|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Logoagogo
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I enjoyed this film actually. I was a fan of the original comic back in the 80s and when Alan Moore wanted nothing to do with it I could understand why, having sat through the godawful League of Extraordinary Gentlemen and From Hell. I think it was pretty well done and more thought-provoking than most Hollywood flicks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChimpumCallao

Joined: 17 May 2005 Location: your mom
|
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2006 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| deessell wrote: |
| If you are an American this is one movie you need to see. It is very close to what is happening right now in your own country. Look closer at the themes my friend. |
how can we look closer at the 'themes' when they were crammed down our throats? not to mention they were the most juvenile themes possible...themes that HS students talk about over a bong. i would love to have a sit down with you about politics as much as id like to slowly burn to death. not to mention its europe that is having their problems with the turbanites. our iranian population, second largest in the world, is thriving and employed, thank you very much.
but i digress...
THIS MOVIE WAS THE BIGGEST CLICHE TIMEWASTER IN THE WORLD.
i agree with the OP. The movie was abysmal and only appealed to the lowest common denominator. the political themes were in your face and it was was about as preachy as a college freshman who just discovered chomsky. seriously, maybe a 13 year old in a che guevara shirt would find the 'message' fresh and important...
'yeah man, like islam is peace...and like if you love each other you should like, be able to be together...'
regardless of what I agree/disagree with, could two themes be more overdone? who the hell thinks this stuff hasn't been beaten to death already?? v for vendetta groundbreaking?? new? a must watch?? maybe for you guys, if Natalie Portman showed her boobies. But alas, no dice.
Can hollywood make a movie without preaching? is it so impossible to tell a story without trying to cram its 14 year old views of governemt and the world in general to a public who just wants to escape for 2 hours.
as someone severely anti-government. and a TRUE anarchist, to leave an anti-government movie with a bad taste in my mouth probably means that it sucked some giant cojones. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 2:03 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
Umm, yeah, well...
I basically found this movie trying to go 2 directions at te same time.
****SPOILER WARNING****
Stop here if you haven't seen the movie.
.
.
.
.
.
.
So, we essentially have an attempt at a comic book/political movie.
If it was going to go the comic book route, I wish it had gone hardcore in that direction.
a la Sin City
This was basically what I was expecting. I wanted a visually dazzling movie with a fast-moving plot.
I wanted her to shave her head about 10 minutes into, then amp up and amplify, join a militant group, and rage against the machine.
That didn't happen. It plodded along, then the political bit got more interesting. However, for political bit to be meaningful, I didn't need a guy with superhuman powers who kills gun-wielding opponents with his knife-skills.
In fact, when it got deeper into the political bit, I was thinking that a nice remake of 1984 would've served me a lot better than this half-baked concept of a guy who can get into anywhere (which is never explained) to kill people and a girl whose specialty is the hide-under-something tactic (used no less than 3 times in this movie).
Ultimately, I'm forced to believe that this dude has a basement pad with a mock prison camp and a subway running under parliament. Not to mention that he special delivered a few 100,000 masks, capes, and hats to people who in turn put them on and walk through military blockades.
I suppose there's a message in there, but it's lost in a lot of silliness.
If this movie is remembered, I believe it will be for how it suits the political climate circa 2006, but a far better movie could have been crafted just from the TV reports and civil unrest.
Does anybody remember a made-for-TV movie from the mid-eighties where this militant group has a nuke on board a boat and the whole movie is done as an unfolding news special report? Something like that.
To sum up, I think there were some interesting ideas, but I can't say that this film was a success. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ajstew
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 5:40 am Post subject: V |
|
|
| It was a good movie. It had a good character in V, but perhaps too much of an over the top character in the Chancellor... but I bought his part, since there have been over the top leaders of nations before. It reminded me of the original Matrix at times, and that's not a bad thing. There are certainly far worse movies out there to watch today... wonder why the OP hasn't ripped into the rest of them? I'll agree with joblo of joblo.com... one of the best movies of the new year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Asiablue
Joined: 15 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Neo was the hero of the Matrix, yet he was a terrorist. It is easier to see him as a hero because the bad guys were machines and his whole life was a dream. Quite the contrast to the Terminator in T2: Judgement Day. In that movie the logic was reversed, with the robot hero trying to help rescue humanity from their real life illusions of a peaceful future.
In most movies the bad guys are usually human. In V, the most human character was hidden behind a Guy Fawkes mask and never shows his face. This allows the symbolism of V being any guy, you know, like you or me. So it's easy to see ourselves in him. Everyone wants to believe they could be a hero. I know I do. You know you do too. God help us on the day we are called to the test.
V wears a mask for symbolic as well as esthetic reasons. Due to his hideous appearance, caused by the government he now seeks to overthrow, the mask is a kindness to anyone who might see him. Remember the scene where he puts on his gloves?
In politics truth is the opinion that survives. Nelson Mandela was a terrorist who survived to become the first black President of South Africa. George Washington was a terrorist who survived to be the first President of the USA. Several Prime Ministers if Isreal were former terrorists and other notables of history not mentioned here. What would be the point? Names listed here would be terrorists for some and freedom fighters for others.
The best scene for me was near the end, when the crowd wearing identical Fawkes costumes begin removing their masks all at once. It reminded me of another movie about another terrorist. You know, the one where all those grungy losers stood up in manly dignity to say: "I am Spartacus."
Firstly, the goal of this movie is the same as any other: be watched by as many people as possible.
Secondly, it hopes to be finnancially successful as a result of all those folks watching it.
Thirdly, V hopes it's ideas are discussed long afterwards, in coffee shops, university classrooms and messages boards like this one.
But perhaps those who dislike this movie are most troubled by it's greatest achievement: revealing what they hold most dear, their political beliefs, ideals and even in part, their identity, as a lie. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought it was all right, though the serious political themes right alongside such a ridiculous and preposterous plot did look a little bit silly. Then again, a lot of Americans would be [a hem] enough to think it's all perfectly plausible and I guess that's whom the film is directed at.
How do you explain to a k-girl what a 'fingerman' is? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thunndarr

