|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiveeagles

Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:40 pm Post subject: Re: re: |
|
|
| Troll_Bait wrote: |
| fiveeagles wrote: |
Anyway, I don't respond to Satori or Troll Bait because they have said stuff like this.
| Quote: |
You are deranged. You're unstable. You're not well."
You are the most hate filled bigot I've ever read.
Your ignorance is deep and profound, your hatred is bilious and dangerous. to Is this guy for real or what? Please, for the sake of humanity, don't have children...
What a fruitcake...
You haven't the faintest idea what "truth" even is.
Pure and utter rubbish from you, again.
You hate yourself. And frankly I don't blame you. I suggest serious professional psychiatric help is your only option now.
I don't feel xians have the right to shove thier idiocy in my face either. |
They are more interested in censorship than freedom of speech. |
I have never said anything like that. Each and every one of the above quotes is from Satori.
Do not slander me by putting words in my mouth.
That you would attribute any of the above quotes to me shows that you either don't read my posts carefully, have a low tolerance for disagreement, don't like it when I point out your errors/ignorance, or are delibately trying to twist the truth to make me look like the villain.
I am not for censorship. I am against abusing one's position as an ESL teacher to sneak some "stealth" evangelism into a classroom full of young, impressionable students.
If someone starts evangelising me, I can walk away, stop reading, or log off. Students have none of these options available if their teacher starts preaching.
|
Troll Bait, going through a few of my threads, here are a few things you have to say,
| Quote: |
Said the hypocrite. (refering to me)
Again, you betray your total ignorance of everything except for your particular, narrow brand of Christianity. (refering to me)
I imagine that it must be frustrating for him that we consider him to be an equal, not a superior, and refuse to blindly follow him. (refering to me) |
Like I have said before, if you want to use restraint and civility then ok, I am up for discussion, but if you want to use this as a platform to judge me and then paint me as something that I am not, then no thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:01 pm Post subject: Re: re: |
|
|
| fiveeagles wrote: |
Troll Bait, going through a few of my threads, here are a few things you have to say,
| Quote: |
Said the hypocrite. (refering to me)
Again, you betray your total ignorance of everything except for your particular, narrow brand of Christianity. (refering to me)
I imagine that it must be frustrating for him that we consider him to be an equal, not a superior, and refuse to blindly follow him. (refering to me) |
Like I have said before, if you want to use restraint and civility then ok, I am up for discussion, but if you want to use this as a platform to judge me and then paint me as something that I am not, then no thanks. |
Thanks for quoting me out of context. Still trying to make me look like the villain. I expect no less from you. Let's put these into perspective, shall we? I've included the links so that readers can follow them and see for themselves the deception.
http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/korea/viewtopic.php?t=58537&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=Heaven+reincarnation&start=135
| Troll_Bait wrote: |
| fiveeagles wrote: |
| Besides, both Jewish (Josephus and Talmud writers) and Roman (Tacitus, Pliny and others) historians mention and confirm such gospel claims as the crucifixion of Jesus, the martyrdom of James, the claim of miracle-working and of the resurrection. |
In previous threads, both hermes.trismegistus and myself refuted that. All of it. You obviously never bothered to read.
Previously, in this very thread, I mentioned a book.
So, I say again: I read your book. Why won't you read mine? What are you afraid of? When mindmetoo refused to read your book, you accused him of a cop-out. But when you refuse to read a book, it's not a cop-out?
Do as I say, not as I do.
Said the hypocrite.
| fiveeagles wrote: |
| All you have to do is read the supposed "Gospel" of Thomas or Judas or Phillip alongside with Matthew or Luke. You will instantly see for yourself that there is no comparison. These books have ridiculous stories of Jesus doing miracles as a baby. |
Again, you betray your total ignorance of everything except for your particular, narrow brand of Christianity.
Have you ever read the Gospel of Thomas? It's great! And it does not contradict the four canonical Gospels. It is basically a list of sayings by Jesus, many of which are parallelled in the canonical Gospels. The Jesus Seminar considers the Gospel of Thomas to be a source of the actual sayings of Jesus.
