Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The moon...in 2030
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
laogaiguk



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

huffdaddy wrote:


Quote:

Regarding the supposed moon landing though; it wouldn't take much to fake them and not many need be involved.


Let's see...all the astronauts, quite a few scientists working on the mission (given that they at least did go into space), all the people who worked on the sound stage where the fakery supposedly occured. And yet, has anyone come forward with an expose? And the chance of making millions on a book deal. No carpenters or camera men with tales to tell? No evidence of the set? I do believe it would be easier, and far more likely, to send men to the moon then to fake the entire thing and keep 95% of the American people "in the dark" for 30+ years.


This is the real kicker here. Seriously, when you think of it like that, it's hard to ignore. This seems to be going the same way of the parapsychology thread. Until I see verifiable proof for or against something, I will base my assumptions on common sense and what has been provided (or lack thereof), both of which tell me parapsychology is not real and America went to the moon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Lemon



Joined: 11 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 2:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's also the reason why I can't give the time of day to those who say 9/11 and JFK were government conspiracies. This is the same US government that couldn't keep arms dealings with Iran or the breakin of a Washington hotel suite secret.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GoshiwonGuy



Joined: 31 Oct 2003

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 3:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Lemon wrote:
Quote:
It's also the reason why I can't give the time of day to those who say 9/11 and JFK were government conspiracies.


Very Happy

Have you watched 9/11 Loose Change, 2nd edition?

Very informative.

And anyone who walks away still beleiving the Official Version that it was 19 Muslim hijackers with boxcutter has got to have a hole in their head.

A plane didn't even hit the Pentagon. Wink

huffdaddy wrote:
Quote:
Informed, but not necessarily smarter. I'm willing to trust the thousands upon thousands of scientists that agree that the moon landings occured. Heck, I couldn't explain how an atomic bomb works, but I believe that it's possible.


I'm really not that bright Very Happy so why don't you tell me about the many number of experts who also state that there were so many unexplainable contradictions in the facts and footage that it's still suspect?

Quote:
If you were truly unbiased and critical, the conspiracy would hold even less water then the moon landings.


Well, I am a critical thinker and I do have a bias against just beleiving what the government says because the government (all of them) have been caught lying repeatedly.

The Holo...oops, JFK, Martin Luther King Jr., 9/11, the WMD in Iraq...

And yes, now even the moon landing is in question. Wink

*looks under bed*

Quote:
um, yea. Hundreds of hours of research, and that's the best anyone's got?


The response is as good as the question posed. Like a having a 'moon rock' is definitive proof that man walked on the moon.

Use your head.

Quote:
Let's see...all the astronauts,...


Very few ever claimed to walk on the moon.

Quote:
...quite a few scientists working on the mission (given that they at least did go into space),


None of them claimed to have walked on the moon...and needn't have known about a staged landing. They weren;t exactly on the moon to confirm or refute. Wink

Quote:
all the people who worked on the sound stage where the fakery supposedly occured.


And how many would that take?

Quote:
And yet, has anyone come forward with an expose? And the chance of making millions on a book deal. No carpenters or camera men with tales to tell? No evidence of the set? I do believe it would be easier, and far more likely, to send men to the moon then to fake the entire thing and keep 95% of the American people "in the dark" for 30+ years.


Easy as pie to fake the whole thing. And not many will come forward if not many were involved in the core fakery.

And do you know how many have come forward with information reagrding the 9/11 inside job?

But they don't get airplay because the mainstream media is controlled by a very small cabal...

Quote:
You've spent "hundreds of hours" researching the issue,


Not this one alone. Various ones...

Quote:
and still haven't found the answer, which is posted on almost every anti-moon conspiracy web site?


Must have missed it. Care to help me out?

What about the many others?

Nasa has been asked but they just say that men went to the moon, pictures were taken and moon rocks were brought back...

Thanks!

Quote:
Anyways, who would be stupid enough to recreate a moon landing with a blowing flag. The presence of these "inconsistency" should be proof enough that it wasn't faked. Noone who faked it would have made these "mistakes".


???

What the hell does the above mean?

Make sense please.

There are so many inconsistencies that can't just be explained away. Does the fact that there are sooooo many mean that it must be sooooo true that the moon landing occured?

What lemmings... Wink

GG
PS. 9/11 was definitely an inside job. The most uninformed people in the world on this matter are actually westerners themselves. Because their media is so controlled and they are so brainwashed it. It's almost a topic not worth discussing with anyone until they've at least researched it a bit. Otherwise...the Official Believers come across as a bit...nutty. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regarding the waving flag.

