Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

4 RCMP killed in Alta marijuana raid
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 1:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I would say yes, to a certain extent, by necessity. However, most Canadian casualties happened much later in the war, when all the allies were treating life as more disposible to acheive their goals.

A much better parallel would be 1914-1917, when Canadians clearly had a much lower regard for the life of their men than Americans did.


Yu Bum:

Thanks for the polite, succinct reply.

I guess the question then becomes how much Canadians could have anticipated the casualty rate in 1939, plus how much of an option it would've been for them to withdrawq from the war after the casualty rate started to mount.

Good point about WWI.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:
Quote:
I would say yes, to a certain extent, by necessity. However, most Canadian casualties happened much later in the war, when all the allies were treating life as more disposible to acheive their goals.

A much better parallel would be 1914-1917, when Canadians clearly had a much lower regard for the life of their men than Americans did.


Yu Bum:

Thanks for the polite, succinct reply.

I guess the question then becomes how much Canadians could have anticipated the casualty rate in 1939, plus how much of an option it would've been for them to withdrawq from the war after the casualty rate started to mount.

Good point about WWI.


One of the many negative consequences of war is that it cheapens the value of life for all sides concerned. This is yet another good reason to avoid it at almost any cost.

A soceity rife with violent crime has a similar effect, though this is more indirectly related to the political will of a nation. The fact that this event - a horrific tragedy, but small compared to what is going on in the world today - is having such a huge impact on Canadian society shows how very lucky we've been in recent times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 4:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ex-Mayerthorpe RCMP commander frustrated by second-guessing over shootings

Mon Mar 7, 3:22 PM ET
MICHELLE MACAFEE

MAYERTHORPE, Alta. (CP) - The former RCMP commander in the town where four slain Mounties are being mourned said Monday he understands some of the second-guessing across Canada about how the force handled the killer.

But Kim Connell, a 29-year veteran who spent his last 10 years in the Mayerthorpe detachment, also said he's directing his anger and frustration at the justice system that gave James Roszko so much freedom to be the menace he was.

Roszko was a convicted pedophile who spent 2�� years in prison. But he managed to avoid jail over the years on numerous other charges ranging from assault to weapons offences.

"When these people show these violent natures, put them in jail," said Connell, who commanded the detachment and worked with slain officer Peter Schiemann.

"Quit listening to the sob stories of the defence counsel, 'Oh, my client's going to do better next time.' After two or three times it's obvious they're not going to be rehabilitated. Why are they out there?"

Police say Schiemann, 25, Anthony Gordon, 28, Brock Myrol, 29, and Leo Johnston, 32, were ambushed by Roszko, who was a known cop-hater and community pariah, in a metal Quonset hut they were guarding.

The officers had been staking out his property while investigating stolen car parts and a small marijuana grow operation.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1845&ncid=1845&e=1&u=/cpress/20050307/ca_pr_on_na/rcmp_shootings

This certainly sheds some light on matters.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Alias



Joined: 24 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Ottawa lawyer Eugene Oscapella, one of the founders of the Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy, fears some dangerous repercussions as a result of the swift finger-pointing at marijuana grow-ops last week.

"You are going to see more violent raids now as police point to what happened in Alberta as proof that the people operating grow-ops are armed and dangerous and possibly crazy," he said.

"That may lead to the militarization of the illegal drug trade -- police have bigger weapons and use more violent tactics, so growers may then arm themselves. And all the state really has to do to end this insanity is get rid of the lucrative black market that encourages large grow-ops. The economies of prohibition are pretty plain -- you don't have to be a brilliant economist to get this."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 2:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gunman who killed 4 Mounties in Alta didn't meet dangerous offender criteria
JOHN COTTER
Thu Oct 6, 6:31 PM ET

EDMONTON (CP) - The man who gunned down four Mounties last spring was flagged as early as 1995 for consideration as a dangerous offender, an Alberta justice report says.

But James Roszko's long criminal history did not meet the Criminal Code criteria for the designation that would have allowed authorities to keep him in jail indefinitely, says the report released Thursday.

That's despite a sexual assault conviction, weapons charges and dozens of other offences dating back to 1976.

"The Crown vigorously prosecuted Roszko to the fullest extent possible," says the review of Roszko's criminal records by senior Crown prosecutor Gordon Wong.

"At no time did Roszko meet the criteria to be considered for a dangerous offender application."

He was wounded twice by officers before he turned his weapon on himself.

Roszko had expressed a hatred for police for years.

Alberta Justice Minister Ron Stevens said the review did not find anything that could have foreshadowed what happened on the farm northwest of Edmonton.

