|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sooke

Joined: 12 Jan 2004 Location: korea
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:53 am Post subject: Cheney: Betting on the Good Ol' U.S.A! |
|
|
I have to admit I didn't study very much economics, but isn't this a bad sign?
"According to Tom Blackburn of the Palm Beach Post, Cheney has invested heavily in "a fund that specializes in short-term municipal bonds, a tax-exempt money market fund and an inflation protected securities fund. The first two hold up if interest rates rise with inflation. The third is protected against inflation."
Cheney has dumped another (estimated) $10 to $25 million in a European bond fund which tells us that he is counting on a steadily weakening dollar."
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/article.php?sid=26772&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
Msn sez:
"Vice President Dick Cheney's financial advisers are apparently betting on a rise in inflation and interest rates and on a decline in the value of the dollar against foreign currencies."
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Extra/CheneysBettingonBadNews.aspx?GT1=8283
"His lawyer, Terrence O'Donnell, says outside money managers supervise the investments. "He has nothing to do with it," O'Donnell says."
Phew, that's a relief!!!
Before you guys rag on the magazine (Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine), here's what wiki has to say about them:
"Kiplinger's Personal Finance is a magazine that has been continuously published, on a monthly basis, from 1947 to the present day. It was the nation's first personal finance magazine, and prides itself on delivering "sound, unbiased advice in clear, concise language". It offers tips and tricks on managing money and achieving financial security, as well as information and practical guidance on saving, investing, planning for retirement, paying for college, and buying automobiles, homes and other major purchases."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiplinger's_Personal_Finance
http://www.kiplinger.com/personalfinance/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:42 pm Post subject: Re: Cheney: Betting on the Good Ol' U.S.A! |
|
|
Sooke wrote: |
I have to admit I didn't study very much economics, but isn't this a bad sign? |
I wouldn't read that much into it. Even if Cheney has a hand it in (which of course, he shouldn't), it is of only minor interest. People invest in different things for a variety of reasons. Such as diversification, tax benefits, and risk. For a man of Cheney's age and income, a low risk, tax free bond fund sounds pretty reasonable. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rising US inflation and a falling dollar is not a likely scenario? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wangja wrote: |
Rising US inflation and a falling dollar is not a likely scenario? |
Or Cheney's insider knowledge of another looming "terrorist" attack. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
igotthisguitar wrote: |
Wangja wrote: |
Rising US inflation and a falling dollar is not a likely scenario? |
Or Cheney's insider knowledge of another looming "terrorist" attack. |
Hmm, hard to say. The bond markets didn't react too much after Madrid or London. Not like they did on 9/11 (as a side note, I was working in the trading pits in Chicago at the time). A money market fund wouldn't benefit from a terrorist attack. Also, according to the MSN article, he owns an Intrernational Fund and an Emerging Market fund, which would both get slaughtered in the event of a major terrorist attack. Meanwhile, Bush has mainly treasuries, money market funds, and CDs. All low risk, low return, neutral investments. Objectively (and I am certainly no fan of Dick's) I don't see anything wrong with his choice of investments. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Woland
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
The OP assumes that the individual members of the administration have more influence over economic cycles than they do. I don't see any story here, much as I dislike this administration. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|