| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wrench
Joined: 07 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I got myself x1900xtx 512mb. Happy with it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 7:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Wrench wrote: |
| I got myself x1900xtx 512mb. Happy with it. |
Given the price, I would hope that you aren't anything less than ecstatic about it.
What are those going for in Korea?
In Canada they are $600 and up... well beyond the limits of what I can justifiably spend on a video card without getting a frying pan to the head. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrugha

Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Location: On a 2-wheeled engine
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
get a 7600GT
can't go wrong with that card |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
7600GT's architecture is 128-bit while the 6800 is 256-bit.
They both have the same transfer rate: 22.4 GB/s.
They both have the same number of pixel pipelines= 12.
The 7600 has fast core and memory speeds though:
580Mhz compared to 325Mhz for the core, and 1.4Ghz compared to 700Mhz for the memory.
So, while it's a moot question for me (because there is no 7600GT in AGP format),
is there any reason not to get a 6800 instead of a 7600GT, given that on average the price is about $60-$75 USD cheaper for the 6800 (with the same 256 GDDR3 VRAM)?
In other words, does gpu and memory speed trump architecture?
My (uninformed) thinking is that if they both have the same throughput (transfer rate), you might as well save yourself $70 and get the 6800.
Anyway, I'm just learning as I go and posting findings and questions here, I'm not out to challenge anyone's choice of purchase.
Lord knows I didn't do so hot on my last choice of upgrade. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cubanlord

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Location: In Japan!
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bulsajo wrote: |
7600GT's architecture is 128-bit while the 6800 is 256-bit.
They both have the same transfer rate: 22.4 GB/s.
They both have the same number of pixel pipelines= 12.
The 7600 has fast core and memory speeds though:
580Mhz compared to 325Mhz for the core, and 1.4Ghz compared to 700Mhz for the memory.
So, while it's a moot question for me (because there is no 7600GT in AGP format),
is there any reason not to get a 6800 instead of a 7600GT, given that on average the price is about $60-$75 USD cheaper for the 6800 (with the same 256 GDDR3 VRAM)?
In other words, does gpu and memory speed trump architecture?
My (uninformed) thinking is that if they both have the same throughput (transfer rate), you might as well save yourself $70 and get the 6800.
Anyway, I'm just learning as I go and posting findings and questions here, I'm not out to challenge anyone's choice of purchase.
Lord knows I didn't do so hot on my last choice of upgrade. |
If you are into Geforce, the best value right now is the 6800GT with 256ram. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrugha

Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Location: On a 2-wheeled engine
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah, you'll be happy with the 6800 for a while... at least for the next year to year and a half
when dx 10 hits the market, an upgrade may be in order... but first we need vista to come out, and who knows when that will be. Let alone, market saturation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As I said in the OP, I am only looking for AGP cards in this thread- I'll have to worry about a whole new computer well before I have to worry about Vista and DX 10 video cards.
What do you think of my question, though?
Even if the prices were the same, is 7600GT any better than a 6800?
All other things being equal (transfer rate, amount of RAM) does speed beat architecture? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cubanlord

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Location: In Japan!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, in a perfect world I'd be trying to decide whether to buy it or return to the ATI fold with the x1900...
I wonder how those two shape up head to head?
Somebody, somewhere must have done the benchmarks already... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Demophobe

Joined: 17 May 2004
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cubanlord wrote: |
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1929944&CatId=0&SRCCODE=WEBFC086
go for it. |
Notice anything about this card?!
Please...Carefully Inspect it......
You were replying to Bulsajo's post, yes? He wanted AGP, that's all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah... we just sorted that out in PMs. Am curious to see how the best nVidia and the ATI shape up- has ATI taken back the crown, or no? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cubanlord

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Location: In Japan!
|
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Demophobe wrote: |
| cubanlord wrote: |
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1929944&CatId=0&SRCCODE=WEBFC086
go for it. |
Notice anything about this card?!
Please...Carefully Inspect it......
You were replying to Bulsajo's post, yes? He wanted AGP, that's all. |
hahahah. Yeah..I know. Believe it or not, I got all excited being able to help an online buddy out (when I saw the price and what it was and all) that I completely forgot that he needed AGP. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I ordered a 6800 AGP- best balance between price and performance for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bulsajo wrote: |
| I ordered a 6800 AGP- best balance between price and performance for me. |
How much? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|