|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
flotsam
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And apparently nothing rhymes with "silver" either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jinks

Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Location: Formerly: Lower North Island
|
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AbbeFaria wrote: |
Sounds like a French word though. Would that count as an english word that ryhmes with orange if it's french?
�S� |
But its not French and it doesn't sound French, it is pronounced just like orange (blorange). Check out the [non French] link. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bucheonleon
Joined: 04 Feb 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HapKi wrote: |
2 syllables.
A better debate is finding a word that rhymes with orange. Not really a debate, since there isn't any. |
Isn't this somewhat of an argument for it being one syllable?
If it's truly two syllables, or-unj then wouldn't it rhyme with lunge, plunge, etc.?
I'm an American... Northeasterner... and to me, it's one syllable. Ornj. The same "Orn" sound as in ornery or ornate, just with a J sound immediately following.
What about the plural of the fruit? Or-un-jez, or orn-jez? The latter, for me...
On the our/hour question, where I'm from they don't sound the same. Our sounds like are (the Be verb), 1 syllable, and hour rhymes with shower, 2 syllables. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AbbeFaria
Joined: 17 May 2005 Location: Gangnam
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bucheonleon wrote: |
| HapKi wrote: |
2 syllables.
A better debate is finding a word that rhymes with orange. Not really a debate, since there isn't any. |
Isn't this somewhat of an argument for it being one syllable?
If it's truly two syllables, or-unj then wouldn't it rhyme with lunge, plunge, etc.?
I'm an American... Northeasterner... and to me, it's one syllable. Ornj. The same "Orn" sound as in ornery or ornate, just with a J sound immediately following.
What about the plural of the fruit? Or-un-jez, or orn-jez? The latter, for me...
On the our/hour question, where I'm from they don't sound the same. Our sounds like are (the Be verb), 1 syllable, and hour rhymes with shower, 2 syllables. |
Sweet, I'm not the only one.
�S� |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kiwigirl :O)
Joined: 05 Jan 2006 Location: Bundang
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think that its actually two syllables
or-ange
but in korea its three syllables:
or-ran-gee
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flotsam
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bucheonleon wrote: |
| HapKi wrote: |
2 syllables.
A better debate is finding a word that rhymes with orange. Not really a debate, since there isn't any. |
Isn't this somewhat of an argument for it being one syllable?
If it's truly two syllables, or-unj then wouldn't it rhyme with lunge, plunge, etc.?
I'm an American... Northeasterner... and to me, it's one syllable. Ornj. The same "Orn" sound as in ornery or ornate, just with a J sound immediately following.
What about the plural of the fruit? Or-un-jez, or orn-jez? The latter, for me...
On the our/hour question, where I'm from they don't sound the same. Our sounds like are (the Be verb), 1 syllable, and hour rhymes with shower, 2 syllables. |
Do you pronounce "unge" the same as "ange"? Are you a Brit? Cause I am pretty gosh dawng shewuah us Yanks pronounce the words differently. You see, lunge rhymes with grunge and orange rhymes with...oh, god damn it.
(Of course, if you're a Kiwi, this question doesn't apply as you only have one vowel anyway.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pet lover
Joined: 02 Jan 2004 Location: not in Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| In elementary school, I was taught to count syllables of words by how many times my mouth opens when I say the word. Orange. It opens once. One syllable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Woland
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe everybody's right and what's needed is explanation of how this might be so. My reference for the material on deletion and syncope below is Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (1996). Teaching Pronunciation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pages 163-164, to be specific), just so folks don't think I'm talking through my hat.
The canonical form of the word orange has two syllables, the first of which is stressed, while the second is unstressed.
In rapid, informal native-speaker speech, it is possible for such unstressed vowels to be deleted, as in 's'pose' for 'suppose'.
More commonly, deletion is of medial unstressed vowels following a stressed syllable in three-syllable words, a phenomenon known as syncope (which has three syllables, by the way, but doesn't undergo itself); for example, 'ev'ry' for 'every' and 'diff'rent' for 'different'. This could certainly explain the deletion of the vowel in the plural form 'oranges'.
But we really haven't completely accounted for deletion in the singular. Here's one possible explanation. The word 'orange' can be used as a modifier as well as a noun, as in 'orange shirt' or 'orange automobile'. In these contexts, the conditions for syncope are met within the phrase, and could account for deletion in the singular form, if we accept that the environment for syncope can cross word boundaries.
Note that the deletion in both the two-syllable and three-syllable conditions is optional, which may account for some of the variation that people perceive in themselves.
My personal guess is that this variation is the case in all speakers, but just in case there are speakers who always produce orange as a one-syllable word, we need to try to explain that.
Acccording to data from Tom Cobb's invaluable Compleat Lexical Tutor (http://132.208.224.131/), 'orange' occurs more frequently overall as a modifier than as a noun. (Cobb's data sources are largely written. I'm assuming that the frequencies in speech are the same; this may be incorrect.) If this is the case, it may be that the form produced by syncope becomes the standard representation for some people and is applied generally, thus explaining the consistent one-syllable folks. If I'm right that they don't exist, then this somewhat strained explanation is unnecessary.
But there we go, everyone accounted for. For the one-syllable folks, it is likely that the two-syllable pronunciation will remain 'standard' for the foreseeable future.
Last edited by Woland on Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:26 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jacl
Joined: 31 Oct 2005
|
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ... and does anyone really say "comfortable" using four syllables? Usually it's pronounced "comftorble" or "comfterble". 3 syllables. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jacl wrote: |
| ... and does anyone really say "comfortable" using four syllables? Usually it's pronounced "comftorble" or "comfterble". 3 syllables. |
I was trying to explain that just today. Ah, what a small goofy ESL world we all live in. |
|
| Back to top |
| |