Go to www.google.com

Type in "waving flag moon conspiracy". The first page:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=waving+flag+moon+conspiracy&btnG=Google+Search

I may be mistaken, but I believe every one of these sites debunks the flag waving

Quote:
The Great Moon Hoax
After all, there's no breeze on the Moon.... see captions Not every waving flag needs a breeze -- at least not in space. When astronauts were planting the ...
science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm - 19k - Cached - Similar pages

Fox TV and the Apollo Moon Hoax
In other words, the flag looks like it is waving because the astronauts ... Grissom was ready to talk to the press about the Moon hoax, so NASA killed him. ...
www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html - 60k - Cached - Similar pages

Michael Shermer�s brilliant (and VERY LONG !) "Moon Hoax"-debunk
But the moment he let go of the flag, it mysteriously stopped waving. ... ANSWER The show began by saying that the moon conspiracy was hatched late in the ...
homepages.wmich.edu/~korista/moonhoax2.html - 28k - Cached - Similar pages

The Great Moon Hoax
Not every waving flag needs a breeze -- at least not in space. ... The best rebuttal to allegations of a "Moon Hoax," however, is common sense. ...
www.solarviews.com/eng/moonhoax.htm - 17k - Cached - Similar pages

Moon Hoax : Waving Flags
How can a flag flutter on the moon if there is no atmosphere?
www.dave.co.nz/space/moon-hoax/waving-flag.html - 4k - Cached - Similar pages

hoax flag
In many pictures taken during the Apollo 11 mission the flag planted on the moon seems to be waving, as if it were being blown about by wind. ...
physics.bgsu.edu/~layden/A212H/Gloria/hoax_flag.htm - 12k - Cached - Similar pages

The UnMuseum - The Great Moon Hoax
The Waving Flag. While the American flag was being put up on the moon it appears to ... The producers of Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon? are ...
www.unmuseum.org/moonhoax.htm - 26k - Cached - Similar pages

Moon Hoax:Purported Mistakes - SkepticWiki
Look at the video clip starting about one minute in: the flag is clearly waving. There is no air on the moon, so, we are told, this must have been faked on ...
www.skepticwiki.org/wiki/index.php/Moon_Hoax:Purported_Mistakes - 29k - Cached - Similar pages

SPACE.com -- End of Conspiracy Theories? Spacecraft Snoops Apollo ...
Buzz Aldrin walks on the Moon during Apollo 11. Conspiracy theorists wonder why the flag is waving, given that the Moon has no atmosphere. ...
www.space.com/missionlaunches/050304_moon_snoop.html - 58k - Cached - Similar pages

� Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - Video Evidence
Because of this the flag waving can be accounted for by Neil twisting the pole. ... Conspiracy Theories and Hoaxes � Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - Camera ...
www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com/apollo-moon-landing-hoax-video-evidence.html - 14k - Cached - Similar pages


Quote:
What about the many others?


Do the research yourself. You obviously haven't. The conspiracy crowd will never be satisfied. They are going to forever raise sniggling "discrepencies" that are almost always easily explained. By doing so, they demonstrate a complete lack of understanding regarding physics, photography, and pretty much any topic they touch. Please come back when you uncover something which hasn't already been dealt with on the other sites.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
GoshiwonGuy



Joined: 31 Oct 2003

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

huffdaddy wrote:
Quote:
Regarding the waving flag.


Thanks for the 'refutations' on the 'waving flag' issue.

Unfortunately...when some things can't be explained away...they just lie.

Such as saying (verbatim)..."if you look really closely the flag only waves when the astronaut is holding it; when he stops...the flag stops 'waving'. So it wasn't alleged wind...it was the astronaut physically manipulating it..."

In fact, I just looked at the clip again (have it on my computer Wink ) and the flag is waving both dependently and independently of any astronauts hand/s.

Even 'mission control', or whoever provided commentary commented on the 'wind'...

So that 'refutation' is bullshit. That people who want to beleive it (or are too lazy to think it through and confirm or deny) will believe. Or the ambivilent (sp) will accept until they remember that 90210 is on...(and then they forget all about the controversy again)...

It's like the 9/11 Pentagon scam; where there is no plane; no debris, no bodies, nothing...except for a huge hole punched through the first 3 layers of the Pentagon bulding.

The authorities just say "yes there was one" (a plane) and then have the audacity to release a single 5-second clip, 5 years after the fact...where it is still clear that it wasn't a plane that hitting...