"This was a horrific, unprecedented incident in which four officers lost their lives," Stevens said.

"A lot of questions were being asked about why this man with a lengthy criminal history was on the streets that day. I felt it was the government's responsibility to the public and the families to review the files to see if there is anything we could add to this puzzle."

The report notes that while Roszko, 46, faced 40 criminal charges during his life, not all were prosecuted. In one case, a common assault charge was stayed when subpoenas were not generated for the trial date.

Some of the cases did not proceed because witnesses either lied or failed to show up to testify.

For example, Roszko was charged in 1999 with aggravated assault and assault with a weapon after two men walked onto his farm to vandalize his property.

The men, one of whom was wounded by pellets from a shotgun blast fired by Roszko, eventually escaped, but during the police investigation they lied to justice authorities.

"The Crown's case against Roszko was seriously weakened to the point where the decision was made to call no evidence at trial," the report says.

Wong said there was no evidence that Roszko ever threatened any witnesses.

He also said that even if Roszko had been convicted of more offences over the years, there is no guarantee it would have led to him being designated a dangerous offender.

Roszko killed constables Anthony Gordon, 28; Leo Johnston, 32; Brock Myrol, 29; and Peter Schiemann, 25.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/cpress/20051006/ca_pr_on_na/rcmp_shootings_roszko
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Carole Anne



Joined: 04 Oct 2005

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2005 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to say that I am disappointed with this discussion as a whole. I live in northern Alberta and this was a huge tragedy for us. It seems that no one has mentioned that the four RCMP officers were rookies, one of them on the job for less than two weeks. They were young, with very little experience, and had been placed there as guards more than officers.

I am disgusted that this thread was hijacked by US vs Canada b***s*** because it has nothing to do with this event. It's a pissing contest that no one should or will ever win because it's at the expense of the lives that these officers lived and the respect that they deserve.

I am however, proud of the way our city (Edmonton) and province dealt with honouring these men. On the day of the memorial, thousands of mounties marched in the city streets in their red serge (dress uniforms). It was a literal sea of red. And I am also proud and thankful for the police members that came to pay their respects, from all over North America. Yes, there were US officers from all over including Boston, Texas, and several others.

This was a thread started to show respect to those who were killed, not to decide if pot should be legal, or if Ralph Klein sucks, or even who is better, US or Canada. Some of you should be ashamed and embarrassed at your blatent attempts to sully these officers jobs and reputations.

I thank those of you who placed the articles for all to read. If for no other reason than to inform those whose are addicted to the world of casting general, generic opinions without a shread of proof, or information, and who are without the appearance of an intellect or ablility to search for the truth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pligganease



Joined: 14 Sep 2004
Location: The deep south...

PostPosted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 5:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some modest proposals...


You know, if they took the criminality out of rape, occasionally a girl might enjoy it.

If you took the criminality out of child porn, maybe some poor child might have enough money to buy shoes for just a few pictures.

If you took the criminality out of PCP use, then there would have been no need to beat the hell out of Rodney King.

I have read some stupid lines, but that whole "desperados shooting people line" takes the cake.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sooke



Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Location: korea

PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 7:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

VanIslander wrote:

No, it wasn't. Though the faux pas was apt. I'm more aware of Spanish than drug talk. I thought "toke up" was spelt "toque", the Spanish alternative of "momento" or second, as in: it takes only a second (a puff does).


And you're from Vancouver Island?!?!?!?!?!? Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sooke



Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Location: korea

PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 7:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hank Scorpio wrote:


Actually, they ask you what drugs you've used. I answered yes to pot and acid, when he asked frequency I answered truthfully on pot (frequently) and acid (twice). That's that. As long as you disclose that you've done it it's no big deal. Of course, once you're in you're subject to surprise piss tests, so that part of your life is over.


Although I often disagree with HS (despite his relation to my much beloved Simpsons) I have to agree that the army doesn't give two shizznits about weed, acid and other recreational drugs. I gave similar answers as he did (pot: often, acid: once, coke: only when it was in doobies and i didn't know it) and I was in basic training within the month. I would think that if you were a heroin junkie or on oxyxontin etc. they would worry. Hell, some of the best snipers I knew were huge potheads. As long as the drugs don't get in the way of the job, I think the CF doesn't care. Just don't be to blatent about it.

Although, I remember on a posting on a naval base (I was part of the army garrison attached to the base) there was a 2nd lieutennant caught doing rails on the bridge of the ship (in drydocks) he was assigned to. That was a pretty big thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Page 6 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International