|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 am Post subject: The Impact of an "Overheating Economy" |
|
|
I was wondering if I could ask a question to anyone who was an Economics major in college, or who is knowledgeable about the subject?
On the weekend I was reading an article in the Korea Times to the effect that there is concern the Chinese economy is growing too fast. Apparently the economy there is 'overheating', and there are fears of a 'melt-down'.
Metaphors aside, I took Econ 101 a long long time ago, and I don't quite remember why it's bad if an economy grows 'too fast'. It might be partly because I'm from Canada...a place where an 'overheated' economy and full employment are institutionally impossible.
I understand the inflation aspect; if an economy grows very quickly, there is a risk that too much cash may end up chasing too few goods and services, in the short run. But inflation risk aside, if an economy is roaring along at 10% a year and pulling more and more of the population into full employment, how is that bad?
How does - or what happens precisely when - an economy 'overheats'? Is it primarily because of an increased risk of bad loans and/or investment defaults/bankruptcies? I'm honestly curious, and would appreciate any comments from people in the know. Thanks!
MOS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Moldy Rutabaga

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
MOS is already a knowledgeable guy, but I'll try to add my 2c.
Albertans tend to get worried about an overheated economy because they expect a federal grab of the money, or they have the more everyday problem of labor shortages and poor service in restaurants, or simply a too rapid expansion of people and houses which puts strains on the infrastructure of a city.
China likely has similar worries, that the growth in money, cars, houses, and affluence will strain the already overtaxed road and good systems of the cities, and exacerbate the problems of pollution and wealth disparity between city and countryside.
But more cynically, many commentators simply think that China doesn't want the country to get too rich too fast, because if China can't cry poor this will increase calls from other countries to let the yuan float higher. The regime only cares about the cost of an increased currency.
Every country wants growth, or claims to, but controlled and sustained growth, and the Chinese government would probably prefer controlled stagnation to uncontrolled growth, which is unpredictable and might lead to sudden collapse.
Ken:> |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ChopChaeJoe
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Boom and bust. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pastis

Joined: 20 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
A big problem is speculative investment, or over-investment in certain areas. This is what happened in Japan during the famous bubble. The economy was kicking @ss for so long people thought it would never end. Investements continued even after prices became ridiculous. In Japan's case land values became so high they simply couldn't deliver (Tokyo was once worth more on paper than the entire U.S.). A lot of this over investment was funded by credit loans from Japanese banks.
In China's case I think it's more a danger of investing too much too quickly in certain parts of the economy (mainly infrastructure) without knowing if it's going to pay off long-term and not focusing enough of domestic consumption. When everyone starts throwing their money around haphazardly, just assuming all their investments will continue to make money, over-investment becomes a risk, and huge amounts of borrowed capital risk being suddenly wiped out (like in Japan) if there's a market downturn. This would of course bankrupt many people who would then default on loans, in turn killing off the banks themselves (= less investment = economy stops growing like in Japan). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pastis wrote: |
In China's case I think it's more a danger of investing too much too quickly in certain parts of the economy (mainly infrastructure) without knowing if it's going to pay off long-term and not focusing enough of domestic consumption. When everyone starts throwing their money around haphazardly, just assuming all their investments will continue to make money, over-investment becomes a risk, and huge amounts of borrowed capital risk being suddenly wiped out (like in Japan) if there's a market downturn. This would of course bankrupt many people who would then default on loans, in turn killing off the banks themselves (= less investment = economy stops growing like in Japan). |
If you remember the S&L scandal. It created all this cheap money and people built a lot on spec: homes, condos, strip malls. They didn't have customers or buyers. Just speculated that there would be a buyer. Of course, lots of people bought condos and homes not to live in but as investments. "I'll buy four condos, get a bulk discount, and then flip them."
The problem comes in when the boom busts and there isn't someone to flip that property to... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Overheating usually means businesses grow too quickly, and the internal structures can't keep up with the other parts of the business. A classic is AOL/AOHell, in the 90's,in the US- lots of promises- their marketing programs were amazing ("free" internet access, disks everywhere, TV ads), but could the internal structure handle the number of customers? NO- and it drove millions AWAY from AOHell. In the short-term, AOHell gained millions of customers, but, in the long-run, AOHell LOST millions of customers, and earned a reputation as a terrible company for customer service.
It can be the same for a country in the business development stage- the country borrows A LOT of money, and then doesn't build up the infrastructure to ensure permanent growth. If something bad happens, the country will have problems making payments of the loans- and that will probably involve billions of dollars- enough to cause a crisis at major banks. This would cause investors to pull their money out of that country, (to protect themselves), and the economy would collapse. This would then cause economic trouble throughout the region, and, eventually, the rest of the world.
Inflation and deflation are very real possibilities in this part of the world, with the reliances on imports/exports
The Korean real estate "bubble" could burst- prices FAR above real values. Then something happens, (internal or external), and those who bought in with borrowed money, are trapped. Eventually the lenders are stuck holding the bag. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pastis wrote: |
A big problem is speculative investment, or over-investment in certain areas. This is what happened in Japan during the famous bubble. The economy was kicking @ss for so long people thought it would never end. Investements continued even after prices became ridiculous. In Japan's case land values became so high they simply couldn't deliver (Tokyo was once worth more on paper than the entire U.S.). A lot of this over investment was funded by credit loans from Japanese banks.
In China's case I think it's more a danger of investing too much too quickly in certain parts of the economy (mainly infrastructure) without knowing if it's going to pay off long-term and not focusing enough of domestic consumption. When everyone starts throwing their money around haphazardly, just assuming all their investments will continue to make money, over-investment becomes a risk, and huge amounts of borrowed capital risk being suddenly wiped out (like in Japan) if there's a market downturn. This would of course bankrupt many people who would then default on loans, in turn killing off the banks themselves (= less investment = economy stops growing like in Japan). |
Okay so if I understand this correctly, the biggest potential problem when an economy grows too quickly is not that it will "oveheat" (to use the automobile metaphor), but that it will "stall". Too much money will get poured into doubtful investments, and when those investments don't pay off, a large number of investors lose their money. I guess a recent example would be the dot com meltdown in 1999 and 2000; people pouring money into e-businesses with ridiculous business plans, leading to all the stories on websites like www.phuckedcompany.com and so on.
So rapid growth itself is not the issue, but bad investments.
wylies99 wrote: |
It can be the same for a country in the business development stage- the country borrows A LOT of money, and then doesn't build up the infrastructure to ensure permanent growth. If something bad happens, the country will have problems making payments of the loans- and that will probably involve billions of dollars- enough to cause a crisis at major banks. This would cause investors to pull their money out of that country, (to protect themselves), and the economy would collapse. This would then cause economic trouble throughout the region, and, eventually, the rest of the world. |
So generally speaking, rapid growth -> inflation -> high real estate prices -> too much money invested in overvalued real estate -> lack of productivity in the economy -> bust? I guess that's a bit simplistic. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ilsanman

