Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Former MI5 Agent Says 9/11 An Inside Job
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 11, 12, 13  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
Believing everything on the internet...? Sure why not?

It's better than believing the lies that the government is spewing.

www.oilempire.us

http://www.oiltruth.com/



These sites can defeat any 9-11 conspiracy theory

http://www.911myths.com/

http://www.debunking911.com/

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
happeningthang



Joined: 26 Apr 2003

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I haven't been following the dbate here, but I'm pretty sure that a conspiracy theory that says 11/9 was organised by Bush and co, is a load of crap.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

www.oiltruth.com


Dear Reader,

Civilization as we know it is coming to an end soon. This is not the wacky proclamation of a doomsday cult, apocalypse bible prophecy sect, or conspiracy theory society. Rather, it is the scientific conclusion of the best paid, most widely-respected geologists, physicists, and investment bankers in the world. These are rational, professional, conservative individuals who are absolutely terrified by a phenomenon known as global "Peak Oil."


"Are We 'Running Out'? I Thought

There Was 40 Years of the Stuff Left"



Oil will not just "run out" because all oil production follows a bell curve. This is true whether we're talking about an individual field, a country, or on the planet as a whole.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

and so?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EFLtrainer



Joined: 04 May 2005

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gotta love this:

Quote:
Not surprisingly, George W. Bush has echoed Dick Cheney�s sentiments. In May 2001, Bush stated, "What people need to hear loud and clear is that we�re running out of energy in America." Bush's Crawford ranch is completely off-the-grid and equipped with the latest in energy saving and renewable power systems. It has been described as an "environmentalist's dream home." The fact a man as steeped in the petroleum industry as Bush would own such a home should tell you something.


I've said it before (although it was before reading Peak Oil, ao this just adds fuel to the fire, so to speak) and I'll say it again:

All fall down, go BOOM!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
www.oiltruth.com


Dear Reader,

Civilization as we know it is coming to an end soon. This is not the wacky proclamation of a doomsday cult, apocalypse bible prophecy sect, or conspiracy theory society. Rather, it is the scientific conclusion of the best paid, most widely-respected geologists, physicists, and investment bankers in the world. These are rational, professional, conservative individuals who are absolutely terrified by a phenomenon known as global "Peak Oil."


"Are We 'Running Out'? I Thought

There Was 40 Years of the Stuff Left"



Oil will not just "run out" because all oil production follows a bell curve. This is true whether we're talking about an individual field, a country, or on the planet as a whole.


Well Brazil experienced peak oil. Now it's energy self sufficient, using methanol from its massive sugar crops.

Food increases arithmatically, population increases geometrically. People thought this rule would mean the world would soon starve to death. But then they invented the pill and the green revolution. Genetic engineered crops is the next promise.

Humans thought they were going to run out of nitrogen for fertilizer and everyone was going to starve to death. Nitrogen was mined until the early 20th century and the mines were running out. Then Fritz Haber came along and figure out how to pull nitrogen out of the air (our air is mostly nitrogen). Voila. Problem solved. Haber is a curious fellow. He saved the entire world from starvation but during WWI he was the father of chemical warfare. Needless to say, he never got his Nobel prize for saving the world. He was Jewish too and his discovery probably greatly contributed to the rise of Hitler. Explosive are made from nitrogen. If Germany had to rely on mined stock piles they wouldn't have lasted long in WWI and wouldn't have experience the financial ruin that led to Hitler's rise. The Haber Process ended up allowing Germany to stay in the war long after it was financially prudent. Haber himself avoided the gas chamber and Nazi persecution based on the strength of his contribution to Germany in WWI and he was allowed to quietly leave Germany.

Anyway, think about the oil shock of the early '70s that kicked off stagflation and 20% prime rates. While no one is jumping up and down with oil at $76 a bbl, its effects on a highly efficient 21st century economy has been distinctly muted. Add in that there are loads of technologies (methanol, solar, wind, tidal power, tar sands, gas hydrates) in the wings ready to jump in if everyone concerned comes to the conclusion high oil is here to stay. The problem with high oil is every time there's been high oil, it's been quickly followed by record lows. People are gun shy to invest in such technologies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 4:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote:
and so?



And so? And so!!!!!!!!

You haven't been paying attention, have you laddie?

http://www.oilempire.us/911why.html

9/11: why it happened
is more important than how

Deep Politics of 9/11

Motivations for allowing 9/11 to happen
Create pretext to seize Middle East oilfields (to control Earth's oil supplies after Peak Oil) and enact "Homeland Security" police state

The attacks were allowed to happen to facilitate an aggressive policy of world empire, particularly in the Middle East and Central Asian oil fields, which contain energy supplies that will become even more critical in the near future as oil extraction declines in the non-Islamic world. (It has been said that the last two barrels of oil will be Saudi and Iraqi.

Shocked

And if you're up for a bit of reading, here's an essay on what peak oil means and why.

http://www.copvcia.com/free/ww3/dec2001_files/background_is_oil.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 5:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wait a minute if Bush had planned 9--11 to seize mideast oil fields why go throught the trouble of airplanes.

I mean why not place a small nuclear bomb near the WTC and then blame it on Saddam? Why go after the Taliban in Afghanistan?

Moonbat
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:


The attacks were allowed to happen to facilitate an aggressive policy of world empire



Or they could have just used the attacks to get America behind a Apollo-level effort to move the American economy off oil. I dunno you're expecting a lot from Bush. If he was so crafty, he would have prepared better for Iraq.

And back to peak oil. Shifting an economy causes some pain, no doubt, but there are lots of energy alternatives, as I've outlined above, that peak oil will make affordable. A nation of 180 million has already demonstrated it can make the switch to methanol with little fuss and muss. Do you seriously think the free market won't respond and come up with a solution?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Or they could have just used the attacks to get America behind a Apollo-level effort to move the American economy off oil. I dunno you're expecting a lot from Bush. If he was so