| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
fiveeagles
Joined: 19 May 2005
Location: Vancouver
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 7:03 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
[deleted]
Last edited by Gopher on Mon Jun 12, 2006 5:36 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 7:29 pm Post subject: Re: Pentagon Strike |
|
|
| fiveeagles wrote: |
| What do you think? |
What is this, "trot out the tired old videos" theories or something?
Here are the tired old rebuttals:
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=6&c=y
For those having trouble keeping up, we've moved on. The hot topic is now WTC7. Why is it 'hot'? Because it's all that is left for 9/11 conspiracy theorists- the rest has been effectively debunked every sane person's satisfaction.
There will always be crazy shlt on the internet, including here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like this site because it lists some of the various "disinformation" sites.
http://www.oilempire.us/state.html
If you want the "truth" you have sort through the mountains of BS.
And I disagree with the above post, but then I suppose many might say that I am not exactly "sane". 
What has been "debunked" are the hoax theories, the real questions surrounding 9/11 still remain.
Here is a site that replies to the Popular Mechanics article.
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics.htm
It would seem that the article raises more questions than it answers.
But I guess only an "insane" person would want anwers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| some waygug-in wrote: |
I like this site because it lists some of the various "disinformation" sites.
http://www.oilempire.us/state.html
If you want the "truth" you have sort through the mountains of BS.
What has been "debunked" are the hoax theories, the real questions surrounding 9/11 still remain.
Here is a site that replies to the Popular Mechanics article.
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics.htm
It would seem that the article raises more questions than it answers.
But I guess only an "insane" person would want anwers. |
re: The now infamous Popular Mechanics "truth" article, guess what high-ranking gov't good guy official author Benjamin Chertoff is related to?
Here's a hint ...
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| some waygug-in wrote: |
I like this site because it lists some of the various "disinformation" sites.
http://www.oilempire.us/state.html
If you want the "truth" you have sort through the mountains of BS.
And I disagree with the above post, but then I suppose many might say that I am not exactly "sane".
What has been "debunked" are the hoax theories, the real questions surrounding 9/11 still remain.
Here is a site that replies to the Popular Mechanics article.
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics.htm
It would seem that the article raises more questions than it answers.
But I guess only an "insane" person would want anwers. |
http://www.serendipity.li/hr/zundel.htm
another holocaust denial site that throws out conspriacy theories about 9-11.
Coinsidence? Nope.
9-11 conspiracy theorists for the most part are professional disinformation artists who say what they do because they have a politcal goal of of trying to weaken , overthrow or destroy the United States government. not because they want to investigate the truth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| 9-11 conspiracy theorists for the most part are professional disinformation artists who say what they do because they have a politcal goal of of trying to weaken , overthrow or destroy the United States government. not because they want to investigate the truth. |
While we're on the topic, let me remind the general viewing public to take a look at one of the biggest 9/11 Conspiracy theorist "insiders". 
His cousin was responsible for overseeing the manufacture of the now infamous Poopular "Mechanics" official-line reinforcement story.
Coinsidence? Nope
To quote someone who terribly loves using the catchphrase:
"Case Closed". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| Prove his cousin was behind the story. |
Look Joo, i'm not going to spoon you feed the facts. If you're too lazy to investigate this simple truth yourself, buddy that's you're problem.
Which theories? The OFFICIAL line views & conclusions, or those which challenge the all too often repeated politically "correct" propaganda, half-truths & lies? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is a color-coded critique of the PM article:
http://911review.com/pm/markup/
Even the most "politically challenged" should be able to make enough sense of this one to see that there are some serious flaws with the PM article. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
[
| Quote: |
| Look Joo, i'm not going to spoon you feed the facts. If you're too lazy to investigate this simple truth yourself, buddy that's you're problem. |
you don't have any facts just misinformation from Jeff Rense and company.
| Quote: |
| Which theories? The OFFICIAL line views & conclusions, or those which challenge the all too often repeated politically "correct" propaganda, half-truths & lies? |
That site takes down your conspriacy theories.
When some keeps making charges and they are proven wrong and then all they do is make another charge maybe it is time to question the motives of those making the charge. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
