|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bourquetheman
Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Suwon
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 3:11 pm Post subject: Bush Teleconference With Soldiers Staged |
|
|
This seems to be a reoccuring theme at the White House lately. I wonder just what is real and what is not, it's tough to tell anymore.
Bush Teleconference With Soldiers Staged
By DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer 58 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - It was billed as a conversation with U.S. troops, but the questions
President Bush asked on a teleconference call Thursday were choreographed to match his goals for the war in
Iraq and Saturday's vote on a new Iraqi constitution.
ADVERTISEMENT
"This is an important time," Allison Barber, deputy assistant defense secretary, said, coaching the soldiers before Bush arrived. "The president is looking forward to having just a conversation with you."
Barber said the president was interested in three topics: the overall security situation in Iraq, security preparations for the weekend vote and efforts to train Iraqi troops.
As she spoke in Washington, a live shot of 10 soldiers from the Army's 42nd Infantry Division and one Iraqi soldier was beamed into the Eisenhower Executive Office Building from Tikrit — the birthplace of former Iraqi leader
Saddam Hussein.
"I'm going to ask somebody to grab those two water bottles against the wall and move them out of the camera shot for me," Barber said.
A brief rehearsal ensued.
"OK, so let's just walk through this," Barber said. "Captain Kennedy, you answer the first question and you hand the mike to whom?"
"Captain Smith," Kennedy said.
"Captain. Smith? You take the mike and you hand it to whom?" she asked.
"Captain Kennedy," the soldier replied.
And so it went.
"If the question comes up about partnering — how often do we train with the Iraqi military — who does he go to?" Barber asked.
"That's going to go to Captain Pratt," one of the soldiers said.
"And then if we're going to talk a little bit about the folks in Tikrit — the hometown — and how they're handling the political process, who are we going to give that to?" she asked.
Before he took questions, Bush thanked the soldiers for serving and reassured them that the U.S. would not pull out of Iraq until the mission was complete.
"So long as I'm the president, we're never going to back down, we're never going to give in, we'll never accept anything less than total victory," Bush said.
The president told them twice that the American people were behind them.
"You've got tremendous support here at home," Bush said.
Less than 40 percent in an AP-Ipsos poll taken in October said they approved of the way Bush was handling Iraq. Just over half of the public now say the Iraq war was a mistake.
White House press secretary Scott McClellan said Thursday's event was coordinated with the Defense Department but that the troops were expressing their own thoughts. With satellite feeds, coordination often is needed to overcome technological challenges, such as delays, he said.
"I think all they were doing was talking to the troops and letting them know what to expect," he said, adding that the president wanted to talk with troops on the ground who have firsthand knowledge about the situation.
The soldiers all gave Bush an upbeat view of the situation.
The president also got praise from the Iraqi soldier who was part of the chat.
"Thank you very much for everything," he gushed. "I like you."
On preparations for the vote, 1st Lt. Gregg Murphy of Tennessee said: "Sir, we are prepared to do whatever it takes to make this thing a success. ... Back in January, when we were preparing for that election, we had to lead the way. We set up the coordination, we made the plan. We're really happy to see, during the preparation for this one, sir, they're doing everything."
On the training of Iraqi security forces, Master Sgt. Corine Lombardo from Scotia, N.Y., said to Bush: "I can tell you over the past 10 months, we've seen a tremendous increase in the capabilities and the confidences of our Iraqi security force partners. ... Over the next month, we anticipate seeing at least one-third of those Iraqi forces conducting independent operations."
Lombardo told the president that she was in New York City on Nov. 11, 2001, when Bush attended an event recognizing soldiers for their recovery and rescue efforts at Ground Zero. She said the troops began the fight against terrorism in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and were proud to continue it in Iraq.
"I thought you looked familiar," Bush said, and then joked: "I probably look familiar to you, too."
Paul Rieckhoff, director of the New York-based Operation Truth, an advocacy group for U.S. veterans of Iraq and
Afghanistan, denounced the event as a "carefully scripted publicity stunt." Five of the 10 U.S. troops involved were officers, he said.
"If he wants the real opinions of the troops, he can't do it in a nationally televised teleconference," Rieckhoff said. "He needs to be talking to the boots on the ground and that's not a bunch of captains." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The president told them twice that the American people were behind them.
"You've got tremendous support here at home," Bush said.
Less than 40 percent in an AP-Ipsos poll taken in October said they approved of the way Bush was handling Iraq. Just over half of the public now say the Iraq war was a mistake. |
This would make a great punchline for a joke, except for the fact that lying to men who are ready to die has got to be the sickest kind of behavior imaginable, especially when the purpose olf the lies are to promote a selfish goal, that of pure propaganda.
Actually, I think a vast majority of Americans DO support the American military enlisted men and women and the officer corps who have made it their career to keep our country safe - but increasing numbers of us have come around to the idea that "the job" they are being asked to complete is not any kind of positive goal for our country. We are making things worse and creating new problems that will take decades to solve, but of course, no one in the Bush crowd wants to hear this, or even look at it.
The best way to support our men and women in uniform is to bring them home and end this thing. End it now. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Octavius Hite

