culturally dominated, and depend for your security on a stronger foreign power.
You don't have to live with a statue of Chairman Mao in New York. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dogbert

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
rapier wrote: |
To be fair, not many westerners know how it feels to be saved, developed, culturally dominated, and depend for your security on a stronger foreign power.
You don't have to live with a statue of Chairman Mao in New York. |
Chairman Mao didn't do dick for New York. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ike threatened Mao with nukes over the Matsu-Quemoy crisis. Mao said something like: go ahead, you'll only kill a few hundred million. (Reported in Ike's memoirs).
If Washington pulled out the troops, South Korea would have serious security issues. There would also be economic fallout.
The South Koreans aren't thinking this through. Not apparently concerned with the consequences. They'd probably be pledging allegiance to Pyongyang by 2006... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Leslie Cheswyck wrote: |
Ironic when you consider MacArthur nearly succeded in re-unifying Korea. That is, until the Chinese stepped in and ruined the whole thing. |
Interesting viewpoint. What made the Chinese step in, exactly? MacArthur saying he wasn't going to stop until he got to Beijing? Commenting about using nukes in China (and this was before the Chinese entered NK)? I'm no fan of Mao or Kim Il Sung, but what the US needed at the time was for MacArthur to listen to his boss and hold up the race to the Yalu- the success of the Incheon landing got him believing his own PR.
Anyway, it's kind of funny that people are fighting about the MaCarthur statue in Chayu park while less than a 100 M away is a giant sculpture dedicated to US-Korean friendship. You'd think the die hard Anti-US Koreans would be freaking out more over that than the saviour of Inchon.
My wife's from Inchon and I doubt you could find anyone her parents' age who say would anything bad about him or the US. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
The inscription at the MacArthur statue reads:
"We shall never forget what he and his valiant officers and men of the United Nations Command did here for us and for freedom. And until the last battle against the malignant infection of communism has finally been won, may we never forget it was also he who said 'In war, there is no substitute for victory.'"
South Koreans doubt relevance of MacArthur
By Jeremy Kirk, The Washington Times (January 18, 2005)
http://washingtontimes.com/world/20050117-100732-5590r.htm
Would civic groups and South Koreans prefer this statue?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/02/01/wnkor01.xml
http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/images/pictures/ideasnk7.jpg
http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/old-ideas/ideasnk7.html
Kim Il-sung started the war to place South Korea under his control by force, but as a result of the war he lost 1,500 square miles (3,840 square kilometers) of land to South Korea. Korea is still divided by a 248km-long and 4km-wide buffer zone called the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ). The war was the greatest tragedy the Korean people had ever suffered in their 5,000-year-long history.
Not many historians believe that Kim Il-sung was merely a puppet who initiated the war at the behest of his Soviet and Chinese bosses. Documents made available to the public recently in Russia and China clearly show that it was Kim Il-sung himself who first brought up the idea of war, and begged his bosses, Stalin and Mao, to help him in carrying out the war. Kim��s blind ambition to rule a united Korea under his Communist dictatorship resulted in one of the bloodiest wars in the history of the world. Therefore, Kim Il-sung, who died in 1994, will remain a war criminal whom the Korean people will never forget. A Korean War memorial is in Washington, D.C., next to the Lincoln Memorial. The inscription on the marble wall reads: FREEDOM IS NOT FREE.
This piece is dedicated to all those who died in the Korean War.
http://monthly.chosun.com/html/200005/200005220017_21.html
Last edited by Real Reality on Fri Jul 15, 2005 8:32 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
This coincides with the problem in Pyongtaek. The government has had 2 years to buy up land for the planned move from Yongsan by the end of this year. Naturally, it hasn't done so. The good people of Pyongtaek (some of them) have decided they don't want the move. Not In My Back Yard!
Both issues could be solved by a phone call from Condi.
Condi: Pres. Noh? Is that you? How are you? Having a good day are we? Good. There's something we need you to do.
There is a small problem. We need you to make a speech saying the troops are moving out of Yongsan, just like we agreed to do back in '85 and every Korean government since then has stalled doing anything about. We'd like you to say this is the express wish of the present Korean government.
If that isn't true, that's OK. We understand. We're packing up to move and it's just as easy to ship the boxes to Guam as it is to Pyongtaek. In fact, it is probably easier as we wouldn't have to deal with drivers on the roads.
There is also the matter of the MacArthur statue in Incheon. You remember the Incheon Landing don't you? That's the one where the entire North Korean Army ended up on the run out of Seoul. Good, I though you'd remember it. We don't really care what you do with the statue. It's just a symbol. As you know, appearance doesn't mean anything.
Thanks for the speech. We'll be listening for it in the next couple of days. You have a nice day now. Hear?
Bye-bye. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wrench
Joined: 07 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well I think they should really see what it would be with out the americans. Maybe they need to feel the full consequences before they see the light. I personnaly think the economy will tank when the yanks pull out. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiberious aka Sparkles

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
This coincides with the problem in Pyongtaek. The government has had 2 years to buy up land for the planned move from Yongsan by the end of this year. Naturally, it hasn't done so. The good people of Pyongtaek (some of them) have decided they don't want the move. Not In My Back Yard!
Both issues could be solved by a phone call from Condi.
Condi: Pres. Noh? Is that you? How are you? Having a good day are we? Good. There's something we need you to do.
There is a small problem. We need you to make a speech saying the troops are moving out of Yongsan, just like we agreed to do back in '85 and every Korean government since then has stalled doing anything about. We'd like you to say this is the express wish of the present Korean government.
If that isn't true, that's OK. We understand. We're packing up to move and it's just as easy to ship the boxes to Guam as it is to Pyongtaek. In fact, it is probably easier as we wouldn't have to deal with drivers on the roads.
There is also the matter of the MacArthur statue in Incheon. You remember the Incheon Landing don't you? That's the one where the entire North Korean Army ended up on the run out of Seoul. Good, I though you'd remember it. We don't really care what you do with the statue. It's just a symbol. As you know, appearance doesn't mean anything.
Thanks for the speech. We'll be listening for it in the next couple of days. You have a nice day now. Hear?
Bye-bye. |
Wicked funny.
Sparkles*_* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tiberious aka Sparkles wrote: |
Wicked funny.
|
Agreed. It'd be nice to see that published in the Times or the Herald, or even a real newspaper. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|