|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Hank Scorpio

Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Ann Arbor, MI
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
bigverne wrote: |
You do realise, of course, that muslims do not consitute a 'race'. |
Yep. Try talking to a Khaldean sometime, Bobster. You want to see hatred of Islam? These folks have it to spare, and with a lot of good reasons. Of course, their big fear is that they'll be lumped in with the Muslims since they're also arabs.
Good folks, the Khaldeans, and if you ever have a chance go to one of their weddings. Easily the most fun wedding I've ever been to. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Note to self: go see Khaldean wedding.
Last night I saw an hour documentary on Kosovo in 1999 and now, six years later. NHK. Quite good. Internet here was down for a few days.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
This is good news. It doesn't really go far enough though. We should be closing down hakwons and only allowing government licensed hakwons to operate. It's time to really close in on the foreigner community, and bring it crashing down to earth with a real thump.......Bring the bastards down. |
Hagwons should be licensed, and those who flagrantly ignore Korea's laws (i.e handing forged documents to the authorities which is considered a serious offence in the UK) should be clamped down on. The analogy sticks and your attempts to undermine it are disingenuous.
Quote: |
Does the entire Muslim community deserve to suffer for the acts of the extremists? Even those Muslims who do condem the attacks? And how would you find out? |
It's deceitful of you to invent my position for me. It's otherwise known as the strawman. There was no suggestion that all muslims should suffer irrespective of their allegiences, but rather that the government should pursue the extremists with equal vigour as they pursue the BNP. I alluded to this a few pages back. The BNP doesn't advocate mass murder but it has suffered from indiscriminate government attacks for years while at the same time Islamists were preaching hatred, and calling for another holocaust with impunity. The liberal elite have shelted and excused the behaviour of those calling for the mass murder of their own compatriots for an unacceptable amount of time. Even now, Ken Livingston is offering an olive branch to the extremists by refering to Israel when engaging in discussion about the 7/7 attacks.
Quote: |
Would there be special teams prowling the street asking them "Are you a illegal teacher..." Whoops sorry I meant "Do you support the terror attacks?" |
Don't be so ridiculous. If there was an interview and a presenter asked a cleric "do you condemn the 7/7 attacks?" and the cleric responded with "No I refuse to condemn them lalalalal" then he should be prosecuted. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gwangjuboy wrote: |
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
This is good news. It doesn't really go far enough though. We should be closing down hakwons and only allowing government licensed hakwons to operate. It's time to really close in on the foreigner community, and bring it crashing down to earth with a real thump.......Bring the bastards down. |
(1) Hagwons should be licensed, and those who flagrantly ignore Korea's laws (i.e handing forged documents to the authorities which is considered a serious offence in the UK) should be clamped down on. The analogy sticks and your attempts to undermine it are disingenuous.
Quote: |
Does the entire Muslim community deserve to suffer for the acts of the extremists? Even those Muslims who do condem the attacks? And how would you find out? |
(2) It's deceitful of you to invent my position for me. It's otherwise known as the strawman. There was no suggestion that all muslims should suffer irrespective of their allegiences, but rather that the government should pursue the extremists with equal vigour as they pursue the BNP. I alluded to this a few pages back. The BNP doesn't advocate mass murder but it has suffered from indiscriminate government attacks for years while at the same time Islamists were preaching hatred, and calling for another holocaust with impunity. The liberal elite have shelted and excused the behaviour of those calling for the mass murder of their own compatriots for an unacceptable amount of time. Even now, Ken Livingston is offering an olive branch to the extremists by refering to Israel when engaging in discussion about the 7/7 attacks....
. |
(Numbers are mine)
1. The analogy was mine. It was the other people attempting to undermine it. Try and read more clearly. I MADE THE ANALOGY. Glad you agree it sticks though.
