Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Israeli terrorists evolved into statesmen.Why not Hezbollah?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bulsajo



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
So, what EXACTLY is your point here Bully?

Christ almighty, do I have to write it out in crayon for you?
And will you be needing your nappies changed first?

My point, EXACTLY:
Rense is a piece of shit and not to be trusted as a source. The obvious corollary to this- obvious, because I've already explicitly spelled it out, but I understand that you are a special case, so I'll make it crystal clear- is anyone who constantly quotes Rense as a source is either a moron or a liar (and in your special case the two are not mutually exclusive).

If you want to pare that down to 10 words or less, be my guest. Given your penchant for distortion I won't be at all surprised if you choose these 10, and in this order:

Rense is to be explicitly trusted as a special source.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Put another dime in the Joo box baby........great rebuttal.


You answer that way cause you have no other answer.
what I said is true. You would rather I don't say it well too bad . When you shoot down the argument then I will. Until then expect to see it again and again.




Quote:
This was not the focus of the article and it would be great if you could stop with your one answer to everything and address the article. Also, anybody could also quote numerous Israel spokesmen, from past to present , from Dyan to Netanyahu , with the same sort of rhetoric and disregard for humanity. It proves nothing.



Well Hizzbollah advocates Genocide and refuses to give up their war.

Israel would love to make peace with its enemies. Indeed they even have at least w/ Egypt and Jordan.

Quote:

Your "proof " of this consists of alleged finding of bills in a building and also a govt commissioned report. We all know the govt has been finding what it wants during the Bush administration and this one is pur fantasy and innuendo. They don't need to, they get plenty of support from other sources, as does Israel from its big brother....



That was a govt report before Bush was president. It is pure fantasy. why don't you show it is .

why is it pure fantasy? You are in your dream world aren't you?

Quote:
I think the point of the article is
1). Why is there no notion of peace, pressure for peace and dealing with adversaries through other means than the gun. Because there is no respect for other cultures and their own political autonomy



Israel has made peace with Egypt and Jordan. They used to have good relations with Iran. If they have no notion of peace then explain why they made peace or used to have it with their enemies.?

Quote:
2) U.S. foreign policy is populist and reactionary and not decided on what is best but rather what the current spin is.......


based on what.

If the Khomeni lovers and Bin Laden followers and Bathsit gave up their war then there would be no war.

Quote:
3). Israel evolved from terrorist quasi state to legitimacy and so could Hizbollah and they've shown their willingness to be part of a democracy. So why doesn't Israel support that and start dialogue?


Cause Hizzbollah is commited to destroying Israel. What shows that they are not? Everything shows that they are.

Quote:
4) Hizbollah is the rejected son of Israel.....much like the story of Tantalus who killed his son and fed him to the Gods. Pelops returned to haunt the father.....


how so?

There would be Hizzbollah without Iran's support. They are they ideology of Khomeni.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am getting tired of the argument that Hizbollah and Al Qaeda and their brethren should give up their war. These individuals have been radicalized. They will never give up their war. They have to be captured or killed. If captured and released they will begin fighting again.

The difficult problem is that we have to stop those who have already been radicalized WITHOUT creating another generation of terrorists. This is where US foreign policy has failed.


Israel has shown over and over and over again that they do want peace. Many moderate arabs and moslems want peace as well.

Individuals and groups such as Hezbollah only want war until their genocidal goals have been achieved. These people will (unfortunately and sadly) NEVER give up their war.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I am getting tired of the argument that Hizbollah and Al Qaeda and their brethren should give up their war. These individuals have been radicalized. They will never give up their war. They have to be captured or killed. If captured and released they will begin fighting again.


I am getting tired of those who think that peace can be brought by the barrel of a gun. CAN:T. NEVER HAS. Especially given modern warfare and the technological world and communicative power we live under.

How sad that people, logical, sane people, actually think that you can bring peace by killing, torture etc.......Your arguement is specious...

All parties, with all their means (especially financial), need to start off the military path and deal with the underlying social causes of the conflict. What happened to the Palestinian/Israeli program of having youth soccer teams play each other? Wonderful program promoting understanding. Israel closed the border, closed the program and labeled it seditious.....

Please -- stop all the rhetoric about "if we only blow them all up to smithereens peace will reign for a thousand years." Apocalyptic and not enlightened or even logical....

DD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes dddeubel,

We have to somehow deal with those in the Arab who are moderate, young, poor ... whatever and NOT YET radicalized. The greatest help would come from not killing them or their relatives, not shooting or bombing them, not blowing up their stuff. To let them build free and prosperous societies. We need to do these things so that they will remain moderate and peaceful.

At the same time, those who have already been radicalized must be killed or captured. They will NEVER give up their fight unless their genocidal goal of the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people is satisfied. These radicals do not care about the Arab peoples except as sources for more radical warriors and funds for fighting.

Thus, we must deal with both groups simultaneously. We must aid the former and eliminate the latter. Quite problematic. Neither simplistic military action nor simplistic social welfare will suffice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ontheway,

I agree with most of what you say ................until the point where you say "we" should kill those who are "radical" . Truth be told, there is not a clear line regarding who is a radical and who isn't. And are we to just keep declaring who is and who isn't and who should be killed and who shouldn't, as we wish? Making it up as we going, when we wish? Detaining, torturing , imprisoning, killing based on innuendo, association etc....? are we to just keep the course of killing anyone who is suspect? What moral degeneracy has entered us?

