|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
have you heard of the pillaging 60's??
Yes!! the 1060's was a decade unlike any other that changed the world forever. william the conqueror invaded England and radically altered the future and demographics of that country. It was a crazy decade, not to be forgotten by all who were there.The survivors reckon their music and their military battles were the best in world history, and they poo-pooed the attempts of successive generations and decades to emulate their style.
another decade that changed the world was the 1940's. The world was engaged in massive warfare- with almost no nation on earth left untouched! the bravery and courage of people in that crazy decade was awesome- it changed the world and the course of history!!
or...maybe the 940's?? amazing decade.
i guess all decades have been massively important to the histroy of the world. Its just the 60's had a guy who wore thick rimmed spectacles and penned a few songs, woohoo! Amazing!!!
We will forever live in the shadow of that decade, and nothing will ever compare or match up to it. Even the meteorite impact and ice age has nothing on it, for charting world destiny. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rapier, you anal maggot,
I take great insult at the fetid mewlings of retrograde anencaphalic twits like you. John Lennon vs Hagwon Monkey? Blimey, it's a tough choice. You a ranky stanky arsehole and you have nothing whatsoever to offer this existence other than the unfounded mental dumpster juice you spew forth. If I'm ever misfortunate enough to meet you in real life, I'll put my thumb in your nose, my fingers in your eye sockets and use you as a bowling ball. You festering discharge from the anus of a haemorroidal leper, you living backstreet miscarriage, your parents should apologise for your birth! Your sole premise for disrespecting JL appears to be that he's from Liverpool/North of England. Yes, very grim the Yorkshire Dales, Peak District, Lake District, Northumbria. Stoke Newington, Bracknel, Hackney...that's my definition of grim, as well as the genepool you vomited forth from. You don't even have enough merit to your miserable scabrous little life to lick Lennon's toilet clean. Fook off back to your estate with your bloody regional accent you putrescent pile of puke. The majesty of Mother Nature is befouled simply by the fact that liverless maggots like you exist. John Lennon was a working class hero who went from relatively little to inspiring several generations with his talent for music and poetry; you're some junk-food eating piece of *beep* with a useless degree in The Land of the Western Losers. I'll take Lennon anyday, thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Its just the 60's had a guy who wore thick rimmed spectacles and penned a few songs, woohoo! Amazing!!! |
Yeah, the Beatles were drastically over-hyped. Too bad, rapier. Going on an internet site to deliberately show disrespect to someone on the anniversary of their death just shows how little class you have, and how little you understand the concept. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah what I'm saying is:
*The 1960's was not a superior decade. Not even the greatest of the 20th century. Trying to say anyone who wasn't there is somehow deprived or that all attitudes and music are poor imitations of that time, is rubbish.
*John lennon was nothing great. He owed his fame to the fortunate invention of TV and mass media which ensured his face was in every home, giving the masses the illusion of thinking they knew him. Its a bit like the mass hysteria and public grief over the Death of Princess Diana. Abnormal. Some people even cried when Scott left "Neighbours". Such is the power of mass media.
* If I hear "Imagine" one more time, I'm throwing the tv out the appartment block window. Now give me some DJ Tiesto.
Last edited by rapier on Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:02 am; edited 6 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the_beaver

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rapier wrote: |
have you heard of the pillaging 60's??
Yes!! the 1060's was a decade unlike any other that changed the world forever. william the conqueror invaded England and radically altered the future and demographics of that country. It was a crazy decade, not to be forgotten by all who were there.The survivors reckon their music and their military battles were the best in world history, and they poo-pooed the attempts of successive generations and decades to emulate their style.
another decade that changed the world was the 1940's. The world was engaged in massive warfare- with almost no nation on earth left untouched! the bravery and courage of people in that crazy decade was awesome- it changed the world and the course of history!!
or...maybe the 940's?? amazing decade.
i guess all decades have been massively important to the histroy of the world. Its just the 60's had a guy who wore thick rimmed spectacles and penned a few songs, woohoo! Amazing!!!
We will forever live in the shadow of that decade, and nothing will ever compare or match up to it. Even the meteorite impact and ice age has nothing on it, for charting world destiny. |
Usually you're a brainless *beep*, but except for Lee Harvey Oswald offing John Lennon (everybody knows it was Jack Ruby), you're right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I get it rapier, you have *beep* envy. Your real problem is that YOU are actually AFRAID that the sixties actually WERE more fun. Just like insecure people everywhere you're desperately worried that your own experience won't live up to the dream, that somewhere, somehow, someone is having ( or had ) more fun than you. You lack the confidence to believe in your own decade, and the get up and go to create your own halcion days. The legacy of the sixties INTIMIDATES you, and thus your react by putting it down. Of course, my bad, how could anything good come from that incence infected era!?
