View previous topic :: View next topic |
What to you think is the major contributing factor? |
Violence in schools is creating an inferior learning environment. |
|
7% |
[ 1 ] |
A government monopoly over the school system has established a lack of competition. |
|
7% |
[ 1 ] |
A deficiency in the quality of teaching is to blame. |
|
15% |
[ 2 ] |
The Parents are to self absorbed to push little Johnny/Jenny. |
|
30% |
[ 4 ] |
Driven by a need to fit in, teens are working through high school to afford the latest trend. |
|
7% |
[ 1 ] |
This generation of kids has been spoiled by their parent��s hard work. |
|
15% |
[ 2 ] |
Other |
|
15% |
[ 2 ] |
|
Total Votes : 13 |
|
Author |
Message |
JAWINSEOUL
Joined: 19 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:07 pm Post subject: 'Stupid in America' |
|
|
I'm interested in hearing why the richest country in the world is failing to educate their youth. American students fail in international comparisons, placing 18th in reading, 22nd in science and 28th in math — behind countries like Poland, Canada, Australia and Korea. Are American kids less intelligent? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Compunction Junction
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can't imagine that it's a generation thing. Not 5 years ago, the US was still up there weren't they?
I can't even begin to suggest what it may be as i have absolutely no experience in american education.
edit:
Who am I kidding? Yes, I have one theory.
The teachers.
The teachers are scared shitless of doing anything cause they don't want to lose their jobs or get their pants sued off.
It appears as though the US is spending a LARGER portion of their GDP and BUDGET on education than canada
Last edited by khyber on Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My theory: Other countries are more selective in who they test and which test results they turn in for international comparisons. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hater Depot
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
My theory: Other countries are more selective in who they test and which test results they turn in for international comparisons. |
Pretty much.
http://www.slate.com/id/2124163/
Quote: |
The fact that 8-year-olds and 17-year-olds have different attitudes toward low-pressure exams isn't going to come as a surprise to anyone who has raised a teenager—or has been one. The NAEP is used to judge school systems and overall student performance, but the test doesn't matter at all to individual kids. In 2002 nearly half of the 17-year-olds tapped to take the national NAEP exam didn't bother to show up. Students who did show up left more essay questions than multiple-choice questions blank, an indication that they weren't going to be bothered to venture an answer if it required effort.
The "who cares?" phenomenon probably plagues older students' performance on international exams, too. Granted, kids in Japan and the United Kingdom don't pay a personal price for how they do on global tests, either. But cultural pressures can be very different in other countries. Korean schools have staged rallies to rev their children up before they take international assessments. And Germany created a national "PISA Day" to mark the date when 15-year-olds take the exam that will rank them against students in other countries. The U.S. Department of Education, meanwhile, has a hard time convincing principals to administer voluntary international tests at all. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Compunction Junction
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think it's very fair to students to say "they're lazy" and then provide examples of other countries where ADULTS CREATED MOTIVATION for them.
but wait a sec....
Quote: |
Nineteen states now require their students to pass assessments before they can don a cap and gown; seven others are testing students but not yet withholding diplomas. |
you mean there is no standardized testing in each state??? whoa.
Teachers are taught in college that it's important to motivate students. It's great that, just MAYBE the public and the law makers are, perhaps realizing that "hey....if we actually EXPECT something from them, well maybe, they'll perform".
interesting read. thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
you mean there is no standardized testing in each state??? whoa.
|
When I last taught back home, there were no standardized tests at the end of the school year, for graduation or anything else. We did administer the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills sometime in the fall each year. Lots of states used those tests at that time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cubanlord

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Location: In Japan!
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
khyber wrote: |
I can't imagine that it's a generation thing. Not 5 years ago, the US was still up there weren't they?
I can't even begin to suggest what it may be as i have absolutely no experience in american education.
edit:
Who am I kidding? Yes, I have one theory.
The teachers.
The teachers are scared *beep* of doing anything cause they don't want to lose their jobs or get their pants sued off.
It appears as though the US is spending a LARGER portion of their GDP and BUDGET on education than canada |
You hit the nail on its' head. Teachers, during my elementary school times, well...they taught. They didn't have to worry about little sue's father sueing (sp?) because her student got a bad grade on a test or because her/his student fell off the swing. It's rediculous and shameful. The K-12 United States educational system needs a complete overhaul. If they would only set limitations in legislation as to how much a teacher can be held liable, man, things can get back down to business.
Also, the doing away with recess, music, art, etc. coupled with the introduction of test get-ready classes has seriously hindered the child's ability to learn. Children are children and their attention span, when studying, lasts roughly 10 to 15 minutes. They need to be kept active and keep their minds working at the same time (music, art, P.E., etc.)
When I was in those schools, we would have recess, music, etc. I do believe my generation is and will continue to make a difference in our beloved country. However, I fear and shudder at the thought of where The U.S. will be in 20 more years; once the current teenagers are old enough to take higher positions, etc., making multiple life changing decisions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HapKi

Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Location: TALL BUILDING-SEOUL
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This was on 20/20 last night.
According to the program, teacher's unions are very strong, making it very hard to fire bad teachers. Also, there is no competition in the American school system. Parents pretty much are forced to send their children to the schools in their zone. If federal money was attached to the student, rather than the school, as it is done in European countries, children could have more choices as to where they want to go, and thus schools would work harder to attract them.
Competition raises the bar on education levels. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hater Depot
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Right, because competition is producing hagwons that care more about education than profit. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuckistan Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003 Location: Training future GS competitors.....
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seriously? Too many don't grow up eating healthy food on any regular basis. Take a look at the average North Americans' shopping cart at the grocery store--it's mostly highly prcessed products laden with suger, fat and salt--or super-giant sized portions at fast food restuarants.
You can't learn well eating crap every day.
Fresh vegetables? Normal straight-out-of-the-ground etc food?
Where?!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hermes.trismegistus

Joined: 08 Sep 2005
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As competition increases, cooperation decreases.
As cooperation decreases, communication decreases.
The power-over paradigm favors competition because it prevents the holistic solutions implicit in cooperative paradigms.
Competition-heavy paradigms create domesticated primates - not human beings.
The fact that some countries manage to produce better worker-drones who have sound competence in taking standardized tests and regurgitating data does not matter in the least. This cannot be used as a standard for competence. It does not measure intelligence or cognitive competence. Actual intelligence, as discussed by Hawkins in On Intelligence involves the novel synthesis of invariant representations and the ability to manipulate symbols to accurately represent those representations. Standardized tests do not gauge this ability.
The US may have some proficiency in creating these drones, but the US also has far more access to potentially debilitating distractions. As Canuckistan wrote, diet plays a role here as well, as does a national penchant to acquiesce personal responsibility, complacency, greed and a host of other issues.
Looking at the issue in such simplistic terms [as implied in the options for the poll] won't create insight into the actual problem.
Namaste. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
krats1976

Joined: 14 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
Quote: |
you mean there is no standardized testing in each state??? whoa.
|
When I last taught back home, there were no standardized tests at the end of the school year, for graduation or anything else. We did administer the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills sometime in the fall each year. Lots of states used those tests at that time. |
NCLB has changed this. All states are now required to have some form of exit exam (or will soon... I'm not sure).
Alaska implemented a graduation exam several years ago. The first 5 years were trial runs, but starting in '03 or it became a requirement for graduation.
Brilliant idea right? Sure...
The first couple of years, not enough students were passing. So, they made the test a bit easier. Same thing after the third year, fourth year, fifth year... you get the idea.
Completely pointless IMHO. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Corporal

Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cough*homeschool*cough... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuckistan Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003 Location: Training future GS competitors.....
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Corporal wrote: |
cough*homeschool*cough... |
How about a private boot-camp style school?
The more I think about it, the less public school is appealing.
1 hr a week of TV and the rest spent studying and doing some sort of physical exercise outside. Soccer, baseball, whatever. They have to move their butts. And wear uniforms--so showing off the latest Nike runners isn't part of their academic day. They'll just have to show off with their brains instead.
I'm serious. I don't want to raise intellectually stunted couch potatoes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hermes.trismegistus

Joined: 08 Sep 2005
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
canuckistan wrote: |
And wear uniforms--so showing off the latest Nike runners isn't part of their academic day. They'll just have to show off with their brains instead. |
Wearing uniforms decreases personal development and favors top-down control.
Instead, why not help them realize the irrelevance of such materialistic frivolity?
Children should learn lessons like this at home, from the tribe.
Namaste. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|