Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Must-read for women & pussified men
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Axl Rose



Joined: 16 Feb 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

crazylemongirl wrote:
I'm a believer in good manners. If a man gets the check I will offer to pay for my bit of dinner, if he refuses I let him pay. However I make a point of inviting him out next time and picking up the tab. However if he's been a jerk, I'll pay my half and say goodbye.

Anyone woman who expects a man to pay for all 'date related' expenses over a long period of time must be either very hot or have a mouth like a hoover. Chances are if she's in that league, she won't be dating guys off of Daves.


she won't be dating anyone because any guy in his right mind would just get rid no matter how hot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kermo



Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Location: Eating eggs, with a comb, out of a shoe.

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

drumpounder wrote:


300+ satisfied customers so far. Laughing


Maybe you have a creative definition of the word "satisfied." If a woman has been led to bed under false pretenses, she doesn't always walk away going "He was a creep, but it was worth it." In fact, if you bed her honestly and well, she will tell her friends about it. If you've been snakey, then her friends will know as well, and you've ruled out dozens of potential hook-ups.

I had one boyfriend who numbered his sexual conquests in the three digits, but he was a great disappointment. Maybe if he had been sober and somewhat interested in the pleasure of his partners, his copious practise would have paid off.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dan The Chainsawman



Joined: 05 May 2005

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sometimes you can learn progressively from your 'hook ups' or in many cases you just do the same thing 300 or so times with no real improvement.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
drumpounder



Joined: 20 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Axl Rose wrote:
drumpounder wrote:
My father once told me, "Son, there are two people you never tell the truth to. Cops and women."
I use the time honoured tradition of sexual conquest. I lie. I tell a woman whatever she wants to hear. Whatever it takes to get her into bed.

300+ satisfied customers so far. Laughing


no surprise to see the PC replies to that.

I appreciated your humor dude.


Yeah yeah Laughing Laughing Why lie when no one believes the truth??? (I was playing drums in a rock band for a few years...that helps.) Plus I was a flight attendant for 10 years and as they say...whoever 'they' are...If you can't find a date, find a *beep*...if you can't find a *beep*, find a flight attendant.

A seriously fun job for a straight guy, especially back then when we were very few and far between Wink

Before I left Calgary I went to a MacDonalds for a last Big Mac. Honestly the two Pakistani girls who served me wore name tags reading

Suckamani and Gagandeep
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RACETRAITOR



Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Location: Seoul, South Korea

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Women can basically choose any man they want, so if one guy doesn't treat them right, they can easily replace him. It's up to the man to act appropriately because he's expendable and replaceable. Of course there is more than one way to do this. Using chivalry is one, and probably not the best. Being a lying scumbag gets better temporary results.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
drumpounder



Joined: 20 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 10:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RACETRAITOR wrote:
Women can basically choose any man they want, so if one guy doesn't treat them right, they can easily replace him. It's up to the man to act appropriately because he's expendable and replaceable. Of course there is more than one way to do this. Using chivalry is one, and probably not the best. Being a lying scumbag gets better temporary results.


That is the crux of the matter right there. No choice = force = rape. One of the few crimes I think deserves the death penalty.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
drumpounder



Joined: 20 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 10:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just as an aside, any guy who has played and gone on the road in a half assed successful rock band can attest to the groupie thing. Especially in the days prior to anyone ever having heard the word AIDS. And it's only sex for god's sake. Have some fun, let loose, let your hair down and party. This game called life has gotten way to serious. I blame the 80's.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Moldy Rutabaga



Joined: 01 Jul 2003
Location: Ansan, Korea

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ken's thesis: where he really gets flamed.

I'm proud of the responders -- and a little surprised that it hasn't turned into a gender war, so far at least. The author has basically said that the entire modern feminist movement is a mistake for trying to grab both the Germanic concept of equality and the Romantic idea of chivalry and wringing the benefits but not the responsibilities out of them. The woman wants the door held open for her, but she wants to be promoted ahead of the man who held the door because the sisterhood has suffered at the hands of the patriarchy.

Partly it's true, but I think the author has the symptoms right and the disease wrong. I don't think feminism itself is wrong-- there were laudable ideas about improving the conditions and attitudes for females-- but its modern application in the west has turned into a culture of selfishness. I'm constantly hearing complaining about western women in this forum, that they're fat and unfeminine. But to me the underlying and subconscious complaint is that they don't take care to look attractive but expect to be wooed and put on pedestals, and the objection that many (not all) men here aren't realizing is to pride and not simple unattractiveness.