2. I am not inventing your position. It is deceitful of you to pretend this, when the below link clearly shows that you said this "Deport all Muslims from the U.K." And now you claim that "...there was no suggestion that all muslims should suffer... In the below link you clearly said ALL.
http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/korea/viewtopic.php?t=42835&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/korea/viewtopic.php?t=42835&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15 |
Was your sarcasm radar doing strange things when you read that?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gwangjuboy wrote: |
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/korea/viewtopic.php?t=42835&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15 |
Was your sarcasm radar doing strange things when you read that?  |
The problem with sarcasm over the 'Net is that it's very hard to read it. Maybe you should have put in a smilie or two to indicate this next time.
Anyway I am glad to hear that was not intended seriously, but I am sure you can see how I got that idea. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bigverne wrote: |
Quote: |
If islam could perform a vast surgical removal of its many offensive and hate-inciting passages |
Impossible. The Koran is the last, immutable word of God, and is therefore unchangeable. To even propose such an idea would be met with charges of apostasy. Even 'moderate' muslims do not argue with this. Some muslims, who do argue for a more nuanced interpretation in the Koran, unfortunately represent a lunatic fringe. |
Thursday August 11, 02:40 PM
Rushdie calls for Muslim Reformation
LONDON (Reuters) - Novelist Salman Rushdie, sentenced to death in 1989 by a Moslem edict for "The Satanic Verses", called on Thursday for an Islamic Reformation to update the religion and broaden its appeal to the young.
Writing in The Times newspaper, Rushdie said that in cities such as Leeds -- home to three of the four rucksack bombers who attacked London on July 7 -- Muslims were living in "near-segregation from the wider population".
"From such defensive, separated worlds some youngsters have indefensibly stepped across a moral line and taken up their lethal rucksacks," he wrote.
Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini issued the fatwa, or edict, instructing Muslims to kill Rushdie for "The Satanic Verses", which he considered blasphemous.
The fatwa, which forced Rushdie into hiding, was officially lifted in 1998 and Rushdie now lives openly in Britain.
Rushdie said Islam needed wholesale reform to end some Muslims' separation from the rest of society.
"What is needed is a move beyond tradition -- nothing less than a reform movement to bring the core concepts of Islam into the modern age, a Muslim Reformation to combat not only the jihadi ideologues but also the dusty, stifling seminaries of the traditionalists, throwing open the windows of the closed communities to let in much-needed fresh air."
The India-born author urged Muslims to read the Koran as a historical document and "a product of its place and time" rather than a book whose teachings are set in stone.
"Few Muslims have been permitted to study their religious book in this way," he said.
"If ... the Koran were seen as a historical document, then it would be legitimate to reinterpret it to suit the new conditions of successive new ages. Laws made in the 7th century could finally give way to the needs of the 21st.
"The Islamic Reformation has to begin here, with an acceptance that all ideas, even sacred ones, must adapt to altered realities."
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/11082005/325/rushdie-calls-muslim-reformation.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bigverne

Joined: 12 May 2004
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
And what happened to this man who dared to 'defame' Islam? He lives under a death sentence and the Japanese translator of his book had his throat slit. Debate about Islam is impossible when even the slightest questioning and criticism is met with violence. There are some muslims (Rushdie, Ishad Manji) who would like a more historical, allegorical interpretation of the Koran, but they are massively outnumbered by the extremists and 'moderates' who stick to medieval literalism. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fresh deportations now in the U.K. definitely sending the right message. Blair's handling it well at this stage.
should there be any rioting at this new law then I'd say he'd be free to deport a whole lot more.
Britain Bars Radical Cleric From Returning By MICHAEL McDONOUGH, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 14 minutes ago
LONDON - Britain on Friday barred radical Muslim cleric Omar Bakri from returning to the country that was his home for the past 20 years, saying his presence was no longer "conducive to the public good."
The decision came as the country's top legal official defended plans to deport another radical Muslim cleric and nine other foreigners suspected of posing a threat to national security.
Jordan said Friday it would ask Britain next week to extradite one of those detained, cleric Omar Mahmoud Othman Abu Omar, also known as Abu Qatada. Spanish officials have described him as Osama bin Laden's "spiritual ambassador in Europe."
