View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stumptown
Joined: 11 Apr 2005 Location: Paju: Wife beating capital of Korea
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:35 am Post subject: My family get up early..?!?! |
|
|
I just had an argument with a Korean English teacher about that phrase. She showed me the book that she uses and it had two phrases: "My family is very large" and "My family get up early." I found the second phrase to be really awkward. I told her that it wasn't right, just like saying "My family go to church." Unless this is some British English thing I'm not aware of, could someone help me come up with a way to explain why it isn't correct. I get stuck on explanations sometimes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I assume you think it should be "my family GETS up early/goes to church"? (because a family is a singular thing)
Interesting question. It's like....Americans say of a band "Black Sabbath is a great band", yet the British say "Black Sabbath ARE a great band".
My view...."my family GOES to Church" and "My family GO to church" are both valid, yet "my family are very large" is not (unless of course we wish to say our family members are very fat/large). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:48 am Post subject: Re: My family get up early..?!?! |
|
|
As weird as it may sound ( i agree ) i think technically it would be "GET".
Why?
My family = THEY ... not HE or SHE etc ...
So, THEY agrees with GET not THEY GETS ...
Get it?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stumptown
Joined: 11 Apr 2005 Location: Paju: Wife beating capital of Korea
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:54 am Post subject: Re: My family get up early..?!?! |
|
|
igotthisguitar wrote: |
As weird as it may sound ( i agree ) i think technically it would be "GET".
Why?
My family = THEY ... not HE or SHE etc ...
So, THEY agrees with GET not THEY GETS ...
Get it?  |
Yeah, I got that. It just sounded funny to me. I always tell people "My family lives in the US." But, I also say "I had some beers last night" which is grammatically incorrect but won't raise any flags in a conversation.
Interesting point Spinoza. I didn't know that. From what the both of you said I'm more inclined to change my manner of speaking. American English is pretty quirky to say the least, and that is coming from an American. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jeonnam Jinx

Joined: 06 Oct 2005 Location: Jeonnam
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just my two cents' worth, I would simply say "gets" because "my family" is a singular noun. Of course, "family" is not a "he" or a "she" in the third person singular (nor is it "they"), but "it," as there is only one family to which you are referring. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
krats1976

Joined: 14 May 2003
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
'Family' is a collective noun. In American English, that's treated as a singular noun, so "My family gets up early" would be correct in the US. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
denverdeath
Joined: 21 May 2005 Location: Boo-sahn
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why don't you tell the teacher to insert "members" after family to make it sound better. That is, "My family members get up early." I guess because I'm from Canada, the example given sounds REALLY strange. I would go with "My family gets(not get) up early" as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sheba
Joined: 16 May 2005 Location: Here there and everywhere!
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Verb grouping
Group 1 - he, she it (Gets, likes, wants, has, walks, wears)
Group 2 - I, you, we, they (get, like, want, has, walk, wear)
'Family' can be classed as 'it' or 'they'. However, I believe in this case it is classed as they.
My brother likes cake - he likes cake.
Mum and I like cake - we like cake
My family gets up early - it gets up early
My family get up early - they get up early |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
riley
Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Location: where creditors can find me
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just googled on collective nouns and found this.
http://www.learnenglish.org.uk/grammar/archive/collective_nouns.html
So, while I, as an American, use collective nouns as singular, maybe some of you are British, so you feel comfortable teaching collectives as plural.
Of course, if family is plural, what is families? Can both be plural? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah yes, collective nouns.
I'm English but this still sounds weird to me (probably been here too long):
"My bank are awful."
"The company are doing well."
It's been a long time - maybe 200 years? - since we thought of a company as a band of gentlemen rather than a single corporate entity.
On the other hand, with some nouns, both singular and plural forms sound ok to me. I suspect many other Brits would be comfortable with both these days:
"The family is going out to dinner." / "The family are going out to dinner."
"The team is playing well." / "The team are playing well."
It just depends if you think of a family as a unit or as a collection of individuals. Oh and for the plural 'families' it's also "The families are going out to dinner.".
So why not just simplify and treat all collective nouns as singular? Well you can go wrong that way too:
"The team took its seats." vs "The team took their seats."
Which one sounds better to you? Which one comes most naturally? (I nicked these examples out of a book by the way). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiberious aka Sparkles

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
denverdeath wrote: |
Why don't you tell the teacher to insert "members"... |
Totally thought that was going somewhere else.
Sparkles*_* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:15 am Post subject: Re: My family get up early..?!?! |
|
|
stumptown wrote: |
Yeah, I got that. It just sounded funny to me. I always tell people "My family lives in the US." But, I also say "I had some beers last night" which is grammatically incorrect but won't raise any flags in a conversation.
|
Actually the word beers makes me cringe every time I hear it, though I'm not really sure why. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
J.B. Clamence

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I say "get" is incorrect. It should be "gets". And I'm American, if it matters. I would never say, "My family get up early." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jeonnam Jinx

Joined: 06 Oct 2005 Location: Jeonnam
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Actually the word beers makes me cringe every time I hear it, though I'm not really sure why. |
Hi Peppermint (been reading your posts for a while now. You always have something worthwhile to say (IMHO). Yeah, I feel the same way about beers. I think, initially, beer was an uncountable noun. So, we always say "some beer" or "a bottle of beer, two bottles of beer." But, I'm sure you know that.
I think, though, that the language is changing. Before, we would always stress that beverages are uncountable and leave it at that, using containers to quantify them. Nowadays, it is quite common, though, to hear someone say, in a coffee shop, "Two coffees to go, please."
Looks like, conversationally, some non-count nouns are becoming countable (at least, informally). Just what I've noticed... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes. "My family gets up early" sounds better.
A family is a single thing. A team is a single thing.
British English is different. They also say "mumf" instead of "month". At least in the Harry Potter movie I watched last night. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|