View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Marcilla
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 7:15 am Post subject: Korean is not the third hardest language in the world |
|
|
that's complete bullshit
it took me 2 months of studying chinese just to be able to say a few ridiculously simple things "That's my thing. That's your thing. Do you want this? I don't like that." etc
granted, it's not as easy as spanish for us to learn, but it's not THAT hard |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the_beaver

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Who told you that it was the third hardest language? I'd imagine Ju�/hoansi, Ega, Narau, Finnish, and probably Japanese are harder.
But, according to the Monterey fellas (and in accordance with other opinions from the language acquisition field) Korean is a category IV language which puts it in the most difficult category along with a bunch of other languages. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
I_Am_Wrong
Joined: 14 Sep 2004 Location: whatever
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe, you just suck at Chinese??
People who talk about rankings and people who try to discredit rankings fall under the same pile of shit if you ask me.
Chinese is difficult, Korean is difficult. Now shut up. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hater Depot
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the off chance that you are actually being serious.. you did once claim to be fluent in Japanese, yes? Perhaps that's why you find Korean easy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
One thing always missing is how prevalent a language is. At least in China people who don't know the language always have the feeling in the back of their mind that "damn, 1.5 billion people speak this language and I heard it back home in Chinatown all the time, maybe I should get my ass in gear because it's pretty useful" which doesn't happen as much with Korean. In that sense Korean is harder.
Korean language textbooks are also way worse than those written for Japanese and Chinese. Add to that their slightly better English skill, visa system that doesn't allow people on E-2s to do any work on the side and maybe find a niche for themselves that they like better than teaching, and finding the motivation to learn the language is harder still. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the saint

Joined: 09 Dec 2003 Location: not there yet...
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mithridates wrote: |
Korean language textbooks are also way worse than those written for Japanese |
eh?
6 years learning Japanese and 3 Korean tell me differently. There's not that much in it as far as textbooks go. Almost no books in Japan use anything except one tone colour and the same endless repetition of langauge activities with very little cultural info. The best Japanese textbooks are those published outside Japan (BBC in the UK and Yokoso in the US). When comparing like for like i.e. in country produced materials, Korean ones are more appealing and more communicative in my experience. Now something like Yokoso for Korean would be a real bonus. WHen you consider the resources and how much more important globally Japanese is status-wise, it suprised me how basic many Japanese materials were. It's like they themselves didn't realise how anyone but Japanese studied language... "You want to learn our language? Okay. Study it the same boring way we learn English." No thanks...
What doesn't exist in Korean (and somebody will make a mint out of this when the light goes on somewhere) is a K-English-K learners' dictionary that is worth more than just good quality loo paper. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
click on the OPs name and then scroll through his old posts and check out how many start with "hey dOOds." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with Marcila. Korean is piss-easy to read and learning many basic phrases (doing a little more than merely getting by) in your first few months is achievable with relatively little effort. I had my hair cut yesterday. I had a chat with Ajuma about Korean, where I live, where I'm from, the weather in Korea vs where I'm from, communicated clearly what I wanted done with my hair, made a simple transaction, used all the right manners, more besides. I've been here a little over 8 months.
Obviously, conversations between Koreans totally go over my head a lot of the time, but that'd be the case with any of the easier languages after only 8 months.
In my humble opinion, these people who classify Korean in such a way have probably never lived and worked in Seoul. It's all very well sitting in an office in...where ever they are...coming up with all these trendy theories about languages. Try living in Seoul for a year or two and then come back and tell me how difficult Korean is. God I effin' hate academics. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Korean is a very difficult language for English speakers to learn. Once you get past the "how are you" 'how's the weather" "i want an apple" and attempt to construct natural sounding sentences it gets very tough. Try explaining the sentence forms 무릅스고, 더니, and 봤자. Basically they are easy to translate into Engish, but making sentences that sound natural to Koreans using those forms takes a lot of time and effort. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the saint wrote: |
mithridates wrote: |
Korean language textbooks are also way worse than those written for Japanese |
eh?
6 years learning Japanese and 3 Korean tell me differently. There's not that much in it as far as textbooks go. Almost no books in Japan use anything except one tone colour and the same endless repetition of langauge activities with very little cultural info. The best Japanese textbooks are those published outside Japan (BBC in the UK and Yokoso in the US). When comparing like for like i.e. in country produced materials, Korean ones are more appealing and more communicative in my experience. Now something like Yokoso for Korean would be a real bonus. WHen you consider the resources and how much more important globally Japanese is status-wise, it suprised me how basic many Japanese materials were. It's like they themselves didn't realise how anyone but Japanese studied language... "You want to learn our language? Okay. Study it the same boring way we learn English." No thanks...
What doesn't exist in Korean (and somebody will make a mint out of this when the light goes on somewhere) is a K-English-K learners' dictionary that is worth more than just good quality loo paper. |
I'm including out of country resources (Jack Seward's Easy Japanese, Living Language's Intermediate Japanese etc. for example), tests like the 日本語能力試験, the 日本語ジャーナル, and everything else. I used the 日本語能力試験 to get a visa in Japan the equivalent of an E-7 over here without a university degree. Not only textbooks but in Japan there's also the 文化センター in pretty much every city that holds classes for free or just about for free every weekend where you can start learning the language right away. Though the actual fun factor in the textbooks might be the same (except in Seward's book with example sentences like お前の葬式に行って踊るつもりだ to teach つもり), at least in Japan they're focused on something concrete. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DaeSung
Joined: 05 Dec 2005 Location: ����
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't make a lot of posts... but as for Korean being hard or easy I'll throw in my two cents. I guess they are saying it is "hard for the average native English speaker to learn". I personally have seen many people brag about how well they speak Korean but know very few that are that good. Basic stuff you read in a book and memorize about the weather, yeah that�s not really going to be hard in any language. Learning to read and write Korean is easy, well at least at the basic level, but writing like a Korean, or reading as well as a Korean will take you years. Most Korean people are nice about it and want to encourage people to learn more and in turn don�t really push us that hard when it comes to mistakes. If you want to understand what goes in the newspaper it'll take a dictionary to look up most of the words, or if your like me you will know two different words that mean the same thing but get tired of learning the 5th or 6th word for the same thing and just stick to the ones used most commonly. I don't want to sound like I'm being negative but I have only ever heard one or two foreigners that sound Korean when they speak and could really say that they have native speaking ability (I know there are more, but not enough to say that its an easy language. If you think Korean is easy you are either very lucky or highly unaware of your own Korean speaking ability.) I would also bet that very few Korean language students could sit through a business meeting and pick up very much. If you can you probably understand that Korean is a somewhat difficult language. Any how that�s my rant for now.
Korean is a difficult language, some parts are easy but if you want to get into a deep level of speaking, reading, understanding you will need to invest years of study and constant contact with the language for mastery or the ability to speak at a near native level. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zark

