|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guri Guy

Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Location: Bamboo Island
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it is safe to say that Koreans have never been great inventors. However they have been skilled innovators. That is, taking a product and improving on it. Living next to China allowed Korea access to a lot of advanced technology. This was subsequently passed onto Japan.
I don't think the invention of Hangul is all that special to be honest. It seems likely they got the idea from the Mongols about modifying Chinese to suit their own language's phonetics. I read an account on how the Mongols commisioned Tibetan monks to do this for them. I will say that the shape of the characters being related to tongue position is pretty cool though. That and the Ying-Yang Dark and Light Vowels thingee makes Hangul somewhat scientific so I will give Koreans credit for that.
About suspension bridges:
Some of the earliest suspension bridge cables were made from twisted grass.
Rope made from bamboo, itself a form of grass, was used to hang the Anlan suspension bridge in China, first constructed about A.D. 300. The bridge spans the 1,000-foot wide Min River, using piers that support eight sections of cable to do so.
People have walked across the Anlan Bridge for 1,700 years.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/lostempires/china/meetsusp.html
As far as prnting presses go, I believe Korea had the first metal movable type printing press.
Block printing
The original method of printing was block printing, pressing sheets of paper into individually carved wooden blocks (xylography). Block printing is believed to have originated in Asia. Recently, an excavation of a Korean pagoda unearthed a Buddhist sutra which predates the dates to 750-751 CE, and is now considered the oldest discovered printed work in the world. [1] [2]. Before this discovery, it was believed that the earliest known printed text was the Diamond Sutra (a Buddhist scripture), printed in China in mid-9th century. The technique was also known in Europe, where it was mostly used to print Bibles. Because of the difficulties inherent in carving massive quantities of minute text for every block, and given the levels of peasant illiteracy at the time, texts such as the "Pauper's Bibles" emphasized illustrations and used words sparsely. As a new block had to be carved for each page, printing different books was an incredibly time consuming activity.
Movable type
Movable type allowed for much more flexible processes than hand copying or block printing. It was invented in 1041 by Bi Sheng in China. Sheng used clay type, which broke easily, but Wang Zhen later carved more durable type from wood. Eventually, the Goryeo dynasty of Korea created metal type and established a brass type foundry in 1234, using Chinese characters. Examples of this metal type are on display in the Asian Reading Room of the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. The oldest extant movable metal print book is the Jikji, printed in Korea in 1377.
Since there are thousands of Chinese characters, the benefit of the technique was not as large as with alphabetic based languages, which typically are made up of fewer than 50 characters. Still, movable type spurred scholarly pursuits in Song China and facilitated more creative modes of printing. Nevertheless, movable type was not extensively used in China until the European-style printing press was introduced in relatively recent times.
Johann Gutenberg is credited with inventing the first printing press. Gutenberg is also credited with the first use of an soy-based ink. He printed on both vellum and paper, the latter having been introduced into Europe somewhat earlier from China by way of the Arabs, who had a paper mill in operation in Bagdad as early as 794.
Before inventing the printing press in the 1450s, Gutenberg had worked as a goldsmith. Without a doubt, the skills and knowledge of metals that he learned as a craftsman were crucial to the later invention of the press. Gutenberg made his type from an alloy of lead, tin, and antimony, which was critical for producing durable type that produced high-quality prints.
http://www.answers.com/topic/printing-press |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
[edit]Interesting post, Guri guy![/edit]
| Zulu wrote: |
| Newbie wrote: |
A couple of years ago I visisted the grave of some Korean dude that apparently invented the pulley system... When was this great feat accomplished, ca. 1780!!!  |
Now the Koreans claim they even invented the pulley? You have to get used to this stuff living here. But wasn't there that old Greek fella, oh, you know, nobody important, Archimedes http://www.answers.com/topic/archimedes who did that about 205 BC?
You have to distinguish between what Koreans like to say they've accomplished, and what they actually have. |
You know, you also have to distinguish between what Koreans say they accomplished and what Newbie said they said they accomplished, based on a memory of a trip 2 years ago.
