| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Did Old Man Bush have a hand in killing JFK ??? |
| Yes, it's quite likely |
|
29% |
[ 5 ] |
| No, that's impossible |
|
29% |
[ 5 ] |
| Maybe |
|
35% |
[ 6 ] |
| Gee, I've never considered that possibilty ... tell me more ... |
|
5% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 17 |
|
| Author |
Message |
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 9:50 pm Post subject: Re: Video: JFK II - The Bush Connection |
 |
|
Not even going to bother, and can you guess why?
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
A thorough, documented, criminal indictment of George Herbert Walker Bush, establishing beyond a reasonable doubt his guilt as a supervisor in the conspiracy to assassinate John F. Kennedy ...
|
If this had even a glimmering of truth we wouldn't be reading it here first... from you. It would have been all over CNN, BBC, NYT etc.
But of course that didn't happen, because of, you know, the conspiracy... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:03 pm Post subject: Re: Video: JFK II - The Bush Connection |
|
|
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
A thorough, documented, criminal indictment of George Herbert Walker Bush, establishing beyond a reasonable doubt his guilt as a supervisor in the conspiracy to assassinate John F. Kennedy ...
|
I'd heard about the GH Walker Bush connexion to the JFK assasination a few years ago. Interesting the things you come across when you Google it.
Seek & ye shall find ...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=bush+jfk+assassination&spell=1
| Bulsajo wrote: |
If this had even a glimmering of truth we wouldn't be reading it here first... from you. It would have been all over CNN, BBC, NYT etc.
But of course that didn't happen, because of, you know, the conspiracy... |
Mainstream corporate media 
" ... reporting all the news that's fit to print".
What's that's old saying about TRUTH often being even STRANGER than fiction ???
Last edited by igotthisguitar on Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:18 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| When the BBC run the story you can say "I told you so." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gopher
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
deleted
Last edited by Gopher on Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:45 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Highly unlikely, at least from where Oswald supposedly shot him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gopher
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bucheon bum wrote: |
| Highly unlikely, at least from where Oswald supposedly shot him. |
Unlikely or not, what most people deal with are probabilities and circumstantial evidence -- an awful lot of "could haves" and "might haves."
We don't have enough direct evidence to make a firm conclusion about this event. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| and given that evidence, it is probable he didn't do it. Evidence being the distance of the shot, the # of shots fired, and the angle the bullets went into the body. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
>. Has anyone watched the video documentary ???
http://madcowpolitics.com/jfk2bb.wmv
What claims do you agree with ??? Which ones do you think are nonsense ???
igtg. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gopher
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bucheon bum wrote: |
| and given that evidence, it is probable he didn't do it. Evidence being the distance of the shot, the # of shots fired, and the angle the bullets went into the body. |
if all you have is a plausible theory, then all you have is a plausible theory...
Who do you propose was the trigger man, by the way? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gopher
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
| Gopher wrote: |
| Who do you propose was the trigger man, by the way? |
MEN much more likely.
E. Howard Hunt & Frank L. Sturgis have each been fingered as shooters. Both also happened to be two of "Dirty" *beep* Nixon's Watergate "Plumbers". |
Hunt shot Kennedy?
Cite your evidence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
Hunt shot Kennedy?
Cite your evidence. |
You do your homework. This isn't my responsibility ... ya ding dong.
Obviously you didn't bother to watch the MADCOW video 
He was found guilty of the President's murder & then years later, during WATERGATE extorted $1,000,000 from Nixon to keep him quiet.
Who gave the CIA assassin Hunt the "hush" $$$ ??? Bush's long time business partner : William Liedtke 
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jfk+liedtke+hunt+bush+
All a mere happy coincidence of course.
http://madcowpolitics.com/jfk2bb.wmv
p.s. In case anyone is REALLY convinced it's utterly impossible old man Bush ( any guesses what U.S. city he was in on November 23rd ??? ) could of had anything to do with JFK's public execution, the name ZAPATA has for researchers long helped to shed a lotta light on a few things.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=jfk+zapata+bush |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
joe_doufu
Joined: 09 May 2005
Location: Elsewhere
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
| the name ZAPATA has for researchers long helped to shed a lotta light on a few things. |
Do you mean Zapruder?
PS That George HW Bush is one smart cookie. I was reading "The Selling of the President 1968" a while back, an astonishingly good read. For those who don't know, "The Making of the President 1960" was one of the first "campaign stories" written by a journalist, and "1968" was a take off of this. The 1968 campaign was the first presidential campaign year in which both sides used professional marketing/advertising strategy instead of old fashioned "campaigning" (creating catchy jingles, relying on local party chapters to win votes, etc). Of course that's normal nowadays but the writer of "1968" was appalled and he wrote the book as a tell-all expose of sin and plotting.
The point I'm working up to is this. In an early chapter they mention the men who became Nixon's chief campaign strategists, and their background. They said that these techniques had never been used in a Presidential campaign before, but they got a "test" the previous year in the Senate campaign of a young man in Texas named George Bush.
That guy was on the cutting edge even back then. And now look, he's secured the Presidency for himself, a history-making Presidency for his first son, and almost guaranteed the job for another son and a grandson. Damn, he's good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| joe_doufu wrote: |
| Damn, he's good. |
He certainly is. I never appreciated that when he was in office; he always seemed like a little bit of a lost bumbler who made it into the office on the reputation of his predecessor.
But looking back you can see that he left the CIA with his reputation relatively intact, and considering that he lost the re-election he also left the presidency relatively painlessly and scandal-free.
No mean feats, those.
And he's been especially careful about voicing approval-disapproval of the actions of his son the former president.
A slick guy, you have to admire that to a certain extent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
