View previous topic :: View next topic |
Should the New York Times be charged? |
Yes |
|
16% |
[ 4 ] |
No |
|
68% |
[ 17 ] |
No, but go after the leakers..reveal the sources |
|
8% |
[ 2 ] |
No, but take away their white house press privileges |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
Both c and d |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 25 |
|
Author |
Message |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
this whole thing isn't really news, as the government has always had the right to investigate international swift communications. money laundering has been around for ages, now it's terrorist money. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fiveeagles

Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
sundubuman wrote: |
this whole thing isn't really news, as the government has always had the right to investigate international swift communications. money laundering has been around for ages, now it's terrorist money. |
If it wasn't really news, why was it in the front page of the New York times? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
BTW, the NY Times was supportive of the practice, unlike the wire-tapping. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank God for checks & balances to absolute unbridled psychopathic power.
Media's role is key here in holding the bastards accountable. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|