Admittedly, there is a tendency to, shall we say, represent things in a somewhat skewed manner. So I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out that Newbie's memory was entirely accurate and the English translation on the guy's grave did in fact say 'pulley', rather than 'type of crane known locally as the 거중기'. But it's more likely a misunderstanding or mistranslation.
| Zulu wrote: |
From a Korean website: �Hangul is the only alphabet in the whole world invented by man.� �Hangul is more scientific than any other writing system�
Amusing. So thousands of years before the Koreans got Hangul, when they were probably living in the forests, the Phoenicians, Mesopotamians, Harappans, Romans, Greeks, Hebrews, Chinese, and all the other ancient civilizations had their women do all the inventing of alphabets? Well, I guess those civilizations were even further ahead of their times than I thought. And they had no consonant or vowel sounds either? Funny, that�s not how I remember it from my from my Latin class. And in modern times alphabets from Inuktitut to IPA were not invented by man? Well, thank God for Area 51 and alien technology. �Hangul is more scientific than any language�. Shrug. Yet another ultra-nationalist myth bites the dust. |
Talking of representing things in a skewed manner, the description of how hangeul came into being is, arguably, an example of what I mean. In fact arguably it's a fair description. It hinges on the word 'invent'. They're saying hangeul is the only alphabet that a group of scholars sat around and concocted from scratch, as opposed to all other systems which evolved in a more or less natural manner. If it's true that Tibetan monks did the same thing for the Mongols, then ok that claim is refuted too, but at least you can see what they meant by it.
In fact I'm not sure, Zulu, whether you really failed to see that point or whether you were just wilfully misunderstanding it in order to make a joke.
I too get fed up with hearing the 'Europe was a backwater' line, because, firstly, it's not that simple, secondly, it's not really news to me, it's only news if you've grown up with a chip on your shoulder about the West's superiority, and, lastly, so what? The past doesn't change the present, and no-one knows the future either. Just as now we can look back and be impressed by all the inventions made by the Chinese, without feeling the need to get political about it, perhaps in 500 years people will be able to look at the West's contribution to world civilization and be sufficiently impressed without getting either worshipful or resentful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guri Guy

Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Location: Bamboo Island
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Privateer. I find Asian history fascinating.
It is possible that the "Korean invention" of the Ironclad ship is in doubt too. The idea is found in a Wikipedia article so I am not 100% sure of it's accuracy.
n 1576, the Japanese daimyo Oda Nobunaga had six partially iron-covered war ships (Ōatakebune 大安宅船) constructed. These ships were called "Tekkousen" - literally, iron armored ships - and were armed with multiple cannons and large caliber rifles. Nobunaga defeated the navy of his enemy Mori Motonari with these ships at the mouth of the Kizu River, Osaka in 1578 with a successful naval blockade. Despite being regarded as floating fortresses, they were used as warships in the Seven-Year War with Korea. The most notable and largest of these ships was the Nihon Maru, which briefly fought a Korean turtle ship in the battle of Angolp'o harbor in 1592.
Although not a generally accepted theory, some postulate that the first instance of an ironclad warship may have been a ship designed by General Qin Shifu during the Song Dynasty in 1203. Some Chinese historical records credit Qin Shifu with the invention of a ship that was shaped like a Falcon, which had sheet-iron armor and an iron ram.[1]
It is noted that the Chinese ships actually had Iron side armour while the Korean ships only had iron on the top. I suppose it depends on your definition of Ironclad as to who was first.
I don't believe Koreans invented bombs or mortars either. I believe they may have modified an already existing Chinese invention.
GUNPOWDER
Gunpowder, reportedly produced from saltpetre, sulphur and charcoal, is a Chinese invention. Earliest records of the formula date to the 800s. The Chinese used gunpowder to propel rockets, and to produce incendiary and explosive projectiles thrown by catapult. By the 1200s, a Chinese Bureau of Munitions was operating seven factories that produced 7,000 rockets and 21,000 bombs a day. The weaponry included a so-called "thunder-crash bomb", which the Chinese unleashed in 1232 on Mongol troops besieging Kaifeng, capital of the north Chinese Jin Empire. During the later years of the 13th century, the Chinese invented cannons, using gunpowder to fire projectiles from metal barrels.
