Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The History Behind ESL Teaching
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:32 am    Post subject: Re: The History Behind ESL Teaching Reply with quote

jacl wrote:
TheUrbanMyth wrote:
Rock wrote:
Moreover, what's the future prospects for this field, seeing someone, somewhere, is bound to catch on that having native speakers just doesn't cut the mustard, at least not 100%.


I will assume you are asking a serious question and not just trolling.

I've worked in hakwon and public schools. The hakwon kids that were exposed to numberous native speakers before me, spoke MUCH better (and coherent) English than the kids at my public school where I was the first native speaker, they'd ever had.

So it is better than nothing. And short of sending their kids overseas, which most Koreans can't afford, it is the best option.


(1)Why would you assume someone's trolling. Surprised

(2) You make a good point though.. .


(numbers are mine)

1. His post(s) seem nothing more than an attack on teachers here. But regardless I didn't assume he WAS trolling, I assumed he was asking a serious question. Read my quote again.

2. As with all things I write. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jacl



Joined: 31 Oct 2005

PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 5:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know. I think this is all one big troll after another.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomwaits



Joined: 05 Feb 2003
Location: PC Bong

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the OP is asking where this idea comes from that people an teach-using only the target language....

I studied French and Spanish in the past and cannot imagine how a Native speaker (without a word of English) would have done me ANY good in the world.

It is a rather zany idea really----in fact isn't the hiring of Kyopos getting more common eah year. That is where the future lies.

Wire that cash home while you can. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tomwaits wrote:
I think the OP is asking where this idea comes from that people an teach-using only the target language....

I studied French and Spanish in the past and cannot imagine how a Native speaker (without a word of English) would have done me ANY good in the world.

It is a rather zany idea really----in fact isn't the hiring of Kyopos getting more common eah year. That is where the future lies.

Wire that cash home while you can. Wink


I go to a Chinese hagwon now. Her English is pretty good, but most of the time it is all in Chinese. The couple times it wasn't we just went to her electronic dictionary. When there is no chance of easy translation, you have to work harder (and usually learn more). Did you study those languages in a classroom environment?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tomwaits wrote:
I think the OP is asking where this idea comes from that people an teach-using only the target language....

I studied French and Spanish in the past and cannot imagine how a Native speaker (without a word of English) would have done me ANY good in the world.

It is a rather zany idea really----in fact isn't the hiring of Kyopos getting more common eah year. That is where the future lies.

Wire that cash home while you can. Wink


Actually most Korean students start learning English from the Korean teacher who translates for them. When you start teaching they have already learned a little English. In public schools many classes are taught with a native speaker and a Korean English teacher in the same class. We are here to teach proper pronunciation and usage not English per se.

And the hiring of native speakers is getting more common (since many kyopos can not speak much or any Korean for that matter). Gyenoggi-Do wants to hire a native speaker for every school under its control in the next few years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bosintang



Joined: 01 Dec 2003
Location: In the pot with the rest of the mutts

PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tomwaits wrote:
I think the OP is asking where this idea comes from that people an teach-using only the target language....

I studied French and Spanish in the past and cannot imagine how a Native speaker (without a word of English) would have done me ANY good in the world.


I on the other hand started studying French with English speakers who did not teach in French, and then went on a six week program when I was 15 years old where only French was spoken, including in the classroom. Absolutely anything I learned in French, including before and since then, was learned during those six weeks.

As far as where the idea of teaching in the target language comes from, it's not a new idea. I remember reading that it goes back at least as far as the 19th century when a French speaker who couldn't speak English lied and said he could so that he got a job teaching French in England. (Or something like that. I don't know the whole story.)


Quote:

It is a rather zany idea really----in fact isn't the hiring of Kyopos getting more common eah year. That is where the future lies.


Why is it zany? Perhaps Koreans overrate the usefulness of native speakers, but learning a foreign language is about learning to communicate, is it not? Teaching the target language through the target language ensures a couple of things. One, the students are forced to use the target language in the classroom, and forced to learn to communicate with it. Two, the teacher is forced to keep language tasks tangible and pragmatic, or the consequences of the students not understanding will be immediate. Having a native speaker or a really well-trained non-native speaker also ensures one other thing. The students don't learn to speak Korean with English words.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mj roach



Joined: 16 Mar 2003

PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 3:06 am    Post subject: The History Behind ESL Teaching Reply with quote

Peace Corps + Profitable Japanese business models in hiring foreigners!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 3:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jacl wrote:
I don't know. I think this is all one big troll after another.


And you complain about me assuming people are trolls....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International