And people just look at this clip and still say "yes, clearly it was a plane", hahaha.

Just lie. It works for the government!

Quote:
Do the research yourself. You obviously haven't. The conspiracy crowd will never be satisfied. They are going to forever raise sniggling "discrepencies" that are almost always easily explained.


How dismissive. Very Happy

The best 'explanations' we've got from NASA to date are that (verbatim) "it happened, pictures were taken, and we got da moon rockz ta prove it".

*w.ank wa.nk*

Quote:
By doing so, they demonstrate a complete lack of understanding regarding physics, photography, and pretty much any topic they touch. Please come back when you uncover something which hasn't already been dealt with on the other sites.


Actually, many experts found the inconsistencies. It wasn't regular people who initially (especially then) had the knowledge to believe or otherwise disbelieve what they were seeing.

Except for some things; like the people in Australia who saw one of the astronauts, on a supposed live feed...kick a coke or pepsi bottle on while doing a walk on the moon.

*snigger*

And then the next time the very same person saw the clip...it was gone. Wink

In much the same way as multiple demolitions were heard..and reported at the WTC towers on 9/11..prior to its collapse.

But that footage was subsequently 'disappeared' into the 'Memory Hole' (do a google, if you want to know what this is Wink ).

But nothing can totally disappear nowadays; especially not with the internet.

Much of it is still available if people look for it.

It's not like the 60's when radio transmissions reported multiple shooters at the JKF assassination (my friends mother heard them)..and these were later 'disappeared'.

*looks under bed again*

Razz

GG
PS. Regarding 9/11, and the WTC element, specifically, how did 2 'hijacked' planes hit only two buildings but three 'collapsed'? (Although they *later*, after first denying it, admitted to demolishing, via a controlled demolition...the 3rd.) Most people don't even know that 3 WTC buildings 'collapsed' on 9/11... Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

GoshiwonGuy wrote:
I've spent a couple of years looking at all these issues and more; likely in the hundreds of hours or reading and viewing Wink ...and I'm probably a hell of a lot more informed than the people who have never much looked at anything.

GG


Speaking as a long-time listener of Coast to Coast AM (so you know I'm not dismissive of anything out of hand), the problem is that you've tried doing too much in one go. Bringing in the holocaust, 9-11 and everything else in with the moon landing is too much in one thread. It's akin to a thread where we're talking about taxes and then someone decides that because some people have advocated raising taxes to pay for free education for everybody that they're also sympathetic to Palestine and prefer Castro to Blair.
Far better if you want to make your case is to approach the debate one point at a time. Also don't tell people that you've put in hundreds/thousands etc. hours of research, just show what you know. Some other people on the board bring out the "I've got an MA / Ph.D" in the middle of a debate when they start to lose and that doesn't do anything to make their case either. You should look at On The Other Hand and emulate his style. Nobody can ever win against him.
Yes, it's true that most people don't know that three buildings fell down on 9-11. I've always found that rather odd.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 6:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

GoshiwonGuy wrote:

Well, I am a critical thinker and I do have a bias against just beleiving what the government says because the government (all of them) have been caught lying repeatedly.


Yup, exactly. They get caught. And when they get caught, it makes for major major news. See Watergate, Gulf of Tonkin, and Monica for starters. So much for your controlled American media theories. And they'd all pale in comparison to a 9/11 or moon landing cover up.

One final thing - if they faked the first moon landing, why would they need to risk faking five more landings? Wouldn't once have been enough? All of the supposed motivations for faking the moon landing disappeared after the first successful "landing."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Privateer



Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Location: Easy Street.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So by 2030 a single apartment block in Tokyo will literally be worth the Moon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Bobster



Joined: 15 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Somthing about this thread made me think of a blog post I submited some time ago. The blog is now defunct, but I had the wit to save it elsewhere - it's a bit longish, a bar story really, so feel free to scroll past if you're not in the mood, but one or two friends have confessed to amusement ... if it makes you smile a little it will make me smile a little more.

It reads like fiction, but it's pretty much verbatim what I remembered over lunch the next day, when I jotted it down. (I was still chuckling about it. Actually< I still am now.)

People who know me are aware that my views on some things are somewhat different from what is expressed here. It happens sometimes, perhaps perversity on my part - people who are not from my country and decide to take a perspective that is unkind or, as in this case, just uninformed, often get to hear the patriot inside me speak ... gently and sometimes with a bit of irony.