Joined: 12 May 2003 Location: Phuket, Thailand: Look into my eyes . . .
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For basic communication, Korea has been one of the easiest for me to learn.
I've lived/worked in Botswana, Taiwan, Thailand, Saudi Arabia and Korea - and probably became more skilled in Korean than in any of the other languages where I have lived. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was the one who wrote that Korean was designated as extremely hard by linguists, and obviously it irked the OP enought to start a whole thread about it, I wont go into what that says about the OP. Ive read this fact several times by different linguists, and it ties in with my own experience living in Korea 5 years and working hard on the language, which I do speak quite well, though not fluently, and really enjoy. Chinese is easier because its grammar is much closer to English, and Japanese is easier because its phonetically extremely simple, it has one of the smallest sound sets of all languages.
However, your own personal experience of whether Korean is easy or hard is not really much of a measure. Im much happier to trust a language professional who has dedicated his/her life to studying the subject.
Last edited by Satori on Wed May 03, 2006 5:41 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hosub
Joined: 17 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 5:40 pm Post subject: Re: Korean is not the third hardest language in the world |
|
|
Marcilla wrote: |
that's complete *beep*
it took me 2 months of studying chinese just to be able to say a few ridiculously simple things "That's my thing. That's your thing. Do you want this? I don't like that." etc
granted, it's not as easy as spanish for us to learn, but it's not THAT hard |
You do suck at Chinese :O, or you didn't try at all ;(. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the saint

Joined: 09 Dec 2003 Location: not there yet...
|
Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Satori wrote: |
I was the one who wrote that Korean was designated as extremely hard by linguists, and obviously it irked the OP enought to start a whole thread about it, I wont go into what that says about the OP. Ive read this fact several times by different linguists, and it ties in with my own experience living in Korea 5 years and working hard on the language, which I do speak quite well, though not fluently, and really enjoy. Chinese is easier because its grammar is much closer to English, and Japanese is easier because its phonetically extremely simple, it has one of the smallest sound sets of all languages.
However, your own personal experience of whether Korean is easy or hard is not really much of a measure. Im much happier to trust a language professional who has dedicated his/her life to studying the subject. |
sorry but having read widely in linguistics this just doesn't make sense. No decent linguist would say that "x language is extremely hard" because all linguists know that language is extremely relative.
Now there are languages that linguists have documented which do seem so incredibly complicated that it inspires awe in the ability of people to simply acquire them without noticeable effort. Believe me, Korean isn't one of them. Navajo makes Korean look like you could learn the latter just falling out of bed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|