Men haven't helped. First, we haven't helped by the easy availability of pornography and the ever-presence of perfect models that have raised male expections to unrealistic levels. In other words, we've demanded that western women act and dress like porn stars, and then we've condemned them for it. Neither have we helped by promoting immature promiscuity as a heroic goal and then again blaming women for their flippancy and disloyalty. What did we expect-- a nation of Penelopes waiting faithfully for us while we slept around? At the same time, we've kept the double standards. When you turn 35 and you're single, if you're male you're still the lad; if you're female, here's your library card and your cat.

In other words, to me the fault of the west is not feminism but materialism in general which has encouraged an attitude of selfishness. And selfishness results in blaming the other party for everything. Many of us men (like me, I admit) are bitter about western women after being rejected or treated poorly countless times for not looking like Brad Pitt. But now in Korea we look back and make fun of those women for not looking like Jennifer Aniston. Both parties have turned love and commitment into products that you keep until an upgrade comes along.

Quote:
I define chivalry as benevolent sexism, or BS, a one-way street of largesse from men to women.

Well, BS might be the proper word for it. Women never benefited much from chivalry, for it permitted men to fetishize or idealize adultery or war for romantic reasons, and to change their everyday and actual treatment of women little. At least this is what I gather from reading these sources between the lines--the wife of Bath isn't much for chivalry; she'd rather have a young man who's 'freshye in bed' who won't bore her with empty platitudes. The Germans were not a chivalric people; women don't play much of a role in the old legends, but those who are there aren't treated much differently from the men. The women of Beowulf don't take sheeet from anyone.

Asian women have a double whammy. They enjoy neither the abstract benefits of chivalry or the real benefits of equality. They get Confucianism; the men are the sky, the women the earth. It's one reason why Korea can be so attractive for a western male when women here haven't been brought up with twenty gallons of attitude. But it might not last more than a generation or so. I'm not going to condemn guys who sleep around all the time, because it just sounds like sour grapes (it probably partly is.. Cool ), but I think that if one's sleeping around hurts or humiliates people it accerates women here being just like women back home.

Ken:>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mashimaro



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: location, location

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Axl Rose wrote:

she won't be dating anyone because any guy in his right mind would just get rid no matter how hot.


You make the assumption that all guys are in their "right mind" Smile
Plenty of men act like idiots around women.. and some people
are just idiots
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Junior



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Location: the eye

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mashimaro wrote:
Axl Rose wrote:

she won't be dating anyone because any guy in his right mind would just get rid no matter how hot.


You make the assumption that all guys are in their "right mind" Smile
Plenty of men act like idiots around women.. and some people
are just idiots


Which is why the 10's end up with whoever is dumb enough to tolerate their behaviour.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Manner of Speaking



Joined: 09 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RACETRAITOR wrote:
Women can basically choose any man they want, so if one guy doesn't treat them right, they can easily replace him. It's up to the man to act appropriately because he's expendable and replaceable. Of course there is more than one way to do this. Using chivalry is one, and probably not the best. Being a lying scumbag gets better temporary results.


A few years ago, I was sitting in a restaurant in downtown Halifax. The place was run by the Sri Chinmoy people, and had fairly good veggie food. It was just down the street from work, and I just wanted to pop in for lunch and have an hour or so to read the paper and think about the database I was working on.

The place is a little small and the tables are a bit close together. About 20 minutes after I got there, two women sat down at the table next to me. They seemed a few years older than me, fairly attractive, and they were obviously two friends meeting for lunch. One had dark hair and glasses, the other had light brown hair. I just had my lunch and read my paper. Then something weird happened.

After they finished their lunch, the dark-haired one started to get up and leave. She hesitated, and I heard her whisper, "Are you staying?" I didn't hear the other woman's response, but out of the corner of my eye I saw the dark-haired woman glance at me, glance back at her friend, smile and wink, and then leave.

Once alone, the brown-haired woman then proceeded to put on the most...persistent campaign of flirting and trying to get someone's attention I have ever seen...sighs, flips of the hair, tossing the neck, stretching, etc., trying to get my attention. We were the only two people left in the restaurant.

But, quite frankly, I was just not in the mood. I was tired, I was stressed, I had a lot on my mind about work, I didn't want to talk to anybody. I didn't want to be rude to anyone, and I'm sure she was a nice enough person. But I just wanted to be left alone. And I have to admit, part of me faintly resented the fact that this woman seemed to assume she could just, 'press a few buttons' and I would respond, like some kind of pocket calculator. She didn't know anything about me; I didn't know anything about her. So why did I HAVE to respond to her?