So I'm drinking last night at a small bar near my hotel here in Bangkok, getting into a chat with a fellow named Jools, from Capetown, I think, who right off the bat wants to commiserate with me for the fact that I come from "the most hated country in the world right now."

"Really?" I said. "Most hated? That's saying a lot isn't it? Didn't realize - hey, maybe it means we're doing something right, then ..." Big wink.

"Don't get me wrong, I don't hold anything against you personally, in fact - "

"Thanks. Appreciate that. Mighty nice of ya, haha."

" - I really enjoy talking to Americans individually."

"And we like talking to you ... shall I buy the next round?" Signalling the bargirl next to me. "Most hated, huh? In the whole world?"

"Sure, an' I'll buy the one after that ... "

"Must be a nice change for you, considering how people used to feel about S Africa, you know, before Mandela got out of jail and won the Peace Prize and all ..."

"I'm not saying it's fair, and Bob, same thing, lotta blokes assume I'm racist because of where I come from - "

"Naw, I'd have to get to know you more before I said anything like that. Cheers." I raised the bottle, tipped it back. "But really, I can understand anti-americanism when it comes from some countries. Japanese, Vietnamese, Nicaraguans, Koreans and Chinese, too, and the Palestinians, Persians and Iraqis - our bombs end up on top of them from time to time, so one could understand if they get a bit peeved. But when I talk to people from other English-speaking countries, the Kiwis, the Aussies, the Brits, the Irish, the ... what do we call people from your country?"

"South Africans," he said.

"Right. And what I don't understand is, what did we do to you lot?"

"But, you know, the American govt - not to say the American people, not that - 'ave set themselves up as a sort of police for the whole world."

"Yeah, and I wish we didn't do that - I've had friends and family killed that way ... but y'know, one point of view is the idea that when we do this it means you guys don't have to."

"Ah, but that's all about self-interest, innit? Look at this, this thing now where they're not letting France and Germany take part in the postwar rebuilding over in Iraq ... a bit childish, right?"

"Maybe, sure, but well, I haven't been back home for a while but I think a lot of people there feel like, hey, they opposed the whole project, didn't want any part of it, so why should they get any benefit from the aftermath. And really, you know, not having the French involved was a terrible blow to us - like someone said, it seriously impaired our ability to surrender."

"Ha ha. Good one, that. Let's have another round. My shout this time - Chang again?"

He went off to the toilet while the drinks were being poured, which gave the comely serving wench I'd been buying Cokes for an opportunity to impart some medical advice. It seems she sincerely believes that sleeping alone is unhealthy.

"Really?" I said. "Sabadi mei shai?"

She nodded, the most serious expression on her face I'd ever seen in a bar at 1:35 in the morning. "Barfine only 300 baht."

An ounce of prevention, and all that ... "Maybe next time," I told her, patting her hand and assuring her, "Khun chan narak. You are sweet and lovely."

I didn't have the heart to mention that a lot of my friends have also expressed anxiety about my health while I'm over here, but for reasons pretty much exactly the opposite of the ones she had cited ...

Jools came back from the 'loo just then and wanted to know if I really believed that Americans ever walked on the moon.

"Um, yeah. I think so. I really do. You think they faked it?"

He nodded sagely with an air of wisdom only possible after a dozen or so inexpensive draught ales.

"It was the most incredible and successful hoax in the history of the human race."

"Didn't fool you, though. Damn, and I thought we were doing so well ... Lemme get this straight. We couldn't win a jungle war in Southeast Asia but we could pull this off? You give my government a lot of credit, my friend. They bombed Cambodia and Laos and they couldn't keep that secret. The president back then couldn't even keep the lid on a small hotel burglary that happened in his own city, but we could keep something like this secret? All these years?"



"Kind of odd, isn't it, no one's been back there in all that time."

"Hey, you're welcome to make the trip anytime you like. We didn't annex the place or anything - we came in peace for all mankind, you know. Seem to recall we left a lot of garbage up there. Sorry, you might have to clean up after us, I'm afraid."

"Still, just those two guys, Neil Armstrong and whatwasit, Buzz Aldrin, and only that one time ..."

"Oh, come on, there were 4 or 5 other times after that. There's been something like a dozen Americans walked on the moon, not just two." I was on the verge of giggling, never once having ever imagined having a conversation like this.

"Really? That so, then why weren't they on television?" Yeah, I know, nothing really happens unless it happens on television.

"Actually, I think they were televised, but it stopped being interesting after the first time. They even started trying to jazz it up with golf and cute little moon cars, then people started realizing, well, that's all very silly, isn't it?"