http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/oldwrld/armies/gunpowder.html
All in all, it is conceivable that Koreans have the metal movable type printing press as their only great invention and it was really just an upgrade on the Chinese wooden one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SeoulFinn

Joined: 27 Feb 2006 Location: 1h from Seoul
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't remember reading that Romans or Greeks used ironclad ships. But that's not the issue here, though. Samuel Hawley in his book "The Imjin War (2005)" mentioned couple times how Oda Nobunaga used "iron ships" during late sengoku period. I recommend his book to everyone who is interested about the Japanese 1592 and 1597 invasions.
| Quote: |
"[...] seven heavy ships, armored in part if not wholly in iron, that would be impervious to the Mori's arrow and musket fire." (page 104)
|
| Quote: |
| "[...] English-language accounts of the Imjin War usually described it as such, typically adding that it was the worlds first ironclad ship. This latter claim is certainly not true. Fifteen years earlier in Japan, Oda Nobunaga had employed ships armored in some manner with iron [...] a technological innovation that the Japanese never capitalized one." (page 195 - 196) |
Hawley also points out that Korean turtleship may not have been completely covered in iron. Perhaps they only had iron spikes on the roof to keep of the boarders?
| Quote: |
| "Indeed, it is unlikely that Yi Sun-sin's turtle ship was iron plated at all. The evidence to support this claim does not exists. [...] Yi himself makes no mention in either his diary or his reports to court of any sort of iron plating covering the roof of kobukson. Nor does his nephew Yi Pun in his biography of the admiral. [...]" (page 196) |
And then Hawley goes on about the weight issue. It has been estimated that it would have taken 6 tons of iron to cover one kobukson roof with 3 mm thick plating. That's a lot of iron at that time. Furthermore, admiral Yi sees it worthy to pen down in his diary the present of a mere 22 Kg of iron from another navy commander... so what do you think? Does Korea have the first ironclad ships (even in Asia) or not?
EDIT: Oops! Maybe I should have read the whole thread through before posting this. Looks like Guri Guy answered the question I wanted to shed some light on. My bad. Well, more information is never a bad thing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
China has been the source of more inventions than whatever country the op is from.
If one is going to compare east vs. west.
But this thread seems intended to be a sort of Real Reality writ small.
Glad to see posters taking it in another direction. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guri Guy

Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Location: Bamboo Island
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No no Seoulfinn. You gave much more information than I did. That's a good source you found. I talked about the subject in general and you were much more specific. Good work.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doggyji

Joined: 21 Feb 2006 Location: Toronto - Hamilton - Vineland - St. Catherines
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zulu wrote: |
| doggyji wrote: |
| Okay, it's not even worth mentioning that Koreans use lots of stuff first invented in western countries. So Koreans are not entitled to criticize any of the great western nations where all the goods have come from? Koreans just have to keep their mouths shut, smile and cheer for the west no matter what happens? |
Not at all. I probably criticize my own government more than most Korean people. I hate Bush and his illegal, immoral war in Iraq. The US, like China, Russia, England, France and other countries has a lot to learn about foreign and domestic policy. But it really pisses me when I see Koreans spit on soldiers here. These people saved Korea a longtime ago. You should show them a little respect even if you hate their leader. Some of them really hate Bush, too. In France many hate Bush. Fine. But most French people are still grateful for what the US, Britain, Canada and other allies did there during the war. In the Netherlands if they find out you're a Canuck, they'll likely buy you a beer for the same reason. What happens if in Korea you say you were a Korean War vet? The majority of young people simply don't care or worse, some will insult you.
So let's get one thing straight. I'm not talking about the right to protest the US or any other country. What bugs me is that so often the Korean media, and a lot of Korean people, like to pretend that the economy is doing well because of 'Korean dynamism' and an inherant racial superiority, Korea's being 'better-educated' their 'superior manual dexterity from use of chopsticks', or whatever. |
Okay, I think I understand where you are coming from. If I were on your shoes, I would feel the similar dissapointment. I don't know much about the politics but I do think Koreans should give much respect to the individual soldiers who fought in a foreign soil regardless of everything else.