So, quite deliberately, I turned my back to her, and quite deliberately, immersed myself in my paper. Glanced at my watch, saw that I had about 20 minutes left before I had to be back in the office. Behind me, I could hear that the figeting stopped, and could feel a pair of eyes glaring into my back.

She got up and left about five minutes later, shooting me an evil look just as she passed out the door. About ten minutes later I paid my bill, and went back to work. Not feeling the least bit guilty.

I'm sure she was a nice person, I'm sure if I had gotten to know her I might have liked what I saw in her, maybe I made a big mistake in not striking up a conversation with her...but the point was, I was just not looking to meet someone that particular day or time. I had deliberately chosen that restaurant to have some quiet time to myself. I had other things in my life...and I just wanted to eat my lunch in private. Nothing personal. ** shrug **

Point is, NO, we're not expendable and replaceable. Or if we are, then women can be just as "expendable" and "replaceable". We're not pocket calculators, destined to jump whenever a woman presses our buttons. You ARE a pocket calculator if you make yourself out to be one. A woman doesn't owe it to a guy to return his attentions if he offers them...AND, vice-versa.

Men should treat women with courtesy and respect because those are desirable in and of themselves, not because it's going to get her in the sack faster. And the same goes for the way women should/do treat men.

Guys, women are not stupid - they can sense the difference between someone who genuinely respects others, and someone who is just trying to score points with the opposite sex or get them laid faster.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Axl Rose



Joined: 16 Feb 2006

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some excellent points, Ken.

Elsewhere, at the beginning of this thread, there was the inevitable assumption that the author in the article in the OP, given his views, simply MUST be an ugly mysoginist who never gets laid.

It's weak and cliched to say that and, frankly, is suggestive of a person with very limited life experience and thus lives in a world of cliches. My best friend in Korea is the biggest woman-hater I've ever come across - he even disgusts me sometimes and, trust me, that's really saying something - and yet he's a handsome guy, gets women effortlessly and is an absolute womanizer.

That's just one individual, but in my view it's a mistake to view criticisms of women as indicative of being a flawed individual.....indeed, a man who doesn't live up to male standards of what a man should be. Very surprising to see MALES say these things, but typically such males are precisely the kinds of losers they criticize, whereas those truly comfortable with themselves say what the hell they like and don't give a damn about anyone's whineey PC opinion. Criticism of female behavior is crushed because any criticism whatsoever is deemed as never getting laid or being ugly - the biggest threats to masculinity.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hobophobic



Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Location: Sinjeong negorie mokdong oh ga ri samgyup sal fighting

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

drumpounder wrote:
Just as an aside, any guy who has played and gone on the road in a half assed successful rock band can attest to the groupie thing. Especially in the days prior to anyone ever having heard the word AIDS. And it's only sex for god's sake. Have some fun, let loose, let your hair down and party. This game called life has gotten way to serious. I blame the 80's.


this is so true....you sir are learned..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Satori



Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Location: Above it all

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know about chivalry, the word has too many complicated and questionable associations. I certainly believe courtesy, kindness, and consideration. I think I know how to treat a lady, and it sure ain't about money. Mine have always been very happy little pussy cats... Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Natalia



Joined: 10 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Manner of Speaking wrote:


That may be true for some men, but I don't think it's true for the majority of emotionally mature men at all. I think most men (and women) value courtesy and respect as ends in themselves, not as means to an end.

I think most men treat women with courtesy and respect for obvious reasons - because they like to be liked and thought well of by the opposite gender.

Nobody can get away with treating a certain group in society - any group - in a condescending manner, without it eventually catching up with them. And women are not stupid.


Exactly. I don't like the way the Korean princesses EXPECT to be treated, but there seem to be quite a few very angry men on these boards. Some of whom use sexual equality as an excuse to be a bastard.

"There's no chance in hell I'm going to help her carry something heavy or hold a door open for her, because chivalry is dead, and this is what the feminists deserve," kind of attitude.
What happened to simply showing courtesy and kindness to the person you are supposed to love? You don't have to go overboard, but I thought it was just common sense that both men and women should act like decent human beings towards their partners.


Quote:
I think it's true that many women nowadays start out their adult lives by believing that courtesy and "chivalry" from men is something they're automatically entitled to, and don't feel they have to reciprocate to men they work with or date. But I think the majority of women outgrow that attitude in their 30s and 40s, and learn that courtesy towards and respect for the opposite gender is something valuable in and of itself.


Really? I would say it is a whole lot less these days than ever before. I certainly don't expect it. I just don't want a bastard who moans non-stop about 'bloody feminists and their double-standards'.

Maybe you've been in Korea too long. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International