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is anybody really surprised, this is the most dishonest administration in history, no wonder some many people have become conspiracy theorists. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not clear about a few things here. First of all, who was the intended audience for this teleconference? Just the soldiers in attendance, or was it being broadcast elsewhere?
If it was being broadcast elsewhere, then it could have been considered a propaganda piece. Not the most reputable thing, but hardly the outrage of the century either. If, however, it was only intended for Bush and the particpating soldiers, then it can only be seen as an attempt to deceive Bush. Which is totally bizarre.
Can someone provide a link to the actual news site which carried the story? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
No not surprising in the least. Most have come to expect it haven't they? For the record ALL press conferences are staged as well. Bush in fact gets really ticked when someone asks him a question he's not expecting
If you'll recall, just before the last staged computer fraud presidential "selection" the little story about the army pics that had been digitally doctored? His WAG THE DOG staff took a sample & duplicated it, pasting the same little cropping of good soldiers in the background while he was pictured from behind giving a great rousing & spontaneous WAR speech. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
IGTG wrote: |
No not surprising in the least. Most have come to expect it haven't they? For the record ALL press conferences are staged as well. Bush in fact gets really ticked when someone asks him a question he's not expecting |
Yeah, and you'd think he could answer the prepped questions better than he does, too.
But just to play devil's advocate, this really isn't news. Bush can stage these all he wants as long as he doesn't explicitly sell them as 'spontaneous' or what not. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that Bush is not the first President to stage these kinds of things.
The only time Bush's staged sets bothered me was after Katrina, when he was keeping good manpower away from rescue missions in order to look Presidential. Actually, I'm kind of glad they prep these kinds of things, because I remember that press conference in about mid-2004 they had, and watching Bush flounder made me feel bad to be an American. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Bobster

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Can someone provide a link to the actual news site which carried the story? |
Here's the White House Transcript of the event. Even in print, it looks too obvious to even be interesting ...
Love the echoes of Kipling and "White Man's Burden" that encapsulates this sole exchange with an Iraqi soldier who is part of the training and so forth :
Quote: |
THE PRESIDENT: Yes. Sergeant Akeel, thanks for joining us. I appreciate -- appreciate your service. You've got something to say, Akeel?
SERGEANT AKEEL: Good morning, Mr. President. Thank you for everything. Thank very much for everything.
THE PRESIDENT: Yes, you're welcome.
SERGEANT AKEEL: I like you. (Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I appreciate that. |
That's all the man said - I guess it was all he was asked to say ...
MSNBC also has this. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinglejangle

Joined: 19 Feb 2005 Location: Far far far away.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ummm....... I hate to break it to you but ALL things of this nature are more or less staged.
In ANY administration.
I'm pretty solidly opposed to the Bush Administration, but whoever wrote this "expose" is really reaching.
Now for your amusement.
Consider this possible scenario.
Captain X: "OK, we're going to be doing a teleconference with the president. Who wants to talk to him.
Pvt A: "Me me me!!!"
Pvts B-H: (No response)
PVt I: "F NO!! F-That A-Hole!!!"
Officer X: "OK, thank you Pvt A, we'll get you on with him. Pvt I, that's fine. The rest of you just volunteered. Be in the [location] at [Time]. And those uniforms better be looking crisp."
(aside to SGT Z) "OK Sgt, make it happen. And I want you to do something about PVT I's attitude. And I'm warning you, if any of these guys says something to make me look bad I'm going to hold you responsible" (Leaves room)
SGT Z: "OK SH!TBAGS!!!! You heard the man, get your a$$es squared away and then get that [location] GI'd. PVT I! What the H#LL is your malfunction? Just frigging smoke yourself. You try to pull this kind of Sh!t again and I'll kick your head so far up your fourth point of contact you'll be breathing farts for a month.
Oh, and if any of you jokers makes me look bad during this teleconfrence I'm gonna ruin your Sh!t. You understand me? Now execute!"
Sorry. I'm up way to late. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bourquetheman
Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Suwon
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Point taken JingleJangle but I think there is a difference between vaguely saying "We'll be talking about this topic and asking your opinions, etc." to "Ok I'll read the transcript of what the President will be saying and let's walk you guys through this, now who will be holding the microphone first? That's right, and after......"etc.
I listened the the audio portion that was on yahoo and that's what it was like. I know I've heard before how all Bush's press conferences are tightly controlled/staged but I didn't realize how extensive it really was. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bourquetheman
Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Suwon
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Point taken JingleJangle but I think there is a difference between vaguely saying "We'll be talking about this topic and asking your opinions, etc." to "Ok I'll read the transcript of what the President will be saying and let's walk you guys through this, now who will be holding the microphone first? That's right, and after......"etc.
I listened the the audio portion that was on yahoo and that's what it was like. I know I've heard before how all Bush's press conferences are tightly controlled/staged but I didn't realize how extensive it really was. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
jinglejangle wrote: |
I hate to break it to you but ALL things of this nature are more or less staged.
In ANY administration. |
It's not just politics, but the military as well. The first really bad feeling I had about the military, and I'll never forget it, was when I graduated from basic training. Before marching around the parade grounds, we attended a briefing on what we had been through for the last three months for our parents, who sat in front of us in the hall.
We practiced this two or three times before attending the briefing. When the base cmmdr showed pics of us doing bends and thrusts in the pit, we were instructed to yell "hoo-rah!" When the top graduate was presented with his certificate and his promotion to PFC, we were instructed to clap the "golf clap" until the moment the cmmdr stopped clapping, and then we were to stop immediately, that is, precisely as he stopped. We practiced this for quite a while, because there are always some idiots who can't figure it out.
In any case, these things are always extremely well-choreographed, down to the last detail. In politics, but especially when politicians deal with the military, and when the military does any public relations activity. So did the Bush Administration stage this, did the Pentagon, or was it both? Good questions.
The one slip involving the SecDef -- what was it? several months ago? -- cost someone dearly, I assure you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|