In fact we're talking about just one man, it was YOU that made the paranoid leap from John Lennon to the sixties. Lennon only represents the sixties if you decide in your own mind that it's so. I prefer to take him as a musician. Forget all the cultural hero stuff, that is largely stuff thrust on him by others. For me the music works just fine on it's own, even lifted out of the cultural context, and stripped of the mythology. What we have left is simply a damn fine bunch of songs, brilliantly sung, brilliantly arranged, and brilliantly recorded. And by the way, the Beatles were not "over hyped". They haven't been hyped at all, they don't need to be hyped. You see, it's quite simple, people like thier music. Millions and millions of people accross many cultures, continuing to this day, even though the cultural context is way gone, the band is not touring, or playing live, or making videos, they have absolutely no media presence whatsoever apart from the odd nostalgia retrospective in Rolling Stone every five years, and guess what? They continue to sell staggering amounts of records and pick up new young fans who have no idea what it all supposedly meant. How can this be? And this is in competition with the latest ultra marketed hip hop and teen gloss. Could it be, just perhaps, that four guys from Liverpool got together and just happened to make some of the most stunningly indelible pop music ever recorded on the face of this planet?
You are dissmissed. Next please!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Satori wrote: |
| I get it rapier, you have *beep* envy. Your real problem is that YOU are actually AFRAID that the sixties actually WERE more fun. |
Were you there to verify this? Seems to me a lot of people idolising the 60's and its musicians weren't even there. They just think its the right thing to do to appear cultured and sophisticated. Take "spinosa" for example, He was surely born after Lennon died (seems about 23)yet pretends that someone he never knew or was around for is incredibly important to him.
| Quote: |
| Just like insecure people everywhere you're desperately worried that your own experience won't live up to the dream, that somewhere, somehow, someone is having ( or had ) more fun than you. You lack the confidence to believe in your own decade, and the get up and go to create your own halcion days. |
Actually the late 80's were memorable to me: '88+ 89.
| Quote: |
| The legacy of the sixties INTIMIDATES you, and thus your react by putting it down. Of course, my bad, how could anything good come from that incence infected era!? |
Did anything good come from it? as far as I can Lennon's song "give peace a chance" ensured thousands of VN vets who either died or went through hell fighting communism returned home without a heroes welcome. not to mention Lennons brand of morality "No religion, do whatever you like if it feels good, rebellion and disobeying your parents is cool, take as many drugs as possible" probably did more to hasten the downfall of western civilisation than anything else. His message was an atheistic lack of responsibility, measured in unmarried mothers, drug addicts and crime.
| Quote: |
| For me the music works just fine on it's own, even lifted out of the cultural context |
Its ok: lennon and the beatles are songs I've never listened to twice. Never had any appeal to me, never liked them. The who and the monkess all sukked too.
No: something from my own time is far more relevant and enjoyable to me.
| Quote: |
| They haven't been hyped at all, they don't need to be hyped |
they are the music equivalent of chaucer. All kids growing up are told how wonderful and essential the beatles are to any appreciation of music, and how nothing will ever compare etc. As a result you have people buying their stuff just to appear educated and musically cultured. Its like literature students all blindly nodding shakespeare is the best because its the done thing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Did anything good come from it? as far as I can Lennon's song "give peace a chance" ensured thousands of VN vets who either died or went through hell fighting communism returned home without a heroes welcome. |
What a fantastic leap of imagination. The peace movement would have forced the end of the war with or without Lennon. The public sentiment was overwhelming and the government was forced to act. Lennon didnt cause anything, he simply gave voice to what a lot of people were thinking by putting a song or two. And how exactly Lennon or the peace movement contribute to the poor reception of vets when they returned? I suggest the government was far more culpable in that regard.
