|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Are you PRO or ANTI football (aka soccer) ??? |
| PRO |
|
66% |
[ 32 ] |
| ANTI |
|
33% |
[ 16 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 48 |
|
| Author |
Message |
waggo
Joined: 18 May 2003 Location: pusan baby!
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ajgeddes wrote: |
THe problem here is that most of the people here that are not from USA or Canada, have absolutely no idea how to play hockey, because for most of them, just skating is probably a challenge.
Why don't more countries play hockey? They can't afford it. On average in Canada, the price for one kid to play hockey is probably $1,500 just for equipment and ice time, and that is really on the cheap side. If the kid plays for any kind of travelling team, triple or quadruple those numbers. Keep on doing that every year, and it really adds up in the end. Soccer is actually the most widely played sport in Canada. Why? It costs like $40 for the whole year.
You talk about the passion that people feel for soccer. Go to Canada and I guarantee that passion is matched or exceeded by a large number of people by how they feel about hockey. |
I dont need to go to Canada ...I am bored rigid on a daily basis by the the grey people from that country about how passionate they are about hockey. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan The Chainsawman

Joined: 05 May 2005
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ajgeddes wrote: |
I like soccer, I play soccer and all-around, it is a great sport. My only problem with soccer has to do with exactly how tough the players are.
My problem isn't that the sport isn't tough enough, it is that the players aren't. I can't stand it when two guys are running for the ball, one guy accidentally breathes on the other player, and then this player than proceeds to act like he was hit with a shot-gun and then rolls around on the ground for a while, then realizes nobody is looking at him , whines about getting no whistle, and gets up and is completely fine, and realizes his ACT didn't work this time. So, if he just waits one minute, he can do the whole act again and maybe get a whistle. So, I guess my problem is that the players need to grow some balls and act like a man.
That is really my ONLY beef with the sport which I otherwise really enjoy watching on tv, but everytime someone does that, I can't help but cringe and want to punch the player in the face. |
Rugby owns both of these sissy sports. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diablo3
Joined: 11 Sep 2004
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hehehe, which code of rugby?
Anyway, soccer is simple, there is only 1 version understood around the world. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan The Chainsawman

Joined: 05 May 2005
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I dun remember to many concussions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yaya

Joined: 25 Feb 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've grown to like soccer since I've lived in Korea but well, I have to say the low-scoring nature of the game is a turnoff to many in the United States, esp. the German or Italian varieties. And the penalty shootout is also a HUGE turnoff as well.
I also don't see soccer growing in stature in the United States anytime soon despite the hundreds of thousands of kids playing the game and the "soccer mom" phenomenon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flakfizer

Joined: 12 Nov 2004 Location: scaling the Cliffs of Insanity with a frayed rope.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
What's with the people on this thread saying hockey is played only in Canada or the US? Take a look at the NHL rosters and you will see that about 50 percent are native Canadians, 15 percent Americans, and the other 35 percent are Europeans. Lots of Russians, Swedes and Chechs.
Anyway, soccer is pretty lame. It's too bad because I like the concept of it, but it would benefit a lot by taking a look at hockey. (No, I am not Canadian). Fewer players, a much faster moving game, play behind the net (that would be cool in soccer) and much less of that excitement-killing offsides garbage. I like the blue line way of determining offsides so much more. Soccer players get plenty of arm excercise by raising their arms in an attempt to get the officials to call offsides every freaking time they get beat.
Soccer is popular to play because all you have to do is run around a lot without falling down...wait, actually falling down a lot is a plus if you can be trained to clasp your ankle and writhe. It's perfect for all the left over kids who are not tall enough to play basketball, strong enough to play football/rugby/wrestling etc. and not fast enough to run track.
It's popular among fans because so many of them are nationalistic morons. Take away the whole nationalism and it would be like swimming, or speed skating-popuar during the Olympics, but not so much in non-nationalistic venues. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Swiss James

