View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
seoulunitarian

Joined: 06 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 5:40 am Post subject: Any Ayn Rand Fans? |
|
|
Hi All,
I was wondering if there are any Ayn Rand fans on this board. I recently finished reading The Fountainhead and am almost finished with Atlas Shrugged. I just bought The Philosophy of Ayn Rand by Leonard Peikoff, the foremost authority on Rand's philosophy, Objectivism. If any of you are fans, and would like to start a reading/discussion group, that would be awesome. I am in Suwon.
Peace |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Our real self-interest is spiritual development beyond the bodily, mental and intellectual platforms. "Objectivism" may facilitate material progress, but that won't ultimately benefit or satisfy our real self...( Hey, I should start a bhakti-yoga club...) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seoulunitarian

Joined: 06 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 6:20 am Post subject: re: |
|
|
Rteacher wrote: |
Our real self-interest is spiritual development beyond the bodily, mental and intellectual platforms. "Objectivism" may facilitate material progress, but that won't ultimately benefit or satisfy our real self...( Hey, I should start a bhakti-yoga club...) |
I think if I understand Rand correctly, though she is an atheist, material self-interest facilitates obtaining meaning in life. Of course, she would not necessarily classify that as spiritual. But I think that's as close to spirituality as we can get.
Peace |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
My understanding is that the meaning of our life here is that whatever we have done throughout our life will shape our mentality at the time of death - which will determine our next birth. The spiritual technique of regularly chanting transcendental names of God every day (preferably in early morning hours before sunrise...) practically guarantees a much better situation in the next life, and one can experience transcendental pleasure even in this life... You - or anyone - can chant whenever convenient. In Korea, even Buddhist beads can be used (as long as there are 108) or you can get a cheap meditation kit from the following link:
http://krishna.tv/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=MMK&Category_Code=CB2&Product_Count=0
Here's also a pretty good discussion link: http://www.chakra.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
coolsage
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: The overcast afternoon of the soul
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
It seems that some members of every generation find it necessary to read this series of badly-written exhortations of 'egoism'. Her work is essentially claptrap, but useful as a journey through quasi-fascist thinking. Her contribution to literature, if one can call it that, was during the thirties and forties when political extremism was rather similar to what it is these days. For a more complete picture of those times I would recommend any work by Simone de Beauvoir, and 'The Mandarins' in particular. And that woman could Write. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seoulunitarian

Joined: 06 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:11 am Post subject: re: |
|
|
coolsage wrote: |
It seems that some members of every generation find it necessary to read this series of badly-written exhortations of 'egoism'. Her work is essentially claptrap, but useful as a journey through quasi-fascist thinking. Her contribution to literature, if one can call it that, was during the thirties and forties when political extremism was rather similar to what it is these days. For a more complete picture of those times I would recommend any work by Simone de Beauvoir, and 'The Mandarins' in particular. And that woman could Write. |
Thanks for the Simone de Beauvoir recommendation - I will definitely check that out. It's interesting the different emotions Rand draws from her readers. People either love or hate her. Actually, the Objectivist movement is kind of cult-like in it's intensity - something that goes directly against her philosophy.
Peace |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
I read Atlas Shrugged and Fountainhead way back in the day (high school and Uni), but never read any analysis of the philosophy/politics of her books.
I started reading (I can't remember which one) because I had heard it described as a Science Fiction novel.
Anyway, I came away thinking that her books were kind of heavy-handed for fictional novels.
And I came away thinking that her ideas sounded great on paper, just like Marx.
But just like the flaws in Marx's works- people don't actually behave the way you'd like or expect them to, even though you might have a fantastic economic system for everyone to follow.
I'd recommend John Brunner's "Sheep Look Up" and Ursula K. LeGuin's "The Lathe of Heaven" for further reading, not so much for political/economic philosophy as on the foibles of mankind in general. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leslie Cheswyck

Joined: 31 May 2003 Location: University of Western Chile
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bulsajo wrote: |
I read Atlas Shrugged and Fountainhead way back in the day (high school and Uni), but never read any analysis of the philosophy/politics of her books.
|
I got about two thirds through Fountainhead. Couldn't stand the strident, bombastic self-righteousness.
I found her non-fiction more to the point.
For the New Intellectual
The Virtue of Selfishness
Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal
Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology
The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution
Philosophy: Who Needs It
I would often rave about her to the guys and all but there was no way I was going to toss that word epistemologicalically around.
I don't get the quasi-fascist bit, coolsage, considering her philosophy is heavily if not strictly anti-collectivist ... a collectivism without which a fascist system could not long survive. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vox

Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Location: Jeollabukdo
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I loved The Fountainhead and We The Living. The Fountainhead was a stronger, more commanding, impressive work I felt.
The Fountainhead constituted a posthumous lesson I learned on my own about living and working as an artist for 15 years. I remember wondering if it would have done me more harm than good to have read it at the beginning of my career as opposed to the end.
We The Living was a long hard slog right up to about the first third then I started to get into it.
I think the lessons are really important for young people especially in their idealist phase, and especially since it appears that substance and competence are increasingly out of fashion in several sectors of the western workplace. Actually I believe Working Wounded, the column on workopolis.com has an article on this very thing this week. I wrote to the columnist about a letter from last week and he wrote me back saying he was going to devote his column to the issue I raised, which I also feel is embodied in the antagonist character in The Fountainhead.
We need more Ayn Rands around. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I read every word she ever published, even rolled my research and readlings into a university Independent Studies course in 1993 I called "The Philosophic Thought of Ayn Rand". Got an A-minus because my professor didn't think I was critical enough toward her ideas and positions.
A year or two later, after immersing myself in social and political philosophy, even heading off to grad school for a year of study, my understanding of history and philosophy expanded so much that I was scared at how ignorant and narrow minded Rand's thinking takes.
No offense intended, but I'm horrified at how I used to think... it's a kind of tunnel vision,... better: a virus! It's better to be infected as long as you recover and have a stronger political immune system as a result of it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vox

Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Location: Jeollabukdo
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VanIslander wrote: |
No offense intended, but I'm horrified at how I used to think... it's a kind of tunnel vision,... better: a virus! It's better to be infected as long as you recover and have a stronger political immune system as a result of it. |
I don't recommend a diet of Rand, but she does belong on the plate.
Must be suppertime. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vox wrote: |
I don't recommend a diet of Rand, but she does belong on the plate. |
But the taste is so assertive, overpowering other tastes, it can ruin the meal. And it's addictive and not entirely healthy.
Better as a snack food for young people. A junk food with some nutrition, good for growth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jaganath69

Joined: 17 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Although I am an unashamed capitalist, individualist and liberal (in the classical sense) I am scarcely able to stomach her bilge. Worse still is the cult-like church of objectivism she built and which is carried on today by her acolyte, Peikoff. I strongly recommend Popper if you want a more sound defense of liberal capitalism. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vox

Joined: 13 Feb 2005 Location: Jeollabukdo
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VanIslander wrote: |
vox wrote: |
I don't recommend a diet of Rand, but she does belong on the plate. |
But the taste is so assertive, overpowering other tastes, it can ruin the meal. |
No it's not you big baby. It has its place just like the competing perspectives that temper it. It's a necessary part of a constellation of values, at least for people who work in industries where one has to rely on creativity for production.
When I lived and worked in a creative enterprise, there were two polarities that were necessary to be aware of as I waded through daily demands of the industry - serving the patron (the opposite of Rand's characters) and being aware of one's own voice (read: strengths and aptitudes)(an interpretation of Rand's usual protagonist/anti-hero) The ability to survive (I did for 15 years) depended on knowing when to walk to and from each. In the 19th century, the artist as prophet had its place but in the late 20th century, this line of thinking best serves the individual if it is processed as a means of self-cultivation.
It's not exactly the same, but without the Rand polarity present, one's individual strengths don't even get played as a factor. Creative enterprises just become servile wastelands with high turn-over rates for the careers. I've seen the hacks that come out of that result. The image she evokes in The Fountainhead of the ridiculous architectural plan from the inferior architect, the blueprint that looked like a Greek parthenon stretched like rubber 50 storeys up painfully but accurately hits a very sore nerve that many, many creators experience when patrons wander outside their field of knowledge. The industry suffers if you remove all traces of Rand.
The opposite however is also true. Blind fanatic devotees of the Rand polarity wind up really knowing how to cook Kraft dinner and if they are outside cosmopolitan centers, they may as well be cryogenically frozen for all the progress their careers will make. Unless they luck out and create a cult. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd recommend reading Eduardo Galeano well before (if ever) recommending Rand to anyone. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|