Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Lieberman Concedes Losing Dem. Primary in Conn...
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:
How about "the economy seems to move mostly of its own accord and even economists are not entirely certain how it works, and, therefore, in spite of the claims to fame and bitter partisan attacks we see in the media and in election years, presidents are just as much along for the ride as the rest of us"...?


I'm a bit more of a subscriber to the 'great man' theory myself; not entirely, but maybe more than you. Leadership is necessary when making large changes like weaning one's country off of oil for example. Making enough rounds of daytime news shows by the administration could result in SUV ownership without a good reason seem almost unpatriotic. Kind of like the intense efforts they made before the Iraq War but focused somewhere else instead. Changing the values of the average consumer is where an administration has the most influence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't see a drift of the Democratic Party to the left. My perception is that it is drifting to the right and has been since Lyndon Johnson left office. Neither Carter nor Clinton was a liberal in the same way Johnson was. They were moderate Democrats (and southern governors whose names both start with 'C').

While I'm as uncomfortable with knee-jerk anti-Bushites as Gopher is, I am even more distrustful of rabidly knee-jerk supporters of Bush. I've said before that the neocons who are so influential in this administration are not conservatives; they are revolutionaries.

In my view, the Republican party is in much more serious trouble than it was in the pre-Bush years. The Religious Right pretty much silenced the Country Club Republicans who have no where to go with their votes. They've become a major chunk of the Independent vote. What happened to the fiscal conservatives? They are outraged. Teddy Roosevelt was the last Republican who believed in an adventurous foreign policy--till the present administration.

We've had 25 years of Republican-dominated politics and have ended up with massive debts, an unpopular war with no end in sight, are diplomatically isolated much more than in recent memory and are deeply divided over social issues.

We are due for a political re-alignment. Whichever party comes up with a good communicator in the FDR/Reagan model will restructure the electorate for the next quarter century (or so).


WEIRD alert: If you type 'ites' after Bush, it gets deleted. How odd.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Democratic senator-turned-independent candidate Joe Lieberman will win the Connecticut Senate race, CNN projects. Both he and newly elected independent Bernie Sanders in Vermont have said they will caucus with the Democrats.


http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/07/election.main/index.html

Gracious of him, especially given how Democrats have treated him of late. But I expect nothing less than this from him and am not really surprised.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Milwaukiedave



Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Location: Goseong

PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 11:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't don't believe Lieberman for a second that he'll meet with Demcrats. The Republicans will try to "buy" his loyalty. In a way they already have. They donated money and endorsed him because they know it will pay off in the long run.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EFLtrainer



Joined: 04 May 2005

PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Have to agree more with Dave than Gopher. I see him doing what he has so far: opportunism mixed with real stances. What is important is that he caucuses as far as setting up the leadership. I dont expect him to vote the party line, but I don't expect that of anyone.

That said. there are two indications that he's going to end up rethinking his stance on Iraq. He has no choice, in fact. His first wake-up call was the primary. His constituents kicked him in the ass on Iraq. His second is the 11/7 Tsunami. He's nothing if not politically pragmatic.

Finally, in his speech tonight he said this election was a message that not only did people want Congress to change direction, but they wanted Congress to change how it does business.

The upshot? He'll play ball overall.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
His first wake-up call was the primary. His constituents kicked him in the ass on Iraq.


Actually, I believe his constitutents just reelected him. And it turns out the ones who "kicked him in the ass on Iraq" did not carry that much weight after all. And also, as you can see, their guy lost...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Milwaukiedave wrote:
I don't don't believe Lieberman for a second that he'll meet with Demcrats.


I do. His views still predominantly lie to the left of the aisle. His vote could decide whether or not the Senate leans Republican or Democrat. Meaning control of the committees. Given a Democrat House, there's more to be gained by having a Democrat Senate than a Republican Senate. If the Senate stays GOP, expect massive beaurocratic gridlock for the next 2 years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:
Quote:
Democratic senator-turned-independent candidate Joe Lieberman will win the Connecticut Senate race, CNN projects. Both he and newly elected independent Bernie Sanders in Vermont have said they will caucus with the Democrats.


http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/07/election.main/index.html

Gracious of him, especially given how Democrats have treated him of late. But I expect nothing less than this from him and am not really surprised.



I disagree. He knows the repubs are on the way out, so he pretty much has to work with the Dems. Nothing gracious at all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International