Joined: 26 Nov 2003 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Flakfizer, here are the top 5 stupidest parts of your post:
| Quote: |
Anyway, soccer is pretty lame...it would benefit a lot by taking a look at hockey. |
Yes, then maybe it could scale to the ascendant heights of popularity that Ice Hockey has reached.
| Quote: |
Fewer players, a much faster moving game, play behind the net (that would be cool in soccer)
|
We already have this- it's called 5-a-side football and is fun to play, but nowhere near the spectacle as a spectator sport. Play both, then watch both- tell me I'm wrong.
| Quote: |
Soccer is popular to play because all you have to do is run around a lot without falling down
|
Also writing a novel is just putting a bunch of words together
| Quote: |
It's perfect for all the left over kids who are not tall enough to play basketball, strong enough to play football/rugby/wrestling etc. and not fast enough to run track.
|
...and have a bizarre urge to play the world's most watched sport, get all the girls and be adored by millions. When was the last time you saw someone walking around with the name of a rugby player or wrestler written on their backs?
| Quote: |
It's popular among fans because so many of them are nationalistic morons. Take away the whole nationalism and it would be like swimming, or speed skating-popuar during the Olympics, but not so much in non-nationalistic venues. |
Which of course would explain why nobody cares about domestic matches such as these.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pegpig

Joined: 10 May 2005
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
They're getting ready to scrap, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Swiss James wrote: |
Flakfizer, here are the top 5 stupidest parts of your post:
| Quote: |
Anyway, soccer is pretty lame...it would benefit a lot by taking a look at hockey. |
Yes, then maybe it could scale to the ascendant heights of popularity that Ice Hockey has reached.
| Quote: |
Fewer players, a much faster moving game, play behind the net (that would be cool in soccer)
|
We already have this- it's called 5-a-side football and is fun to play, but nowhere near the spectacle as a spectator sport. Play both, then watch both- tell me I'm wrong.
| Quote: |
Soccer is popular to play because all you have to do is run around a lot without falling down
|
Also writing a novel is just putting a bunch of words together
| Quote: |
It's perfect for all the left over kids who are not tall enough to play basketball, strong enough to play football/rugby/wrestling etc. and not fast enough to run track.
|
...and have a bizarre urge to play the world's most watched sport, get all the girls and be adored by millions. When was the last time you saw someone walking around with the name of a rugby player or wrestler written on their backs?
| Quote: |
It's popular among fans because so many of them are nationalistic morons. Take away the whole nationalism and it would be like swimming, or speed skating-popuar during the Olympics, but not so much in non-nationalistic venues. |
Which of course would explain why nobody cares about domestic matches such as these.
 |
flakfizer=owned... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jaderedux

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Lurking outside Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Like soccer okay. Not much scoring. Hate the DRAMA...oh he brushed me....fall down writhe on the ground. Oh no penalty? Hop back up and start playing. If you ain't bleeding from an artery or a bone isn't showing get your butt up and play. They do have great endurance but then so do ballet dancers and marathon runners.
I really have gotten into rugby. GO ALL BLACKS! Now there is a sport I can get into. Scoring, hitting, blood and guts and dear gawd (ladies point of view here) Men built like the proverbial brick *hit house.
Hockey oh yeah baby. Give guys big sticks to hit each other with now thats entertainment. It can be low scoring but there is always the possibility of "blood on the ice"! Woo hoo. Lots of action.
I really am not that fond of pro football. However I am a Husker! Go Big Red...for the non-footballers that is the University of Nebraska. On game day 80,000 people dressed in red fill a stadium in a state that has just over 1.7 million people. Like the college stuff but pro ball sort of sucks to be honest.
All that being said I like that there are more soccer teams in schools and after school programs in the U.S.A. It is a sport more people can play. Gives more women a chance to get involved in competitive sports and it is great EXERCISE.
Jade |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| flakfizer wrote: |
What's with the people on this thread saying hockey is played only in Canada or the US? Take a look at the NHL rosters and you will see that about 50 percent are native Canadians, 15 percent Americans, and the other 35 percent are Europeans. Lots of Russians, Swedes and Chechs.
Fewer players, a much faster moving game, play behind the net (that would be cool in soccer) and much less of that excitement-killing offsides garbage. I like the blue line way of determining offsides so much more |
The game would be too easy if there was no offside rule. Indeed, the offside rule changed radically in recent years (you can now be a mile offside yet 'inactive' and then score a valid goal when onside) because the game was too easy with the old offside rule. All the defenders had to do was all move forward as a unit and catch the attacker offside. Bingo! The changes sorted that little loophole out.
I once formally taught the offside rule to a bunch of women as part of a course I did. They got it! The offside rule is not difficult and not garbage. It's an essential feature of the game. The problem with offside, however, is that it's difficult to monitor consistently and valid goals get disallowed whilst invalid goals are given. That's all part of the fun though. After a soccer game, the discussions involve "that goal wasn't legitimate", "that penalty was a poor decision", "he should've been sent off for that dangerous challenge". By contrast, the after-game comments in American Football are "he played a great game". Boring. No controversy. No passion. Just a load of blokes clattering into one another for a few hours. Dreadful shower. I don't like Hockey because I can never see where the puck is - and considering the puck is the most important object in the game that's rather a drawback. However I prefer it to American Football and Baseball infinitely. I'm not being anti-America because I'M NOT ANTI-AMERICA AT ALL but I think its sports suck.
Generally, we English, I think, side with the Americans over our European counterparts - we speak the same language and we have many cultural things in common like Rock and Roll. But there's a divide when it comes to sport. And Soccer - believe me - will get popular in the States before American Football/Baseball gets popular in England. It will never be popular in England because we think it sucks nuts. Sorry guys. Don't have a fit over it - we're still your friends and allies. We'll continue giving you John Lennon and Pink Floyd whilst you give us Nirvana and The Doors. But sport? Never. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flakfizer