"But, mate, those pictures, the flag is flappin' like in a breeze but there's no bloody air on the moon!"

"They built it into the fabric, Jools. Tiny wires, I think, something like that."

"You believe that, huh?"

"Look, no reason to bring the fool thing all that way except to take the picture, right? And a flag just looks better that way, how we're used to seeing it. Like in the anthem, "Oh, how proudly she waves ..."

"Sure, right. Go on, pull the other one."

"Look, I'm old enough I actually watched it on TV when I was a kid in real time. The weird thing to see was the waving pattern of the cloth and the fact that it actually wasn't moving at all."

"But, wha' abou' all those shadows? Eh?"

"Shadows?"

"Yeah, there's shadows goin' off in several different directions."

"Christ, you read this off the internet, didn't you?" I laughed. "There are several different light sources up there. The sun. Reflected light from the earth. The walls of nearby craters reflected light also, and mountains, and no atmosphere to diffuse it ... and then the lights we brought for the camera also."

"Lights from the studio, you mean - it was a sound stage!"

"Actually, the opposite. We know how to control shadows in an enclosed area like that. Hollywood doesn't make those kind of mistakes."

"I think we're just gonna hafta disagree, then."

"Sure," I said. And unless he could think of something to say that isn't rubbish I supposed we'd continue to do so, amiably enough if he's willing to buy every other round. In truth, I hadn't been so amused in a while, and the whole time I kept expecting him to confess he was just having me on.

"While we're at it," I said, "we never really dropped any bombs on Japan, either. That was also a big scam, and they were in on it all the way up to the Emperor. We promised to give them our electronics and automotive industries, just to have something to scare the Russians into an arms race that would eventually bankrupt them. Worked, too."

Jools got a thoughtful look on his face for a minute, then he smiled. "No, I think the bombs really happened."

"Nice talking. Hey, I like this bar. See you again?"

"No doubt at all, mate."

The girl on the stool next to him was a little more successful with her medical arguments than mine had been, and they left together. A downunder fella at the other end of the bar was doing something that involved balancing 5 toothpicks between the endpoints of all 10 fingers and slowly moving his hands over his head and behind his neck. He promised 1000 baht to every girl in bar, and mamasan too - all of whom were sitting in rapt attention watching him - if just one of them could repeat the trick.

"No can! No can!" they all cried.

Aussies always seem to know the best bar games
.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GoshiwonGuy



Joined: 31 Oct 2003

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mithridates wrote:
Quote:
the problem is that you've tried doing too much in one go. Bringing in the holocaust, 9-11 and everything else in with the moon landing is too much in one thread.


I was just having fun.

I can't make a serious case on any of them as I had an initial post edited and was threatened by a mod with a ban.

Laughably, I was actually told if I made any more "Anti-Semitic" comments (WTF? Confused ) that I would be banned...

Quote:
Far better if you want to make your case is to approach the debate one point at a time.


The Holocaust is not up for discussion on this messageboard-or so I was told by a mod. So I am barred from making any case regarding it.

So I haven't really tried.

I've just tried to be clear that there is a common thread of deciet running through many of these same signifact events.

The same players...much of the time...

Quote:
Also don't tell people that you've put in hundreds/thousands etc. hours of research, just show what you know.


My point was that it is ironic to be dismissed and derided as a nut and a jackass by people who more likely than not are less informed on the issue/s.

Quote:
Yes, it's true that most people don't know that three buildings fell down on 9-11. I've always found that rather odd.


Like the Holocaust, most people know very, very little about 9/11.

They just know the official line and the sound-bites.

But that's propaganda for you.

And everyone imagines that propaganda is just a game run on 'the other guy'. Wink

Huffdaddy wrote:
Quote:
Yup, exactly. They get caught. And when they get caught, it makes for major major news. See Watergate, Gulf of Tonkin, and Monica for starters.


Well, it depends who the powers behind the media want to expose and when.

But if there is a story or a slant that they don't want covered...that story will be reined in.

Most of the media is controlled by a very small group of people.

Quote:
So much for your controlled American media theories. And they'd all pale in comparison to a 9/11 or moon landing cover up.


The moon landing is pure entertainment in my books.

What is happening with 9/11 is treasonous.

And most of the facts are being covered up.

It's sad so many are under and misinformed.

Quote:
One final thing - if they faked the first moon landing, why would they need to risk faking five more landings? Wouldn't once have been enough? All of the supposed motivations for faking the moon landing disappeared after the first successful "landing."