Here's an example:
Jesus said, "If your leaders say to you, 'Look, the Father's kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede you. Rather, the Father's kingdom is within you and it is outside you.
True, that.
| fiveeagles wrote: |
| They (these Gospels) contain made up events which are blatantly created, not because they are true, but because they support the gnostic agenda. |
Substitute "gnostic" with "Christian" and you'd be about right.
| fiveeagles wrote: |
| Anyone who attempts to put these bogus gospels on par with the canonical books is either a very poor scholar or he or she has an agenda, and that agenda is certainly not to support the truth. |
So, anyone who disagrees with you is "a very poor scholar"? Who decides that? You? And on what basis? You're an English teacher who doesn't even know the differences between your/you're, corroboration/collaboration, and cosmology/evolution. You're obviously no scholar yourself and are thus in no position at all to judge who's a good scholar and who isn't. |
http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/korea/viewtopic.php?t=50282&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=frustrating+shepherd&start=120
| Troll_Bait wrote: |
| shortskirt_longjacket wrote: |
Yeah, why does he insist on calling it "Wade and Roe?" ... We were all giving him a hard time about it on like page 2 of this ten page thread and he's still doing it. |
Do you really think he's listening to you at all?
He is the shepherd, and we are the sheep.
He is supposed to talk down to us and tell us what to do.
I imagine that it must be frustrating for him that we consider him to be an equal, not a superior, and refuse to blindly follow him. |
By the way, this man is truly a prophet (from here)
| Bronski wrote: |
| Some of you are looking to convert us heathens. You'll have better luck with your usual stand-bys: reformed junkies/alcoholics, suicidal teens and children who don't know any better. In other words, the vulnerable who are looking for a group to join. |
So instead of being evasive or conducting ad hominem attacks, how about answering some of the other posters, such as laogaiguk?
And let's try to keep the discussion about evangelising in the classroom in the other thread, not here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:18 am Post subject: Re: re: |
|
|
| fiveeagles wrote: |
Like I have said before, if you want to use restraint and civility then ok, I am up for discussion, but if you want to use this as a platform to judge me and then paint me as something that I am not, then no thanks. |
You have earned no civility and you'll get none from me. I judge you. I judge you as a reprasentative of satan on earth. And no I'm not painting you are something you are not, I'm painting you as something you are, evil. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tomato

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 3:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
■ Religion can create feelings of depression.
I used to belong to a mental health discussion group. There were two members of the group who claimed to hear the voice of God telling them that they were destined for Hell.
We had the dangdest time trying to talk sense into those two people.
■ Religion can lead to bigotry.
If you prefer not to take the path of my melancholy associates, here is another option open for you: Announce that God is on your side and everyone opposed to you is in league with Satan.
Obviously, Hitler is history's best-known practitioner of this technique. Pat Robertson is the current media's best-known practitioner. I am sure you have known others.
■ Religion can lead to foolish decisions.
Oral Roberts tried to start a hospital in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The marketing experts tried to convince him that there was not enough room for another hospital, but he would not listen. After all, God told him otherwise, and he intended to listen to the voice of God.
Oral Roberts opened the hospital, but he had to close it down soon afterward for lack of business. Apparently, the marketing experts were right.
■ Religion can lead to rationalizations and euphemisms.
Religion makes impossible demands on all of us. How, then, can you cope when you fall short of those demands? Just concoct a little word play. Such a game may lead you away from true introspection, but it could also help fool your co-parishioners.
Do you drool over dirty pictures? Don't call it "lust," call it "aesthetic enjoyment." Are you angry with someone? Don't call it "hatred," call it "righteous indignation."
■ Religion preaches honesty but practices dishonesty.
In Sunday School, I learned about Nero feeding Christians to the lions, but I learned somewhere else about the Christians burning down the library in Alexandria.