Joined: 30 Sep 2003
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For anyone who disliked the movie on the grounds that the themes were sophomoric...Consider that the social commentary in MOST sc-fi is pretty elementary.
Consider, in no particular order:
The Matrix (Oh, perception is reality! Whoa! We're only limited, by like, what we think we're limited by. Dude!)
Equilibrium (Like, emotions are, important, and stuff! Burning books is, like, way uncool!)
Starship Troopers, the book, not the movie (Citizenship only for the military, corporal punishment is better than incarceration. Get these bugs off me!)
Blade Runner (Whoa, that robot-replicant thingy is, like, emotional and, like stuff. Is he, like, a human or something?)
Armaggedon (France should be wiped off the face of the earth. Editor's note: I agree with this one.)
Minority Report (Like, what if, like I was going to like kill someone, but like, the time cops stopped me before I did it. Would I still be guilty? Pass the nachos.)
V for Vendetta was cool. Not the greatest movie ever, but certainly not as bad as some would suggest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IchiTK

Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Location: on my way...
|
Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just saw it tonight. It totally rocked, I highly recommend it.
And thanks to the OP for putting an extra burr in my brain to remember and check this flick.
I'd be interested to know why someone hated it--maybe expecting something more akin to Batman? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hermes.trismegistus

Joined: 08 Sep 2005
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ChimpumCallao wrote: |
| as someone severely anti-government. and a TRUE anarchist, to leave an anti-government movie with a bad taste in my mouth probably means that it sucked some giant cojones. |
I love it when minority voices attempt to universalize their perceptions.
With the plethora of anarchist communities out there serving as an example, YOU DO NOT SPEAK FOR OTHERS. Many anarchists - of varrying stripes - enjoyed the movie greatly. It was quite the phenom in several anarchist communities, and the hype was probably greater than any other event over the past 3 years.
You speak of sophomoric themes, but this just shows that you don't understand the situation as well as you portray yourself to. The unwashed masses don't deal with subtle innuendo. They get lost in the metaphor. They fail to associate the thematic elements with their own lives. They externalize the problems instead of internalizing their own role in the perpetuation of oppressive paradigms. Personal responsibility doesn't exactly have much glamour among domesticated primates.
Chomsky never, to my knowledge, advocated terrorism, so your association seems to miss the target. Furthermore, Chomsky rarely takes the criticisms far enough, and I'd rather see him marginalized than aggrandized.
I don't consider myself a "true anarchist", but I do realize that the views you have expressed don't appear to be universal among "true anarchists" - whatever that may be. I'd rather sustainable, integral solutions over anarchistic solutions any day.
| Quote: |
| Can hollywood make a movie without preaching? is it so impossible to tell a story without trying to cram its 14 year old views of governemt and the world in general to a public who just wants to escape for 2 hours. |
Sure. They make plenty of them. I refer to them generally as "tripe". If you want to escape, pick a movie that doesn't have an agenda. However, I find some amusement in a "true anarchist" wanting to "escape" and bitching about "preaching". If the public were exposed to more integral "preaching", the world wouldn't be in such dire circumstances, with the Singularity rapidly approaching and no obvious avenues for affecting wide-scale sustainable memetic evolution.
Namaste. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cohiba

Joined: 01 Feb 2005
|
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 8:14 pm Post subject: Level |
|
|
I thought this movie's dialogue was aimed slightly higher
than the usual 13-year-old level of most flics.
I enjoyed it. However, I'm glad I didn't pay for it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 10:08 am Post subject: Re: Level |
|
|
| Cohiba wrote: |
| However, I'm glad I didn't pay for it. |
You naïve fool! You always pay for it in the end, one way or another...
Oh, wait- That's if you're a chick... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jacl
Joined: 31 Oct 2005
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| When that guy started going off on the v and the vicar vivarious vvvvvvvvvvvvv, I closed the window on my computer, right clicked on the movie, and chose "Remove all files". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sillywilly

Joined: 20 Jan 2003 Location: Canada.
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't seen the movie. I had intended to, though. i read the comic several years ago ( believe it was written in the 80s) and thought that it was a piece of crap. A lot of people disagree with me on that, though.
Well, maybe piece of crap is too much. Allen Moore wrote Watchmen, which is probably one of the best stories in comic history. the grandpapa of the genre. V for Vendetta did not stand up in comparison. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 10:52 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
| Quote: |
| When that guy started going off on the v and the vicar vivarious vvvvvvvvvvvvv, I closed the window on my computer |
That means you missed the bit where he took the Viagra.
Bummer, dude.
That was my favorite part.
Aside from the other part where he flirts with incest before riding his "secret" subway car full of ammonium nitrate down his "secret" subway tunnel under parliament to explode before his "secret" friends, to whom he'd "secretly" mailed thousands of his "secret" costumes, who turn out to be you and I.
Yup, that was my other favorite part. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|