| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 5:20 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Well?
Would you like me to give you a few hints? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leslie Cheswyck
Joined: 31 May 2003
Location: University of Western Chile
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Canadian po-lice to be givin' mo power to Snoop.
I don't think so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bulsajo wrote: |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
Speaking of refreshing, in case you missed it the first time i posted it, here's another little something which is related to our discussion here. While i've yet to read the entire document
i still can heardly believe something like this would ever have been published.
Canada & the New Challenges Posed by Corruption in the New World Order: A Literature Review
Distributed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Website 
You got your copy?
http://www.rcmp.ca/ccaps/reports/corruption_e.pdf |
Just let me know when you've finished reading it. Alternately, I could save you the trouble and spell out how this thread proves you're a moron. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hint #1:
To understand the meaning of this astonishing document,
there are only 3 pages
(out of 60 or so including appendices, etc.)
that you need concern yourself with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bulsajo wrote: |
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
I wonder what checks will be in place in order to ensure accountability. |
It's called The Security Intelligence Review Committee, The Office of the Inspector General of CSIS, the RCMP External Review Committee, and The Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP. |
That's a lot like leaving a gang of sly foxes to guard the hen house. You're obviously a LOT more trusting than i
| Quote: |
| "Who polices the police?" |
| Bulsajo wrote: |
See above, as well as The Solicitor General of Canada.
|
See above. Circular reasoning.
No, btw, i'm not "afraid" of Canada ( or for that matter the world's ) big bad policemen & women. Why are bent on being so presumptuous & confrontational? That kinda language = little more than Joo - lite.
There are decent cops with a lot on their plates. Some serve well for years doing the best job they can. However, there are also HIGHLY CORRUPT elements within the ranks of police as well. Not just in foreign places either. Kudos to the whistle-blowers.
These sick forces within "the system" need to be held accountable for their heavy handed & ill-guided actions. This includes lying, assault, graft, profitting from their involvement with "illegal" drugs, framing of innocent victims etc.
Greater citizen involvement & the spreading of general awareness can help fight the dark rising tide of police state excess, invasion & abuse.
Don't you agree ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Who do you think you're fooling?
Your pathetic attempts to redirecte the thread away from the fact that YOU DON'T EVEN READ THE LINKS YOU POST are not working.
You've done it in this thread and I'd be willing to bet you do it in most- if not all- the links you post here.
Everything you post here is utter BS.
The fact that you're flake doesn't bother me, it's the fact that you're a liar.
Lucky for us you're a bad one and easy to spot.
HINT #2:
The first page (of only 3 pages) that you need to read is page 2.
Page 2! Not page 17, or 37, or Appendix E. Page 2!
YOU DIDN'T EVEN GET AS FAR AS PAGE 2 BEFORE POSTING THAT LINK HERE! TWICE!
In case you've forgotten already, this is what you wrote:
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
Speaking of refreshing, in case you missed it the first time i posted it, here's another little something which is related to our discussion here. While i've yet to read the entire document i still can heardly believe something like this would ever have been published.
Canada & the New Challenges Posed by Corruption in the New World Order: A Literature Review
Distributed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Website
You got your copy?
http://www.rcmp.ca/ccaps/reports/corruption_e.pdf |
Are you ready to come clean yet or should I continue to humiliate you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Man known as The Man
Joined: 29 Mar 2003
Location: 3 cheers for Ted Haggard oh yeah!
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| continue |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, it'll be up to him; He's already admitted in a PM to not having read the document at the link.
If he decides to read it and somehow still isn't convinced he's made an utter fool of himself, well then he knows where to find this thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bulsajo wrote: |
Well, it'll be up to him; He's already admitted in a PM to not having read the document at the link.
If he decides to read it and somehow still isn't convinced he's made an utter fool of himself, well then he knows where to find this thread. |
| Bulsajo wrote: |
confession time- you never actually read any of that 'document', did you?
You just saw the title and the fact that it was posted on an RCMP website.
Fess up, and I'll let it drop. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Shall I post the rest of it?
You admitted to not having read it and gave a lame excuse "it's on my other computer".
Yes, I would have dropped it if you had admitted to it here, which- BTW- you're still not doing.
| Gopher wrote: |
Your answers are like a fast-peddling wheeler-dealer with lots of fast hand movements and millions of links. You undermine yourself.
Can't you just give short answers and cite evidence without linking every conspiracy theory you get on Google? |
And I would add that you should also try reading some of those links before posting them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
Your answers are like a fast-peddling wheeler-dealer with lots of fast hand movements and millions of links. You undermine yourself.
Can't you just give short answers and cite evidence without linking every conspiracy theory you get on Google? |
While on the one hand i love your array of "sexy" eye-catching avatars, your criticism here is entirely unfounded:
Style over substance
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=style+substance+fallacy
You want a short answer? "Evidence" ? Well then, don't be afraid. Just CLICK on the link.
Why nasty little "JOO-LITE" guys like you prowl around itching for a "virtual" scrap i have no idea. If you're not on somebody's payroll, i suppose we can only chalk it up to something comparable to "small man's complex" ... i guess |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
| While on the one hand i love your array of "sexy" eye-catching avatars, your criticism here is entirely unfounded |
You mean my criticism that you are posting links you haven't read?
"i still can heardly believe something like this would ever have been published." -igotthisguitar
It's been over 2 weeks now, have you read it yet? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