I say, unless these "radicals" actually kill and bomb (as AlQaeda), they are to be dealt with civily and diplomatically. We are to look at the underlying causes and not just "shoot". We should be strong against a threat but not taking the route of the Bush "shoot first, bomb first" , ask questions later after all the innocents are also killed.....doctrine.

We must also look at ourselves too. Our own prejudices and our own "adding" to the problem. Without this honest look at ourselves, we have no hope of offering anything towards peace.

Interesting view in the Times and I agree with this article........again it states how Israel/America lose by continuing their military efforts and not addressing the reasons, Muslims are radicalized. The U.S. and Israel are just planting more "bombs"...

Quote:
Three conflicts, two mind-sets, one solution


Published: August 7, 2006


PARIS Lebanon, Iraq, Palestine

Behind the fighting in Lebanon, as in Palestine and Iraq, there is a fundamental conflict of views. America sees each as a clash between freedom and terrorism, while the Arabs think in terms of freedom versus military occupation and unjust wars. Unless the two opposing approaches are reconciled politically and diplomatically, the Middle East will sink into perpetual war and chaos.

The Bush administration charges Islamist fundamentalists and their sponsors in Tehran and Damascus with spreading an authoritarian ideology of hate against the will of the Arab majority. Washington believes that there is an American-style freedom-lover inside every Muslim, and that its mission is to drag it out by hook or crook. After all, the cause of liberty in America, according to the new Bush doctrine, is dependent on the cause of freedom abroad.

The Arabs, for their part, blame U.S. and Israeli wars and occupations for turning citizens into freedom fighters and providing terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda with fresh recruits and ideological alibis. They hold America and Israel responsible for death, destruction and surging extremism, in pursuit of narrow geopolitical interests rather than of universal values.

These opposing sets of beliefs come with corresponding myths and images. The United States and its allies invoke 9/11, the Madrid bombings, the London Underground attacks and hundreds of terrorist acts in between, while the Arabs underline the invasions and occupations of 1967, 1982 and 2003; the Abu Ghraib, Kheyam and Guant�namo detention centers, as well as hundreds of massacres, from Der Yassin in 1948 to last month's Qana bombing.

Under occupation, frustrated and angry people who see themselves as having nothing to lose turn to acts of terrorism, which in turn are exploited by the occupiers to justify continuing their domination. The fact that violent terrorist acts perpetrated by resisting groups are illegal and criminal should not overshadow their root cause - military occupations that cause mass suffering, humiliation and hatred. Occupation provides a permanent state of provocation.

This link between occupation and terrorism points to the crucial difference between the 9/11 attacks and the Middle East conflicts, which should not be held hostage to Washington's war on terrorism. An overwhelming majority of Arabs do not recognize their religion in the image of Islam projected by Al Qaeda. And in the region there is little identification with the Taliban, except in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

If this fundamental conflict of views continues, so will asymmetrical wars in Palestine, Lebanon and Iraq that produce no white flags, only more nationalistic and religious extremism that deepens the fault lines between East and West.

Washington's strategy of "constructive chaos" - which is also Al Qaeda's and Tehran's - needs to be seen against a backdrop of mounting religious fundamentalism. In claiming to answer a higher calling, the likes of President George W. Bush, and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran are theologizing what were colonial and imperial conflicts, recasting them in terms of jihad versus crusade.

If the 20th century is any guide, it is evident who will be the eventual loser in these conflagrations. America and its allies might possess far more advanced and destructive firepower, but they are far less committed than their opponents and far more prone to losing momentum.

Highly trained and highly equipped American, Israeli and British soldiers strive to stay alive as they fight low-tech volunteer militants who are more than ready to sacrifice themselves and die as martyrs. As America mourns its deaths, resisting Islamist and secular groups celebrate theirs. Military interventions have generated a huge reservoir of pent-up violence among Arabs, while hardly shaking Palestinian, Iraqi and Lebanese resolve against foreign domination.

In short, time is not on the side of America and its allies. In the Middle East, the continuing hardship of military occupation plays into the hands of religious fundamentalists and discredits moderate democrats.

There is a solution available, however - not divine intervention, but a measure that already exists. The West must apply to the whole region the basic principles of UN Security Council Resolution 1559, which calls for complete withdrawal of foreign troops and the disarming of local groups. That means U.S. and Israeli withdrawal from Iraq and Palestine as well as Lebanese and Syrian lands, as a prelude to disarming of all armed groups and freeing prisoners there.

The only means of halting the cycle of violence and terrorism in the Middle East, and paving the way toward real freedom, is to end military occupation.

Marwan Bishara, a lecturer in international affairs, is the author of "Palestine/Israel: Peace or Apartheid."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is one force that can get deal with of the radical groups in the mideast.

Mideast governments and their security services.

And if mideast regimes and elties they didn't incite violence and teach hate - well their would be far less violence.

The answer is as simple as that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
There is one force that can get deal with of the radical groups in the mideast.

Mideast governments and their security services.

And if mideast regimes and elties they didn't incite violence and teach hate - well their would be far less violence.

The answer is as simple as that.


Including ISRAEL, or are they in your thinking entitled to a "special" exemption?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Israel doesn't act worse than other nations at war. and they would like to make peace. They have relations w/ Egypt & Jordan and Turkey. They used to have good relations with the Shah.

Arab Israelis are members of Israel''s government .

What are conditions like for Arab Jews? Oh I forgot they are all gone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International