"What happens if in Korea you say you were a Korean War vet?"
What happens? Indifference? At least I believe many Koreans will treat old vets with warmth especially because it is a personal encounter and they are very old which is one important factor to consider in Korea even before they are given the right respect out of a historical consideration. They are likely to be considered special foreign guests even if things like Nogeun-li incident are a bit of an issue that makes us hard to give pure heartfelt respect to everyone involved in the war. And yeah I guess it is a different story when it comes to the young US soldiers who are currently stationed in Korea. On a related note, it seems many people who served in Katusa with GIs end up having a generally good opinion of them unlike the media depiction which usually only focuses on the negative happenings.
| Zulu wrote: |
| doggyji wrote: |
| What's your view on the French? They are part of "the west" and yet lots of stuff they use have come from, say, the US. Would you say the same thing? Is it a luxury for them to have protests against the US administration at times? Or they are OK unlike Korea because they as part of the west have contributed in other things? |
I love France and many French things. They've invented a lot of things as well and have made many great scientific and artistic contributions to the world. That said, no, of course I don't agree with everything France has done either. Nuclear testing on South Pacific islands? Not cool. Blowing up New Zealand shipping? Not cool. Trying to sell advanced European weapons to China these days? Not cool. They have a legit beef with the Bush administration but that's politics. There are racists in France too, like Le Pen, but the xenophobia there deosn't seem as widespread as here.
| doggyji wrote: |
| What about Belgium, Iceland, Ireland, or even Canada? |
Belgium I have problems with politically. Until Hitler came on the scene Leopold 2 was probably the worst despot to hit Europe, just ask the Congolese. They still have trouble admitting this and prefer to glorify that *beep*.
Iceland. No problem. Ireland, great neutral country with wonderful beer, some of the world's best music and a keen sense of wit and humor. Canada has had it's moments in the past but have done a lot to make up for this - Nunavut being a prime example. It's certainly one of the most progressive nations on Earth and would be in my top 5 places to live. I've lived there and can say it's extremely cosmopolitan and laid back. In many ways I prefer it to the states and envy them as they don't have to endure Bush directly. Oh, and they have a better hockey team! Grrrr. They've also made many scientific contributions and have some world class universities. Yeah, I like all those places you've mentioned not beause of their obvious scientific and tech contributions but because the cultures are just more open to the rest of the world. |
I just randomly picked those countries to question the OP's logic. While I could see his general intentions, he sounded a bit extreme. "You got this from my family and we helped you and you gave us nothing important, so whatever we do to you now and in the future, you are supposed to shut up and appreciate what we've done."
| Zulu wrote: |
| 1) Han-gul? Developing an alphabet of exactly 25 characters is pretty specific and nothing of great significance. Loads of civilizations developed alphabets and writing systems millennia before Saejong hit the scene. |
I think it's pretty unique that one patronizing leader decided one day to make easier letters for the common people. Hangul was invented by a few of known people. I think Privateer has a point on this one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zulu
Joined: 28 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Privateer wrote: |
| Zulu wrote: |
| From a Korean website: �Hangul is the only alphabet in the whole world invented by man.� �Hangul is more scientific than any other writing system� |
Talking of representing things in a skewed manner, the description of how hangeul came into being is, arguably, an example of what I mean. In fact arguably it's a fair description. It hinges on the word 'invent'. They're saying hangeul is the only alphabet that a group of scholars sat around and concocted from scratch, as opposed to all other systems which evolved in a more or less natural manner. If it's true that Tibetan monks did the same thing for the Mongols, then ok that claim is refuted too, but at least you can see what they meant by it.