Bakri, 45, left Britain on Saturday, one day after Prime Minister Tony Blair proposed tough new anti-terrorism measures including the deportation of extremist Islamic clerics who preach hate. Bakri was arrested in Lebanon on Thursday.
Bakri, who has dual Syrian and Lebanese citizenship, had come under increasing pressure from the British government for his hardline rhetoric after last month's transit bombings. He had insisted that he planned to return to north London, where his wife and children live.
Home Secretary Charles Clarke had written to Bakri to inform him he would not be allowed back into Britain. The cleric has 14 days to appeal.
"The Home Secretary has issued an order revoking Omar Bakri Mohammed's indefinite leave to remain and to exclude him from the U.K. and the grounds that his presence is not conducive to the public good," the Home Office said in a statement.
Bakri founded the now-disbanded radical Islamic group al-Muhajiroun, which came under scrutiny in Britain, particularly after some of its members praised the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.
A spokesman for Britain's Crown Prosecution Service said Thursday prosecutors were looking at Bakri's recent remarks to assess whether he could be charged with solicitation of murder or incitement to withhold information known to be of use to police.
Meanwhile Britain's plans to deport the 10 foreigners have sparked fears for their safety in their destination countries.
The Home Office did not identify the detainees. But a government official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue, confirmed that Abu Qatada, a Palestinian cleric who carries a Jordanian passport, was among them.
A statement from Abu Qatada's lawyer said the detainees were "primarily Algerians."
Lord Chancellor Charles Falconer said it was necessary to balance the risk of a deportee being mistreated against the threat they pose to Britain. He added that the government may seek new human rights legislation to make the deportations easier. The measure would be among a raft of tough new anti-terrorism laws announced in the wake of the July bombings.
"The deportee has got rights, but so have the people of this country," Falconer told British Broadcasting Corp. radio. "If they are threatened in terms of national security, that is something that the government has got to protect them against as much as possible."
As a signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights, Britain is not allowed to deport people to countries where they may face torture of mistreatment. The government has been trying to sign agreements guaranteeing humane treatment of deportees with 10 countries, including Algeria, Lebanon, Egypt and Tunisia. The first such memorandum of understanding was signed with Jordan on Wednesday.
The detentions and are another indication of the dramatic impact of last month's bombings in a country until recently regarded as something of a safe haven for radicals.
"The circumstances of our national security have changed, it is vital that we act against those who threaten it," Home Secretary Clarke said.
Abu Qatada was granted political asylum in Britain in 1993. He has been in jail or under close supervision here since 2002, but now faces deportation to Jordan where authorities convicted him in absentia in 1998 and again in 2000 for involvement in a series of explosions and terror plots.
British authorities believe Abu Qatada inspired the lead Sept. 11 hijacker Mohamed Atta and he is suspected of having links with radical groups across Europe.
Jordanian Interior Minister Awni Yirfas said his country would request Abu Qatada's extradition next week. A spokesman for Britain's Home Office had no immediate reaction.
The cleric's lawyer, Gareth Peirce, condemned the detentions. Her firm said in a statement that the detainees had not been allowed to see their lawyers.
Like Abu Qatada, some of the foreigners detained Thursday had spent up to three years in jail without trial under sweeping anti-terror legislation until their release in March after Britain's highest court ruled the detentions unlawful. Since then, they have been supervised under so-called control orders, such as curfew or house arrest, and banned from using the telephone or Internet.
The Home Office said the detainees had five working days to appeal deportation — a process that could drag on for months. A spokeswoman insisted they would not be deported until the British government gained assurances from the destination countries that they will not be treated inhumanely.
Civil rights campaigners and the U.N. special envoy on torture, Manfred Nowak, have warned, however, that such assurances carry no weight in international law and would not sufficiently protect the deportees.
