| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
zappadelta

Joined: 31 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| This seems like a Job Related post, no? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Homer wrote: |
In most cases they are good enough to teach the grammar. The conversation bit is a challenge for them sometimes.
Their knowledge of English grammar is however far superior to your average foreign teacher. |
No it's not, at least not at either howgan or public school (maybe uni's different).
Take grammar trivia:
1. 'The milk was delivered by the deliveryman' - change to active voice. Not one of five teachers had a clue but my top student last year nailed it.
2.
'Waiting for a bus, I had a heart attack'.
'Waiting for the bus, a brick fell on my head'.
'Waiting for the bus, the man realised he was late'.
Which is incorrect? 1/3 of my students could get it from guessing, but no teacher had a clue.
I could go on and on. No teacher at my school could write anything grammatical to save his or her life. Some of them have an impressive (written) vocabulary but that's about it. In terms of grammar all they've done is memorised patterns and how to identify adjectives from adverbs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't feel qualified to comment on the teachers but the Korean textbooks I've looked at seem to have pretty good grammatical explanations in them.
Precious few of any of the students I've taught seem ever to have absorbed the lessons in these books, however. It's about time the myth that Korean students are good at grammar was put to rest once and for all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tiberious aka Sparkles

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Corporal wrote: |
| ...have never heard of Phillis Wheatley... |
Ironic that you and I were once on a witch hunt re: Harin.
Sparkles*_* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good enough to explain in Korean, mostly, but often a struggle to speak with. You find yourself still teaching when you talk with them, at least some.
Yes, and the idea they know grammar is silly. Knowing terms, versus knowing how to use them in speaking or writing, is different.
Last edited by jajdude on Sun Apr 02, 2006 6:38 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tiberious aka Sparkles

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| zappadelta wrote: |
| This seems like a Job Related post, no? |
Omarosa is such a b*tch.
Advantage: O/T Forum.
Sparkles*_* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| In terms of grammar all they've done is memorised patterns and how to identify adjectives from adverbs. |
Which..compared to many foreign teachers is a hell of an improvement!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Homer wrote: |
| Quote: |
| In terms of grammar all they've done is memorised patterns and how to identify adjectives from adverbs. |
Which..compared to many foreign teachers is a hell of an improvement!  |
Well that's true, especially if the writing on this board is any indication. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Irelevant: they will only use English for listen and repeat drills. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Homer wrote: |
In most cases they are good enough to teach the grammar. The conversation bit is a challenge for them sometimes.
Their knowledge of English grammar is however far superior to your average foreign teacher. |
Too bad usage is soooo much more important to acquisition.... ah, well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|