Joined: 12 Nov 2004 Location: scaling the Cliffs of Insanity with a frayed rope.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Swiss James wrote: |
Flakfizer, here are the top 5 stupidest parts of your post:
| Quote: |
Anyway, soccer is pretty lame...it would benefit a lot by taking a look at hockey. |
Yes, then maybe it could scale to the ascendant heights of popularity that Ice Hockey has reached.
Oh, this thread was about popularity? I thought it was about the merits of soccer as a sport. Vanilla is the most popular ice cream flavor. And soccer is very vanilla. So, fine, it's popular. So is Adam Sandler.
| Quote: |
Fewer players, a much faster moving game, play behind the net (that would be cool in soccer)
|
We already have this- it's called 5-a-side football and is fun to play, but nowhere near the spectacle as a spectator sport. Play both, then watch both- tell me I'm wrong.
That is not what the OP was discussing, is it? I thought he was discussing soccer proper, if you will. Soccer proper does not "have this."
| Quote: |
Soccer is popular to play because all you have to do is run around a lot without falling down
|
Also writing a novel is just putting a bunch of words together. Yes, if it's a crappy, embossed one, which what soccer would be if it were a novel.
| Quote: |
It's perfect for all the left over kids who are not tall enough to play basketball, strong enough to play football/rugby/wrestling etc. and not fast enough to run track.
|
...and have a bizarre urge to play the world's most watched sport, get all the girls and be adored by millions. When was the last time you saw someone walking around with the name of a rugby player or wrestler written on their backs?
How predictably unclever of you to jump on wrestling and rugby rather than American football and basketball because I see far more people wearing jerseys from those two sports than soccer. Oh, and it doesn't matter anyway. Your entire argument seems to be popular=good. If you believe that abot everything, I truly pity you.
| Quote: |
It's popular among fans because so many of them are nationalistic morons. Take away the whole nationalism and it would be like swimming, or speed skating-popuar during the Olympics, but not so much in non-nationalistic venues. |
Which of course would explain why nobody cares about domestic matches such as these.
No, it explains why it is seemingly popular on a world level. There are certainly some countries where soccer is very popular at the local level (western Europe, South America), but there are also plenty of countries that don't really care too much about soccer until it become a "national pride" thing.
] |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flakfizer

Joined: 12 Nov 2004 Location: scaling the Cliffs of Insanity with a frayed rope.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Satori wrote: |
[
flakfizer=owned... |
Satori=head-nodding lackey |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flakfizer

Joined: 12 Nov 2004 Location: scaling the Cliffs of Insanity with a frayed rope.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
waggo
Joined: 18 May 2003 Location: pusan baby!
|
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|