Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

URI or GNP?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

URI or GOP
URI
42%
 42%  [ 11 ]
GOP
57%
 57%  [ 15 ]
Total Votes : 26

Author Message
Gorgias



Joined: 27 Aug 2005

PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 4:37 am    Post subject: URI or GNP? Reply with quote

So, if you could vote here, or rather, in spite of the fact that you can't vote here, which party do you favor?

My vote is..., I'm not sure, Uri obviously has a lot of pros, not being the conservatives, but it seems like they are not all on the same page, seems like Uri is made up of all sorts of different intrests that contradict each other. Also I was not happy with the direction the re-development of the Suwon and Yongsan station areas took. So tenatively: GNP. But I'm pretty ignorant about this issue, and would love to see some debate on it to school me some on the topic.


Last edited by Gorgias on Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:42 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jinju



Joined: 22 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 4:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

GOP.

The Uri party is as corrupt as it gets. I hate the appeasement of North Korea that seems to be done at any cost. NK cant do anything wrong in the eyes of the rulling party. If they attacked a South Korean naval ship and killed some sailors the rulling party wouldnt condemn it. Oh wait, that already happened. Its time to get tough on North Korea. Pronto. North Korea has to be faced and stared down. They were all talk about sanctions being a declaration of war. The US went and slapped North Korea with sanctions and nothing happened. The Uri party doesnt get it. The only way to get through to NK is to be tough on them. I think that threatening to shut down Kaesong of NK doesnt come to the talks and be an honest negotiation partner, and then actually going through with the threat if they dont comply, would be the first step to letting them know that Seoul means business. Right now NK is laughing at Seoul's lack of backbone. It has to change.

P.S. Since when did being a NK appeaser and a pro commie become a sign of being progressive? I keep hearing this word used to describe the traitors who sympathize with Kim Jong Il.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
indiercj



Joined: 30 Jan 2003
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 6:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank god, you don't have the vote. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
jinju



Joined: 22 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 6:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

indiercj wrote:
Thank god, you don't have the vote. Wink


Well, I may soon;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobbyhanlon



Joined: 09 Nov 2003
Location: 서울

PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 9:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok, so let's stare down those evil north koreans.. hell, let's bring the country to the brink of war while we're at it!
north korea is run by an awful government, nobody would deny that.. but we have to recognise the reality of the situation. the consequences of war are too terrible to contemplate, so that is why we have to give these rotten bastards a little leeway, even if it goes against our natural instinct. you don't seriously believe that �츮�� actually likes north korea, do you? in my time in korea, i've met a few political/civil service types and the general attitude is pretty much as i've described. i would call it common sense, even if it doesn't strictly feel right. and i would bet a lot of money that if the president were from �ѳ����, he or she would be following a pretty similar path.

as for the corruption aspect... i would suggest they are all pretty darn corrupt. i heard the standard way to bribe a politician is to give him a set of car keys... once you locate your gift, you drive off.. and when you get home, open up the boot and find it stuffed full of cash. nice work if you can get it, i suppose...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
leebumlik69



Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Location: DiRectly above you. Pissing Down

PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 11:54 am    Post subject: Re: URI or GOP? Reply with quote

Gorgias wrote:
So, if you could vote here, or rather, in spite of the fact that you can't vote here, which party do you favor?

My vote is..., I'm not sure, Uri obviously has a lot of pros, not being the conservatives, but it seems like they are not all on the same page, seems like Uri is made up of all sorts of different intrests that contradict each other. Also I was not happy with the direction the re-development of the Suwon and Yongsan station areas took. So tenatively: GOP. But I'm pretty ignorant about this issue, and would love to see some debate on it to school me some on the topic.



http://www.asianinfo.org/asianinfo/mongolia/pro-politics.htm - Politics
http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/korea - ESL stuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jinju



Joined: 22 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 6:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bobbyhanlon wrote:
ok, so let's stare down those evil north koreans.. hell, let's bring the country to the brink of war while we're at it!
north korea is run by an awful government, nobody would deny that.. but we have to recognise the reality of the situation. the consequences of war are too terrible to contemplate, so that is why we have to give these rotten bastards a little leeway, even if it goes against our natural instinct. you don't seriously believe that �츮�� actually likes north korea, do you? in my time in korea, i've met a few political/civil service types and the general attitude is pretty much as i've described. i would call it common sense, even if it doesn't strictly feel right. and i would bet a lot of money that if the president were from �ѳ����, he or she would be following a pretty similar path.

as for the corruption aspect... i would suggest they are all pretty darn corrupt. i heard the standard way to bribe a politician is to give him a set of car keys... once you locate your gift, you drive off.. and when you get home, open up the boot and find it stuffed full of cash. nice work if you can get it, i suppose...