"The assurances of known torturers, many of whom deny the use of torture even when it is widely documented, are not worth the paper they are written on," said Mike Blakemore, a spokesman for Amnesty International. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matthewwoodford

Joined: 01 Oct 2003 Location: Location, location, location.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
rapier wrote: |
Rushdie calls for Muslim Reformation
LONDON (Reuters) - Novelist Salman Rushdie, sentenced to death in 1989 by a Moslem edict for "The Satanic Verses", called on Thursday for an Islamic Reformation to update the religion and broaden its appeal to the young. |
Ironic really. It's the young who are the bloody problem. Ideals, passion, and, unfortunately, extremism appeal to the young.
rapier wrote: |
Writing in The Times newspaper, Rushdie said that in cities such as Leeds -- home to three of the four rucksack bombers who attacked London on July 7 -- Muslims were living in "near-segregation from the wider population". |
There's a loaded term. An author like Rushdie has to know it connotes white institutionalized racism to most of us. Does he really think the segregation in this case is imposed from without? Or just leave it open to his readers to interpet it that way?
rapier wrote: |
"From such defensive, separated worlds some youngsters have indefensibly stepped across a moral line and taken up their lethal rucksacks," he wrote.
Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini issued the fatwa, or edict, instructing Muslims to kill Rushdie for "The Satanic Verses", which he considered blasphemous.
The fatwa, which forced Rushdie into hiding, was officially lifted in 1998 and Rushdie now lives openly in Britain. |
It's good that it was lifted. A figure accused of blasphemy tho' seems an unlikely candidate to lead a Muslim reformation. Still, it would be nice to see Britain become an epicentre for a liberalised version of Islam rather than extremism. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bigverne

Joined: 12 May 2004
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
An author like Rushdie has to know it connotes white institutionalized racism to most of us |
.
Please explain what you mean by this? In many parts of the UK, muslims live in segregated communities out of choice, as indeed, do many whites. Despite government attempts to promote multiculturalism, it would seem that certain groups just do not mix, and sometimes there is nobody to blame for that.
Quote: |
Still, it would be nice to see Britain become an epicentre for a liberalised version of Islam rather than extremism. |
And how likely is that when the leader of the largest 'moderate' muslim group in the UK, the MCB, said of Salman Rushdie 'death is perhaps too easy for him'. When people talk of a 'liberalised' version of Islam, they are applying Western ideals to a philosophy incapable of liberalism. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bigverne

Joined: 12 May 2004
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
The mollycoddling of the muslim community continues;
Police in Nottinghamshire are being given green ribbons to show solidarity with the Muslim community after a rise in racist attacks.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/nottinghamshire/4144368.stm
But apparently no ribbons for those affected by muslim terrorism. As long as we show 'sensitivity' to the muslim community everything will be fine.
This is almost as silly as the recent guidelines given to Bedfordshire Police, instructing them, amongst other things 'to take off their shoes and not interrupt anyone praying during raids of Muslim homes'.
Check out the link, it's almost unbelievable. Amongst the gems are;
Advice should be sought before considering the use of cameras and camcorders due to the risk of capturing individuals, especially women, in inappropriate dress - God forbid!!
Non-Muslims are not allowed to touch holy books, Qurans or religious artifacts without permission. - So there you go lads. If you want to hide any sensitive material, hide it in your hollowed out Koran! Of course, the reason that non-muslims cannot touch said holy books, is because in Islamic Law, kafirs are considered unclean, alongside dogs and urine.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45571 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
bigverne wrote: |
The mollycoddling of the muslim community continues;
Advice should be sought before considering the use of cameras and camcorders due to the risk of capturing individuals, especially women, in inappropriate dress - God forbid!!
Non-Muslims are not allowed to touch holy books, Qurans or religious artifacts without permission. - So there you go lads. If you want to hide any sensitive material, hide it in your hollowed out Koran! Of course, the reason that non-muslims cannot touch said holy books, is because in Islamic Law, kafirs are considered unclean, alongside dogs and urine.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45571 |
Incredible..i wonder how those guidelines compare to the ones used by the british in belfast in the 70's and 80's when they raided catholic homes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|