|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:32 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| flakfizer wrote: |
| jinju wrote: |
| djsmnc wrote: |
By the way, when I was in university, I saw Katie Holmes in person. She was 18 at the time, smoking (hot), and definitely didn't have a blank stare.
The Tom Cruise thing completely ruined her for me though. |
Katie Holmes TF=0.702 |
So, Jinju rates every girl he sees based on his "trannie factor." I'm guessing someone had a bad experience in Thailand. |
The TF is one of many evaluation tools I use. There are many like the BF (barf factor), CF (cow factor), the DF (ditz factor) and the rekated IF (Idiot Factor) as well as the SF (*beep* factor which is a double edged sword depending on your intentions), etc. But the TF is the one relevant here. Look at this logically. Holmes TF prior to marying Cruise was a rather balmy 0.347. However when she married Cruise alarm bells went off. Cruise is homosexual. Hence, why would he marry a woman? As Holmes doesnt really look like a man, but she must be packing since Cruise is gay, the TF skyrocketed to a scorching 0.702. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pegpig
Joined: 10 May 2005
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I heard mention of Cameron Diaz? In a non-beautiful thread? wtf
Jinju TF= .87 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Corporal
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pegpig wrote: |
I heard mention of Cameron Diaz? In a non-beautiful thread? wtf
Jinju TF= .87 |
Don't forget his Idiot Factor, which is currently skyrocketing at alarming speeds. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pegpig wrote: |
I heard mention of Cameron Diaz? In a non-beautiful thread? wtf
Jinju TF= .87 |
Cameron DIaz
TF = 0.652 (huge features, deep manly voice, laughs like a drunk 45 yar old)
BF = 0.998 without make up, 0.671 with make up
IF = 0.901 ever hear her speak?
SF = doesnt really matter as she is so high on the BF. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Reflections
Joined: 04 Jan 2005
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jinju wrote: |
| flakfizer wrote: |
| jinju wrote: |
| djsmnc wrote: |
By the way, when I was in university, I saw Katie Holmes in person. She was 18 at the time, smoking (hot), and definitely didn't have a blank stare.
The Tom Cruise thing completely ruined her for me though. |
Katie Holmes TF=0.702 |
So, Jinju rates every girl he sees based on his "trannie factor." I'm guessing someone had a bad experience in Thailand. |
The TF is one of many evaluation tools I use. There are many like the BF (barf factor), CF (cow factor), the DF (ditz factor) and the rekated IF (Idiot Factor) as well as the SF (*beep* factor which is a double edged sword depending on your intentions), etc. But the TF is the one relevant here. Look at this logically. Holmes TF prior to marying Cruise was a rather balmy 0.347. However when she married Cruise alarm bells went off. Cruise is homosexual. Hence, why would he marry a woman? As Holmes doesnt really look like a man, but she must be packing since Cruise is gay, the TF skyrocketed to a scorching 0.702. |
Does 'SF' refer to skank factor or slu# factor? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Reflections wrote: |
| jinju wrote: |
| flakfizer wrote: |
| jinju wrote: |
| djsmnc wrote: |
By the way, when I was in university, I saw Katie Holmes in person. She was 18 at the time, smoking (hot), and definitely didn't have a blank stare.
The Tom Cruise thing completely ruined her for me though. |
Katie Holmes TF=0.702 |
So, Jinju rates every girl he sees based on his "trannie factor." I'm guessing someone had a bad experience in Thailand. |
The TF is one of many evaluation tools I use. There are many like the BF (barf factor), CF (cow factor), the DF (ditz factor) and the rekated IF (Idiot Factor) as well as the SF (*beep* factor which is a double edged sword depending on your intentions), etc. But the TF is the one relevant here. Look at this logically. Holmes TF prior to marying Cruise was a rather balmy 0.347. However when she married Cruise alarm bells went off. Cruise is homosexual. Hence, why would he marry a woman? As Holmes doesnt really look like a man, but she must be packing since Cruise is gay, the TF skyrocketed to a scorching 0.702. |
Does 'SF' refer to skank factor or slu# factor? |
the second one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djsmnc
Joined: 20 Jan 2003
Location: Dave's ESL Cafe
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, it does make some sense now, Jinju. However, I don't agree with all of your stats. You need a panel of judges.
Also, what woman doesn't have a TF? I think I saw somewhere that you're married (but I could be mistaken)...Where does your wife/girlfriend rate on these scales? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Qinella
Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Location: the crib
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The Man known as The Man wrote: |
| djsmnc wrote: |
| TheFonz wrote: |
| They all have that blank stare and can look cute, but aren't beautiful. . |
Who doesn't have the blank stare? |
Whoever put Uma Thurman in this thread should be slapped |
In which culture is slapping a sign of praise? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Qinella
Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Location: the crib
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jinju wrote: |
| pegpig wrote: |
I heard mention of Cameron Diaz? In a non-beautiful thread? wtf
Jinju TF= .87 |
Cameron DIaz
TF = 0.652 (huge features, deep manly voice, laughs like a drunk 45 yar old)
BF = 0.998 without make up, 0.671 with make up
IF = 0.901 ever hear her speak?
SF = doesnt really matter as she is so high on the BF. |
All this carrying on about your factors, meanwhile your own LAME! Factor is steadily approaching 200%. We all need goals. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hyeon Een
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| flakfizer wrote: |
| So, Jinju rates every girl he sees based on his "trannie factor." I'm guessing someone had a bad experience in Thailand. |
I'm not Jinju, but I can definitely say you don't need to go to Thailand for the trannie thing. Or am i the only one who's picked up a trannie on the streets of Seoul by mistake? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| flakfizer wrote: |
| jinju wrote: |
| djsmnc wrote: |
By the way, when I was in university, I saw Katie Holmes in person. She was 18 at the time, smoking (hot), and definitely didn't have a blank stare.
The Tom Cruise thing completely ruined her for me though. |
Katie Holmes TF=0.702 |
So, Jinju rates every girl he sees based on his "trannie factor." I'm guessing someone had a bad experience in Thailand. |
I'm betting they had repeated, very satisfying experiences and are trying to pre-empt the publication of the pics.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WorldWide
Joined: 28 Apr 2006
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
republicasses drewl over her.... Why??? I have no idea...
Ann Coulter. Creepy looking dog!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Qinella
Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Location: the crib
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WorldWide wrote: |
republicasses drewl over her.... Why??? I have no idea...
Ann Coulter. Creepy looking dog!
|
That's a doctored photo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
flotsam
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Qinella wrote: |
| WorldWide wrote: |
republicasses drewl over her.... Why??? I have no idea...
Ann Coulter. Creepy looking dog!
|
That's a doctored photo. |
Must be. She looks like she comes from the wrong side of the tracks in Middle-Earth.
Nasty, Elf-Ghetto Biyatch.
Oh yeah, Morgoth bred the orcs from elves...this must be one of the advanced stages... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Compunction Junction
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
her left (our right) eye is quite a bit higher than the other.
I guess that explain her distorted view of reality. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