There wouldnt be a war. Everything the NK warned about being a "declaration of war" have come to pass and NK doesnt look like they want any part of a war. The latest being sanctions slapped on them by the US. And sanctions were supposed to be a declaration of war. Wheres the war?

NK is weak, they know it. It seems that the president and his party of NK sympathizers doesnt know it. Or perhaps Im right and they sympathize with NK.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
patchy



Joined: 26 Apr 2005

PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 6:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shouldn't that be GNP - Grand National Party?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RACETRAITOR



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul, South Korea

PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 3:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not crazy about fascism, and there are people close to me who would likely get thrown in prison if they take power. Plus, it would suck if they ban all live music clubs, like Lee Myungbag hinted they would do last summer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 7:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I'm not crazy about fascism, and there are people close to me who would likely get thrown in prison if they take power. Plus, it would suck if they ban all live music clubs, like Lee Myungbag hinted they would do last summer.


Yeah, I think Uri gets a bad rap on Dave's as the party of anti-wayguk xenophobia, largely because of the '02/'03 hatefest. But five'll get ya ten that the GNP would be at least as bad for that sort of thing, albeit for their own purposes. They'd ease up on the anti-GI stuff, not because they like Americans but because they like the military. And if, like most social conservatives, they start pursuing a law and order agenda, who do you think they're gonna scapegoat as the main cause of crime? Their fellow Koreans? Not likely!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beavis



Joined: 24 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

heheh hNnnnh. hehe! yeah. yEeah heh! i'm doWn wih the OPP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RACETRAITOR



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul, South Korea

PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 6:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:

Yeah, I think Uri gets a bad rap on Dave's as the party of anti-wayguk xenophobia, largely because of the '02/'03 hatefest. But five'll get ya ten that the GNP would be at least as bad for that sort of thing, albeit for their own purposes. They'd ease up on the anti-GI stuff, not because they like Americans but because they like the military. And if, like most social conservatives, they start pursuing a law and order agenda, who do you think they're gonna scapegoat as the main cause of crime? Their fellow Koreans? Not likely!


I really don't care what they think about waegs; they could try and kick us all out but enough of us would cheat the system. I'm talking about what they'll do to intellectuals and university professors and musicians. My girlfriend didn't have a dad for three years of her early childhood because her dad was in Park Junghee's guesthouse for the overachievers, underachievers, activists, and random criminals (just to make things spicy).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
On the other hand wrote:

Yeah, I think Uri gets a bad rap on Dave's as the party of anti-wayguk xenophobia, largely because of the '02/'03 hatefest. But five'll get ya ten that the GNP would be at least as bad for that sort of thing, albeit for their own purposes. They'd ease up on the anti-GI stuff, not because they like Americans but because they like the military. And if, like most social conservatives, they start pursuing a law and order agenda, who do you think they're gonna scapegoat as the main cause of crime? Their fellow Koreans? Not likely!


I really don't care what they think about waegs; they could try and kick us all out but enough of us would cheat the system. I'm talking about what they'll do to intellectuals and university professors and musicians. My girlfriend didn't have a dad for three years of her early childhood because her dad was in Park Junghee's guesthouse for the overachievers, underachievers, activists, and random criminals (just to make things spicy).


I agree. There are worse things they could do than ship out all the ESLers. I just used race-baiting as an example of things that right-wing governments tend to do.

Overall, though, I'm not sure how far the GNP could go in reviving the mass imprisonment of dissidents without making Korea the object of international scorn. On the other hand, I'm sure they wouldn't be holding any debates about repealing the National Security Laws either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RACETRAITOR



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul, South Korea

PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:

I agree. There are worse things they could do than ship out all the ESLers. I just used race-baiting as an example of things that right-wing governments tend to do.

Overall, though, I'm not sure how far the GNP could go in reviving the mass imprisonment of dissidents without making Korea the object of international scorn. On the other hand, I'm sure they wouldn't be holding any debates about repealing the National Security Laws either.


I don't see a difference between enacting those laws and illegally imprisoning people for being "North Korean supporters." This country really hasn't travelled far from its dictatorship roots. Especially considering the current world situation, where fighting the Axis of Evil is seen as more important than human rights, it would be in the name of anti-Communism, so who would step in? The US would be smiling.

And yeah, you'd probably see a lot of English teachers signing up for the ol' Samchung University.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Privateer



Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Location: Easy Street.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2006 12:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think any of the parties are going to set the clock back 20 years and start mass imprisonment of 'North Korea supporters' again...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 1 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International