Joined: 15 Aug 2003 Location: Bucheon, Korea
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 6:04 pm Post subject: yes |
|
|
Also they're growing too fast and not dealing with social issues nearly as quickly. eg, sexual discrimination, illiteracy.
Sounds like Korea. It will boom and then crash and burn. During the recession, they will start to deal with those issues, like Korea is doing now.
Last I heard, the Chinese banks have lent out about every cent possible. That does not bode well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pastis

Joined: 20 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Manner of Speaking wrote: |
pastis wrote: |
A big problem is speculative investment, or over-investment in certain areas. This is what happened in Japan during the famous bubble. The economy was kicking @ss for so long people thought it would never end. Investements continued even after prices became ridiculous. In Japan's case land values became so high they simply couldn't deliver (Tokyo was once worth more on paper than the entire U.S.). A lot of this over investment was funded by credit loans from Japanese banks.
In China's case I think it's more a danger of investing too much too quickly in certain parts of the economy (mainly infrastructure) without knowing if it's going to pay off long-term and not focusing enough of domestic consumption. When everyone starts throwing their money around haphazardly, just assuming all their investments will continue to make money, over-investment becomes a risk, and huge amounts of borrowed capital risk being suddenly wiped out (like in Japan) if there's a market downturn. This would of course bankrupt many people who would then default on loans, in turn killing off the banks themselves (= less investment = economy stops growing like in Japan). |
Okay so if I understand this correctly, the biggest potential problem when an economy grows too quickly is not that it will "oveheat" (to use the automobile metaphor), but that it will "stall". Too much money will get poured into doubtful investments, and when those investments don't pay off, a large number of investors lose their money. I guess a recent example would be the dot com meltdown in 1999 and 2000; people pouring money into e-businesses with ridiculous business plans, leading to all the stories on websites like www.phuckedcompany.com and so on.
So rapid growth itself is not the issue, but bad investments. |
I think "overheat" is an appropriate word to use in the sense that over-investment can often cause the economy to stall in the long term. But in the case of a bubble, it doesn't simply grind to an easy halt, rather it only "stalls" after massive losses of capital (or a financial "meltdown", as it were). A "bad" investment is one thing (could be based on any number of factors unrelated to a bubble market, like one's own stupidity for example), but investing on a speculative market where real-estate values are through the roof is kind of a different thing. It's not so much that the investments were "doubtful" (like if you were investing in junk stock, knowing full well it was junk). Bubble stocks are just based on artificially high values due to a lot of market speculation (for whatever reason) but even though they're risky, you likely have reason to believe it will continue performing well for some time. See the subtle difference? It's possible to make a lot of money if you sell before the bust, but one way or the other someone's going to get screwed in the end. In the case of S&L debacle, it was the American public. In Japan, the banks got notably screwed. Bubble markets are rarely substantiated (by definition) and are almost never good for the economy in the end, but it's difficult to control such things. And you're right about people losing their money, and the dot com stuff, as that too was a bubble market. Often bubbles form around something new or untested like hi-tech companies or AOL or whatever it may be.
Sometimes I too scratch my head about how it all works... it seems like a game in a lot of ways. Same way that American deficit spending is seen as actually being good for the economy by some people (lowering the dollar value is good for exports). Sometimes seems paradoxical or absurd. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|