| Quote: |
not to mention Lennons brand of morality "No religion, do whatever you like if it feels good, rebellion and disobeying your parents is cool, take as many drugs as possible" probably did more to hasten the downfall of western civilisation than anything else. |
No religion is a great idea, when you think about the amount of war, barbarity, pain, and suffering that has been caused in the name of religion. Rebellion, well, you must remember that he was a teenager of the 50s. Post war, countries always turn conservative. There was the cold war, political suppression and the commy witch hunts. Hoover and MacCarthy. The CIA at its most devious and brutal. An atmoshere of stifly oppression. Problems with civil rights. There was a lot to rebel against. And as far as I know ( and I know a crap load about the Beatles ) Lennon never once promoted drug use. He took drugs himself, and Im damn glad he did. Clearly they opened his mind up and allowed him and the other Beatles to make some startly musical breakthroughs and record music previously unimagined in its color and vibrancy. Before the Beatles Elvis was a racy and far out as it got. They changed the scope and pallette of rock music permanantly.
| Quote: |
His message was an atheistic lack of responsibility, measured in unmarried mothers, drug addicts and crime. |
Lack of responsibility? Most other guys that get to his level of pop stardom simply drown themselves in a sea of cocaine, booze, and a stream of young hot women. Lennon chose to use his platform of visibility to promote, of all things, peace. Gosh how terribly irresponsible of him! As for unmarried mothers, how did he promote this? For a pop star of his fame, he was remarkably unpromiscuous. He was married to Synthia Lennon at an early age, then later moved straight on to Yoko Ono whom he also married. Drug addicts, maybe. Clearly his music was big with the drug culture people, but I doubt he caused anyone to take drugs who would not have ended up taking drugs anyway. And crime? Yeah right. The closest he came to that was inspiring some fairly severe fashion crimes in the seventies.
| Quote: |
Its ok: lennon and the beatles are songs I've never listened to twice. |
Well then, you're in a really great position to assess thier music, aren't you! ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
desultude

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Location: Dangling my toes in the Persian Gulf
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One of the myths of the right is that the left was responsible for the poor treatment of vets when they returned. Look up the history of VVAW (Vietnam Vets Against the War) and you will find that most left groups were affiliated with assisting vets. As is becoming the case with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, vets came home disallusioned with the government, broken physically and spiritually, and many of them addicted to the hard drugs that were everywhere available to them in Southeast Asia (you can research the U.S. government's role in that, also.)
Blame the left for the degeneration of "Western Civilization"? Ha! The U.S. government, via the CIA, AID and the military bear much responsibility for the drugs and chaos of the 60's, and the decline of the faith in government and institutions that is prevalent there today.
No, Rapier, you weren't there. So you cannot speak with any authority on the subject(s) of the 60's. Don't accuse someone else of being young and naive. You are both young and naive, and strangely cynical and misanthropic.
The 60's were like the 20's in that there are times in history when there are convergences of ideas and events that mark them as memorable. Yes, the 60's were a very specific and peculiar time that has many effects on things today, but you are confusing coincidence with causality in your "decline of the west" thesis. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Satori wrote: |
| No religion is a great idea, when you think about the amount of war, barbarity, pain, and suffering that has been caused in the name of religion |
"No" religion IS a religion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
| Satori wrote: |
| No religion is a great idea, when you think about the amount of war, barbarity, pain, and suffering that has been caused in the name of religion |
"No" religion IS a religion. |
Recently came across the famous 1980 Playboy Interview Lennon did shortly before his death. Quite spooky really.
He did have a few things to say on the matter of "religion" as well.
Music: Lennon's Anniversary: Russ Ward Reflects
December 06, 2005
The tragic irony of John Lennon is that in death he became what he never was in life: fixed, frozen and unchanging. The man who surprised us with every song and and every spoken word, the creative and philosophical gypsy who never stayed in the same place for long, suddenly became a statue, an icon of the era in which he left us - as if he had been struck by the White Witch's wand.
He is remembered as the world's foremost anti-religious feminist, rather than our generation's great explorer of ideas. Like Bob Dylan, he was always busy breaking new ground while everyone else was trying to understand and imitate the last thing he did. And like Dylan, many of his followers resented his abandonment of the past.
Unfortunately, the last thing Lennon did was probably the easiest to understand and the least worthy of imitation. He was simply taking a sabbatical from the craziness. His thoughts had been clouded by his broken relationships with the other Beatles, and his creative energies were in hibernation. He was just getting ready to emerge from his cave, but one of his disappointed, resentful followers made sure that he stayed there.
There is no way to know what John Lennon would have done in the eighties and beyond. The only certainty is that he would not have stayed where the culture has enshrined him. I have no doubt he would have surprised us again. Like Dylan.
