Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Bush and the US economy

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 3:33 pm    Post subject: Bush and the US economy Reply with quote

Before we start let it be clearly understood that as a non-American I desire a strong and healthy US economy for the benefit of not only the US but also other countries, including my birthplace, UK, and my adoiptive home, RoK.

I am not, however, a fan of GWB and, even including his much-vaunted tax cuts for the rich, struggle to find one act to improve the economic climate. That is why I am worried, deeply worried.

Consider these factors present in the US economy:

* negative net savings rate
* housing bubble
* rising inflation - now 4%
* budget deficit
* trade deficit

Together with other issues such as over-valued currency (yes, really), personal debt levels, reduced immigration etc I'd say the outlook is gloomy. Deflating the hosuing bubble will cause far more pain than the stockmarket bubble. (The "smart money" was already out of course when that burst.)

In addition, the US image abroad has been severely damaged: once seen as Mr Clean, Mr Right, Mr Benign, Mr Moral-High-Ground, many now see the US far less favourably. That can and will have an effect, perhaps a lasting effect, on US trade and inward FDI. To balance that, the US is far less dependent on exports than most other developed countries - I believe only around 10% of GDP is export production.

If you are an American porperty owner, now might be a fine time to sell. Replace what you own with a foreclosure sale in about 12 months. There are going to be bargains around and I for one will probably buy one - San Diego probably.

Stromy times ahead: and please, it is 5 years since GWB became prezz and too late to blame the previous administration - which was fiscally very, very correct.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's a mistake to over-emphasize how much influence a president has on the economy. But it is equally a mistake to deny presidents and their policies do have an influence on it. Presidents can ask for a tax increase or cut, but it is Congress that must legislate it, primarily the House.

But I agree with what I see as the main thrust of your post: the signs are not good for the long term--budget deficits, trade deficits, inflation, poor level of savings, the housing bubble. Prospects are gloomy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
desultude



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Location: Dangling my toes in the Persian Gulf

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Everyone seems to be praising this guy Bush has nominated to replace Greenspan at the Fed.- but he has been Bush's chief economic advisor. Confused That should be enough alone to completely disqualify him. Evil or Very Mad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 9:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

desultude wrote:
Everyone seems to be praising this guy Bush has nominated to replace Greenspan at the Fed.- but he has been Bush's chief economic advisor. Confused That should be enough alone to completely disqualify him. Evil or Very Mad


You're absolutely right to be worried. This guy whole-heartedly endorses Bush's fiscal policies. Even Greenspan only tepidly encouraged Bush and backed off by 2003.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 11:49 pm    Post subject: Re: Bush and the US economy Reply with quote

Wangja wrote:
If you are an American porperty owner, now might be a fine time to sell. Replace what you own with a foreclosure sale in about 12 months. There are going to be bargains around and I for one will probably buy one - San Diego probably.

Agree with everything - particularly this one!

I have a friend of a friend who has two houses.. one in Nevada and one in San Jose, CA. His house in San Jose is valued at 750,000 (same house in say Hoston would be 100,000).. yet he's holding out until it reaches 1 million to sell it! Unbelievable. Seems like a huge mistake.

Even when I was in San Fran a few years ago.. there was a mass migration to get out of the area and head for cheaper housing.. its unbelievable the housing has remained as high as it has - the entire economy seems to be running ONLY on the housing market (outside of those Iraq ventures that is).. its just a matter of time for a huge housing bust.. like dot.com 5 years ago.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 12:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When it comes, TB, as come it will, it will be far, far worse than the dotcom meltdown.

Property is a very illiquid asset. Shares can at least be sold instantly, there is always a buyer for cash. But in housing bubble deflations, there are no buyers: they dry up completely and a house cannot be sold and paid for in an instant - there is a long lead between deal and closure. It's not just a question of being unable to sell at 10% lower than the house next door, it's not being able to sell at all.

In the meantime, the interest payments are falling due - and do you all believe that interest rates will stay low? - and as that ticks away, there comes a time when the bak forcloses and sells the property at auction. People like you and I are waiting on the sidelines to buy an asset the woner thought was "worth" 750,000 for maybe a tenth of that. Banks will cut their losses and run as fast as they can.

Or, they will set up a property investment trust: oh yes, I have seen that happen. Twisted Evil perfectly legal.

Edit: and didn't GWB just make it much harder for the "little guy" to get bankruptcy protection?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hater Depot



Joined: 29 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 12:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just in time for Katrina survivors. Who says Christmas never comes early?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wangja wrote:
Or, they will set up a property investment trust: oh yes, I have seen that happen. Twisted Evil perfectly legal.

