| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
| How about "the economy seems to move mostly of its own accord and even economists are not entirely certain how it works, and, therefore, in spite of the claims to fame and bitter partisan attacks we see in the media and in election years, presidents are just as much along for the ride as the rest of us"...? |
I'm a bit more of a subscriber to the 'great man' theory myself; not entirely, but maybe more than you. Leadership is necessary when making large changes like weaning one's country off of oil for example. Making enough rounds of daytime news shows by the administration could result in SUV ownership without a good reason seem almost unpatriotic. Kind of like the intense efforts they made before the Iraq War but focused somewhere else instead. Changing the values of the average consumer is where an administration has the most influence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't see a drift of the Democratic Party to the left. My perception is that it is drifting to the right and has been since Lyndon Johnson left office. Neither Carter nor Clinton was a liberal in the same way Johnson was. They were moderate Democrats (and southern governors whose names both start with 'C').
While I'm as uncomfortable with knee-jerk anti-Bushites as Gopher is, I am even more distrustful of rabidly knee-jerk supporters of Bush. I've said before that the neocons who are so influential in this administration are not conservatives; they are revolutionaries.
In my view, the Republican party is in much more serious trouble than it was in the pre-Bush years. The Religious Right pretty much silenced the Country Club Republicans who have no where to go with their votes. They've become a major chunk of the Independent vote. What happened to the fiscal conservatives? They are outraged. Teddy Roosevelt was the last Republican who believed in an adventurous foreign policy--till the present administration.
We've had 25 years of Republican-dominated politics and have ended up with massive debts, an unpopular war with no end in sight, are diplomatically isolated much more than in recent memory and are deeply divided over social issues.
We are due for a political re-alignment. Whichever party comes up with a good communicator in the FDR/Reagan model will restructure the electorate for the next quarter century (or so).
WEIRD alert: If you type 'ites' after Bush, it gets deleted. How odd. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Democratic senator-turned-independent candidate Joe Lieberman will win the Connecticut Senate race, CNN projects. Both he and newly elected independent Bernie Sanders in Vermont have said they will caucus with the Democrats. |
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/07/election.main/index.html
Gracious of him, especially given how Democrats have treated him of late. But I expect nothing less than this from him and am not really surprised. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't don't believe Lieberman for a second that he'll meet with Demcrats. The Republicans will try to "buy" his loyalty. In a way they already have. They donated money and endorsed him because they know it will pay off in the long run. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer

Joined: 04 May 2005
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Have to agree more with Dave than Gopher. I see him doing what he has so far: opportunism mixed with real stances. What is important is that he caucuses as far as setting up the leadership. I dont expect him to vote the party line, but I don't expect that of anyone.
That said. there are two indications that he's going to end up rethinking his stance on Iraq. He has no choice, in fact. His first wake-up call was the primary. His constituents kicked him in the ass on Iraq. His second is the 11/7 Tsunami. He's nothing if not politically pragmatic.
Finally, in his speech tonight he said this election was a message that not only did people want Congress to change direction, but they wanted Congress to change how it does business.
The upshot? He'll play ball overall. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| His first wake-up call was the primary. His constituents kicked him in the ass on Iraq. |
Actually, I believe his constitutents just reelected him. And it turns out the ones who "kicked him in the ass on Iraq" did not carry that much weight after all. And also, as you can see, their guy lost... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
huffdaddy
Joined: 25 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Milwaukiedave wrote: |
| I don't don't believe Lieberman for a second that he'll meet with Demcrats. |
I do. His views still predominantly lie to the left of the aisle. His vote could decide whether or not the Senate leans Republican or Democrat. Meaning control of the committees. Given a Democrat House, there's more to be gained by having a Democrat Senate than a Republican Senate. If the Senate stays GOP, expect massive beaurocratic gridlock for the next 2 years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
| Quote: |
| Democratic senator-turned-independent candidate Joe Lieberman will win the Connecticut Senate race, CNN projects. Both he and newly elected independent Bernie Sanders in Vermont have said they will caucus with the Democrats. |
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/07/election.main/index.html
Gracious of him, especially given how Democrats have treated him of late. But I expect nothing less than this from him and am not really surprised. |
I disagree. He knows the repubs are on the way out, so he pretty much has to work with the Dems. Nothing gracious at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|