Lennon asked us to imagine a world without religion, but shortly before his death he said this:
... People always got the image I was an anti-Christ or antireligion. I'm not. I'm a most religious fellow. I was brought up a Christian and I only now understand some of the things that Christ was saying in those parables ... but the whole religion business suffers from the 'Onward, Christian Soldiers' bit. There's too much talk about soldiers and marching and converting. I'm not pushing Buddhism, because I'm no more a Buddhist than I am a Christian, but there's one thing I admire about the religion: There's no proselytizing.
When asked about Bob Dylan's recent conversion to Christianity, he said this:
I don't like to comment on it. For whatever reason he's doing it, it is personal for him and he needs to do it.
Clearly Lennon was not unaffected by this unexpected turn of events in the life of someone he respected and had often emulated. But Lennon was nothing if not a seeker, and his search was never impeded by the fear of how others might react. Imagine if that search had led him to Christ. Perhaps this is what the White Witch feared.
The above quotes are from the famous and informative 1980 Playboy interview. Here are a couple more ...
http://www.dickstaub.com/links_view.php?record_id=5038
Read the on-line book that shocked the rock world: (558 pages)
Rethinking John Lennon's Assassination:
The FBI's War on Rock Stars
by Salvador Astucia (April 2004)
"...It is difficult to criticize the official explanation of what happened to John Lennon because a universally accepted version does not exist. There was no trial, no testimonies, no witnesses. The police report was certainly of little value and the autopsy report is suppressed from public view ... Most of the public��s perception of Chapman is hocus-pocus nonsense, half-truths, media spin, and the power of suggestion. A patsy was needed to take the blame for murdering Lennon, so Chapman was set up to take the fall ..."
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/lennon_report.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
"No" religion IS a religion. |
No it's not, except in the most pedantically literal way. Coming to us as it does in song form it can be taken in a wide open way. My own take is that he means none of the organised type of religion that is used as a method of state control over populations. Looking at the way he lived his life and the concerns he had, it's easy to infer that he was a spiritual person with a rich a questioning inner life. "No religion" to does not mean strict atheism, it means freedom to pursue and define your own spiritual life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wasn't aware that it was the 25th anniversary of John Lennon's passing away, but somehow I was inspired to play a "Superstar Christmas" CD compilation which featured "Happy Christmas/ War is Over" as the opening song - so I played that song at the beginning of all my classes that day.
Actually, I was in Washington D.C. on the first anniversary of John's death, and was at the National Mall near the Washington Memorial where there was a big turnout of fans (many advocating stronger gun control laws ...) I happened to be distributing small books entitled "Search For Liberation" which featured cover photos of John and Yoko and George Harrison and was comprised of some insightful talks they had with Bhaktivedanta Swami while he was a guest at Lennon's estate (Tittenhurst). The following is a brief excerpt from an interview with George Harrison as he reminisces about John during that period:
John Lennon and Hare Krishna
Mukunda: Did any of the other Beatles chant?
George: Before meeting Prabhupada and all of you, I had bought that album Prabhupada did in New York, and John and I listened to it. I remember we sang it for days, John and I, with ukulele banjos, sailing through the Greek Islands chanting Hare Krishna. Like six hours we sang, because we couldn't stop once we got going. As soon as we stopped, it was like the lights went out. It went on to the point where our jaws were aching, singing the mantra over and over and over and over and over. We felt exalted; it was a very happy time for us.
Mukunda: You know, I saw a video the other day sent to us from Canada, showing John and Yoko Ono recording their hit song "Give Peace a Chance," and about five or six of the devotees were there in John's room at the Queen Elizabeth Hotel in Montreal, singing along and playing cymbals and drums. You know, John and Yoko chanted Hare Krishna on that song. That was in May of '69, and just three months later, Srila Prabhupada was John and Yoko's house guest for one month at their estate outside London.
While Prabhupada was there, you, John, and Yoko came to his room one afternoon for a few hours. I think that was the first time you all met him.
George: That's right.
Mukunda: At that point John was a spiritual seeker, and Prabhupada explained the true path to peace and liberation. He talked about the eternality of the soul, karma, and reincarnation, which are all elaborately dealt with in the Vedic literatures.Vedas, predating the Bible and covering all aspects of spiritual knowledge from the nature of the self, or individual soul, to the Supreme Soul (Sri Krishna) and His kingdom in the spiritual world. Although John never made Hare Krishna a big part of his life, he echoed the philosophy of Krishna consciousness in a hit song he wrote just about a year after that conversation, "Instant Karma."
Last edited by Rteacher on Fri Dec 16, 2005 3:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| No it's not, except in the most pedantically literal way. |
I am surprised at how often people here describe themselves without meaning to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|