Edit: and didn't GWB just make it much harder for the "little guy" to get bankruptcy protection?

What is a property investment trust - I haven't heard of that exactly.

Yeah, bankruptcy just got a whole lot harder - mandatory financial counseling for 90 days and a bunch of other weird stuff. All I know is creditors are jumping with glee out of it.

As to markets.. San Diego does seem prime doesn't it? That city is ideal.. particularly there as real estate prices are sky high but average wages in that area no way even remotely reflect that!

desultude wrote:
Everyone seems to be praising this guy Bush has nominated to replace Greenspan at the Fed.- but he has been Bush's chief economic advisor. Confused That should be enough alone to completely disqualify him. Evil or Very Mad

That scares the hell out of me. Can't wait to see what The Economist has to say about him.. (they were pulling for Kerry in the last election - basically with the presumption that anything would be better than Bush). Now thats funny stuff coming from a fiscally-conservative generally quite Republican-policy oriented magazine!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A property investment trust in this context means a private company set up and whilly owned by a bank, perhaps with a limited life, whose sole purpose is to buy at auction properties which the owning bank has foreclosed and repossessed. The proerty so purchased - some might say stolen - is typically rented out and later sold.

Property prices might be worth a separate thread: from today's Telegraph I see that foreclosures in UK have increased by 66% and in London by a staggering 81%. It's already happening in UK and US (esp hot spots like S California) can't be far behind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wangja wrote:
People like you and I are waiting on the sidelines to buy an asset the woner thought was "worth" 750,000 for maybe a tenth of that.

Er, oh yeah, me too! Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Bush and the US economy Reply with quote

Tiger Beer wrote:


I have a friend of a friend who has two houses.. one in Nevada and one in San Jose, CA. His house in San Jose is valued at 750,000 (same house in say Hoston would be 100,000).. yet he's holding out until it reaches 1 million to sell it! Unbelievable. Seems like a huge mistake.

Even when I was in San Fran a few years ago.. there was a mass migration to get out of the area and head for cheaper housing.. its unbelievable the housing has remained as high as it has - the entire economy seems to be running ONLY on the housing market (outside of those Iraq ventures that is).. its just a matter of time for a huge housing bust.. like dot.com 5 years ago.


Housing prices are still high in the bay area, set a record this summer. There isn't going to be a bust in SF, I assure you. SJ? Eh, maybe. THe prices there have gone down in the past couple years.

SD? I don't know. Las Vegas and NV? Definitly going to drop.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tiger Beer wrote:

That scares the hell out of me. Can't wait to see what The Economist has to say about him.. (they were pulling for Kerry in the last election - basically with the presumption that anything would be better than Bush). Now thats funny stuff coming from a fiscally-conservative generally quite Republican-policy oriented magazine!


The Economist seems to be broadly pro, cocncluding the article ...



Quote:
The truth is that big ideas and a stellar academic résumé are not always hallmarks of a good central banker. Arthur Burns, the only other academic to lead the Federal Reserve, in the 1970s, was a big thinker but a weak inflation-fighter. Good central bankers need technical competence, political smarts and sound judgment. Mr Bernanke has the technical competence and seems to have the political smarts (after all, he got the job). The big bet, therefore, is on his judgment.



Full story at http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=5077535&fsrc=nwl but you may need to pay to see.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's a nice take on inflation. http://www.financialsense.com/stormwatch/2005/1028.html

A super graph ....




What this shows is that if you take out all non-essential costs, such as food, heating, petrol (gasoline), power and housing costs, inflation in US is only 4%.

If they are included, as they used to be, then inflation is running at around 7%.

This is not a "bash USA" post - the EU governments are practising similar sleights of hand.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hypnotist



Joined: 04 Dec 2004
Location: I wish I were a sock

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wangja wrote:
What this shows is that if you take out all non-essential costs, such as food, heating, petrol (gasoline), power and housing costs, inflation in US is only 4%.

If they are included, as they used to be, then inflation is running at around 7%.

This is not a "bash USA" post - the EU governments are practising similar sleights of hand.


It's a semi-legitimate technique if you don't expect the high oil prices to last (shocks do distort the basket-of-goods unfairly - though in a car-driven society like the US, excluding 'gas' seems daft. Less so in countries with better public transport where it becomes more of a choice). But given the latest rises in oil prices are demand and not supply driven (how many times have I read that in the Economist), I think you're right to be concerned.

(The guy who wrote that article ain't no Keynesian, that's for sure!)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International