In fact I'm not sure, Zulu, whether you really failed to see that point or whether you were just wilfully misunderstanding it in order to make a joke. |
Actually I took issue with the word "only" and provided examples to disprove this claim. All alphabets or cunieform were invented and evolved from something, somewhere. Fact is, these predate Hangeul by so many thousands of years that we can't pinpoint their exact origins - and you can't prove a negative. I also questioned the very subjective "more scientific than any other writing system", which comes across as yet more of the same old racial chest-thumping with little proof to back the claim. More scientific than IPA (yet another invented alphabet), for example?
| Privateer wrote: |
| I too get fed up with hearing the 'Europe was a backwater' line, because, firstly, it's not that simple, secondly, it's not really news to me, it's only news if you've grown up with a chip on your shoulder about the West's superiority, and, lastly, so what? The past doesn't change the present, and no-one knows the future either. Just as now we can look back and be impressed by all the inventions made by the Chinese, without feeling the need to get political about it, perhaps in 500 years people will be able to look at the West's contribution to world civilization and be sufficiently impressed without getting either worshipful or resentful. |
Well it's news to me. I basically agree that Europe was somewhat of a backwater (although again, a simplification) for a long time until the Renaissance. However, to post that China was always more advanced than the West is to *conveniently* ignore certain European civilizations prior to the Dark Ages. One can easily argue that the Greeks and Romans, for example were at least on par with, and probably well ahead of any of their contemporaries, anywhere. There were certainly advanced peoples on the scene well before the Chinese or Europeans as well; particularly the Middle Eastern civilizations where advanced writing systems, agriculture, and human settlement were developed. Jericho is the oldest city in the world, at 10,000 years.
Pretty much every other civilization, particularly various Moslem, Indian, and American indigenous peoples, and the Chinese too, can certainly claim their share of valuable achievements in old times which continue to benefit us today. But all these pale in comparison to the rapidity, sophistication, and impact of the West's industrial and technological achievements of the last 350 years. Nobody should worship anybody for that, but neither should they try to subvert this simple fact, or as you suggest, resent it. I find that in Korea more than anywhere else I've been - they choose the latter with a certain glee. It's a big world and everybody has, can, and will, contribute.
And let's not forget - we're all Africans when you get right down to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zulu
Joined: 28 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| VanIslander wrote: |
China has been the source of more inventions than whatever country the op is from.
If one is going to compare east vs. west.
But this thread seems intended to be a sort of Real Reality writ small.
Glad to see posters taking it in another direction. |
Van Islander you need to read a book, preferably an avionics manual or similar. China has NOT been the source of more inventions than the US or the UK, or some other European countries like Germany and France. Not even close. Think about what you just said. The number of inventions, innovations and scientific breakthroughs required to make a single Boeing 747 fly certainly exceeds the entire inventory of Chinese inventions. That's not to come down on the Chinese, but to state the incredible comparative complexity of Western technology. This is all the more amazing as the US is a new country and China has existed for thousands of years with a much larger population. But the massive technological gap shouldn't be surprising; Confucianism and little episodes like the Cultural Revolution probably didn't permit China to advance as much as it could have, despite claims to the contrary. There's also no doubt that China will benefit greatly in the future from today's Western, Russian, and Japanese know-how.
Regardless, if we were to take Europe as a whole, to attempt to narrow the huge population disparity compared to China, the scope of Europe's contributions would be even bigger. But we don't even need to go that far. Sure, the Chinese like the Greeks and other civilizations, can claim a lot of valuable ancient inventions. Great. There's no denying they've made some big contributions to the world. But these come nowhere near the number of things invented during the West's Industrial Revolution all the way up to today. If you buy that propaganda I've got a nice bridge to sell you.
Still, this thread has been sidetracked from that of Korea's 'Glorious' 5000 Years and I'd certainly agree China has invented many more things than old Daehan-mingug. No contest. By a mile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SirFink

Joined: 05 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| otis wrote: |
| They came through it fine. |
Why so positive? Is is the Korean wife?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Natalia
Joined: 10 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| blaseblasphemener wrote: |
Can anyone who has lived abroad, other than Korea, please comment on this thread.
I'm curious if the "bitterness" exists in foreigners in other countries, or if it is just a "living in korea" phenomenon.
Personally, I didn't start out bitter, but the longer I am here, the more I have to fight it. There are just things that really push my buttons here, alot. I don't think I have to elaborate, because I think most foreigners here experience the same thing, if they have been here at least more than 2 years.
I don't get the people on the board who get sooo angry when Korea is criticized. It seems like a natural reaction to living in Korea. It doesn't mean we want to leave, it just means that this place can drive many of us bonkers at times, for what I believe to be largely justifiable reasons, and why not complain about it sometimes?