I learned in church about the Puritans getting mistreated in England, but I learned somewhere else that they gave the same treatment to to other religious groups in America. I learned in church that "God is love," but I learned somewhere else that the Bible says that God loved Jacob and hated Esau.
■ Religion undermines independent thought.
If a person who is taught to believe without understanding in church, that person might carry that blind obedience elsewhere. "An adjective modifies a noun" because the teacher says so. "A equals pi r square" because the teacher says so.
■ Religion puts emotion over reason.
There is any number of reasons why a person might answer an altar call--to release an emotional high created by the preaching and the singing, to gain the approval of a boyfriend or girlfriend, to yield to group pressure, or seek a solution for a personal problem.
Yet when a person answers an altar call, the co-parishioners rejoice that the person has been "saved."
■ Religion has escape clauses built in.
You say you prayed for a Mercedes Benz and didn't get one? Then either:
1. you didn't pray hard enough
2. it wasn't God's will for you to get a Mercedes Benz
If you try to convince me that prayer doesn't work, I am all prepared for any kind of evidence. I will only repeat the two escape clauses which you just saw.
Another favorite escape clause is "Those aren't true Christians." You can remind me of the Crusades, the Inquisition, the Salem witch hunt, the Protestants and Catholics fighting in Ireland, or any other event which is embarrassing to Christians. But that won't do a bit of good, because this one escape clause fits all of them.
■ Religion is ineffective in transcending those very animal instincts which they say don't exist.
Churches hold pitch-in dinners and call it "fellowship." That's no different from 외국인's hanging out in Western bars.
Jehovah's Witnesses call themselves "sheep" and everyone else "goats." That's no different from 외국인's posting snotty remarks about Koreans on ESL Cafe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DanielInKorea
Joined: 28 Nov 2005 Location: Not a small village
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Satori wrote: |
| DanielInKorea wrote: |
I I get more sustained and powerful satisfaction in intimacy with my glorious, almighty, eternal and holy God through His word than any other 'satisfaction' I've found anywhere else in the world.
|
Then you're not doing sex properly... |
So sex gives you eternal satisfaction? Does it answer the soul searching questions you have about meaning, reality, and why we are here on earth? Well, that is, if you think about those kinds of things... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joyfulgirl

Joined: 05 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
i'm an athiest. we're here 'cause bits of cells connect and make us, we die and our cells die. then the worms eat us. it's all pretty natural. we're not more special than goats er ducks er whatever..
i can appreciate why people need to believe in a 'higher power.'...it can be very comforting. and even make perfect sense sometimes, when many things don't. live and let live, i say. as long as, ya know, you don't go around hurting each other...ummm
spritual people i can understand better than the 'christians' i've met recently in korea. geez, they haven't been nice people at all. it's an easy label to wear and means nothing, it seems. many of my 'non christian' friends have been far more 'christian.' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiveeagles

Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:29 am Post subject: Re: re: |
|
|
| Satori wrote: |
| fiveeagles wrote: |
Like I have said before, if you want to use restraint and civility then ok, I am up for discussion, but if you want to use this as a platform to judge me and then paint me as something that I am not, then no thanks. |
You have earned no civility and you'll get none from me. I judge you. I judge you as a reprasentative of satan on earth. And no I'm not painting you are something you are not, I'm painting you as something you are, evil. |
So be it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiveeagles

Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:35 am Post subject: Re: re: |
|
|
| Troll_Bait wrote: |
Again, you betray your total ignorance of everything except for your particular, narrow brand of Christianity. |
Troll Bait, if someone called you a horrible name and then added more dialogue to it. What are you going to remember?
Likewise, the same is true with what you have said. Yeah, you have raised good points, but when you sandwich it with a statement like what I have quoted, it doesn't fly with me.
So I am sorry if you are offended, but you don't seem to want to reconcile these differences. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anjucat
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Holy kerschnickedy, i love these snarky religious threads!
