Korean Job Discussion Forums

[jaderedux]

[Tiger Beer]

[pauly]

Hey, why is religious preference discriminatory? I don't mean to be offensive, but how many people here would date someone that is obese, an amputee, or someone that has a conjoined twin? Having a religious preference is no more discriminatory that any of those, and others...it's just that, preference.

Jinju, if you were still single, would you honestly say that you would be open to dating, and eventually marry, someone that is a 250 lb. crossdresser that is very public about her lifestyle? Hmmmmm...I'm going to assume not. That's a bit close-minded and discriminatory, isn't it? I know, it's a bit of an extreme case, but is it really any different?

For some of the others, how is Kermo's preference different in any way, shape or form than your preference to date Korean women over "overweight Western women?" According to some of the things said on this thread, that's downright rascist and discriminatory at the same time. Shiza...talk about hypocrisy. And if you don't have a preference for K-girls over "overweight Western women", I don't see you slamming all the posters that do.

I, for one, don't want to date and marry someone that is obese. Is it because I hate obese people? No, I just happen to have a preference for women that are healthy because I live an active lifestyle and I want to eventually marry someone that will go inline skating with me, play some volleyball or squash, go hiking every summer weekend in the Rockies, ski...you get the picture. Is there something wrong with that? No. Is it wrong for Kermo to want to go to church with her family, husband included, to pray, worship and fellowship with other believers every Sunday? Hell no. Sheesh, talk about double standards.

[RACETRAITOR]

[flotsam]

[RACETRAITOR]

[flotsam]

[canuckistan]

[crazylemongirl]

[EFLtrainer]

[simone]

Good that you know what you want, Kermo!

Someone here mentioned discriminating against vegans! Damn straight! Even lacto-ovo-vegetarians are too unfun for me.

At the time I was single, I was actively discriminating against anyone UNCOOL.

I also wouldn't have considered anyone who wasn't willing to live with me at least a couple of years before getting married. Yes, and also wouldn't have considered a teetotaller, someone who didn't like travelling, and gasp! maybe even serious sports nuts.

My hubby and I are both non-believers, and I'm glad. I think what it comes down to is a meeting of the minds with their spouse, and if you begrudge people wanting that, you're a kneejerk troll.

Kermo might see singing children's songs about Jesus a nice way of spending time together before bed. Or church picnics, or this or that thing church-community related. Should she have to give up this part of her future, just to "be fair?"

Be fair to yourself, and your chosen future, Kermo. It'll be your family - you choose how you want to make it.

[Junior]

So you're looking for someone?

Always the way that when you're in that state of mind you never find anyone. However when you're genuinely disinterested, involved with someone already, the potential suitors come knocking your door down. The way to get a lot of boyfriends/girlfriends is to get married. if you're single or available, nobody's interested.

the last thing anybody wants, is someone who actually wants them.

[Apple Scruff]

If you can't get along with someone just because they have different beliefs than you, you are a weak-minded boob. And you're probably boring, too.

[Corporal]

[WorldWide]