View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jjurabong

Joined: 22 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:47 pm Post subject: grammar gurus - of/as +position or role |
|
|
Hi all,
I was asked by a Korean friend today why, when applying for a job, we drop the article before the position - "I'm applying to work as instructor/ I'm applying for the position of instructor"..
I told him that the first case would keep the article (as ) unless that job was a title. But then I remembered that we can use the expression "to serve as + job without article. I also told him that the second wouldn't have an article ( of ) because "of instructor" is a prepositional phrase that modifies the noun "position". Was I correct?
I couldn't remember if there were any rules regarding this, and promised to check. However, I'm having difficulty finding resources online for this.
Any explanation or suggestions for websites that might have an explanation or rule would be great.
Thanks in advance. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jjurabong

Joined: 22 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
pretty please?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ChopChaeJoe
Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Your post seems a bit muddled. "I'm applying to work as instructor." is not correct English. Additionally, "as" and "of" are not articles. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jjurabong

Joined: 22 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry for the confusion..
I know that as and of are not articles. In the example:
I held the position of instructor - the article "an" is omitted before instructor.
My friend wanted to know why in that case, we can omit the article even though instructor is a countable noun.
Thanks for taking the time to reply. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
jjurabong wrote: |
Sorry for the confusion..
I know that as and of are not articles. In the example:
I held the position of instructor - the article "an" is omitted before instructor.
My friend wanted to know why in that case, we can omit the article even though instructor is a countable noun.
|
Disclaimer: I am not a grammar guru.
"the position" has an article. that's your countable noun. "of instructor" works as an adjective to describe "the position". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jjurabong

Joined: 22 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Huff - You can be my guru anytime -
That was exactly what I wanted.
Thanks so much.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hotpants
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think either of your example sentences can be correct, especially, I would never say the first example without an article.
Remember that articles can be omitted in certain types of formal reports of academic theses. You could perhaps class your expressions under this category, and thus may be written on a resume without an article for purpose of brevity and formality. However, on the accompanying cover letter, I don't think your sentences are acceptable without an article.
It was a KOREAN colleague who came to you with this question. How good is their English really?
Any other takers? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|