I really have nothing useful to add at this point, except to say: keep it up, people! You're doing a fine job thus far... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:57 pm Post subject: Re: re: |
|
|
| fiveeagles wrote: |
| Troll_Bait wrote: |
Again, you betray your total ignorance of everything except for your particular, narrow brand of Christianity. |
Troll Bait, if someone called you a horrible name and then added more dialogue to it. What are you going to remember?
Likewise, the same is true with what you have said. Yeah, you have raised good points, but when you sandwich it with a statement like what I have quoted, it doesn't fly with me.
So I am sorry if you are offended, but you don't seem to want to reconcile these differences. |
"Ignorance" does not mean "stupidity." "Ignorance" means: the lack of knowledge or education. I don't know much about economics (despite taking some courses about it in college). Therefore, I am ignorant in that area. In the Off-Topic Forum, I don't post in threads in which economics is being discussed. If I did, and I was wrong, and someone said that I was ignorant about what I was talking about, they'd be right. So, I didn't insult you. I pointed out a fact. Yes, I admit that it was phrased in a not-so-nice way. So why are you following me around and picking on me, I wonder? Many other posters have said far worse things about you than I ever have. Would you like me to draw up a list of the "greatest hits"? (And to be fair, I won't use anything from Satori or Grotto.) If you're that thin-skinned, then maybe you shouldn't log on. I mean that sincerely, not sarcastically. It can be rough out here in cyberspace. I honestly think that the Internet can often be a tougher place than Real Life. And haven't you ever thought about why you attract so much negative attention? There are a lot of Christians on this board, but you're the only one who gets so many people so upset. In the past, you've been told many times that you're behaviour was offensive. Usually, you just ignored the comment, and later repeated the exact same behaviour. Why is that? Personally, I think you're intentionally trying to draw fire so that you can paint yourself as a persecuted Christian martyr. One thing you don't do is answer hard questions. One need only skip over to the other thread to see examples of this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seoulunitarian

Joined: 06 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:29 pm Post subject: re: |
|
|
| joyfulgirl wrote: |
i'm an athiest. we're here 'cause bits of cells connect and make us, we die and our cells die. then the worms eat us. it's all pretty natural. we're not more special than goats er ducks er whatever..
i can appreciate why people need to believe in a 'higher power.'...it can be very comforting. and even make perfect sense sometimes, when many things don't. live and let live, i say. as long as, ya know, you don't go around hurting each other...ummm
spritual people i can understand better than the 'christians' i've met recently in korea. geez, they haven't been nice people at all. it's an easy label to wear and means nothing, it seems. many of my 'non christian' friends have been far more 'christian.' |
Why shouldn't we hurt other people sometimes? For example, if two people are starving, and there's only one piece of bread, why shouldn't you kill the other person to eat? Or do you want to qualify the statement "as long as, ya know, you don't go around hurting each other...ummm".
Peace |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
laogaiguk

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: somewhere in Korea
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:53 pm Post subject: Re: re: |
|
|
| Troll_Bait wrote: |
| fiveeagles wrote: |
| Troll_Bait wrote: |
Again, you betray your total ignorance of everything except for your particular, narrow brand of Christianity. |
Troll Bait, if someone called you a horrible name and then added more dialogue to it. What are you going to remember?
Likewise, the same is true with what you have said. Yeah, you have raised good points, but when you sandwich it with a statement like what I have quoted, it doesn't fly with me.