Nothing wrong with getting it off your chest once in a while.
What is it like in other places? Or is it a living in korea thing? |
I've lived all around the world, and the only two countries I have taken a dislike to are Korea and India. But India is ten trillion times worse than Korea.
I think my problem with Korea is that the negatives are not so terrible (compared to India), except for the arrogance Koreans have about their country. It's more that there isn't all that much to like. I find Korea to be a bit of a dead wasteland when it comes to culture, food, sights, well most things. It's passable, but it doesn't excite me in the slightest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
laogaiguk

Joined: 06 Dec 2005 Location: somewhere in Korea
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Natalia wrote: |
| blaseblasphemener wrote: |
Can anyone who has lived abroad, other than Korea, please comment on this thread.
I'm curious if the "bitterness" exists in foreigners in other countries, or if it is just a "living in korea" phenomenon.
Personally, I didn't start out bitter, but the longer I am here, the more I have to fight it. There are just things that really push my buttons here, alot. I don't think I have to elaborate, because I think most foreigners here experience the same thing, if they have been here at least more than 2 years.
I don't get the people on the board who get sooo angry when Korea is criticized. It seems like a natural reaction to living in Korea. It doesn't mean we want to leave, it just means that this place can drive many of us bonkers at times, for what I believe to be largely justifiable reasons, and why not complain about it sometimes?
Nothing wrong with getting it off your chest once in a while.
What is it like in other places? Or is it a living in korea thing? |
I've lived all around the world, and the only two countries I have taken a dislike to are Korea and India. But India is ten trillion times worse than Korea.
I think my problem with Korea is that the negatives are not so terrible (compared to India), except for the arrogance Koreans have about their country. It's more that there isn't all that much to like. I find Korea to be a bit of a dead wasteland when it comes to cuture, food, sights, well most things. It's passable, but it doesn't excite me in the slightest. |
I use to think like this too, but after making a lot of Korean friends, found out different. What the Koreans are doing wrong is blowing up stuff that has little importance to now and only help their "prestige" instead of promoting what is actually good about the country. Japan knows how to promote it's country. If it wasn't for the high costs, travelers would always be going there. China is getting pretty good too, and Thailand, is, well, Thailand. Etc etc. They need a new PR guy  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
own_king

Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Location: here
|
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah, I can't see why having an alphabet is such an incredible idea. Not having one - now that's really something. The only reason King Sejong sanctioned this undertaking, was because all official business of the time was conducted in Chinese, but very few people could read or write Chinese. Actually, King Sejong had little to do with the making of hangul. The idea of developing an alphabet for the Korean language had been batted around for a couple quite some time, but a few of the aristocrats who could read and write Chinese got their noses out of joint, because they saw their influence and power going out the window. As a result, they always thwarted any attempts to introduce one. To his credit King Sejong finally got the job done, but it wasn't his invention, just like the turtle boat wasn't built by Admiral Yi. It was built by the workers and Hangul was developed by a few of the more forward thinking scholars, who wanted to appease Sejong for their own gain. So often in history, credit goes to the powerful or famous - not the true builders and visionaries. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bluelake

Joined: 01 Dec 2005
|
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| own_king wrote: |
| To his credit King Sejong finally got the job done, but it wasn't his invention, just like the turtle boat wasn't built by Admiral Yi. It was built by the workers and Hangul was developed by a few of the more forward thinking scholars, who wanted to appease Sejong for their own gain. So often in history, credit goes to the powerful or famous - not the true builders and visionaries. |
You are correct. To elaborate, the basic design of the 거북선 had been around since the time of King T'aejong, Yi Pang-won, at the beginning of the 15th C., which was nearly two centuries before Yi Sun-sin. As for Hangul, it didn't get that name until 1912; before that time, it was called Hunmin Chŏng'ŭm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kwangjuchicken

Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Location: I was abducted by aliens on my way to Korea and forced to be an EFL teacher on this crazy planet.
|
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Leonardo Da Vinci invented the first computer around 500 years ago.
The only problem was that there was no place to plug it in. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|