Ask them. Wink

GG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Bobster



Joined: 15 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

GoshiwonGuy wrote:
Ask them. Wink GG

I'd rather ask you and I am doing so now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GoshiwonGuy



Joined: 31 Oct 2003

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

^

Ok, frankly, I didn't pull off the hoax so I don't know the exact motivations of those that did...but;

Quote:
One final thing - if they faked the first moon landing, why would they need to risk faking five more landings?


Maybe they wanted to lend further weight to their claim and the benefits appeared to outweigh the risks.

Quote:
Wouldn't once have been enough?


Possibly not.

Quote:
All of the supposed motivations for faking the moon landing disappeared after the first successful "landing."


That's an interesting opinion.

But it's hard to know the motivations of the different players through the cold war. They could have had specific reasons and motivations to time the different moon landings when they did that we might never know...

Again, I wasn't a party to the hoax so I don't have the anwsers.

But also again, I, like many other have plenty of legitimate questions that organisations like NASA just shrug off with the explanation that the moon landings 'happened', we took pictures, and we brought back rocks.

Glad to see at least my answers aren't any worse than theirs. Wink

GG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bulsajo



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, we should just take your word for it?
Why should we trust your answers over NASA's?

GoshiwonGuy wrote:

But also again, I, like many other have plenty of legitimate questions that organisations like NASA just shrug off


Please post these legitimate questions and the corresponding answers that NASA provided.
That should be easy enough for you, given that you've studied this stuff 'for years' and are more informed than the rest of us.
If you need any incentive, posting your legitimate questions would go a long way to showing how uninformed we are.

So the challenge is-
are you able to put your money where your mouth is instead of just spewing vague BS about us all being chumps?

Personally, I don't think you believe your own nonsense any more than the rest of us and are simply trolling.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Lemon



Joined: 11 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bulsajo wrote:
Personally, I don't think you believe your own nonsense any more than the rest of us and are simply trolling.

I didn't need to get to page 4 to conclude that...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GoshiwonGuy



Joined: 31 Oct 2003

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

^

Actually, I am not trolling.

*scary thought*

I believe what I may about the 'Holocaust' *whistles*, have my doubts about the moon landing, but know for certain that the Official Version of the 9/11 situation is a lie. Razz

Bulsajo wrote:
Quote:
So, we should just take your word for it?
Why should we trust your answers over NASA's?


I never asked anyone to 'trust' my 'answers'. I only posed the belief that the moon landing may well be a hoax.

And if anyone chooses to believe Nasa's 'common-sense-been-there-done-that-and-brought-back-the-moon-rock' Wink explanations for the varied descrepencies...then fine. Razz

Quote:
Please post these legitimate questions and the corresponding answers that NASA provided.


Is that all? Wink

Quote:
That should be easy enough for you, given that you've studied this stuff 'for years' and are more informed than the rest of us.


Watch the videos that I mentioned. They pose all the questions and we already have NASA's very 'scientfic' repsonse. Wink

Quote:
If you need any incentive, posting your legitimate questions would go a long way to showing how uninformed we are.


It's not a pissing contest and no need to get catty.

I have a wife for that. Wink

Quote:
So the challenge is-
are you able to put your money where your mouth is instead of just spewing vague BS about us all being chumps?


I don't believe you are all chumps; anymore than I believe all of the personal swipes against me that I am some sort of 'jackass' or 'nut', or what have you.

I just stated that I beleive myself to be more informed on various 'conspiratorial' Wink issues than many.

Quote:
Personally, I don't think you believe your own nonsense any more than the rest of us and are simply trolling.


Please see my response to the Lemon.

Unfortunately it's not the case.

And like I said previously, on the moon landing issue...it's just fun.

If people want to believe that man landed on the moon I'll let them indulge their fantasies.

We all need something to believe in that states that we are more than animals stuck on our own dingy little warring planet. Razz

On another note however, how many people here knew that 3 buildings 'collapsed' at the WTC on 9/11?

Or that no plane filled with passengers hit the Pentagon?

Or even that there was no plane or bodies amid the 'wreckage' at the crash site in Pennysylvania?

[I guess that is why the coroner is on record as saying he stuck around for all of twenty minutes as there were no bodies for him to examine].

The moon landing seems like a 1960's/70's era childish fit-up with moon props and good'ol Anerican flags billiowing in the winds in comparison this modern day crime.

Oh for the innocent days of yesteryear. Wink

GG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 4 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International