So I am sorry if you are offended, but you don't seem to want to reconcile these differences. |
"Ignorance" does not mean "stupidity." "Ignorance" means: the lack of knowledge or education. I don't know much about economics (despite taking some courses about it in college). Therefore, I am ignorant in that area. In the Off-Topic Forum, I don't post in threads in which economics is being discussed. If I did, and I was wrong, and someone said that I was ignorant about what I was talking about, they'd be right. So, I didn't insult you. I pointed out a fact. Yes, I admit that it was phrased in a not-so-nice way. So why are you following me around and picking on me, I wonder? Many other posters have said far worse things about you than I ever have. Would you like me to draw up a list of the "greatest hits"? (And to be fair, I won't use anything from Satori or Grotto.) If you're that thin-skinned, then maybe you shouldn't log on. I mean that sincerely, not sarcastically. It can be rough out here in cyberspace. I honestly think that the Internet can often be a tougher place than Real Life. And haven't you ever thought about why you attract so much negative attention? There are a lot of Christians on this board, but you're the only one who gets so many people so upset. In the past, you've been told many times that you're behaviour was offensive. Usually, you just ignored the comment, and later repeated the exact same behaviour. Why is that? Personally, I think you're intentionally trying to draw fire so that you can paint yourself as a persecuted Christian martyr. One thing you don't do is answer hard questions. One need only skip over to the other thread to see examples of this. |
Nothing a fundamentalist Christian likes more than persecution. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Privateer wrote: |
| Also I agree that those 2 options you present are fair descriptions of the 2 ends of the spectrum. I was only giving my opinion on both. |
OK.
| Privateer wrote: |
| The main point I addressed to your post directly was that to me it really doesn't matter what point on the spectrum you attach belief to. Just as I reject the 2 end points I also reject everything in between, because I don't believe in things based solely on authority and without evidence. |
I would disagree. For example, Einstein said, more than once, "God does not play dice with the universe," indicating a belief in a God of some sort. However, he also clearly did not believe in a personal God (that is, one who listens to and answers prayers), as evidenced by these quotes:
"I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it." (1954)
"I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings."
"The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology. Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious sense arising from the experience of all things natural and spiritual as a meaningful unity."
"Scientific research is based on the idea that everything that takes place is determined by laws of nature, and therefore this holds for the action of people. For this reason, a research scientist will hardly be inclined to believe that events could be influenced by a prayer, i.e. by a wish addressed to a Supernatural Being." (1936, responding to a child who wrote and asked if scientists pray)
"I cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves." (The World as I See It)
"If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed."
"The idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I am unable to take seriously." (Letter to Hoffman and Dukas, 1946)
"Though I have asserted above that in truth a legitimate conflict between religion and science cannot exist, I must nevertheless qualify this assertion once again on an essential point, with reference to the actual content of historical religions. This qualification has to do with the concept of God. During the youthful period of mankind's spiritual evolution human fantasy created gods in man's own image, who, by the operations of their will were supposed to determine, or at any rate to influence, the phenomenal world. Man sought to alter the disposition of these gods in his own favour by means of magic and prayer. The idea of God in the religions taught at present is a sublimation of that old concept of the gods. Its anthropomorphic character is shown, for instance, by the fact that men appeal to the Divine Being in prayers and plead for the fulfillment of their wishes."(1941)
I was a little dismayed by the results of my poll ("What Does "God" Mean To You?"). Clearly, reponses have clustered at both extreme ends of the spectrum. It seems that the vast majority of people either believe an a very human-like God, or not at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yo!Chingo

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: Seoul Korea
|
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Religion is such a personal thing that many people feel positively uncomfortable discussing it. Generally I'm one of those people because the second you say agnostic people almost gasp and look at you as if you're going straight to Hell b/c you're a non believer! I had that happen to me last week when my husband visited his former kindergarden teacher and she asked my religion.
I've always felt that religion has been the single most deadly concept ever created. It has caused innumerable wars and billions of deaths over the centuries, and for what? My god's better than your god!?!
I believe that there is a god and like many others on this board have said, he/she is just too damn busy to worry about the likes of me and if I don't go to church every Sunday. I'm kind to old people and animals, give to the needy, and have never killed anyone. I keep my nose out of other people's business (generally ), am brutally honest, and work hard.
I think that if there is a Heaven I'm going there not b/c I dressed up to go to church on Sunday's and socialize, but b/c of the life I've lived. If that's not enough, then I'm not sure if Heaven is the right place for me anyway.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|